Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
alinaqi avatar

Cross Agent Delegation

  • 3 installs
  • 706 repo stars
  • Updated July 14, 2026
  • alinaqi/maggy

cross-agent-delegation is a Claude Code skill that routes coding tasks between Claude, Kimi, and Codex based on a five-dimension complexity score.

About

This skill lets Claude Code orchestrate task routing to other AI CLI tools like Kimi and Codex behind the scenes. It scores each task on five complexity dimensions and routes to Kimi solo, Kimi plus Codex auto-review, or Claude directly. It also defines a Codex Stop hook for automatic review and uses iCPG and mnemos to carry context between tools.

  • Routes coding tasks between Claude, Kimi, and Codex by complexity score
  • Codex Stop-hook auto-reviews the diff after tests pass
  • Uses iCPG signals and mnemos checkpoints to transfer context between tools

Cross Agent Delegation by the numbers

  • 3 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #13,677 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

cross-agent-delegation capabilities & compatibility

Capabilities
orchestration · code review
Use cases
orchestration · code review
From the docs

What cross-agent-delegation says it does

Claude Code orchestrates task routing to Kimi and Codex. The user interacts with Claude only — delegation happens behind the scenes.
SKILL.md
File count is a poor proxy for delegation risk.
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/alinaqi/maggy --skill cross-agent-delegation

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs3
repo stars706
Last updatedJuly 14, 2026
Repositoryalinaqi/maggy

What it does

Route coding tasks between Claude, Kimi, and Codex by a complexity score, with automatic Codex review after tests pass.

Who is it for?

Multi-agent setups that want Claude to delegate bounded tasks to Kimi and auto-review with Codex.

Skip if: Security-sensitive, cross-service, or shared-interface changes, which the docs say Claude should handle directly.

When should I use this skill?

Always loaded when multiple AI CLI tools (Claude, Kimi, Codex) are available.

What you get

Tasks are routed to the right agent by a scored complexity model, keeping Claude on high-risk work.

By the numbers

  • 5 complexity dimensions scored 0-2
  • 3 routing tiers by total score

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Cross-Agent Delegation

Claude Code orchestrates task routing to Kimi and Codex. The user interacts with Claude only — delegation happens behind the scenes.

---

Tool Detection

At session start, detect available tools:

command -v kimi &>/dev/null && HAS_KIMI=true || HAS_KIMI=false
command -v codex &>/dev/null && HAS_CODEX=true || HAS_CODEX=false

---

Codex Auto-Review (Stop Hook — Automatic)

When Codex is installed, a Stop hook reviews code after tests pass:

1. TDD loop check runs tests 2. codex-auto-review.sh runs Codex on the diff 3. Critical/High findings feed back to Claude (exit 2) 4. Clean reviews pass through (exit 0)

Fully automatic. No user or Claude action needed.

---

Kimi Delegation (Claude Orchestrates)

When Kimi is installed and the task complexity is bounded, Claude delegates directly — the user does not need to run anything.

Step 1: Score complexity, not file count

File count is a poor proxy for delegation risk. A 1-file change to an authz path is harder than a 12-file rename. Score the task on five dimensions, each 0-2, sourced from iCPG signals plus Claude's semantic reasoning:

Dimension0 (low)1 (medium)2 (high)Source
Cyclomatic / surface depth<10 LOC, no branches10-50 LOC, ≤3 branches50+ LOC or nested control flowiCPG query_graph over function bodies
Fan-out (consumer blast radius)0-2 callers3-10 callers11+ callersiCPG trace_path(<symbol>, mode=callers)
Crosses a security boundary (SEC-006, auth, PII, RLS, org-scope, billing, payments)NoneTangentialDirect read or writeiCPG SEC-* / R-063 tags + grep for org_id, user_id, auth, pii
Concurrency / transactionalPure / syncAsync onlyLocks, transactions, atomic claims, FOR UPDATE, asyncio.Lock, session.beginiCPG concurrency flags + grep
Domain invariants requiredNone / well-documented inlineSome implicit (need to read 1-2 files)Heavy (cross-doc, ADR-bound, RFC-bound)Claude reasoning + iCPG ADR linkage
# Auto-collect signals
icpg query blast <scope> --format json    # fan-out, async flags, sec tags
grep -rE "org_id|user_id|auth|pii"  <file>  # cheap sec heuristic if iCPG flags absent
grep -rE "asyncio.Lock|FOR UPDATE|session.begin" <file>  # concurrency heuristic

Step 2: Sum → routing

Total scoreRouteRationale
0-3Kimi soloBounded surface, no security/concurrency/cross-doc concerns
4-6Kimi → Codex auto-review (no user prompt)Real risk, but not so high that we need full Claude context — Codex catches what Kimi might miss
7-10Claude handles directlyCross-cutting / security-critical / concurrency-heavy — needs full context

Step 3: Floor — trivial-case shortcut

To skip iCPG-query cost on truly trivial work:

# If <2 files changed AND no SEC/auth/PII/concurrency keyword in diff,
# → auto-Kimi without scoring.
FILES=$(git diff --name-only | wc -l)
HAS_RISK_KEYWORDS=$(git diff | grep -ciE "org_id|auth|pii|asyncio|FOR UPDATE|transaction|session\.begin" || true)
if [ "$FILES" -lt 2 ] && [ "$HAS_RISK_KEYWORDS" -eq 0 ]; then
  AUTO_KIMI=true
fi

This handles the trivial-rename / typo-fix case without paying the iCPG round-trip.

When NOT to Delegate (overrides scoring)

  • User explicitly asked Claude to do it
  • Cross-service changes (API + frontend + database) — needs full context regardless of score
  • Production hotfix on a release branch — cross-tool review latency is too high
  • Score 7+ in any single dimension (one critical axis is enough to keep Claude in the loop)

Step 4: Delegate via Bash

Claude writes a mnemos checkpoint, then runs Kimi headless:

# 1. Save current context to disk
mnemos checkpoint --force

# 2. Get context summary for Kimi
CONTEXT=$(mnemos resume 2>/dev/null)

# 3. Get constraints for target files
CONSTRAINTS=$(icpg query constraints <target-file> 2>/dev/null)

# 4. Run Kimi headless with full context
kimi --print -y -w . -p "
## Context (from mnemos checkpoint)
$CONTEXT

## Constraints (from iCPG)
$CONSTRAINTS

## Task
<specific task description>

## Rules
- Run tests after changes
- Record changes: icpg record --base main
- Write checkpoint when done: mnemos checkpoint --force
"

Step 4: Read Results

After Kimi finishes, Claude:

# Read what Kimi did
mnemos resume          # Kimi's checkpoint
icpg status            # Kimi's recorded symbols
git diff               # Kimi's file changes

When NOT to Delegate

  • Security-sensitive code (auth, crypto, payments)
  • Cross-service changes (API + frontend + database)
  • Refactors that touch shared interfaces
  • User explicitly asked Claude to do it

---

iCPG — Mandatory for All Agents

Before ANY code change, Claude runs these (and includes results when delegating):

Pre-Task Queries

# 1. Duplicate check — already done?
icpg query prior "<goal>"

# 2. Constraints — what invariants apply?
icpg query constraints <file-path>

# 3. Risk — is this symbol fragile?
icpg query risk <symbol-name>

After Code Changes

icpg record --reason <id> --base main
icpg drift check

---

Mnemos — Mandatory for All Agents

At Task Start

mnemos add goal "<task description>"

At Sub-Goal Boundaries

mnemos checkpoint

At Task End (auto-handled by Stop hook)

mnemos checkpoint --force

Context Transfer Between Tools

The checkpoint is the bridge. Claude writes it, Kimi reads it:

# Claude saves state
mnemos checkpoint --force

# Kimi (or Codex) reads state
mnemos resume

The checkpoint contains: goal, constraints, recent files, git state, fatigue level.

---

Full Orchestration Flow

TASK ARRIVES (user tells Claude)
    |
    v
[1] Claude: icpg query prior "<goal>"     ← Already done?
[2] Claude: trivial-case shortcut         ← <2 files & no risk keywords?
    |
    +-- YES + Kimi installed -----> AUTO-KIMI (no scoring)
    |
    +-- NO ↓
    v
[3] Claude: score complexity (5 dims × 0-2, iCPG + reasoning)
    |
    +-- score 0-3   ----> KIMI SOLO PATH
    |   [a] mnemos checkpoint --force
    |   [b] kimi --print -y -p "..."
    |   [c] mnemos resume + git diff
    |   [d] Continue in Claude
    |
    +-- score 4-6   ----> KIMI + CODEX REVIEW PATH
    |   [a] mnemos checkpoint --force
    |   [b] kimi --print -y -p "..."
    |   [c] codex review --uncommitted    ← Auto-review the diff
    |   [d] If P0/P1 findings: re-prompt Kimi with findings
    |   [e] Once clean: continue in Claude
    |
    +-- score 7-10  ----> CLAUDE DIRECT PATH (full context)
    |
    v
[4] icpg query constraints <files>         ← Invariants
[5] icpg query risk <symbols>              ← Fragility
[6] mnemos add goal "<task>"               ← Track in memory
    |
    v
[7] IMPLEMENT (TDD: RED -> GREEN)
    |
    v
[8]  Stop: tdd-loop-check.sh               ← Tests pass?
[9]  Stop: codex-auto-review.sh            ← Codex reviews diff
[10] Stop: icpg-stop-record.sh             ← Record symbols
[11] Stop: mnemos-checkpoint.sh            ← Save memory

Related skills

FAQ

How does it decide where to route a task?

It scores five dimensions 0-2 each (complexity, fan-out, security boundary, concurrency, domain invariants) and routes by the total: 0-3 Kimi solo, 4-6 Kimi plus Codex, 7-10 Claude directly.

When should tasks not be delegated?

For security-sensitive code, cross-service changes, shared-interface refactors, or when the user explicitly asked Claude to do it.

AI & Agent Buildingagentsautomation

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.