Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
agricidaniel avatar

Wiki Lint

  • 331 installs
  • 10.4k repo stars
  • Updated August 1, 2026
  • agricidaniel/claude-obsidian

wiki-lint is a Claude Code skill that audits Obsidian vault health—broken links, orphans, title drift, and structural gaps—and writes dated lint reports for developers who maintain team wikis or prepare vault exports.

About

wiki-lint is an Obsidian vault health-check skill for developers maintaining knowledge bases in Claude Code or Cursor. It scans for orphan pages, dead wikilinks, stale claims, missing cross-references, frontmatter gaps, and empty sections, then outputs a lint report to wiki/meta/lint-report-YYYY-MM-DD.md. The skill can create or update Dataview dashboards and generate canvas maps to visualize vault structure. Run it after every 10–15 ingests or weekly; it follows transport v1.7+ read-then-write policy and asks before auto-fixing. Reach for wiki-lint when a vault feels messy before sharing exports, onboarding teammates, or handing off documentation.

  • Broken link detection
  • Orphan page discovery
  • Title consistency checks
  • Structural audits
  • Pre-publish validation

Wiki Lint by the numbers

  • 331 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #274 of 1,352 Code Review & Quality skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-obsidian --skill wiki-lint

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs331
repo stars10.4k
Last updatedAugust 1, 2026
Repositoryagricidaniel/claude-obsidian

How do you audit Obsidian vault link health?

Audit Obsidian wiki health by finding broken links, orphaned pages, inconsistent titles, and structural issues before sharing vault exports or team handoff.

Who is it for?

Developers maintaining shared Obsidian wikis who need a repeatable pre-export or pre-handoff health audit.

Skip if: Teams not using Obsidian vaults or developers who only need one-off note creation without structural linting.

When should I use this skill?

User says lint, health check, clean up wiki, wiki maintenance, find orphans, or wiki audit on an Obsidian vault

What you get

Dated lint report markdown, optional Dataview dashboards, and canvas structure maps

  • lint-report markdown
  • Dataview dashboards
  • canvas maps

By the numbers

  • Recommends running after every 10–15 ingests or weekly
  • Writes reports to wiki/meta/lint-report-YYYY-MM-DD.md
  • Uses transport v1.7+ read-then-write policy

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

wiki-lint: Wiki Health Check

Run lint after every 10-15 ingests, or weekly. Ask before auto-fixing anything. Output a lint report to wiki/meta/lint-report-YYYY-MM-DD.md.

---

Transport (v1.7+)

Lint primarily reads, then writes a single report file. Both follow the standard transport policy. Read .vault-meta/transport.json (auto-created by bash scripts/detect-transport.sh):

  • cliobsidian-cli read "$VAULT" "$NOTE" for individual reads; obsidian-cli backlinks "$VAULT" "$NOTE" natively handles backlink graph (avoids re-rolling it via Grep); see `skills/wiki-cli/SKILL.md`
  • mcp-obsidian / mcpvaultmcp__obsidian-vault__read_multiple_notes, list_all_tags
  • filesystem — Claude's Read/Glob/Grep (final floor; current v1.6 behavior)

Full decision tree: `wiki/references/transport-fallback.md`. DragonScale Mechanism 3 tiling lint is a separate code path (Python script) and bypasses transport selection.

---

Lint Checks

Work through these in order:

1. Orphan pages. Wiki pages with no inbound wikilinks. They exist but nothing points to them. 2. Dead links. Wikilinks that reference a page that does not exist. 3. Stale claims. Assertions on older pages that newer sources have contradicted or updated. 4. Missing pages. Concepts or entities mentioned in multiple pages but lacking their own page. 5. Missing cross-references. Entities mentioned in a page but not linked. 6. Frontmatter gaps. Pages missing required fields (type, status, created, updated, tags). 7. Empty sections. Headings with no content underneath. 8. Stale index entries. Items in wiki/index.md pointing to renamed or deleted pages. 9. Address validity (DragonScale Mechanism 2). For every page that has an address: frontmatter field, validate the format. See the Address Validation section below. 10. Semantic tiling (DragonScale Mechanism 3, opt-in). Flag candidate duplicate pages (across all scanned types, not just concepts) via embedding cosine similarity. See the Semantic Tiling section below.

---

Lint Report Format

Create at wiki/meta/lint-report-YYYY-MM-DD.md:

---
type: meta
title: "Lint Report YYYY-MM-DD"
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
tags: [meta, lint]
status: developing
---

# Lint Report: YYYY-MM-DD

## Summary
- Pages scanned: N
- Issues found: N
- Auto-fixed: N
- Needs review: N

## Orphan Pages
- [[Page Name]]: no inbound links. Suggest: link from [[Related Page]] or delete.

## Dead Links
- [[Missing Page]]: referenced in [[Source Page]] but does not exist. Suggest: create stub or remove link.

## Missing Pages
- "concept name": mentioned in [[Page A]], [[Page B]], [[Page C]]. Suggest: create a concept page.

## Frontmatter Gaps
- [[Page Name]]: missing fields: status, tags

## Stale Claims
- [[Page Name]]: claim "X" may conflict with newer source [[Newer Source]].

## Cross-Reference Gaps
- [[Entity Name]] mentioned in [[Page A]] without a wikilink.

---

Naming Conventions

Enforce these during lint:

ElementConventionExample
FilenamesTitle Case with spacesMachine Learning.md
Folderslowercase with dasheswiki/data-models/
Tagslowercase, hierarchical#domain/architecture
Wikilinksmatch filename exactly[[Machine Learning]]

Filenames must be unique across the vault. Wikilinks work without paths only if filenames are unique.

---

Writing Style Check

During lint, flag pages that violate the style guide:

  • Not declarative present tense ("X basically does Y" instead of "X does Y")
  • Missing source citations where claims are made
  • Uncertainty not flagged with > [!gap]
  • Contradictions not flagged with > [!contradiction]

---

Dataview Dashboard

Create or update wiki/meta/dashboard.md with these queries:

````markdown --- type: meta title: "Dashboard" updated: YYYY-MM-DD ---

Wiki Dashboard

Recent Activity

TABLE type, status, updated FROM "wiki" SORT updated DESC LIMIT 15

Seed Pages (Need Development)

LIST FROM "wiki" WHERE status = "seed" SORT updated ASC

Entities Missing Sources

LIST FROM "wiki/entities" WHERE !sources OR length(sources) = 0

Open Questions

LIST FROM "wiki/questions" WHERE answer_quality = "draft" SORT created DESC

````

---

Canvas Map

Create or update wiki/meta/overview.canvas for a visual domain map:

{
  "nodes": [
    {
      "id": "1",
      "type": "file",
      "file": "wiki/overview.md",
      "x": 0, "y": 0,
      "width": 300, "height": 140,
      "color": "1"
    }
  ],
  "edges": []
}

Add one node per domain page. Connect domains that have significant cross-references. Colors map to the CSS scheme: 1=blue, 2=purple, 3=yellow, 4=orange, 5=green, 6=red.

---

Address Validation (DragonScale Mechanism 2 MVP)

Opt-in feature. Address Validation runs only if the vault is using DragonScale, detected by:

if [ -x ./scripts/allocate-address.sh ] && [ -f ./.vault-meta/address-counter.txt ]; then
  DRAGONSCALE_ADDRESSES=1
else
  DRAGONSCALE_ADDRESSES=0
fi

When DRAGONSCALE_ADDRESSES=0, skip this entire section. Missing address: fields are not flagged, not even informationally. Pages that happen to have an address: field are passed through unvalidated (treat as user-managed metadata).

When DRAGONSCALE_ADDRESSES=1, proceed with the rollout baseline and checks below.

Rollout baseline: 2026-04-23 (Phase 2 ship date in vaults that adopted DragonScale on that day). Vaults that adopted DragonScale later should override this baseline by setting the earliest created: date of any addressed page as their personal rollout date. Record the chosen baseline at the top of .vault-meta/legacy-pages.txt as a commented line: # rollout: YYYY-MM-DD.

Classification rule (applied per page)

Before validating anything, classify the page:

ClassificationCriteria
Meta / fold / excludedFile is in wiki/folds/ OR filename in {_index.md, index.md, log.md, hot.md, overview.md, dashboard.md, dashboard.base, Wiki Map.md, getting-started.md}. Address not required.
Post-rollout (must have address)type is not meta/fold AND frontmatter created: date is >= 2026-04-23 AND file path is NOT in the legacy baseline manifest.
Legacy (backfill-eligible)type is not meta/fold AND frontmatter created: date is < 2026-04-23 OR file path IS in the legacy baseline manifest. Address not required until backfill.

Legacy baseline manifest: optional file at .vault-meta/legacy-pages.txt, one relative path per line. Pages listed there are treated as legacy regardless of created: date. Use this to grandfather pages whose created: metadata is wrong or missing.

Validation checks (run in order)

1. Format check: any page with address: set must match one of:

  • ^c-[0-9]{6}$ — post-rollout creation address.
  • ^l-[0-9]{6}$ — legacy-backfill address.
  • Pages under wiki/folds/ use fold_id, not address; do not apply the c-/l- regex there.

2. Uniqueness check: no two pages share the same address value. Report both paths.

3. Counter consistency: ./scripts/allocate-address.sh --peek returns the next counter value. Every observed c-NNNNNN must satisfy NNNNNN < peek_value. Violation = counter drift.

4. Post-rollout enforcement: every page classified as "post-rollout (must have address)" that LACKS the address: field is a lint error, not informational. This prevents the silent-regression path where a new page skips address assignment.

5. Legacy identification: every page classified as "legacy" that LACKS an address is informational. The lint report lists them under "Pending backfill" with total count.

6. Address-map consistency (.raw/.manifest.json): for every page path in address_map, the page must exist and its frontmatter address must match the mapping. Mismatches are errors (either a rename dropped the map update, or a manual edit diverged).

Lint posture summary

  • Pages that HAVE an address with bad format: error.
  • Pages that HAVE colliding addresses: error.
  • Pages classified post-rollout WITHOUT an address: error.
  • Pages classified legacy WITHOUT an address: informational (expected).
  • Meta and fold pages without address: ignored (not applicable).
  • Counter drift (observed counter >= peek): error.
  • Address-map mismatch: error.

Lint only observes. Do NOT auto-assign missing addresses during lint. Assignment is wiki-ingest's responsibility only.

Output section in the lint report

## Address Validation

- Counter state: `$(./scripts/allocate-address.sh --peek)`
- Highest c- address observed: c-XXXXXX
- Post-rollout pages checked: N (X passing, Y errors)
- Legacy pages pending backfill: M

### Errors
- [[Page Name]]: invalid address format `{value}`. Expected `c-NNNNNN` or `l-NNNNNN`.
- [[Page A]] and [[Page B]] share address `c-000042`.
- [[Post-Rollout Page]]: missing address. Page created 2026-04-25 (post-rollout); address required. Run wiki-ingest or manually run `./scripts/allocate-address.sh` and add to frontmatter.
- [[Page Name]] has address `c-000100` but counter peek is `50`. Counter drift; run `./scripts/allocate-address.sh --rebuild`.
- `.raw/.manifest.json` maps `wiki/foo.md` -> `c-000010` but page frontmatter has `c-000012`. Resolve mismatch.

### Pending backfill (informational)
- M legacy pages without addresses. See `.vault-meta/legacy-pages.txt` for the canonical legacy set, or filter by `created:` < 2026-04-23.

---

Semantic Tiling (DragonScale Mechanism 3 MVP, opt-in)

Opt-in feature. Semantic tiling flags candidate duplicate pages (not just concept pages — see Scope below) using embedding cosine similarity. Local ollama only by default; remote endpoints require an explicit override flag.

Detection and delegation

if [ -x ./scripts/tiling-check.py ] && command -v python3 >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  ./scripts/tiling-check.py --peek > /tmp/tiling-peek.json 2>/dev/null
  PEEK_EXIT=$?
  case $PEEK_EXIT in
    0)  TILING_READY=1 ;;                                  # ready
    2)  TILING_READY=0 ; echo "tiling ERROR: usage error (exit 2); inspect /tmp/tiling-peek.json" ;;
    3)  TILING_READY=0 ; echo "tiling ERROR: cache corrupt (exit 3); inspect .vault-meta/tiling-cache.json" ;;
    4)  TILING_READY=0 ; echo "tiling ERROR: vault exceeds scale hard-fail (exit 4); batching required" ;;
    10) TILING_READY=0 ; echo "tiling skipped: ollama not reachable (exit 10)" ;;
    11) TILING_READY=0 ; echo "tiling skipped: run 'ollama pull nomic-embed-text' to enable (exit 11)" ;;
    *)  TILING_READY=0 ; echo "tiling ERROR: unexpected exit code $PEEK_EXIT from tiling-check.py --peek" ;;
  esac
else
  TILING_READY=0
  echo "tiling skipped: scripts/tiling-check.py or python3 not available"
fi

Inspect /tmp/tiling-peek.json (structured diagnostics: script path, python interpreter, ollama URL, cache state, thresholds state) whenever the status is ambiguous. Never collapse unknown exits into "unknown status" silently.

When TILING_READY=1:

./scripts/tiling-check.py --report wiki/meta/tiling-report-YYYY-MM-DD.md
REPORT_EXIT=$?
case $REPORT_EXIT in
  0)  echo "tiling report written" ;;
  2)  echo "tiling ERROR: usage error during --report" ;;
  3)  echo "tiling ERROR: cache corrupt during --report" ;;
  4)  echo "tiling ERROR: scale hard-fail during --report" ;;
  10) echo "tiling ERROR: ollama became unreachable between --peek and --report" ;;
  11) echo "tiling ERROR: model became unavailable between --peek and --report" ;;
  *)  echo "tiling ERROR: unexpected exit code $REPORT_EXIT from tiling-check.py --report" ;;
esac

Scope (what the helper scans)

  • Includes: every .md under wiki/ except the exclusion set below. The scope is "candidate tileable pages," not just type: concept.
  • Excludes (path): anything under wiki/folds/ or wiki/meta/.
  • Excludes (filename): _index.md, index.md, log.md, hot.md, overview.md, dashboard.md, Wiki Map.md, getting-started.md.
  • Excludes (frontmatter): type: meta or type: fold.
  • Excludes (security): symlinks. Any page file that is a symlink, or whose resolved path escapes the vault root, is skipped.

If you place a real concept under wiki/meta/ it will be excluded by path regardless of content. Keep concepts in their canonical folders.

How the helper works

  • Computes one embedding per included page via the ollama nomic-embed-text model by default.
  • Caches embeddings at .vault-meta/tiling-cache.json, keyed on sha256(model + body) so model drift auto-invalidates. Frontmatter is not part of the hash or the embedding input — pure frontmatter edits (tag changes, status bumps) do not trigger recomputation.
  • Orphans are GC'd: when a cached page path no longer exists on disk, its entry is dropped on save.
  • Concurrent-safe: exclusive flock on .vault-meta/.tiling.lock around cache I/O; per-PID temp file for atomic writes.

Security posture

  • Defaults to http://127.0.0.1:11434. OLLAMA_URL env override is accepted only with --allow-remote-ollama because page bodies are POSTed as embedding input.
  • Symlinks and vault-root escapes are rejected.

Default bands (conservative seeds, NOT calibrated)

BandSimilarityReport section
Error>= 0.90Errors — strong near-duplicate, likely the same concept
Review0.80 - 0.90Review — possible tile overlap; human judgement needed
Pass< 0.80not emitted

These values are conservative seeds, not literature-backed interpolation. Published reference points: Sentence Transformers community_detection defaults to 0.75; Quora-duplicate calibrations land around 0.7715-0.8352 depending on objective. The 0.80 review floor is already stricter than at least one cited Quora optimum, so expect false negatives against those baselines. Reduce the review floor during calibration if you want more sensitivity.

Calibration procedure (manual, one-time per vault)

1. Run the helper with defaults. Capture the Review band pairs. 2. Temporarily lower bands.review to 0.70 in .vault-meta/tiling-thresholds.json to surface a wider sample. Aim for >=50 pairs spanning 0.70-0.95. 3. Label each pair: duplicate, similar, distinct. 4. Pick bands such that: (a) the error band contains >= 95% true duplicates; (b) the review band captures similar pairs without swamping the report with distinct ones. 5. Edit .vault-meta/tiling-thresholds.json: set new bands.error and bands.review, set calibrated: true, set calibration_pairs_labeled to the label count. 6. Re-run lint. Report footer now says calibrated: true.

Scale

  • Cold-cache cost is O(N) POSTs to ollama. Warm-cache cost is O(N^2) cosines in pure Python.
  • Helper prints a warning at > 500 pages and hard-fails (exit 4) at > 5000. Revisit the implementation (batching, vectorized cosine, or external tooling) before exceeding either limit.

Lint report embed

## Semantic Tiling
See [[tiling-report-YYYY-MM-DD]] for the full pair listing.
- Errors (>=0.90): N pairs
- Review (0.80-0.90): M pairs
- Calibrated: true|false

Invariants

  • Read-only. tiling-check.py never modifies wiki pages.
  • No auto-merge. Duplicates are listed, never resolved.
  • Cache is incremental and model-scoped. Unchanged pages are not re-embedded.
  • Exit codes: 0 ok, 2 usage error, 3 cache corrupt, 4 scale hard-fail, 10 ollama unreachable, 11 model missing. Surface all of them; do not collapse into a single "unknown" bucket.

---

Before Auto-Fixing

Always show the lint report first. Ask: "Should I fix these automatically, or do you want to review each one?"

Safe to auto-fix:

  • Adding missing frontmatter fields with placeholder values
  • Creating stub pages for missing entities
  • Adding wikilinks for unlinked mentions

Needs review before fixing:

  • Deleting orphan pages (they might be intentionally isolated)
  • Resolving contradictions (requires human judgment)
  • Merging duplicate pages

---

How to think (10-principle mapping)

When working on this skill, apply the 10-principle loop. See `skills/think/SKILL.md` for the canonical framework.

#PrincipleApplication here
1OBSERVE (ext)Scan every page, every wikilink, every frontmatter block. No skipping for size or apparent obviousness.
2OBSERVE (int)Am I biased toward "looks fine"? Pretend you're a hostile reader looking for what's actually wrong.
3LISTENDid the user mention specific concerns this session? Prioritize those over generic checks.
4THINKWhich checks matter? Tier findings by severity (BLOCKER / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW), not by ease of fix.
5CONNECT (lat)Orphan + dead-link + frontmatter-gap patterns often co-occur. Cluster findings to expose root causes.
6CONNECT (sys)Tiling-check + Dataview dashboards + canvas overview — multiple lint surfaces to integrate.
7FEELA lint report should empower, not shame. Actionable items beat exhaustive catalog.
8ACCEPTSome lint findings are deliberate (orphan-by-design, intentional stub). Flag, don't force.
9CREATELint report at wiki/meta/lint-report-YYYY-MM-DD.md with tiered findings.
10GROWRecurring lint findings → process improvement targets, not just one-time fixes.

Related skills

How it compares

Pick wiki-lint over generic markdown linters when the vault uses Obsidian wikilinks, Dataview queries, and canvas maps.

FAQ

What does wiki-lint check in an Obsidian vault?

wiki-lint checks orphan pages, dead wikilinks, stale claims, missing cross-references, frontmatter gaps, and empty sections. It can also refresh Dataview dashboards and canvas maps, then write a dated report to wiki/meta/lint-report-YYYY-MM-DD.md.

How often should developers run wiki-lint?

wiki-lint recommends running after every 10–15 ingests or weekly on active vaults. The skill asks before auto-fixing issues and follows transport v1.7+ policies for read-then-write report generation.

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.