
Closeread Verify
- Updated June 11, 2026
- FreeGuy-AI/closeread-verify
Closeread Verify is a MCP server that delivers verified dependency-audit verdicts for AI coding agents instead of raw scan output.
About
Closeread Verify is a lightweight MCP server from FreeGuy-AI that exposes dependency auditing as an agent-friendly verdict rather than a pile of scanner lines. Developers shipping npm, Python, or polyglot stacks can hook it into Claude Code or Cursor so pre-merge checks produce a clear pass-or-review signal suitable for automated gates or human review. Install via the PyPI-distributed closeread-verify package with stdio transport. It does not replace full SCA platforms with policy dashboards; it compresses the audit step into something an LLM workflow can act on. Placement is Ship security alongside code review habits—invoke when dependencies change, before tagging a release, or when an agent proposes new packages.
- Returns a verified dependency-audit verdict callable by any MCP agent
- PyPI package closeread-verify over stdio MCP
- Designed as structured verdict output, not an unstructured raw scan export
- Version 0.1.2 per server manifest
Closeread Verify by the numbers
- Data as of Jul 7, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
claude mcp add closeread-verify -- uvx closeread-verifyAdd your badge
Show developers this MCP server is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Package | closeread-verify |
|---|---|
| Transport | STDIO |
| Auth | None |
| Last updated | June 11, 2026 |
| Repository | FreeGuy-AI/closeread-verify ↗ |
What it does
Let your coding agent request a verified dependency-audit verdict over MCP before merge or release instead of parsing raw scan dumps.
Who is it for?
Best when you want MCP-native supply-chain checks inside Claude Code or Cursor before shipping dependency changes.
Skip if: Enterprises needing full SCA policy consoles, license compliance suites, or infra pentesting rather than dependency verdicts.
What you get
After registering the server, your agent receives a structured audit verdict you can gate merges and releases on.
- Agent-callable verified dependency-audit verdict
- Structured output suitable for merge or release gates
- Repeatable audit step in ship workflows
By the numbers
- Server version 0.1.2
- PyPI identifier closeread-verify
- stdio MCP transport
README.md
closeread-verify
A verified dependency-audit verdict any AI agent can call.
A free scanner gives you raw CVEs. closeread-verify gives you the judgment: the
verdict checked against the version you actually installed, the one finding that
matters, and the exact fix. It runs as an MCP
server, so any agent (Claude Code, Cursor, your own) can call it before it ships
code and get back a checked answer, not a wall of noise.
Why this and not npm audit
A raw scanner and the agent itself can already produce a list of CVEs. What they
cannot manufacture is the verdict. closeread-verify is built around the one
discipline that separates a real audit from a scan:
- It reports the INSTALLED version, not the declared floor.
^4.17.0in a manifest is not what you shipped. The tool resolves the real pinned version from your lockfile and checks that, so it does not cry wolf over a caret range you already patched, and does not miss a vulnerable pin a manifest-only scan would wave through. - It splits direct vs transitive. The dependency you declared and own (yours to bump) is separated from the one you inherited five levels down. Most scanners flatten these into one undifferentiated list. This one tells you which is which.
- It surfaces the one finding that matters. Instead of 200 rows, you get a
single
lead: the highest-severity direct production issue, with the exact fix. If the only findings are transitive or dev-only, the lead is honestlynullrather than a manufactured headline. - It is deterministic and re-checkable. No LLM in the path. Same lockfile in, same verdict out. Advisories are confirmed against OSV.dev. The verdict carries its own basis so a reviewer can re-run it.
That verified artifact, not the raw scan, is the product.
Install
pip install closeread-verify
Python 3.11+. No API key, no account, no source access. Lockfile in, verdict out.
See it in an agent loop
examples/agent_loop.py is a runnable agent that uses
closeread-verify as a pre-ship gate: it blocks on a real Flask CVE, applies the
named fix, re-checks, and ships. Real MCP over stdio, real OSV advisories, no API
key.
python examples/agent_loop.py
Use it as an MCP server
closeread-verify is the stdio command that starts the server:
closeread-verify
Client config
Add it to your MCP client. Claude Code / Cursor style (mcp.json /
claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"closeread-verify": {
"command": "closeread-verify"
}
}
}
If you installed into a specific environment, point at that interpreter instead:
{
"mcpServers": {
"closeread-verify": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["-m", "closeread.mcp_server"]
}
}
}
The three tools
| Tool | Input | Use it when |
|---|---|---|
audit_project |
files: a {filename: content} map |
You have a real checkout. Pass the manifest and its lockfile together (e.g. package.json + package-lock.json) so the direct-vs-transitive split is recovered. Subdir prefixes like server/package.json are allowed. |
audit_dependencies |
lockfile_content: str, filename: str |
You have a single manifest or lockfile and want a one-shot verdict. |
audit_repo |
github_url: str |
You have a public repo URL. It shallow-clones and runs the same audit. Returns an error, never a fabricated result, if the clone fails. |
The filename is load-bearing: it routes the content to the right ecosystem
parser. Supported lockfiles include package-lock.json, yarn.lock,
pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, Pipfile.lock,
Gemfile.lock, composer.lock, and Cargo.lock.
Example
Calling audit_dependencies on a requirements.txt that pins flask==0.12.0:
{
"source": "lockfile:requirements.txt",
"lead": {
"summary": "flask@0.12.0 affected by GHSA-562c-5r94-xh97",
"severity": "high",
"is_direct": true,
"dependency_kind": "prod",
"location": "requirements.txt:1",
"fix": "Update flask to a patched version (see references).",
"confidence": 0.9
},
"findings": {
"issues": [],
"direct": [
{
"kind": "dependency",
"package": "flask",
"severity": "high",
"is_direct": true,
"versions": ["0.12.0"],
"advisories": ["GHSA-562c-5r94-xh97", "GHSA-5wv5-4vpf-pj6m", "GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq"],
"locations": ["requirements.txt:1"],
"recommendation": "Update flask to a patched version (see references)."
}
],
"transitive": []
},
"counts": { "product_critical": 3, "issues": 0, "direct": 1, "transitive": 0 },
"verification": {
"basis": "each version is the INSTALLED version resolved from the lockfile, not the declared floor; advisories confirmed via OSV; result is deterministic and re-checkable",
"scanner": "closeread SCA (deterministic, no LLM)",
"advisory_source": "OSV.dev",
"as_of": "2026-06-08T12:00:00+00:00"
}
}
The agent does not get a scan to interpret. It gets a verdict to act on: bump
flask, here is the line, here is why.
The verified-audit primitive for the agent era
Agents are starting to write, review, and ship code on their own. Before an agent
opens a PR or green-lights a deploy, it needs an answer to a simple question with
a checkable answer: is anything I depend on known-vulnerable, in the version I
actually pinned, and is it mine to fix? closeread-verify is that primitive. One
MCP call, a deterministic verdict, no LLM in the loop to hallucinate a CVE that
does not exist or miss one that does.
Scope, honestly
- Ecosystems: npm/yarn/pnpm, pip/poetry/pipenv, RubyGems, Packagist (Composer), crates.io (Cargo).
- Deterministic: no LLM, no network beyond OSV.dev advisory lookups.
- Lockfile-only: it reads manifests and lockfiles. It does not need, request, or transmit your source code.
- What it is not: this is the free, deterministic dependency-audit tier. It is not a full code review, not a SAST engine, not a license or architecture audit. It does one thing: a verified verdict on your dependencies.
License
MIT. Built by Free Guy.
Recommended MCP Servers
How it compares
Verdict-first dependency audit MCP, not a generic code-review skill or interactive OS vulnerability scanner.
FAQ
Who is Closeread Verify for?
It is for developers and agents that need a concise, verified dependency-audit result over MCP during ship and security workflows.
When should I use Closeread Verify?
Use it when dependencies change, before release tags, or when an agent adds packages and you want a verdict instead of parsing raw scanner logs.
How do I add Closeread Verify to my agent?
Add a stdio MCP server entry pointing at the closeread-verify PyPI package per your agent’s MCP config format.