Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
acedergren avatar

Phase Kickoff

  • 19 installs
  • 22 repo stars
  • Updated May 28, 2026
  • acedergren/agentic-tools

phase-kickoff is a Claude Code skill that scaffolds a new development phase by creating a branch, TDD test shell, and roadmap entry atomically.

About

phase-kickoff is a Claude Code skill for starting a new development phase or sprint. It scaffolds a feature branch, a TDD test shell, and a roadmap entry together as one atomic operation so implementation never begins without a branch and verification criteria. A developer uses it when kicking off a new phase or feature that needs consistent scaffolding. It bundles a scaffold-phase shell script that outputs the branch name, test file path, and roadmap stub.

  • Scaffolds a new development phase as one atomic operation: branch, TDD test shell, and roadmap entry
  • Enforces that implementation never starts without a branch and verification shell
  • Requires each roadmap entry to have a concrete goal and a runnable verification command

Phase Kickoff by the numbers

  • 19 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #2,032 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

phase-kickoff capabilities & compatibility

Capabilities
phase scaffolding · branch creation · tdd setup · roadmap management
Use cases
project management · planning · testing
Pricing
Free
From the docs

What phase-kickoff says it does

Scaffold a new development phase: branch, test shell, and roadmap entry as one atomic operation.
SKILL.md
Never begin implementation before the branch and test shell exist
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/acedergren/agentic-tools --skill phase-kickoff

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs19
repo stars22
Last updatedMay 28, 2026
Repositoryacedergren/agentic-tools

What it does

Scaffold a new development phase with a feature branch, TDD test shell, and roadmap entry in one atomic step.

Who is it for?

Kicking off a new development phase or sprint that needs a branch, TDD test shell, and roadmap entry created together.

Skip if: Executing an existing phase, one-off fixes with no roadmap, or planning that should not touch the repository.

When should I use this skill?

Starting a new development phase or sprint that needs branch creation, TDD test shell, and roadmap entry done together.

What you get

A new phase scaffolded with a named branch, a TDD test shell, and a roadmap entry with runnable verification.

  • feature branch
  • TDD test shell
  • roadmap entry with verification

By the numbers

  • Three deliverables scaffolded atomically (branch, test shell, roadmap)
  • Split-vs-extend decision needs two YES answers

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Phase Kickoff

Scaffold a new development phase: branch, test shell, and roadmap entry as one atomic operation. Enforces the invariant that implementation never starts without a branch and verification shell.

Do NOT load when

  • phase already exists and now needs execution rather than setup
  • task is a one-off fix with no roadmap or branch scaffolding
  • user only wants planning, not repository changes

NEVER

  • Never begin implementation before the branch and test shell exist — retroactively creating scaffolding after code is written means the test shell describes code that already exists rather than driving its design. The TDD shell's value is forcing you to name behavior before writing it.
  • Never create a phase entry without a concrete goal and verification criteria — vague roadmap entries ("improve auth") become unmergeable because nobody can agree what "done" means. The verification field must be a runnable command or an unambiguous observable outcome.
  • Never mix unrelated cleanup into the kickoff commit — the kickoff commit is the reference point for the phase. Mixed concerns make git bisect and phase diffing unreliable.
  • Never use a generic branch name like `feature/phase3` — include the title slug so git branch -a is readable without cross-referencing the roadmap.

Expert decision points

When to split vs. extend a phase

If you're unsure whether work belongs in a new phase or extends the current one, ask:

  • Does it have a different primary deliverable?
  • Does it have different deployment risk?
  • Can it be reviewed independently?

Two YES answers → new phase. Otherwise extend.

Test shell structure determines phase quality

The describe hierarchy in the test shell is the phase's specification. Write it before the roadmap tasks, not after. If you can't write a meaningful it.todo("should...") for a task, the task is not well-defined enough to start.

Roadmap verification field

The verification field is a quality gate. Acceptable forms:

  • npx vitest run src/auth — runnable test command
  • curl -s localhost:3000/health | jq '.status == "ok"' — observable outcome
  • pnpm build && npx tsc --noEmit — build gate

NOT acceptable: "auth works", "tests pass", "looks good".

Script

bash scripts/scaffold-phase.sh "3 - User Authentication"

Outputs: branch name, test file path, roadmap stub.

Steps

1. Parse `$ARGUMENTS`: Extract phase number and title (e.g., "3 - User Authentication") 2. Append roadmap entry:

   ## Phase {N}: {Title}
   **Goal**: {one-sentence goal}
   - [ ] {N}.1 {task}
   **Verify**: {runnable command or unambiguous outcome}

3. Create branch: git checkout -b feature/phase{N}-{kebab-case-title} 4. Create TDD test shell with describe blocks matching roadmap tasks:

   describe("Phase {N}: {Title}", () => {
     describe("{N}.1 - {task}", () => {
       it.todo("should ...");
     });
   });

5. Print summary: phase number, branch, test file path, task count

Arguments

  • $ARGUMENTS: Phase number and title — "3 - User Authentication" or "4 Real-time Notifications"

Related skills

FAQ

Why create the test shell before implementation?

The TDD shell forces you to name behavior before writing it; retroactive scaffolding just describes code that already exists rather than driving its design.

What makes an acceptable roadmap verification field?

A runnable test command, an observable outcome, or a build gate; not vague phrases like 'auth works' or 'tests pass'.

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.