Ito Basket Compare
- 1.2k installs
- 238k repo stars
- Updated August 5, 2026
- affaan-m/ecc
ito-basket-compare is a read-only agent skill that compares Itô prediction-market baskets against a developer's notes, watchlist, and thesis without issuing investment advice.
About
ito-basket-compare is an ECC-origin agent skill for read-only comparison of Itô prediction-market baskets, themes, or market sets against a user's knowledge base, portfolio notes, research memo, CRM context, or stated thesis. The skill inspects fit, exposure overlap, unstated assumptions, and missing context so a developer can decide next steps manually. It explicitly does not recommend trades, rank opportunities, or provide investment advice. Developers reach for ito-basket-compare when evaluating whether a published basket aligns with documented research before adjusting positions or building automation. Guardrails keep output analytical and non-executing, making the skill suitable for pre-decision diligence rather than live order placement.
- Read-only comparison of Itô prediction-market baskets against user knowledge base or notes
- Maps underliers to aligned signals, conflicting signals, and missing research
- Supports Basket vs Knowledge Base and Basket vs Portfolio Notes modes
- Strict guardrails prevent any investment advice or trade execution
- Preserves user document privacy by requiring explicit pointers
Ito Basket Compare by the numbers
- 1,233 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +83 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #424 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ecc --skill ito-basket-compareAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 1.2k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 238k |
| Last updated | August 5, 2026 |
| Repository | affaan-m/ecc ↗ |
How do I compare a prediction market basket to my thesis?
Compare prediction-market baskets or themes against their own research notes, portfolio context, or investment thesis before making decisions.
Who is it for?
Developers or quants maintaining structured research notes who need neutral basket-versus-thesis comparison before manual prediction-market decisions.
Skip if: Users seeking trade recommendations, automated order execution, or live portfolio rebalancing without their own review.
When should I use this skill?
A user asks to compare an Itô basket or theme against portfolio notes, watchlist, CRM context, or a written investment thesis.
What you get
Gap analysis report, exposure overlap notes, assumption checklist, and missing-context flags against the user's knowledge base.
- Basket gap analysis
- Exposure overlap summary
- Missing-context checklist
Files
Itô Basket Compare
Use this skill to compare a basket, theme, or market set against a user's knowledge base, portfolio notes, research memo, CRM context, or stated thesis.
This skill is read-only. It does not recommend trades. It helps a user inspect fit, exposure, assumptions, and missing context before they decide what to do.
Guardrails
- Do not provide investment advice or tell the user to buy, sell, hold, hedge,
lever, or size a trade.
- Do not execute, prepare, or submit orders.
- Do not use private documents unless the user explicitly points to them.
- Use
ITO_API_KEYonly for read-only Itô basket/market data after explicit
user request.
- If comparing against financials, preserve privacy and summarize only the
fields needed for the comparison.
Comparison Modes
Basket vs Knowledge Base
1. Identify the basket theme and underliers. 2. Retrieve the user's relevant notes, docs, or memory snippets. 3. Map each underlier to claims, sources, uncertainties, and stale assumptions. 4. Return aligned signals, conflicting signals, and missing research.
Basket vs Portfolio Notes
1. Parse the user's watchlist, holdings summary, or exposure notes. 2. Compare themes, geographies, time horizons, and event outcomes. 3. Flag concentration, correlation, and duplicated narrative exposure. 4. Avoid recommendations; phrase output as inspection and questions.
Basket vs Financial Context
1. Accept only user-provided or explicitly selected financial context. 2. Identify liquidity, drawdown, time-horizon, and constraint mismatches. 3. Ask for missing constraints instead of guessing.
Output Contract
Use this structure:
1. Basket summary 2. Comparison target 3. Matches 4. Conflicts or stale assumptions 5. Missing context 6. User-action checklist
End with:
This comparison is informational and not investment or trading advice.Related skills
Grill MeHave an agent relentlessly pressure-test their plan or design until every decision branch is resolved and shared understanding is reached.691k196kGrill With DocsPressure-test architecture decisions against their live codebase and living documentation before writing production code.585k196k
Lark CalendarLet their coding agents read, create, and manage events inside Lark (Feishu) Calendar directly from natural language instructions.493kLark ImLet their coding agent send instant notifications, post updates, and receive commands directly inside Lark (Feishu) workspaces.493kLark ContactLet their AI coding agents read and write contacts, send messages, and manage user data inside Lark (Feishu).493kLark AttendanceAutomatically fetch and report daily attendance data from Lark (Feishu) into their own tools or agents.493kFAQ
Does ito-basket-compare place trades or give buy/sell advice?
ito-basket-compare is read-only and non-advisory. The skill compares baskets to user-supplied notes and thesis context without recommending positions or executing orders.
What inputs does ito-basket-compare need for a useful comparison?
ito-basket-compare works best with an Itô basket or theme plus the user's knowledge base, portfolio notes, watchlist, CRM context, or written research thesis for alignment checks.