Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
alinaqi avatar

Cross Agent Delegation

  • 83 installs
  • 706 repo stars
  • Updated July 14, 2026
  • alinaqi/claude-bootstrap

cross-agent-delegation is a Claude skill that routes coding tasks to Kimi, Codex, or Claude based on a five-dimension complexity score.

About

cross-agent-delegation lets Claude Code orchestrate task routing to other AI CLI tools like Kimi and Codex behind the scenes. It scores a task on five complexity dimensions, sourced from iCPG signals and reasoning, then routes low-risk work to Kimi, medium-risk work to Kimi plus Codex auto-review, and high-risk work to Claude directly. A developer uses it to delegate bounded work safely while keeping security-critical changes in Claude's context.

  • Routes tasks between Claude, Kimi, and Codex by a 5-dimension complexity score
  • Runs automatic Codex auto-review on the diff after tests pass
  • Makes iCPG and Mnemos context mandatory before delegating

Cross Agent Delegation by the numbers

  • 83 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #5,144 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

cross-agent-delegation capabilities & compatibility

Capabilities
orchestration · code review
Use cases
orchestration · code review
Pricing
Free
From the docs

What cross-agent-delegation says it does

Claude Code orchestrates task routing to Kimi and Codex. The user interacts with Claude only — delegation happens behind the scenes.
SKILL.md
File count is a poor proxy for delegation risk. A 1-file change to an authz path is harder than a 12-file rename.
SKILL.md
When Codex is installed, a Stop hook reviews code after tests pass:
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/alinaqi/claude-bootstrap --skill cross-agent-delegation

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs83
repo stars706
Last updatedJuly 14, 2026
Repositoryalinaqi/claude-bootstrap

What it does

Route a coding task to Kimi, Codex, or Claude based on a five-dimension complexity score.

Who is it for?

Delegating bounded, low-risk coding work to Kimi or Codex while keeping risky changes in Claude

Skip if: Security-sensitive, cross-service, or shared-interface changes, which the docs say to keep in Claude

When should I use this skill?

Multiple AI CLI tools such as Claude, Kimi, and Codex are available and work can be delegated

What you get

A routing decision that sends bounded work to Kimi or Codex and keeps risky work with Claude

  • a routing decision per task
  • a mnemos checkpoint passed to the delegate

By the numbers

  • Five complexity dimensions scored 0-2 for a 0-10 total
  • Routing bands: 0-3 Kimi, 4-6 Kimi+Codex, 7-10 Claude

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Cross-Agent Delegation

Claude Code orchestrates task routing to Kimi and Codex. The user interacts with Claude only — delegation happens behind the scenes.

---

Tool Detection

At session start, detect available tools:

command -v kimi &>/dev/null && HAS_KIMI=true || HAS_KIMI=false
command -v codex &>/dev/null && HAS_CODEX=true || HAS_CODEX=false

---

Codex Auto-Review (Stop Hook — Automatic)

When Codex is installed, a Stop hook reviews code after tests pass:

1. TDD loop check runs tests 2. codex-auto-review.sh runs Codex on the diff 3. Critical/High findings feed back to Claude (exit 2) 4. Clean reviews pass through (exit 0)

Fully automatic. No user or Claude action needed.

---

Kimi Delegation (Claude Orchestrates)

When Kimi is installed and the task complexity is bounded, Claude delegates directly — the user does not need to run anything.

Step 1: Score complexity, not file count

File count is a poor proxy for delegation risk. A 1-file change to an authz path is harder than a 12-file rename. Score the task on five dimensions, each 0-2, sourced from iCPG signals plus Claude's semantic reasoning:

Dimension0 (low)1 (medium)2 (high)Source
Cyclomatic / surface depth<10 LOC, no branches10-50 LOC, ≤3 branches50+ LOC or nested control flowiCPG query_graph over function bodies
Fan-out (consumer blast radius)0-2 callers3-10 callers11+ callersiCPG trace_path(<symbol>, mode=callers)
Crosses a security boundary (SEC-006, auth, PII, RLS, org-scope, billing, payments)NoneTangentialDirect read or writeiCPG SEC-* / R-063 tags + grep for org_id, user_id, auth, pii
Concurrency / transactionalPure / syncAsync onlyLocks, transactions, atomic claims, FOR UPDATE, asyncio.Lock, session.beginiCPG concurrency flags + grep
Domain invariants requiredNone / well-documented inlineSome implicit (need to read 1-2 files)Heavy (cross-doc, ADR-bound, RFC-bound)Claude reasoning + iCPG ADR linkage
# Auto-collect signals
icpg query blast <scope> --format json    # fan-out, async flags, sec tags
grep -rE "org_id|user_id|auth|pii"  <file>  # cheap sec heuristic if iCPG flags absent
grep -rE "asyncio.Lock|FOR UPDATE|session.begin" <file>  # concurrency heuristic

Step 2: Sum → routing

Total scoreRouteRationale
0-3Kimi soloBounded surface, no security/concurrency/cross-doc concerns
4-6Kimi → Codex auto-review (no user prompt)Real risk, but not so high that we need full Claude context — Codex catches what Kimi might miss
7-10Claude handles directlyCross-cutting / security-critical / concurrency-heavy — needs full context

Step 3: Floor — trivial-case shortcut

To skip iCPG-query cost on truly trivial work:

# If <2 files changed AND no SEC/auth/PII/concurrency keyword in diff,
# → auto-Kimi without scoring.
FILES=$(git diff --name-only | wc -l)
HAS_RISK_KEYWORDS=$(git diff | grep -ciE "org_id|auth|pii|asyncio|FOR UPDATE|transaction|session\.begin" || true)
if [ "$FILES" -lt 2 ] && [ "$HAS_RISK_KEYWORDS" -eq 0 ]; then
  AUTO_KIMI=true
fi

This handles the trivial-rename / typo-fix case without paying the iCPG round-trip.

When NOT to Delegate (overrides scoring)

  • User explicitly asked Claude to do it
  • Cross-service changes (API + frontend + database) — needs full context regardless of score
  • Production hotfix on a release branch — cross-tool review latency is too high
  • Score 7+ in any single dimension (one critical axis is enough to keep Claude in the loop)

Step 4: Delegate via Bash

Claude writes a mnemos checkpoint, then runs Kimi headless:

# 1. Save current context to disk
mnemos checkpoint --force

# 2. Get context summary for Kimi
CONTEXT=$(mnemos resume 2>/dev/null)

# 3. Get constraints for target files
CONSTRAINTS=$(icpg query constraints <target-file> 2>/dev/null)

# 4. Run Kimi headless with full context
kimi --print -y -w . -p "
## Context (from mnemos checkpoint)
$CONTEXT

## Constraints (from iCPG)
$CONSTRAINTS

## Task
<specific task description>

## Rules
- Run tests after changes
- Record changes: icpg record --base main
- Write checkpoint when done: mnemos checkpoint --force
"

Step 4: Read Results

After Kimi finishes, Claude:

# Read what Kimi did
mnemos resume          # Kimi's checkpoint
icpg status            # Kimi's recorded symbols
git diff               # Kimi's file changes

When NOT to Delegate

  • Security-sensitive code (auth, crypto, payments)
  • Cross-service changes (API + frontend + database)
  • Refactors that touch shared interfaces
  • User explicitly asked Claude to do it

---

iCPG — Mandatory for All Agents

Before ANY code change, Claude runs these (and includes results when delegating):

Pre-Task Queries

# 1. Duplicate check — already done?
icpg query prior "<goal>"

# 2. Constraints — what invariants apply?
icpg query constraints <file-path>

# 3. Risk — is this symbol fragile?
icpg query risk <symbol-name>

After Code Changes

icpg record --reason <id> --base main
icpg drift check

---

Mnemos — Mandatory for All Agents

At Task Start

mnemos add goal "<task description>"

At Sub-Goal Boundaries

mnemos checkpoint

At Task End (auto-handled by Stop hook)

mnemos checkpoint --force

Context Transfer Between Tools

The checkpoint is the bridge. Claude writes it, Kimi reads it:

# Claude saves state
mnemos checkpoint --force

# Kimi (or Codex) reads state
mnemos resume

The checkpoint contains: goal, constraints, recent files, git state, fatigue level.

---

Full Orchestration Flow

TASK ARRIVES (user tells Claude)
    |
    v
[1] Claude: icpg query prior "<goal>"     ← Already done?
[2] Claude: trivial-case shortcut         ← <2 files & no risk keywords?
    |
    +-- YES + Kimi installed -----> AUTO-KIMI (no scoring)
    |
    +-- NO ↓
    v
[3] Claude: score complexity (5 dims × 0-2, iCPG + reasoning)
    |
    +-- score 0-3   ----> KIMI SOLO PATH
    |   [a] mnemos checkpoint --force
    |   [b] kimi --print -y -p "..."
    |   [c] mnemos resume + git diff
    |   [d] Continue in Claude
    |
    +-- score 4-6   ----> KIMI + CODEX REVIEW PATH
    |   [a] mnemos checkpoint --force
    |   [b] kimi --print -y -p "..."
    |   [c] codex review --uncommitted    ← Auto-review the diff
    |   [d] If P0/P1 findings: re-prompt Kimi with findings
    |   [e] Once clean: continue in Claude
    |
    +-- score 7-10  ----> CLAUDE DIRECT PATH (full context)
    |
    v
[4] icpg query constraints <files>         ← Invariants
[5] icpg query risk <symbols>              ← Fragility
[6] mnemos add goal "<task>"               ← Track in memory
    |
    v
[7] IMPLEMENT (TDD: RED -> GREEN)
    |
    v
[8]  Stop: tdd-loop-check.sh               ← Tests pass?
[9]  Stop: codex-auto-review.sh            ← Codex reviews diff
[10] Stop: icpg-stop-record.sh             ← Record symbols
[11] Stop: mnemos-checkpoint.sh            ← Save memory

Related skills

FAQ

How is a task routed?

It is scored 0-10 across five dimensions; 0-3 goes to Kimi solo, 4-6 to Kimi plus Codex review, and 7-10 stays with Claude directly.

When should work not be delegated?

The docs say to keep security-sensitive code, cross-service changes, and shared-interface refactors in Claude regardless of score.

AI & Agent Buildingagentsautomation

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.