
Ai Ethics
- 53 installs
- 4 repo stars
- Updated April 11, 2026
- 89jobrien/steve
ai-ethics is a Claude Code skill covering responsible AI development - bias detection, fairness metrics, explainability, human oversight, and regulatory compliance like the EU AI Act.
About
ai-ethics is a Claude Code skill for responsible AI development, covering bias detection, fairness assessment, explainability, and regulatory compliance. It documents fairness metrics, bias mitigation at pre-, in-, and post-processing stages, model cards, and EU AI Act risk categories. A developer uses it when evaluating an AI system for bias, designing human oversight, or building AI governance documentation. It also covers privacy-preserving techniques and environmental impact.
- Covers AI bias detection, fairness metrics, and mitigation strategies
- Includes explainability, model cards, and EU AI Act risk assessment
- Documents human-in-the-loop patterns and AI governance frameworks
Ai Ethics by the numbers
- 53 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #6,979 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
ai-ethics capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- bias detection · fairness assessment · ai governance · compliance review
- Use cases
- research · security audit · documentation
- Pricing
- Free
What ai-ethics says it does
Comprehensive AI ethics skill covering bias detection, fairness assessment, responsible AI development, and regulatory compliance.
Risk Categories (EU AI Act)
npx skills add https://github.com/89jobrien/steve --skill ai-ethicsAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 53 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 4 |
| Last updated | April 11, 2026 |
| Repository | 89jobrien/steve ↗ |
What it does
Evaluate AI systems for bias and compliance, design human oversight, and produce AI governance documentation.
Who is it for?
Assessing AI systems for bias and fairness and building governance and compliance documentation
Skip if: General software ethics unrelated to AI/ML systems
When should I use this skill?
You are evaluating AI bias, implementing fairness measures, running ethical assessments, or ensuring AI regulatory compliance
What you get
A fairness/bias assessment, model cards, and governance and human-oversight documentation for an AI system.
- bias and fairness assessment
- model cards
- AI governance framework
By the numbers
- 6 core AI ethics principles
- 4 EU AI Act risk levels (unacceptable, high, limited, minimal)
- 3 bias mitigation stages (pre-, in-, post-processing)
Files
AI Ethics
Comprehensive AI ethics skill covering bias detection, fairness assessment, responsible AI development, and regulatory compliance.
When to Use This Skill
- Evaluating AI models for bias
- Implementing fairness measures
- Conducting ethical impact assessments
- Ensuring regulatory compliance (EU AI Act, etc.)
- Designing human-in-the-loop systems
- Creating AI transparency documentation
- Developing AI governance frameworks
Ethical Principles
Core AI Ethics Principles
| Principle | Description |
|---|---|
| Fairness | AI should not discriminate against individuals or groups |
| Transparency | AI decisions should be explainable |
| Privacy | Personal data must be protected |
| Accountability | Clear responsibility for AI outcomes |
| Safety | AI should not cause harm |
| Human Agency | Humans should maintain control |
Stakeholder Considerations
- Users: How does this affect people using the system?
- Subjects: How does this affect people the AI makes decisions about?
- Society: What are broader societal implications?
- Environment: What is the environmental impact?
Bias Detection & Mitigation
Types of AI Bias
| Bias Type | Source | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Historical | Training data reflects past discrimination | Hiring models favoring male candidates |
| Representation | Underrepresented groups in training data | Face recognition failing on darker skin |
| Measurement | Proxy variables for protected attributes | ZIP code correlating with race |
| Aggregation | One model for diverse populations | Medical model trained only on one ethnicity |
| Evaluation | Biased evaluation metrics | Accuracy hiding disparate impact |
Fairness Metrics
Group Fairness:
- Demographic Parity: Equal positive rates across groups
- Equalized Odds: Equal TPR and FPR across groups
- Predictive Parity: Equal precision across groups
Individual Fairness:
- Similar individuals should receive similar predictions
- Counterfactual fairness: Would outcome change if protected attribute differed?
Bias Mitigation Strategies
Pre-processing:
- Resampling/reweighting training data
- Removing biased features
- Data augmentation for underrepresented groups
In-processing:
- Fairness constraints in loss function
- Adversarial debiasing
- Fair representation learning
Post-processing:
- Threshold adjustment per group
- Calibration
- Reject option classification
Explainability & Transparency
Explanation Types
| Type | Audience | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Global | Developers | Understand overall model behavior |
| Local | End users | Explain specific decisions |
| Counterfactual | Affected parties | What would need to change for different outcome |
Explainability Techniques
- SHAP: Feature importance values
- LIME: Local interpretable explanations
- Attention maps: For neural networks
- Decision trees: Inherently interpretable
- Feature importance: Global model understanding
Model Cards
Document for each model:
- Model purpose and intended use
- Training data description
- Performance metrics by subgroup
- Limitations and ethical considerations
- Version and update history
AI Governance
AI Risk Assessment
Risk Categories (EU AI Act):
| Risk Level | Examples | Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Unacceptable | Social scoring, manipulation | Prohibited |
| High | Healthcare, employment, credit | Strict requirements |
| Limited | Chatbots | Transparency obligations |
| Minimal | Spam filters | No requirements |
Governance Framework
1. Policy: Define ethical principles and boundaries 2. Process: Review and approval workflows 3. People: Roles and responsibilities (ethics board) 4. Technology: Tools for monitoring and enforcement
Documentation Requirements
- Data provenance and lineage
- Model training documentation
- Testing and validation results
- Deployment and monitoring plans
- Incident response procedures
Human Oversight
Human-in-the-Loop Patterns
| Pattern | Use Case | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Human-in-the-Loop | High-stakes decisions | Medical diagnosis confirmation |
| Human-on-the-Loop | Monitoring with intervention | Content moderation escalation |
| Human-out-of-Loop | Low-risk, high-volume | Spam filtering |
Designing for Human Control
- Clear escalation paths
- Override capabilities
- Confidence thresholds for automation
- Audit trails
- Feedback mechanisms
Privacy Considerations
Data Minimization
- Collect only necessary data
- Anonymize when possible
- Aggregate rather than individual data
- Delete data when no longer needed
Privacy-Preserving Techniques
- Differential privacy
- Federated learning
- Secure multi-party computation
- Homomorphic encryption
Environmental Impact
Considerations
- Training compute requirements
- Inference energy consumption
- Hardware lifecycle
- Data center energy sources
Mitigation
- Efficient architectures
- Model distillation
- Transfer learning
- Green hosting providers
Reference Files
- `references/bias_assessment.md` - Detailed bias evaluation methodology
- `references/regulatory_compliance.md` - AI regulation requirements
Integration with Other Skills
- machine-learning - For model development
- testing - For bias testing
- documentation - For model cards
Related skills
FAQ
What fairness metrics does it cover?
Group fairness (demographic parity, equalized odds, predictive parity) and individual fairness (counterfactual fairness).
How does it map to the EU AI Act?
It classifies systems into unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal risk levels, each with its own requirements.