
Kotlin Testing
- 1.4k installs
- 238k repo stars
- Updated August 5, 2026
- affaan-m/ecc
This is a copy of kotlin-testing by affaan-m - installs and ranking accrue to the original listing.
kotlin-testing is an agent skill that generates idiomatic Kotlin unit and property-based tests with Kotest, MockK, and Kover coverage for developers who need reliable TDD workflows on JVM and Android codebases.
About
kotlin-testing is a Claude Code skill from affaan-m/ecc that teaches and applies Kotlin testing patterns using Kotest, MockK, coroutine testing, property-based testing, and Kover coverage reporting while following strict TDD methodology. The workflow starts by identifying a target function, class, or module, then writes failing tests first, implements mocks and coroutine test dispatchers, and configures Kover for coverage thresholds. Developers reach for kotlin-testing when adding coverage to existing Kotlin services, writing new domain logic, or standardizing test style across a multi-module Gradle project. The skill emphasizes idiomatic Kotlin practices—structured concurrency tests, MockK verification, and maintainable spec layouts—rather than generic JUnit snippets ported from Java.
- 7-step TDD workflow: identify → Kotest spec → MockK → RED → GREEN → refactor → coverage
- Supports Kotest spec styles: StringSpec, FunSpec, BehaviorSpec, DescribeSpec
- MockK patterns for dependencies, coroutines, argument capture
- Property-based testing and coroutine testing examples
- Kover coverage reporting targeting 80%+ with HTML report command
Kotlin Testing by the numbers
- 1,374 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +90 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ecc --skill kotlin-testingAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 1.4k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 238k |
| Last updated | August 5, 2026 |
| Repository | affaan-m/ecc ↗ |
How do you write idiomatic Kotlin tests with Kotest?
Generate reliable, idiomatic Kotlin tests with Kotest, MockK, and Kover while following strict TDD.
Who is it for?
Developers building or maintaining Kotlin backend services or Android modules who want TDD-aligned Kotest and MockK patterns with coverage gates.
Skip if: Teams writing only Java tests with JUnit 4, or projects that do not use Kotlin, Kotest, or MockK and do not plan to adopt them.
When should I use this skill?
User asks to add Kotlin tests, configure Kover, mock dependencies with MockK, or follow TDD on Kotlin code.
What you get
Kotest test files, MockK mock setups, coroutine test cases, property-based tests, and Kover coverage configuration.
- Kotest spec files
- Kover coverage config
- MockK mock setups
Files
Kotlin Testing Patterns
Comprehensive Kotlin testing patterns for writing reliable, maintainable tests following TDD methodology with Kotest and MockK.
When to Use
- Writing new Kotlin functions or classes
- Adding test coverage to existing Kotlin code
- Implementing property-based tests
- Following TDD workflow in Kotlin projects
- Configuring Kover for code coverage
How It Works
1. Identify target code — Find the function, class, or module to test 2. Write a Kotest spec — Choose a spec style (StringSpec, FunSpec, BehaviorSpec) matching the test scope 3. Mock dependencies — Use MockK to isolate the unit under test 4. Run tests (RED) — Verify the test fails with the expected error 5. Implement code (GREEN) — Write minimal code to pass the test 6. Refactor — Improve the implementation while keeping tests green 7. Check coverage — Run ./gradlew koverHtmlReport and verify 80%+ coverage
Examples
The following sections contain detailed, runnable examples for each testing pattern:
Quick Reference
- Kotest specs — StringSpec, FunSpec, BehaviorSpec, DescribeSpec examples in Kotest Spec Styles
- Mocking — MockK setup, coroutine mocking, argument capture in MockK
- TDD walkthrough — Full RED/GREEN/REFACTOR cycle with EmailValidator in TDD Workflow for Kotlin
- Coverage — Kover configuration and commands in Kover Coverage
- Ktor testing — testApplication setup in Ktor testApplication Testing
TDD Workflow for Kotlin
The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle
RED -> Write a failing test first
GREEN -> Write minimal code to pass the test
REFACTOR -> Improve code while keeping tests green
REPEAT -> Continue with next requirementStep-by-Step TDD in Kotlin
// Step 1: Define the interface/signature
// EmailValidator.kt
package com.example.validator
fun validateEmail(email: String): Result<String> {
TODO("not implemented")
}
// Step 2: Write failing test (RED)
// EmailValidatorTest.kt
package com.example.validator
import io.kotest.core.spec.style.StringSpec
import io.kotest.matchers.result.shouldBeFailure
import io.kotest.matchers.result.shouldBeSuccess
class EmailValidatorTest : StringSpec({
"valid email returns success" {
validateEmail("user@example.com").shouldBeSuccess("user@example.com")
}
"empty email returns failure" {
validateEmail("").shouldBeFailure()
}
"email without @ returns failure" {
validateEmail("userexample.com").shouldBeFailure()
}
})
// Step 3: Run tests - verify FAIL
// $ ./gradlew test
// EmailValidatorTest > valid email returns success FAILED
// kotlin.NotImplementedError: An operation is not implemented
// Step 4: Implement minimal code (GREEN)
fun validateEmail(email: String): Result<String> {
if (email.isBlank()) return Result.failure(IllegalArgumentException("Email cannot be blank"))
if ('@' !in email) return Result.failure(IllegalArgumentException("Email must contain @"))
val regex = Regex("^[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\\.[A-Za-z]{2,}$")
if (!regex.matches(email)) return Result.failure(IllegalArgumentException("Invalid email format"))
return Result.success(email)
}
// Step 5: Run tests - verify PASS
// $ ./gradlew test
// EmailValidatorTest > valid email returns success PASSED
// EmailValidatorTest > empty email returns failure PASSED
// EmailValidatorTest > email without @ returns failure PASSED
// Step 6: Refactor if needed, verify tests still passKotest Spec Styles
StringSpec (Simplest)
class CalculatorTest : StringSpec({
"add two positive numbers" {
Calculator.add(2, 3) shouldBe 5
}
"add negative numbers" {
Calculator.add(-1, -2) shouldBe -3
}
"add zero" {
Calculator.add(0, 5) shouldBe 5
}
})FunSpec (JUnit-like)
class UserServiceTest : FunSpec({
val repository = mockk<UserRepository>()
val service = UserService(repository)
test("getUser returns user when found") {
val expected = User(id = "1", name = "Alice")
coEvery { repository.findById("1") } returns expected
val result = service.getUser("1")
result shouldBe expected
}
test("getUser throws when not found") {
coEvery { repository.findById("999") } returns null
shouldThrow<UserNotFoundException> {
service.getUser("999")
}
}
})BehaviorSpec (BDD Style)
class OrderServiceTest : BehaviorSpec({
val repository = mockk<OrderRepository>()
val paymentService = mockk<PaymentService>()
val service = OrderService(repository, paymentService)
Given("a valid order request") {
val request = CreateOrderRequest(
userId = "user-1",
items = listOf(OrderItem("product-1", quantity = 2)),
)
When("the order is placed") {
coEvery { paymentService.charge(any()) } returns PaymentResult.Success
coEvery { repository.save(any()) } answers { firstArg() }
val result = service.placeOrder(request)
Then("it should return a confirmed order") {
result.status shouldBe OrderStatus.CONFIRMED
}
Then("it should charge payment") {
coVerify(exactly = 1) { paymentService.charge(any()) }
}
}
When("payment fails") {
coEvery { paymentService.charge(any()) } returns PaymentResult.Declined
Then("it should throw PaymentException") {
shouldThrow<PaymentException> {
service.placeOrder(request)
}
}
}
}
})DescribeSpec (RSpec Style)
class UserValidatorTest : DescribeSpec({
describe("validateUser") {
val validator = UserValidator()
context("with valid input") {
it("accepts a normal user") {
val user = CreateUserRequest("Alice", "alice@example.com")
validator.validate(user).shouldBeValid()
}
}
context("with invalid name") {
it("rejects blank name") {
val user = CreateUserRequest("", "alice@example.com")
validator.validate(user).shouldBeInvalid()
}
it("rejects name exceeding max length") {
val user = CreateUserRequest("A".repeat(256), "alice@example.com")
validator.validate(user).shouldBeInvalid()
}
}
}
})Kotest Matchers
Core Matchers
import io.kotest.matchers.shouldBe
import io.kotest.matchers.shouldNotBe
import io.kotest.matchers.string.*
import io.kotest.matchers.collections.*
import io.kotest.matchers.nulls.*
// Equality
result shouldBe expected
result shouldNotBe unexpected
// Strings
name shouldStartWith "Al"
name shouldEndWith "ice"
name shouldContain "lic"
name shouldMatch Regex("[A-Z][a-z]+")
name.shouldBeBlank()
// Collections
list shouldContain "item"
list shouldHaveSize 3
list.shouldBeSorted()
list.shouldContainAll("a", "b", "c")
list.shouldBeEmpty()
// Nulls
result.shouldNotBeNull()
result.shouldBeNull()
// Types
result.shouldBeInstanceOf<User>()
// Numbers
count shouldBeGreaterThan 0
price shouldBeInRange 1.0..100.0
// Exceptions
shouldThrow<IllegalArgumentException> {
validateAge(-1)
}.message shouldBe "Age must be positive"
shouldNotThrow<Exception> {
validateAge(25)
}Custom Matchers
fun beActiveUser() = object : Matcher<User> {
override fun test(value: User) = MatcherResult(
value.isActive && value.lastLogin != null,
{ "User ${value.id} should be active with a last login" },
{ "User ${value.id} should not be active" },
)
}
// Usage
user should beActiveUser()MockK
Basic Mocking
class UserServiceTest : FunSpec({
val repository = mockk<UserRepository>()
val logger = mockk<Logger>(relaxed = true) // Relaxed: returns defaults
val service = UserService(repository, logger)
beforeTest {
clearMocks(repository, logger)
}
test("findUser delegates to repository") {
val expected = User(id = "1", name = "Alice")
every { repository.findById("1") } returns expected
val result = service.findUser("1")
result shouldBe expected
verify(exactly = 1) { repository.findById("1") }
}
test("findUser returns null for unknown id") {
every { repository.findById(any()) } returns null
val result = service.findUser("unknown")
result.shouldBeNull()
}
})Coroutine Mocking
class AsyncUserServiceTest : FunSpec({
val repository = mockk<UserRepository>()
val service = UserService(repository)
test("getUser suspending function") {
coEvery { repository.findById("1") } returns User(id = "1", name = "Alice")
val result = service.getUser("1")
result.name shouldBe "Alice"
coVerify { repository.findById("1") }
}
test("getUser with delay") {
coEvery { repository.findById("1") } coAnswers {
delay(100) // Simulate async work
User(id = "1", name = "Alice")
}
val result = service.getUser("1")
result.name shouldBe "Alice"
}
})Argument Capture
test("save captures the user argument") {
val slot = slot<User>()
coEvery { repository.save(capture(slot)) } returns Unit
service.createUser(CreateUserRequest("Alice", "alice@example.com"))
slot.captured.name shouldBe "Alice"
slot.captured.email shouldBe "alice@example.com"
slot.captured.id.shouldNotBeNull()
}Spy and Partial Mocking
test("spy on real object") {
val realService = UserService(repository)
val spy = spyk(realService)
every { spy.generateId() } returns "fixed-id"
spy.createUser(request)
verify { spy.generateId() } // Overridden
// Other methods use real implementation
}Coroutine Testing
runTest for Suspend Functions
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.runTest
class CoroutineServiceTest : FunSpec({
test("concurrent fetches complete together") {
runTest {
val service = DataService(testScope = this)
val result = service.fetchAllData()
result.users.shouldNotBeEmpty()
result.products.shouldNotBeEmpty()
}
}
test("timeout after delay") {
runTest {
val service = SlowService()
shouldThrow<TimeoutCancellationException> {
withTimeout(100) {
service.slowOperation() // Takes > 100ms
}
}
}
}
})Testing Flows
import io.kotest.matchers.collections.shouldContainInOrder
import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.MutableSharedFlow
import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.toList
import kotlinx.coroutines.launch
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.advanceTimeBy
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.runTest
class FlowServiceTest : FunSpec({
test("observeUsers emits updates") {
runTest {
val service = UserFlowService()
val emissions = service.observeUsers()
.take(3)
.toList()
emissions shouldHaveSize 3
emissions.last().shouldNotBeEmpty()
}
}
test("searchUsers debounces input") {
runTest {
val service = SearchService()
val queries = MutableSharedFlow<String>()
val results = mutableListOf<List<User>>()
val job = launch {
service.searchUsers(queries).collect { results.add(it) }
}
queries.emit("a")
queries.emit("ab")
queries.emit("abc") // Only this should trigger search
advanceTimeBy(500)
results shouldHaveSize 1
job.cancel()
}
}
})TestDispatcher
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.StandardTestDispatcher
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.advanceUntilIdle
class DispatcherTest : FunSpec({
test("uses test dispatcher for controlled execution") {
val dispatcher = StandardTestDispatcher()
runTest(dispatcher) {
var completed = false
launch {
delay(1000)
completed = true
}
completed shouldBe false
advanceTimeBy(1000)
completed shouldBe true
}
}
})Property-Based Testing
Kotest Property Testing
import io.kotest.core.spec.style.FunSpec
import io.kotest.property.Arb
import io.kotest.property.arbitrary.*
import io.kotest.property.forAll
import io.kotest.property.checkAll
import kotlinx.serialization.json.Json
import kotlinx.serialization.encodeToString
import kotlinx.serialization.decodeFromString
// Note: The serialization roundtrip test below requires the User data class
// to be annotated with @Serializable (from kotlinx.serialization).
class PropertyTest : FunSpec({
test("string reverse is involutory") {
forAll<String> { s ->
s.reversed().reversed() == s
}
}
test("list sort is idempotent") {
forAll(Arb.list(Arb.int())) { list ->
list.sorted() == list.sorted().sorted()
}
}
test("serialization roundtrip preserves data") {
checkAll(Arb.bind(Arb.string(1..50), Arb.string(5..100)) { name, email ->
User(name = name, email = "$email@test.com")
}) { user ->
val json = Json.encodeToString(user)
val decoded = Json.decodeFromString<User>(json)
decoded shouldBe user
}
}
})Custom Generators
val userArb: Arb<User> = Arb.bind(
Arb.string(minSize = 1, maxSize = 50),
Arb.email(),
Arb.enum<Role>(),
) { name, email, role ->
User(
id = UserId(UUID.randomUUID().toString()),
name = name,
email = Email(email),
role = role,
)
}
val moneyArb: Arb<Money> = Arb.bind(
Arb.long(1L..1_000_000L),
Arb.enum<Currency>(),
) { amount, currency ->
Money(amount, currency)
}Data-Driven Testing
withData in Kotest
class ParserTest : FunSpec({
context("parsing valid dates") {
withData(
"2026-01-15" to LocalDate(2026, 1, 15),
"2026-12-31" to LocalDate(2026, 12, 31),
"2000-01-01" to LocalDate(2000, 1, 1),
) { (input, expected) ->
parseDate(input) shouldBe expected
}
}
context("rejecting invalid dates") {
withData(
nameFn = { "rejects '$it'" },
"not-a-date",
"2026-13-01",
"2026-00-15",
"",
) { input ->
shouldThrow<DateParseException> {
parseDate(input)
}
}
}
})Test Lifecycle and Fixtures
BeforeTest / AfterTest
class DatabaseTest : FunSpec({
lateinit var db: Database
beforeSpec {
db = Database.connect("jdbc:h2:mem:test;DB_CLOSE_DELAY=-1")
transaction(db) {
SchemaUtils.create(UsersTable)
}
}
afterSpec {
transaction(db) {
SchemaUtils.drop(UsersTable)
}
}
beforeTest {
transaction(db) {
UsersTable.deleteAll()
}
}
test("insert and retrieve user") {
transaction(db) {
UsersTable.insert {
it[name] = "Alice"
it[email] = "alice@example.com"
}
}
val users = transaction(db) {
UsersTable.selectAll().map { it[UsersTable.name] }
}
users shouldContain "Alice"
}
})Kotest Extensions
// Reusable test extension
class DatabaseExtension : BeforeSpecListener, AfterSpecListener {
lateinit var db: Database
override suspend fun beforeSpec(spec: Spec) {
db = Database.connect("jdbc:h2:mem:test;DB_CLOSE_DELAY=-1")
}
override suspend fun afterSpec(spec: Spec) {
// cleanup
}
}
class UserRepositoryTest : FunSpec({
val dbExt = DatabaseExtension()
register(dbExt)
test("save and find user") {
val repo = UserRepository(dbExt.db)
// ...
}
})Kover Coverage
Gradle Configuration
// build.gradle.kts
plugins {
id("org.jetbrains.kotlinx.kover") version "0.9.7"
}
kover {
reports {
total {
html { onCheck = true }
xml { onCheck = true }
}
filters {
excludes {
classes("*.generated.*", "*.config.*")
}
}
verify {
rule {
minBound(80) // Fail build below 80% coverage
}
}
}
}Coverage Commands
# Run tests with coverage
./gradlew koverHtmlReport
# Verify coverage thresholds
./gradlew koverVerify
# XML report for CI
./gradlew koverXmlReport
# View HTML report (use the command for your OS)
# macOS: open build/reports/kover/html/index.html
# Linux: xdg-open build/reports/kover/html/index.html
# Windows: start build/reports/kover/html/index.htmlCoverage Targets
| Code Type | Target |
|---|---|
| Critical business logic | 100% |
| Public APIs | 90%+ |
| General code | 80%+ |
| Generated / config code | Exclude |
Ktor testApplication Testing
class ApiRoutesTest : FunSpec({
test("GET /users returns list") {
testApplication {
application {
configureRouting()
configureSerialization()
}
val response = client.get("/users")
response.status shouldBe HttpStatusCode.OK
val users = response.body<List<UserResponse>>()
users.shouldNotBeEmpty()
}
}
test("POST /users creates user") {
testApplication {
application {
configureRouting()
configureSerialization()
}
val response = client.post("/users") {
contentType(ContentType.Application.Json)
setBody(CreateUserRequest("Alice", "alice@example.com"))
}
response.status shouldBe HttpStatusCode.Created
}
}
})Testing Commands
# Run all tests
./gradlew test
# Run specific test class
./gradlew test --tests "com.example.UserServiceTest"
# Run specific test
./gradlew test --tests "com.example.UserServiceTest.getUser returns user when found"
# Run with verbose output
./gradlew test --info
# Run with coverage
./gradlew koverHtmlReport
# Run detekt (static analysis)
./gradlew detekt
# Run ktlint (formatting check)
./gradlew ktlintCheck
# Continuous testing
./gradlew test --continuousBest Practices
DO:
- Write tests FIRST (TDD)
- Use Kotest's spec styles consistently across the project
- Use MockK's
coEvery/coVerifyfor suspend functions - Use
runTestfor coroutine testing - Test behavior, not implementation
- Use property-based testing for pure functions
- Use
data classtest fixtures for clarity
DON'T:
- Mix testing frameworks (pick Kotest and stick with it)
- Mock data classes (use real instances)
- Use
Thread.sleep()in coroutine tests (useadvanceTimeBy) - Skip the RED phase in TDD
- Test private functions directly
- Ignore flaky tests
Integration with CI/CD
# GitHub Actions example
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-java@v4
with:
distribution: 'temurin'
java-version: '21'
- name: Run tests with coverage
run: ./gradlew test koverXmlReport
- name: Verify coverage
run: ./gradlew koverVerify
- name: Upload coverage
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v5
with:
files: build/reports/kover/report.xml
token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}Remember: Tests are documentation. They show how your Kotlin code is meant to be used. Use Kotest's expressive matchers to make tests readable and MockK for clean mocking of dependencies.
Related skills
How it compares
Pick kotlin-testing over generic JUnit skills when the codebase already uses Kotest, MockK, and Gradle Kover and you need idiomatic Kotlin coroutine and property-based patterns.
FAQ
What test frameworks does kotlin-testing use?
kotlin-testing standardizes on Kotest for specs, MockK for mocking, and Kover for Gradle coverage reports. The skill also covers coroutine test dispatchers and property-based testing patterns alongside strict TDD red-green-refactor steps.
When should I invoke kotlin-testing?
kotlin-testing fits new Kotlin functions, retrofitting coverage on legacy modules, and configuring Kover thresholds before merge. Invoke it when the task mentions Kotest, MockK, coroutine tests, or TDD on Kotlin code.