
To Prd
- 145 installs
- 40 repo stars
- Updated August 4, 2026
- akillness/oh-my-skills
to-prd is a Claude Code skill that generates a structured Product Requirements Document from existing conversation and codebase context and publishes it to the project issue tracker.
About
to-prd generates a structured Product Requirements Document from existing conversation context and codebase state, synthesizing knowledge rather than interviewing the user. A developer uses it to document requirements for a feature or change and publish it to the project issue tracker before decomposing work into tickets. It matters because it produces a formal, user-facing spec (problem, solution, user stories, out-of-scope) that prevents scope creep.
- Generates a structured PRD from existing conversation and codebase state without interviewing
- Emphasizes deep modules with simple, testable interfaces and stable contracts
- Publishes the PRD to the issue tracker with a needs-triage label
To Prd by the numbers
- 145 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #573 of 1,879 Documentation skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
to-prd capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- prd generation · requirements capture · user story writing
- Use cases
- documentation · planning · project management
What to-prd says it does
Convert current conversation context into a structured PRD for publication to the project issue tracker.
Do not interview the user — synthesize from existing context.
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill to-prdAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 145 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 40 |
| Last updated | August 4, 2026 |
| Repository | akillness/oh-my-skills ↗ |
What it does
Synthesize a structured PRD from existing conversation and codebase context and publish it to the issue tracker.
Who is it for?
Documenting requirements from existing discussion into a formal PRD before making tickets
Skip if: Breaking work into tickets (use to-issues), internal technical docs, or quick task notes
When should I use this skill?
Documenting requirements for a feature or change to publish to the issue tracker
What you get
A structured PRD published to the issue tracker with a needs-triage label
- Structured PRD
- Problem statement
- User stories
By the numbers
- 5-item quality checklist
- PRD template with problem, solution, user stories, out-of-scope
Files
To PRD
Convert current conversation context into a structured PRD for publication to the project issue tracker.
When to use this skill
- Documenting requirements from existing discussion
- Creating a formal spec before breaking work into issues
- Recording architectural decisions alongside user stories
When not to use this skill
- Breaking work into tickets → use
to-issues - Writing technical internal docs → use
technical-writing - Quick task notes → use
task-planning
Process
1. Explore and understand
Review the codebase using the project's domain vocabulary (CONTEXT.md) and relevant ADRs. Do not interview the user — synthesize from existing context.
2. Design modules
Identify the major components to build or modify. Emphasize deep modules: simple, testable interfaces with stable contracts. Validate assumptions with the user and confirm which modules need test coverage.
3. Document and publish
Complete the PRD template and submit to the issue tracker with the needs-triage label.
PRD template
# [Feature/Change Name]
## Problem Statement
[User-facing description of the issue or opportunity. What pain does this solve?]
## Solution
[User-facing description of the resolution approach.]
## User Stories
1. As a [actor], I want [feature], so that [benefit].
2. As a [actor], I want [feature], so that [benefit].
[... comprehensive list covering all use cases]
## Implementation Decisions
### Modules
[Major components to build/modify with interface descriptions]
### Technical Choices
[Architecture decisions, schema design, API contracts — avoid file paths and code snippets]
### ADR References
[Links to relevant Architecture Decision Records]
## Testing Decisions
[Testing philosophy for this feature, which modules need coverage, relevant test precedents]
## Out of Scope
- [Explicitly excluded item]
- [Explicitly excluded item]
## Further Notes
[Additional context, open questions, or dependencies]Quality checklist
- [ ] Problem statement is user-facing (not technical)
- [ ] User stories cover all actors and use cases
- [ ] Implementation decisions reference existing domain vocabulary
- [ ] Out of scope section prevents scope creep
- [ ] No file paths or code in the PRD (these belong in issues)
Instructions
1. Identify the task trigger and expected output. 2. Follow the workflow steps in this skill from top to bottom. 3. Validate outputs before moving to the next step. 4. Capture blockers and fallback path if any step fails.
Examples
- Example: Apply this skill to a small scope first, then scale to full scope after validation passes.
Best practices
- Keep outputs deterministic and auditable.
- Prefer small reversible changes over broad risky edits.
- Record assumptions explicitly.
References
- Project standards:
.agent-skills/skill-standardization/SKILL.md - Validator script:
.agent-skills/skill-standardization/scripts/validate_skill.sh
Related skills
FAQ
Does to-prd interview the user?
No, it synthesizes the PRD from existing conversation and codebase context without interviewing.
Where is the PRD published?
To the project issue tracker with a needs-triage label.