
Entity Optimizer
- 4.7k installs
- 115 repo stars
- Updated July 13, 2026
- aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills
Agent skill that audits, builds, and maintains entity identity across Knowledge Graph, Wikidata, Wikipedia, and AI systems for canonical brand recognition.
About
Entity Optimizer audits, builds, and maintains entity identity across search engines and AI systems for brands, people, organizations, and products. Google's Knowledge Graph powers Knowledge Panels and entity-based ranking, while AI systems resolve queries to entities before generating answers. If an AI cannot identify an entity, it cannot cite it regardless of content quality. The skill maps six signal categories totaling forty-seven signals, scores each Pass, Fail, or Partial, runs an AI entity resolution test across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview, and produces a gap analysis, building plan, and disambiguation strategy. Workflows start with entity discovery across Knowledge Panel, Wikidata, Wikipedia, and schema.org, continue through structured data, knowledge base, NAP+E consistency, content-based, third-party, and AI-specific signals, and finish with a canonical entity profile and top five priority actions. Optional local helper kg.py reconciles entity names to Wikidata QIDs without API keys. Primary handoff goes to schema-markup-generator after entity truth is established.
- Scores 47 entity signals across 6 categories from structured data through AI-specific recognition
- Runs AI entity resolution tests for ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview
- Produces canonical entity profiles following the entity-geo handoff schema for downstream skills
- Includes zero-dependency kg.py helper to reconcile names to Wikidata QIDs with confidence scores
- Delivers gap analysis, top 5 priority actions, and a Week 1 through Month 2-3 building roadmap
Entity Optimizer by the numbers
- 4,708 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +5 installs in the week ending Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #152 of 1,881 Marketing & SEO skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: MEDIUM risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
entity-optimizer capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- entity signal audit across 47 signals in 6 categ · ai entity resolution testing across major ai sys · wikidata qid reconciliation via kg.py · canonical profile generation with entity geo han · disambiguation strategy and gap analysis reporti · priority action roadmap with impact and effort r
- Use cases
- seo · research · web search
- Platforms
- macOS · Linux · Windows
- Runs
- Runs locally
- Pricing
- Free
What entity-optimizer says it does
--- name: entity-optimizer description: 'Use when the user asks to "optimize entity presence"; builds Knowledge Graph, Wikidata, sameAs, and AI recognition signals for a canonical entity identity.
Not for page-level AI-citation readiness — use geo-content-optimizer.
**Why entities matter for SEO + GEO:** - **SEO**: Google's Knowledge Graph powers Knowledge Panels, rich results, and entity-based ranking signals.
npx skills add https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills --skill entity-optimizerAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 4.7k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 115 |
| Security audit | 2 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | July 13, 2026 |
| Repository | aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills ↗ |
What it does
Audit and build canonical entity identity across Knowledge Graph, Wikidata, and AI recognition systems when brands lack panels or get confused.
Who is it for?
Optimizing entity presence for Knowledge Graph, Wikidata, knowledge panels, and AI engine disambiguation of brands or public figures.
Skip if: Page-level AI-citation readiness; the docs direct users to geo-content-optimizer instead.
When should I use this skill?
User asks to optimize entity presence, audit brand recognition, fix knowledge panel issues, or disambiguate confused entities.
What you get
Entity audit, canonical entity profile, six-category signal scores, AI resolution test results, and top five priority actions ready for memory/entities/.
- Entity optimization report
- Canonical entity profile
- Handoff summary for memory/entities/
By the numbers
- 47 signals across 6 categories
- Version 9.9.10
- Apache-2.0 license
Files
Entity Optimizer
Audits, builds, and maintains entity identity across search engines and AI systems. Entities — the people, organizations, products, and concepts that search engines and AI systems recognize as distinct things — are the foundation of how both Google and LLMs decide what a brand is and whether to cite it.
Why entities matter for SEO + GEO:
- SEO: Google's Knowledge Graph powers Knowledge Panels, rich results, and entity-based ranking signals. A well-defined entity earns SERP real estate.
- GEO: AI systems resolve queries to entities before generating answers. If an AI cannot identify an entity, it cannot cite it — no matter how good the content is.
What This Skill Does
Audits entity presence across Knowledge Graph, Wikidata, Wikipedia, and AI systems; maps all 6 signal categories (47 signals); produces a gap analysis, building plan, and disambiguation strategy.
Quick Start
Start with one of these prompts. Finish with a canonical entity profile and a handoff summary using the repository format in Skill Contract.
Entity Audit
Audit entity presence for [brand/person/organization]How well do search engines and AI systems recognize [entity name]?Build Entity Presence
Build entity presence for [new brand] in the [industry] spaceEstablish [person name] as a recognized expert in [topic]Fix Entity Issues
My Knowledge Panel shows incorrect information — fix entity signals for [entity]AI systems confuse [my entity] with [other entity] — help me disambiguateSkill Contract
Expected output: an entity audit, a canonical entity profile, and a short handoff summary ready for memory/entities/.
- Reads: the entity name, primary domain, known profiles, topic associations, and prior brand context.
- Writes: a user-facing entity report plus a reusable profile that can be stored under
memory/entities/. - Promotes: canonical names, sameAs links, disambiguation notes, and entity gaps to
memory/hot-cache.md,memory/entities/, andmemory/open-loops.md. - Done when: the 6 signal categories are each scored Pass/Fail/Partial, the AI-resolution test is run (or flagged as user-to-run), and a canonical profile plus top-5 priority actions are produced.
This skill is the sole writer of canonical entity profiles at memory/entities/<name>.md. Other skills write entity candidates to memory/entities/candidates.md only. When 3+ candidates accumulate, this skill should be recommended.
Profile schema: the frontmatter of every canonical entity profile follows the authoritative contract in Entity-GEO Handoff Schema. That schema defines which fields downstream skills (geo-content-optimizer, schema-markup-generator, meta-tags-optimizer, ai-overview-recovery) depend on. Do not omit required fields — the consumers will degrade gracefully to DONE_WITH_CONCERNS and surface an open_loop pointing back here.
- Primary next skill: use the
Next Best Skillbelow once the entity truth is clear.
Handoff Summary
Emit the standard shape from skill-contract.md §Handoff Summary Format.
Data Sources
With tools: query Knowledge Graph API, ~~SEO tool, ~~AI monitor, ~~brand monitor. Without tools: ask the user for entity name/type, domain, profiles, topics, and disambiguation context. See CONNECTORS.md.
Zero-dependency local helper (keyless): python3 scripts/connectors/kg.py reconcile "<entity>" resolves the name to a Wikidata QID with a confidence score (does the open KG that feeds Knowledge Panels & AI answers recognize it?); kg.py entity <QID> returns claims + sameAs. See scripts/connectors/README.md.
Decision Gates
Stop and ask the user when:
- No entity name is provided and none is inferable from project context — ask for the entity name and type before auditing.
- The entity is an individual (founder, author, public figure) who may be an EU/EEA/UK resident, before writing to
memory/entities/— prompt: "You are about to create a canonical profile for a person. If this person is or may be an EU/EEA/UK resident, GDPR Art 6 requires a lawful basis: (1) consent, (2) legitimate interest, (3) contract, (4) other. For non-EU subjects, check local regimes (CCPA/CPRA, PIPEDA, LGPD, etc.). If unsure, skip and return NEEDS_INPUT." Only proceed once the user confirms a basis. Advisory only — not legal advice. Reference: Memory Management — GDPR / Privacy Compliance.
Continue silently (never stop for):
- Missing ~~AI monitor or ~~knowledge graph tool access — mark those rows as user-to-run and proceed with user-provided observations.
- Individual signals being unknown — score them Partial with a verification action and continue.
Instructions
When a user requests entity optimization:
Step 1: Entity Discovery
Establish the entity's current state across all systems.
### Entity Profile
**Entity Name**: [name]
**Entity Type**: [Person / Organization / Brand / Product / Creative Work / Event]
**Primary Domain**: [URL]
**Target Topics**: [topic 1, topic 2, topic 3]
#### Current Entity Presence
| Platform | Status | Details |
|----------|--------|---------|
| Google Knowledge Panel | ✅ Present / ❌ Absent / ⚠️ Incorrect | [details] |
| Wikidata | ✅ Listed / ❌ Not listed | [QID if exists] |
| Wikipedia | ✅ Article / ⚠️ Mentioned only / ❌ Absent | [notability assessment] |
| Google Knowledge Graph API | ✅ Entity found / ❌ Not found | [entity ID, types, score] |
| Schema.org on site | ✅ Complete / ⚠️ Partial / ❌ Missing | [Organization/Person/Product schema] |
#### AI Entity Resolution Test
**Note**: Claude cannot directly query other AI systems or perform real-time web searches without tool access. When running without ~~AI monitor or ~~knowledge graph tools, ask the user to run these test queries and report the results, or use the user-provided information to assess entity presence.
Test how AI systems identify this entity by querying:
- "What is [entity name]?"
- "Who founded [entity name]?" (for organizations)
- "What does [entity name] do?"
- "[entity name] vs [competitor]"
| AI System | Recognizes Entity? | Description Accuracy | Cites Entity's Content? |
|-----------|-------------------|---------------------|------------------------|
| ChatGPT | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | [accuracy notes] | [yes/no/partially] |
| Claude | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | [accuracy notes] | [yes/no/partially] |
| Perplexity | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | [accuracy notes] | [yes/no/partially] |
| Google AI Overview | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ | [accuracy notes] | [yes/no/partially] |Step 2: Entity Signal Audit
Evaluate entity signals across 6 categories. For the detailed 47-signal checklist with verification methods, see Entity Signal Checklist.
Evaluate each signal as Pass / Fail / Partial with a specific action for each gap. The 6 categories are:
1. Structured Data Signals — Organization/Person schema, sameAs links, @id consistency, author schema 2. Knowledge Base Signals — Wikidata, Wikipedia, CrunchBase, industry directories 3. Consistent NAP+E Signals — Name/description/logo/social consistency across platforms 4. Content-Based Entity Signals — About page, author pages, topical authority, branded backlinks 5. Third-Party Entity Signals — Authoritative mentions, co-citation, reviews, press coverage 6. AI-Specific Entity Signals — Clear definitions, disambiguation, verifiable claims, crawlability
Reference: Use the audit template in Entity Signal Checklist for the full 47-signal checklist with verification methods for each category.
Step 3: Report & Action Plan
Produce an Entity Optimization Report with: overview (entity/type/date), signal category summary (6-category ✅/⚠️/❌ table with findings), critical issues, top 5 priority actions (impact × effort), entity building roadmap (Week 1-2 → Month 1 → Month 2-3 → Ongoing), and CORE-EEAT A07/A08 + CITE I01-I10 cross-reference.
Reference: See Entity Signal Checklist for the full Step 3 report template.
Save Results
Ask "Save these results for future sessions?" (see Skill Contract §Save Results Template) — if yes, write the canonical entity profile to memory/entities/<entity-slug>.md using the Profile schema above. If the entity is project-critical, also add a 1-3 line pointer to memory/hot-cache.md; do not save canonical profiles to the generic memory/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md pattern.
Before writing any canonical profile, check memory/privacy/tombstones.md for a matching salted fingerprint or redacted label. If reingest_blocked: true, do not recreate the profile; return NEEDS_INPUT and ask the user to resolve the privacy block.
Example
User: "Audit entity presence for Acme Analytics, our B2B SaaS analytics platform at acme-analytics.example"
Output (abbreviated): AI resolution test shows partial recognition — ChatGPT described it as a generic "analytics tool" without B2B specificity; not listed among enterprise analytics players; founder unknown to AI systems. Health summary flags missing Wikidata entry, no Knowledge Panel, and 3 priority actions — Wikidata submission, sameAs links, and a founder-bio page.
Reference: See Example Audit Report for the full entity audit report including AI resolution test results, entity health summary, top 3 priority actions, and CORE-EEAT/CITE cross-references.
Tips for Success
Reference: See Entity Signal Checklist for the full 7-item Tips for Success list (start with Wikidata, leverage sameAs, test AI recognition before/after, compounding signals, consistency > completeness, disambiguation-first, pair with CITE I-dimension).
Entity Type Reference
Reference: See Entity Type Reference for entity types with key signals, schemas, and disambiguation strategies by situation.
Knowledge Panel & Wikidata Optimization
Reference: See Knowledge Panel & Wikidata Guide for Knowledge Panel claiming/editing, common issues and fixes, Wikidata entry creation, key properties by entity type, and AI entity resolution optimization.
Reference Materials
Detailed guides for entity optimization:
- Entity Signal Checklist — Complete signal checklist with verification methods, Step 3 report template, and Tips for Success
- Knowledge Graph Guide — Wikidata, Wikipedia, and Knowledge Graph optimization playbook
Next Best Skill
Primary: schema-markup-generator. Also consider: geo-content-optimizer (AI recognition gap) or seo-content-writer (new About/founder page needed).
Entity Signal Checklist
Part of entity-optimizer. See also: knowledge-graph-guide.md
Work through signals by priority tier. Mark each: present/correct, incomplete, or absent.
Priority 1: Foundation Signals (Must-Have)
On-Site Structured Data
| # | Signal | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Organization/Person schema on homepage | name, url, logo, description present |
| 2 | sameAs links to authoritative profiles | Wikipedia, Wikidata, LinkedIn, social |
| 3 | Consistent @id across all pages | Same @id on every page |
| 4 | About page with entity-rich content | First paragraph defines entity; founding date, key people, mission |
| 5 | Contact page with verifiable info | Physical address, phone, email matching directory listings |
Key External Profiles
| # | Signal | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Wikidata entry | Label, description, key properties, references |
| 7 | Google Business Profile (if applicable) | Claimed, verified, complete |
| 8 | LinkedIn page | Complete, matches entity name/description |
| 9 | CrunchBase profile (companies/products) | Description, founding info, key people |
| 10 | Primary industry directory listing | Listed with correct info |
Branded Search Presence
| # | Signal | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Branded search returns correct entity | Website #1; KP appears or SERP identifies entity |
| 12 | No disambiguation confusion | No other entity dominates results |
| 13 | Branded search volume exists | Measurable volume > 0 |
Priority 2: Authority Signals (Should-Have)
Knowledge Graph Depth
| # | Signal | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Google Knowledge Panel present | Displayed with correct info |
| 15 | KP attributes complete | Key attributes filled (founded, CEO, location, industry) |
| 16 | KP image correct | Preferred image displayed |
| 17 | Wikipedia article (or notability path) | Article exists, or 3+ independent reliable sources available |
| 18 | Wikidata properties complete | 10+ properties with references |
Third-Party Validation
| # | Signal | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Authoritative media mentions | 3+ in recognized publications |
| 20 | Industry awards/recognitions | At least 1 verifiable |
| 21 | Co-citation with established entities | Appears in comparisons, listicles, roundups |
| 22 | Speaking/publications | Appears as speaker, author, or contributor |
| 23 | Third-party platform reviews | Reviews exist with reasonable volume |
Content Authority
| # | Signal | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | Topical content depth | 10+ pages covering target topics |
| 25 | Author pages with credentials | Author schema, credentials, sameAs |
| 26 | Original research/data | At least 1 piece cited by others |
| 27 | Entity mentioned naturally in content | Name appears contextually, not just header/footer |
Priority 3: AI-Specific Signals (Must-Have for GEO)
AI Recognition
| # | Signal | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | ChatGPT recognizes entity | Correct description returned |
| 29 | Perplexity recognizes entity | Correct description with citations |
| 30 | Google AI Overview mentions entity | Entity appears in AI overview |
| 31 | AI description accurate | No factual errors |
| 32 | AI associates correct topics | Correct topic associations |
AI Optimization
| # | Signal | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 33 | Quotable entity definition in first paragraph | Clear, factual, self-contained |
| 34 | Factual claims verifiable | All claims cross-referenceable |
| 35 | Entity name used consistently | Identical format everywhere |
| 36 | Content crawlable by AI systems | Not blocking GPTBot, ClaudeBot (unless intentional) |
| 37 | Fresh information available | Key pages updated within 6 months |
Priority 4: Advanced Signals (Nice-to-Have)
| # | Signal | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 38 | Multi-language Wikidata entries | Labels in target market languages |
| 39 | Google KG ID known | Entity has kg: identifier |
| 40 | Social profiles bidirectionally linked | Website <-> social verified both directions |
| 41 | Consistent entity description across social | Same core description, adapted for platform |
| 42 | Strong homepage backlink profile | DR/DA above industry median |
| 43 | Branded anchor text in backlinks | Entity name appears naturally in anchors |
Priority Action Matrix
| Current State | Focus Area | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Most P1 signals absent | P1 foundation only | 2-4 weeks |
| P1 mostly done, P2 mixed | P2 authority signals | 1-2 months |
| P1-2 mostly done | P3 AI-specific | 2-3 months |
| P1-3 mostly done | Selective P4 | Ongoing |
| All tiers mostly done | Maintenance + quarterly re-audit | Quarterly |
---
Report & Action Plan Template
## Entity Optimization Report
- **Entity**: [name] | **Type**: [type] | **Date**: [date]
### Signal Category Summary
| Category | Status | Key Findings |
|----------|--------|-------------|
| Structured Data | Strong / Gaps / Missing | [findings] |
| Knowledge Base | Strong / Gaps / Missing | [findings] |
| Consistency (NAP+E) | Strong / Gaps / Missing | [findings] |
| Third-Party | Strong / Gaps / Missing | [findings] |
| AI-Specific | Strong / Gaps / Missing | [findings] |
### Top 5 Priority Actions
1. **[Signal]** — [action] | Impact: [H/M] | Effort: [L/M/H]
2-5. [Same format]
### Roadmap
**Week 1-2 (Foundation)**: Schema, sameAs, NAP+E consistency, About page
**Month 1 (Knowledge Bases)**: Wikidata, CrunchBase, directories, Wikipedia notability path
**Month 2-3 (Authority)**: Authoritative mentions, co-citation, topical clusters, PR
**Ongoing (AI)**: Quarterly AI testing, update factual claims, monitor AI outputTips for Success
1. Start with Wikidata — most influential editable KB; often triggers KP creation within weeks 2. sameAs is your most powerful Schema.org property — always include Wikidata URL first 3. Test AI recognition before and after — query ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overview 4. Entity signals compound — 5 weak signals together > 1 strong signal alone 5. Consistency beats completeness — consistent name across 10 platforms > perfect profile on 2 6. Don't neglect disambiguation — if name is shared, disambiguation is first priority
Entity Type Reference
Reference tables for entity types, key signals, and disambiguation strategies.
Entity Types and Key Signals
| Entity Type | Primary Signals | Secondary Signals | Key Schema |
|---|---|---|---|
| Person | Author pages, social profiles, publication history | Speaking, awards, media mentions | Person, ProfilePage |
| Organization | Registration records, Wikidata, industry listings | Press coverage, partnerships, awards | Organization, Corporation |
| Brand | Trademark, branded search volume, social presence | Reviews, brand mentions, visual identity | Brand, Organization |
| Product | Product pages, reviews, comparison mentions | Awards, expert endorsements, market share | Product, SoftwareApplication |
| Creative Work | Publication record, citations, reviews | Awards, adaptations, cultural impact | CreativeWork, Book, Movie |
| Event | Event listings, press coverage, social buzz | Sponsorships, speaker profiles, attendance | Event |
Disambiguation Strategy by Situation
| Situation | Strategy |
|---|---|
| Common name, unique entity | Strengthen all signals; let signal volume resolve ambiguity |
| Name collision with larger entity | Add qualifier consistently (e.g., "Acme Software" not just "Acme"); use sameAs extensively; build topic-specific authority |
| Name collision with similar entity | Geographic, industry, or product qualifiers; ensure Schema @id is unique; prioritize Wikidata disambiguation |
| Abbreviation/acronym conflict | Prefer full name in structured data; use abbreviation only where entity is established |
| Merged or renamed entity | Redirect old signals; update all structured data; create "formerly known as" content; update Wikidata |
Example: Entity Optimization Report
Full example output for an entity audit request.
User: "Audit entity presence for Acme Analytics, our B2B SaaS analytics platform at acme-analytics.example"
Output:
## Entity Optimization Report
### Entity Profile
**Entity Name**: Acme Analytics
**Entity Type**: Organization (B2B SaaS)
**Primary Domain**: acme-analytics.example
**Target Topics**: analytics platform, business intelligence, enterprise analytics
### AI Entity Resolution Test
Queries tested with results reported by user:
| Query | Result | Assessment |
|-------|--------|------------|
| "What is Acme Analytics?" | Described as "an analytics tool" with no further detail | Partial recognition -- generic description, no mention of B2B focus or key features |
| "Best analytics platforms for enterprises" | Acme Analytics not mentioned in any AI response | Not recognized as a player in the enterprise analytics space |
| "Acme Analytics vs Datadog" | Correctly identified as a competitor to Datadog, but feature comparison was incomplete and partially inaccurate | Partial -- entity is associated with the right category but attributes are thin |
| "Who founded Acme Analytics?" | No answer found by any AI system tested | Entity leadership not present in AI knowledge bases |
### Entity Health Summary
| Signal Category | Status | Key Findings |
|-----------------|--------|--------------|
| Knowledge Graph | Missing | No Wikidata entry exists; no Google Knowledge Panel triggers for branded queries |
| Structured Data | Partial | Organization schema present on homepage with name, url, and logo; missing Person schema for CEO and leadership team; no sameAs links to external profiles |
| Web Presence | Strong | Consistent NAP across LinkedIn, Twitter/X, G2, and Crunchbase; social profiles link back to acme-analytics.example; branded search returns owned properties in top 5 |
| Content-Based | Partial | About page exists but opens with marketing copy rather than an entity-defining statement; no dedicated author pages for leadership |
| Third-Party | Partial | Listed on G2 and Crunchbase; 2 industry publication mentions found; no awards or analyst coverage |
| AI-Specific | Weak | AI systems have only surface-level awareness; entity definition is not quotable from any authoritative source |
### Top 3 Priority Actions
1. **Create Wikidata entry** with key properties: instance of (P31: business intelligence software company), official website (P856: acme-analytics.example), inception (P571), country (P17)
- Impact: High | Effort: Low
- Why: Wikidata is the foundational knowledge base that feeds Google Knowledge Graph, Bing, and AI training pipelines; without it, the entity cannot be formally resolved
2. **Add Person schema for leadership team** on the About/Team page, including name, jobTitle, sameAs links to LinkedIn profiles, and worksFor pointing to the Organization entity
- Impact: High | Effort: Low
- Why: Addresses the "Who founded Acme Analytics?" gap directly; Person schema for key people creates bidirectional entity associations that strengthen organizational identity
3. **Build Wikipedia notability through independent press coverage** -- target 3-5 articles in industry publications (TechCrunch, VentureBeat, Analytics India Magazine) that mention Acme Analytics by name with verifiable claims
- Impact: High | Effort: High
- Why: Wikipedia notability requires coverage in independent reliable sources; press mentions simultaneously feed AI training data, build third-party entity signals, and create the citation foundation for a future Wikipedia article
### Cross-Reference
- **CORE-EEAT**: A07 (Knowledge Graph Presence) scored Fail, A08 (Entity Consistency) scored Pass -- entity optimization should focus on knowledge base gaps rather than consistency
- **CITE**: I-dimension weakest area is I01 (Knowledge Graph Presence) -- completing Wikidata entry and earning Knowledge Panel directly improves domain identity scoreKnowledge Graph Guide
Use this guide to turn an entity into a consistent, verifiable profile that downstream SEO/GEO skills can cite.
Entity Profile Core
| Field | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Name | Canonical name plus common variants |
| Type | Organization, person, product, place, publication, or concept |
| Description | 1-2 sentence neutral definition |
| Website | Canonical URL |
| SameAs | Official social, Wikidata/Wikipedia, Crunchbase, app stores, profiles |
| Identifiers | Wikidata QID, schema IDs, product IDs, legal names when available |
| Claims | Source-backed facts only; date every volatile claim |
| Disambiguation | Similar names/entities and how to distinguish them |
Signal Sources
| Source | Use | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Official site/about/legal pages | Canonical facts | URL + accessed date |
| Schema.org markup | Machine-readable entity definition | JSON-LD type/fields |
| Wikidata/Wikipedia | Knowledge graph presence | QID/page + references |
| Social/profiles | SameAs corroboration | Verified handles |
| News/industry citations | Notability/trust | Source/date/context |
| Review/app/product platforms | Product/entity corroboration | Rating/count only if visible |
Optimization Steps
1. Build or refresh the Canonical Entity Profile. 2. Normalize names, descriptions, URLs, and identifiers across owned surfaces. 3. Add or fix Organization/Person/Product/LocalBusiness schema where eligible. 4. Strengthen SameAs links with official, verifiable profiles. 5. Identify missing citations, weak sources, and conflicts. 6. Hand off to schema-markup-generator, geo-content-optimizer, or domain-authority-auditor.
Wikidata / Wikipedia Notes
Do not create weak or promotional pages. Only propose Wikidata/Wikipedia work when notability, sourcing, neutrality, and conflict-of-interest handling are realistic.
GEO Entity Pack
| Asset | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 40-60 word definition | AI answer citation seed |
| Fact table | Stable source-backed facts |
| Source list | Dated, authoritative references |
| SameAs list | Disambiguation and KG linking |
| Claim conflicts | Open loops to resolve |
Quality Checks
- Every factual claim has source/date.
- Profile avoids marketing language.
- Volatile claims are labeled current as of date.
- Downstream schema fields match visible page content.
- Handoff includes confidence, gaps, and next best skill.
Knowledge Panel & Wikidata Optimization Guide
Knowledge Panel Optimization
Claiming and Editing
1. Google Knowledge Panel: Claim via Google's verification (search entity -> "Claim this knowledge panel") 2. Bing Knowledge Panel: Driven by Wikidata and LinkedIn -- update those sources 3. AI Knowledge: Driven by training data -- ensure authoritative sources describe entity correctly
Common Issues
| Issue | Root Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| No panel | Not in Knowledge Graph | Build Wikidata + structured data + authoritative mentions |
| Wrong image | Sourced from incorrect page | Update Wikidata image; ensure preferred image on About page and social |
| Wrong description | Pulled from wrong source | Edit Wikidata description; ensure About page first paragraph is clear |
| Missing attributes | Incomplete structured data | Add to Schema.org and Wikidata |
| Wrong entity | Disambiguation failure | Strengthen unique signals; add qualifiers; resolve Wikidata disambiguation |
| Outdated info | Source data not updated | Update Wikidata, About page, all profiles |
Wikidata Best Practices
Creating an Entry
1. Check notability: at least one authoritative reference 2. Create item: label, description, aliases in relevant languages 3. Add statements: instance of, website, social links, founding date, founders, industry 4. Add identifiers: P856, social media IDs, CrunchBase ID, ISNI, VIAF 5. Add references: every statement needs an authoritative source
COI Note: Wikipedia prohibits self-editing. Focus on building notability through independent sources. Use Requested Articles process for Wikipedia involvement.
Key Properties by Entity Type
| Property | Code | Person | Org | Brand | Product |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| instance of | P31 | human | org type | brand | product type |
| official website | P856 | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| occupation/industry | P106/P452 | yes | yes | -- | -- |
| founded by | P112 | -- | yes | yes | -- |
| inception | P571 | -- | yes | yes | yes |
| country | P17 | yes | yes | -- | -- |
| social media | various | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| employer | P108 | yes | -- | -- | -- |
| developer | P178 | -- | -- | -- | yes |
AI Entity Optimization
Resolution Pipeline
User query -> Entity extraction -> Entity resolution -> Knowledge retrieval -> Answer generation
Signals AI Systems Use
| Signal Type | How to Optimize |
|---|---|
| Training data presence | Get mentioned in high-quality, widely-crawled sources |
| Retrieval augmentation | Strong SEO for branded queries |
| Structured data | Complete Wikidata + Schema.org |
| Contextual co-occurrence | Build consistent topic associations |
| Source authority | Get mentioned by authoritative sources |
| Recency | Keep all entity profiles and content updated |
Entity-Specific GEO Tactics
1. Define clearly: About page first paragraph should be AI-quotable 2. Be consistent: Identical description across all platforms 3. Build associations: Content connecting entity to target topics 4. Earn mentions: Third-party mentions > self-description 5. Stay current: Outdated info causes AI to lose confidence
Related skills
How it compares
Use entity-optimizer for on-site entity and schema work when domain-authority-auditor scores overall domain trust with the 40-item CITE audit.
FAQ
How is entity-optimizer different from geo-content-optimizer?
Entity-optimizer handles Knowledge Graph, Wikidata, sameAs, and AI recognition signals for canonical entity identity. Geo-content-optimizer is for page-level AI-citation readiness.
What output is produced when the skill is done?
An entity audit, canonical entity profile, handoff summary, six signal categories scored Pass/Fail/Partial, AI-resolution test results, and top five priority actions.
When should I audit versus build entity presence?
Audit when checking how search engines and AI recognize an existing entity. Build when establishing a new brand, person, or organization as a recognized expert in a topic space.
Is Entity Optimizer safe to install?
skills.sh reports 2 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.