
Phase Kickoff
- 19 installs
- 22 repo stars
- Updated May 28, 2026
- acedergren/agentic-tools
phase-kickoff is a Claude Code skill that scaffolds a new development phase by creating a branch, TDD test shell, and roadmap entry atomically.
About
phase-kickoff is a Claude Code skill for starting a new development phase or sprint. It scaffolds a feature branch, a TDD test shell, and a roadmap entry together as one atomic operation so implementation never begins without a branch and verification criteria. A developer uses it when kicking off a new phase or feature that needs consistent scaffolding. It bundles a scaffold-phase shell script that outputs the branch name, test file path, and roadmap stub.
- Scaffolds a new development phase as one atomic operation: branch, TDD test shell, and roadmap entry
- Enforces that implementation never starts without a branch and verification shell
- Requires each roadmap entry to have a concrete goal and a runnable verification command
Phase Kickoff by the numbers
- 19 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #2,032 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
phase-kickoff capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- phase scaffolding · branch creation · tdd setup · roadmap management
- Use cases
- project management · planning · testing
- Pricing
- Free
What phase-kickoff says it does
Scaffold a new development phase: branch, test shell, and roadmap entry as one atomic operation.
Never begin implementation before the branch and test shell exist
npx skills add https://github.com/acedergren/agentic-tools --skill phase-kickoffAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 19 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 22 |
| Last updated | May 28, 2026 |
| Repository | acedergren/agentic-tools ↗ |
What it does
Scaffold a new development phase with a feature branch, TDD test shell, and roadmap entry in one atomic step.
Who is it for?
Kicking off a new development phase or sprint that needs a branch, TDD test shell, and roadmap entry created together.
Skip if: Executing an existing phase, one-off fixes with no roadmap, or planning that should not touch the repository.
When should I use this skill?
Starting a new development phase or sprint that needs branch creation, TDD test shell, and roadmap entry done together.
What you get
A new phase scaffolded with a named branch, a TDD test shell, and a roadmap entry with runnable verification.
- feature branch
- TDD test shell
- roadmap entry with verification
By the numbers
- Three deliverables scaffolded atomically (branch, test shell, roadmap)
- Split-vs-extend decision needs two YES answers
Files
Phase Kickoff
Scaffold a new development phase: branch, test shell, and roadmap entry as one atomic operation. Enforces the invariant that implementation never starts without a branch and verification shell.
Do NOT load when
- phase already exists and now needs execution rather than setup
- task is a one-off fix with no roadmap or branch scaffolding
- user only wants planning, not repository changes
NEVER
- Never begin implementation before the branch and test shell exist — retroactively creating scaffolding after code is written means the test shell describes code that already exists rather than driving its design. The TDD shell's value is forcing you to name behavior before writing it.
- Never create a phase entry without a concrete goal and verification criteria — vague roadmap entries ("improve auth") become unmergeable because nobody can agree what "done" means. The verification field must be a runnable command or an unambiguous observable outcome.
- Never mix unrelated cleanup into the kickoff commit — the kickoff commit is the reference point for the phase. Mixed concerns make
git bisectand phase diffing unreliable. - Never use a generic branch name like `feature/phase3` — include the title slug so
git branch -ais readable without cross-referencing the roadmap.
Expert decision points
When to split vs. extend a phase
If you're unsure whether work belongs in a new phase or extends the current one, ask:
- Does it have a different primary deliverable?
- Does it have different deployment risk?
- Can it be reviewed independently?
Two YES answers → new phase. Otherwise extend.
Test shell structure determines phase quality
The describe hierarchy in the test shell is the phase's specification. Write it before the roadmap tasks, not after. If you can't write a meaningful it.todo("should...") for a task, the task is not well-defined enough to start.
Roadmap verification field
The verification field is a quality gate. Acceptable forms:
npx vitest run src/auth— runnable test commandcurl -s localhost:3000/health | jq '.status == "ok"'— observable outcomepnpm build && npx tsc --noEmit— build gate
NOT acceptable: "auth works", "tests pass", "looks good".
Script
bash scripts/scaffold-phase.sh "3 - User Authentication"Outputs: branch name, test file path, roadmap stub.
Steps
1. Parse `$ARGUMENTS`: Extract phase number and title (e.g., "3 - User Authentication") 2. Append roadmap entry:
## Phase {N}: {Title}
**Goal**: {one-sentence goal}
- [ ] {N}.1 {task}
**Verify**: {runnable command or unambiguous outcome}3. Create branch: git checkout -b feature/phase{N}-{kebab-case-title} 4. Create TDD test shell with describe blocks matching roadmap tasks:
describe("Phase {N}: {Title}", () => {
describe("{N}.1 - {task}", () => {
it.todo("should ...");
});
});5. Print summary: phase number, branch, test file path, task count
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS: Phase number and title —"3 - User Authentication"or"4 Real-time Notifications"
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
RAW="${1:-}"
if [ -z "$RAW" ]; then
echo 'Usage: scaffold-phase.sh "3 - User Authentication"' >&2
exit 1
fi
PHASE_NUM=$(printf '%s' "$RAW" | sed -E 's/^([0-9]+).*/\1/')
TITLE=$(printf '%s' "$RAW" | sed -E 's/^[0-9]+[[:space:]]*-[[:space:]]*//')
KEBAB=$(printf '%s' "$TITLE" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | sed -E 's/[^a-z0-9]+/-/g; s/^-+|-+$//g')
BRANCH="feature/phase${PHASE_NUM}-${KEBAB}"
TEST_FILE="tests/phase-${PHASE_NUM}-${KEBAB}.test.ts"
printf 'Branch: %s\n' "$BRANCH"
printf 'Suggested test file: %s\n' "$TEST_FILE"
printf '\nRoadmap stub:\n\n'
printf '## Phase %s: %s\n\n**Goal**: %s\n\n- [ ] %s.1 First task\n- [ ] %s.2 Second task\n\n**Verify**: Define completion check\n' "$PHASE_NUM" "$TITLE" "$TITLE" "$PHASE_NUM" "$PHASE_NUM"
Related skills
FAQ
Why create the test shell before implementation?
The TDD shell forces you to name behavior before writing it; retroactive scaffolding just describes code that already exists rather than driving its design.
What makes an acceptable roadmap verification field?
A runnable test command, an observable outcome, or a build gate; not vague phrases like 'auth works' or 'tests pass'.