Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
AutomateLab-tech avatar

Citation Intelligence

  • 8 repo stars
  • Updated June 8, 2026
  • AutomateLab-tech/citation-intelligence

Citation Intelligence is an MCP server that reports what Perplexity, Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews cite for any query you give the agent.

About

Citation Intelligence is an AutomateLab MCP server that lets your coding agent inspect what major AI answer surfaces cite for a given query. developers shipping landing pages, docs, and blog posts use it during launch and growth when they care about being referenced in Perplexity, Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews—not just traditional blue-link rankings. Install via npm (`@automatelab/citation-intelligence`), wire it into Claude Code or Cursor over stdio, and run citation checks as part of content audits, competitive research, and post-publish GEO iterations. It is a focused integration for visibility in generative search, not a full SEO suite; combine it with analytics and on-page SEO tools when you need traffic and technical SEO depth. Intermediate setup assumes a Node/npx toolchain and an MCP-capable agent.

  • Query-level citation checks across Perplexity, Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews
  • Stdio MCP server `@automatelab/citation-intelligence` v0.9.3 via npm
  • Built for answer-engine optimization and competitive citation gaps
  • Pairs with content refresh and distribution workflows from the same AutomateLab MCP line
  • No browser automation—agent calls tools over stdio

Citation Intelligence by the numbers

  • Data as of Jul 24, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
terminal
claude mcp add citation-intelligence -- npx -y @automatelab/citation-intelligence

Add your badge

Show developers this MCP server is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
repo stars8
Package@automatelab/citation-intelligence
TransportSTDIO
AuthNone
Last updatedJune 8, 2026
RepositoryAutomateLab-tech/citation-intelligence

What it does

See which URLs AI search engines and chatbots actually cite when users ask questions in your niche so you can optimize pages for AEO.

Who is it for?

Best when you already ship content and want agent-driven AEO citation audits without manually opening five different AI products.

Skip if: Skip if you only need classic Google Search Console rankings, backlink counts, or on-page Lighthouse scores with no AI-citation angle.

What you get

After registration, your agent can run citation checks per query and you get a clear picture of which domains and pages win AI citations so you can adjust content and structure.

  • Per-query citation visibility across five AI answer surfaces
  • Competitive citation gap signals for content updates
  • Agent-callable citation checks inside your dev workflow

By the numbers

  • MCP server version 0.9.3
  • npm package `@automatelab/citation-intelligence`
  • Covers 5 engines: Perplexity, Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews
README.md

Citation Intelligence MCP

A free, self-hosted MCP server that tells your agent what LLMs cite - across Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Bing.

npm version license node CI

What this is

An MCP server for agents and developers who need to know which URLs get cited by AI search engines for any query. Install once, query from any MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Claude Code, Continue, Cline, n8n, LangGraph). Self-hosted, no account, no centralized backend. Bring your own API keys; nothing is stored on a remote server.

Who this is for

Install this if you're:

  • Building an agent that does research and want it to cite sources LLMs already trust
  • A solo dev or indie hacker checking whether your SaaS is showing up in AI search
  • A content creator confirming your articles are being cited by ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity
  • An SEO or GEO practitioner who wants programmatic citation data without a $295-$499/mo dashboard
  • Running an editorial pipeline and want citation-deficit-driven topic selection
  • Comparing competitor visibility across AI engines for any niche

Do NOT install this if you want:

  • A polished marketing dashboard with charts and team seats - try Profound, AthenaHQ, or Otterly.AI
  • A hosted service with SLAs - this is self-hosted by design
  • Citation tracking for academic papers - try citecheck
  • 350M+ pre-modeled prompts - that's Ahrefs Brand Radar

Why this exists

The AI citation tracking market is dominated by VC-funded dashboards starting at $295/mo. None ships MCP-first. If you're an agent or developer who wants citation data piped directly into your workflow - not into a SaaS login - there isn't a tool for you. This is that tool.


Tools

Tools are grouped into seven namespaces: citations_*, domain_*, signals_*, panel_*, report_*, competitors_*, audit_*. The prefix is the question category; the suffix is the action. Wire names use underscores (not dots) so Anthropic-API-based MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Claude Code) can forward the tool list without HTTP 400.

Start with citations_provenance or domain_am_i_cited. Single-engine results (citations_check with a pinned engine) are directional; multi-engine consensus is the honest signal. A URL cited by 4 of 5 engines is a very different finding than one cited by 1.

citations_* — query-level: who cites what, with what evidence

Tool Purpose
citations_provenance Recommended first tool. Fan a query across engines; per-URL cross-engine consensus matrix. Returns interpretation_note per engine.
citations_check URLs cited by Perplexity / Claude / ChatGPT / Gemini / Google AI Mode for a query; or web rank via bing_serp / brave_serp
citations_evidence Extract the cited snippet from raw_answer for each citation (why, not just that)
citations_predict Citation likelihood from public signals - no LLM fired
citations_trend Time-series report of citation rate + per-query gained/lost deltas
citations_freshness Recency score (halflife=365d) for the pages an engine cites

domain_* — domain-level: am I cited, what for

Tool Purpose
domain_am_i_cited Domain citation check. With engine=auto (default): fans across all available LLM engines, returns per-engine breakdown + cross-engine consensus. Pin engine= to reduce cost.
domain_cited_for Queries the domain has been cited for, from local cache
domain_cited_for_diff Diff of domain_cited_for between two time windows for a domain

signals_* — external signals: AI Overview, Wikipedia, GSC, answer-box position

Tool Purpose
signals_ai_overview Google AI Overview presence + cited sources
signals_wikipedia List Wikipedia articles referencing a domain (zero keys)
signals_gsc_gap Join Google Search Console performance with AI citation status
signals_answer_box Bin each citation's first mention in raw_answer into early/middle/late thirds

panel_* — saved query panels (editorial watchlists)

Tool Purpose
panel_track Save / load / list named query panels (editorial watchlists)
panel_run Run a panel through domain_am_i_cited and snapshot to disk

report_* — turnkey reporting artifacts

Tool Purpose
report_visibility One-call AI visibility report over a query set (or panel): citation rate (mention frequency), share of voice vs competitors, average rank, and brand sentiment. Returns structured data + a Markdown artifact for a public page.

competitors_* — competitive landscape per query

Tool Purpose
competitors_canonical_set Top cited domains per query, aggregated across engines
competitors_compete End-to-end competitive snapshot: your URL vs top cited competitors
competitors_compare Side-by-side citations_predict across 2-10 URLs

audit_* — fixable on-page / on-site checks

Tool Purpose
audit_schema Deep schema.org validation - required fields per @type, malformed JSON-LD
audit_structured_data Repair-oriented schema.org diagnostics + suggested patches
audit_crawler_access Verify GPTBot / ClaudeBot / PerplexityBot / CCBot / Google-Extended etc. can fetch a URL
audit_sitemap Bulk citations_predict across every URL in a sitemap, worst-first
audit_sitemap_map Cross-reference sitemap URLs with cached citations (inverse of audit_sitemap)
audit_llms_txt Generate an llms.txt (https://llmstxt.org) from a sitemap

Prompts

Server-side prompt templates the client can offer end users (call via the MCP prompt list):

  • audit_citation_readiness(url) - chains citations_predict + audit_schema
  • audit_competitor_snapshot(query, your_url?) - chains competitors_canonical_set + competitors_compete
  • audit_crawler_checkup(url) - runs audit_crawler_access and writes a remediation list
  • audit_gap_analysis(domain, days?) - drives signals_gsc_gap and suggests next moves
  • audit_sitemap_coverage(sitemap_url) - runs audit_sitemap_map and recommends priorities

Resources

Cache views the client can read or subscribe to (no tool call required):

  • citation://cache/summary - entry counts by type/engine, unique queries/URLs, oldest/newest
  • citation://panels - saved panels + per-panel snapshot counts
  • citation://docs/llms-txt - llms.txt primer (markdown)
  • citation://docs/ai-crawlers - AI crawlers cheatsheet (markdown)
  • citation://domain/{domain}/cited-for - dynamic template: citations for {domain}

What this actually measures

Every response includes a surface field that tells you exactly how the data was collected. Understanding this is important before drawing conclusions.

Surface Engines What it means
consumer_scrape perplexity, google_ai_mode Proxied through a real consumer-facing AI search product. Closest to what your users see.
api_proxy claude, openai, gemini API call to a search-enabled LLM. May differ from consumer product behavior — different model versions, no UI-level ranking logic, no personalization. Use as a directional proxy, not as ground truth.
web_rank bing_serp, brave_serp Traditional web search rank (not LLM citation). Measures whether a URL appears in SERP results, not whether an LLM cites it.
static_signal citations_predict, signals_wikipedia Offline signal computed from public data. No live LLM query.

Per-engine notes

perplexity (consumer_scrape) — Sonar Pro via the Perplexity API with a consumer-equivalent system prompt. Reasonably close to Perplexity.ai. Citations come from search_results in the response; the citations fallback contains URL-only entries without title.

claude (api_proxy) — Claude Sonnet via the Anthropic Messages API with web_search tool enabled. The consumer Claude.ai product uses different routing and ranking logic. Citation behavior can differ, especially for recent/time-sensitive queries.

openai (api_proxy)gpt-4o + the web_search_preview tool via the OpenAI Responses API. Replaces the deprecated gpt-4o-search-preview alias OpenAI retired; base gpt-4o plus the tool is the supported path.

gemini (api_proxy) — Gemini 2.5 Pro via the Generative Language API with google_search grounding. Consumer Gemini uses the same grounding index but different re-ranking. Results are directional.

google_ai_mode (consumer_scrape) — Google AI Mode results via SerpAPI. Closest to what users see in Google Search. Requires SERPAPI_KEY.

bing_serp / brave_serp (web_rank) — Traditional SERP rank. Does NOT measure LLM citations. Use citations_check with these engines to compare organic web rank against LLM citation rank. domain_am_i_cited refuses these engines — it only measures LLM behavior.

The proxy nature of api_proxy engines is a feature, not a bug: it lets you run citation checks without consuming expensive consumer-product quota. Just don't report API-proxy numbers as "ChatGPT cites you" without the caveat.

Every tool response includes an interpretation_note field that summarizes the fidelity in one sentence. Full per-engine fidelity ratings: docs/surface-fidelity.md.


Quick start

npx -y @automatelab/citation-intelligence

Requires Node 20 or later.

Claude Desktop

Add to %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows) or ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (macOS):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "citation-intelligence": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@automatelab/citation-intelligence"],
      "env": {
        "PERPLEXITY_API_KEY": "pplx-...",
        "SERPAPI_KEY": "...",
        "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "sk-ant-...",
        "OPENAI_API_KEY": "sk-...",
        "GEMINI_API_KEY": "..."
      }
    }
  }
}

Set only the keys you have. Any MCP client that supports stdio transport works - same command / args pattern.

How it stays free

  • No central backend. The server runs on your machine. Nothing is uploaded.
  • Free tier first. SerpAPI gives 100 free Google AI Overview lookups/month. Bing Web Search has a free tier. Perplexity offers free Sonar access on signup.
  • Bring your own paid keys if you want the premium engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini). Keys pass through to the vendor and never touch any third party.
  • Local cache at ~/.config/citation-intelligence/cache.json. Repeated queries hit cache, not API. Default TTL: 7 days.
  • citations_predict runs with zero keys - it scores citation likelihood from public signals (Wikipedia, schema.org, llms.txt, GitHub) without firing any LLM.

Privacy

  • All API calls go from your machine directly to the vendor (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Perplexity, Bing, SerpAPI).
  • No proxy. No analytics. No telemetry by default.
  • API keys are read from environment variables on the MCP process - never logged, never persisted.
  • Cache file lives at ~/.config/citation-intelligence/cache.json. Delete it any time.

Environment variables

Var Purpose Free tier?
PERPLEXITY_API_KEY citations_check (perplexity — consumer_scrape) Yes
SERPAPI_KEY signals_ai_overview + citations_check (google_ai_mode — consumer_scrape) 100/month free
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY citations_check (claude — api_proxy) Paid only
OPENAI_API_KEY citations_check (openai — api_proxy) Paid only
GEMINI_API_KEY citations_check (gemini — api_proxy) Yes
BING_API_KEY citations_check (bing_serp — web_rank) Yes
BRAVE_API_KEY citations_check (brave_serp — web_rank) Yes (2000/month)
CITATION_CACHE_TTL_DAYS Cache TTL for citations_check entries (default 7) n/a
CITATION_AI_OVERVIEW_TTL_DAYS Cache TTL for signals_ai_overview entries (default 1) n/a
CITATION_CONFIG_DIR Override config dir (default ~/.config/citation-intelligence) n/a

Example: am I cited?

You: For the queries "best AI citation tracker", "MCP for AI search", "self-hosted GEO tool",
     is automatelab.tech cited?

(agent invokes `domain_am_i_cited`)

Result:
{
  "domain": "automatelab.tech",
  "engine": "perplexity",
  "results": [
    { "query": "best AI citation tracker",   "cited": true,  "rank": 4 },
    { "query": "MCP for AI search",          "cited": true,  "rank": 1 },
    { "query": "self-hosted GEO tool",       "cited": false, "matching_urls": [] }
  ],
  "summary": {
    "queries_total": 3,
    "queries_cited": 2,
    "citation_rate": 0.67,
    "average_rank": 2.5
  }
}

Example: predict citation likelihood (no key required)

You: How likely is https://example.com/blog/post to be cited by AI?

(agent invokes `citations_predict`)

Result:
{
  "url": "https://example.com/blog/post",
  "score": 62,
  "grade": "C",
  "signals": {
    "wikipedia_linked": false,
    "github_referenced": false,
    "reddit_referenced": true,
    "llms_txt_present": true,
    "https": true,
    "has_article_schema": true,
    "has_faq_schema": false,
    "has_breadcrumb_schema": true,
    "canonical_clean": true,
    "word_count": 1850,
    "reading_time_minutes": 8,
    "h2_count": 7,
    "h2_question_count": 1,
    "authority_link_count": 2,
    "external_link_count": 6,
    "internal_link_count": 11,
    "last_modified_days_ago": 42,
    "has_open_graph": true
  },
  "fixes": [
    { "signal": "has_faq_schema", "suggestion": "Page already has question-style H2s. Wrap them in FAQPage JSON-LD - high-leverage win.", "estimated_lift": "high" },
    { "signal": "h2_question_count", "suggestion": "Reframe at least 2 H2s as questions users actually ask...", "estimated_lift": "medium" }
  ]
}

The Wikipedia signal is measured (it correlates with citation) but no "go get a Wikipedia article" suggestion is emitted - the advice would be non-actionable. Scoring is split across six buckets - domain authority, structured data, content depth, link graph, freshness, metadata - so a thin page and a deep page on the same domain get meaningfully different scores.


Workflow recipes

Concrete patterns that compose the 26 tools into something useful. Costs assume ChatGPT or Perplexity at ~$0.01-0.03/query.

1. Weekly citation tracker

The single highest-ROI pattern. Pick 20-30 queries from your editorial backlog, snapshot weekly, watch the rate trend.

# One-time setup
panel_track name="editorial-watchlist" domain="example.com" action="save"
            queries=["best widget tutorial", "how to set up X", ...]

# Weekly cron (5 min, ~$0.20-0.60 per run)
panel_run name="editorial-watchlist"

# Anytime
citations_trend panel="editorial-watchlist"

citations_trend returns per-query deltas: which queries flipped from cited: false to cited: true since the first snapshot. That's your real editorial-impact metric.

2. Pre-publish gate

Before publishing a post, find out who owns the citation slot and whether the slot is worth competing for.

# 1. Is there an AI Overview to compete for?
signals_ai_overview query="<target query>"

# 2. Who is cited today?
citations_check query="<target query>"

# 3. After publish + 14 days: did the post break in?
domain_am_i_cited domain="example.com" queries=["<target query>"]

If citations_check returns 5+ strong incumbents on a low-volume query, pick a different angle. If ai_overview_present: false, the query has no AI surface - reconsider.

3. Bulk site audit

Catch site-wide structural issues across every page in one pass. Zero API spend.

audit_sitemap sitemap_url="https://example.com/sitemap.xml" limit=200

Returns worst_first sorted by citation-likelihood score. Surfaces missing schema, conflicting canonicals, missing /llms.txt, broken HTTPS.

4. Competitor signal gap

You're not cited; they are. Why?

# 1. Find the top-cited URLs for your target query
citations_check query="<query>"

# 2. Compare your URL to theirs signal-by-signal
competitors_compare urls=[
  "https://example.com/your-post",
  "https://competitor-1.com/their-post",
  "https://competitor-2.com/their-post"
]

diverging_signals is the list of where you're losing. Usually obvious once you see it - they have FAQ schema, GitHub references, Wikipedia links - you don't.

5. Google-rank vs AI-citation gap

The closest editorial wins are queries where you already rank in Google's top 10 but are invisible to AI. Requires a GCP service account with webmasters.readonly scope.

signals_gsc_gap
  domain="example.com"
  queries=["...editorial watchlist..."]
  start_date="2026-04-01"
  end_date="2026-05-01"

closest_wins returns queries with position <= 10 and ai_cited: false, sorted by impressions desc. Push citation signals on those specific URLs first.

6. Wikipedia mention monitor

Wikipedia is the top-correlation signal but the advice "get on Wikipedia" is useless. So instead: watch when it happens organically.

signals_wikipedia domain="example.com" limit=50

Returns Wikipedia article URLs that already link to the domain. Re-run quarterly; the diff is your "we got a Wikipedia citation" alert.

Schema.org

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "name": "Citation Intelligence MCP",
  "applicationCategory": "DeveloperApplication",
  "operatingSystem": "Cross-platform",
  "description": "Self-hosted MCP server for querying AI citation data from Perplexity, Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Bing, and Google AI Overviews.",
  "offers": { "@type": "Offer", "price": "0" },
  "url": "https://github.com/AutomateLab-tech/citation-intelligence"
}

Contributing

Bug reports, feature ideas, and PRs welcome. See CONTRIBUTING.md.

Security

Report a vulnerability via SECURITY.md.

License

MIT - see LICENSE.

Built by automatelab.tech

Recommended MCP Servers

How it compares

MCP integration for multi-engine AI citation checks, not a monolithic SEO crawler or a one-off ChatGPT prompt template.

FAQ

Who is Citation Intelligence for?

Developers and small teams using Claude Code, Cursor, or similar agents who optimize for AI search citations alongside traditional SEO.

When should I use Citation Intelligence?

Use it when validating positioning, refreshing cornerstone articles, or checking whether competitors dominate citations for your target queries.

How do I add Citation Intelligence to my agent?

Add the stdio MCP entry for `@automatelab/citation-intelligence` (npm v0.9.3) in your agent’s MCP config and invoke citation tools from the chat.

AI & LLM Toolsseocontentdistribution

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.