Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
alinaqi avatar

Icpg

  • 3 installs
  • 706 repo stars
  • Updated July 14, 2026
  • alinaqi/maggy

icpg is a Claude Code skill that adds an Intent-Augmented Code Property Graph tracking why code exists via ReasonNodes with formal contracts and drift detection.

About

This skill adds an Intent-Augmented Code Property Graph, a reason-graph layer that links every function and module to the goal that created it, its owner, and whether it still fulfills its purpose. Before changing code, agents run three canonical queries for prior work, constraints, and symbol risk, and a six-dimension drift model flags when code diverges from its intent. It is built for autonomous development where agents need to know why existing code exists.

  • Tracks WHY code exists via ReasonNodes with formal contracts
  • Three canonical pre-task queries: prior work, constraints, risk
  • Six-dimension drift detection when code diverges from intent

Icpg by the numbers

  • 3 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #13,674 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

icpg capabilities & compatibility

Capabilities
orchestration · code review · documentation
Use cases
orchestration · code review · documentation
Runs
Runs locally
Pricing
Free
From the docs

What icpg says it does

Intent first, code second.
SKILL.md
Drift = predicate failure.** A symbol has drifted when its current behavior no longer satisfies the postconditions of the ReasonNode that created it
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/alinaqi/maggy --skill icpg

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs3
repo stars706
Last updatedJuly 14, 2026
Repositoryalinaqi/maggy

What it does

Query an intent reason-graph for prior work, constraints, and risk before changing code, and detect when code drifts from its purpose.

Who is it for?

Autonomous agents that need to know why code exists, what constraints apply, and whether a change duplicates prior work.

Skip if: Simple projects where intent tracking and drift detection add more overhead than value.

When should I use this skill?

Before any code change, to query the reason graph for intent, constraints, and risk.

What you get

Every symbol is traceable to the goal that created it, and drift from that intent is detected.

By the numbers

  • 3 canonical pre-task queries
  • 6-dimension drift model
  • 6 edge types

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

iCPG Skill (Intent-Augmented Code Property Graph)

Purpose: Add a Reason Graph layer on top of code structure so every function, class, and module is traceable to the goal that created it, the agent or human that owns it, and whether it's still doing what it was supposed to do.

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  iCPG = AST + CFG + PDG + RG (Reason Graph)                    │
│  ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────│
│  AST  = Abstract Syntax Tree (structure)      ← existing       │
│  CFG  = Control Flow Graph (execution paths)  ← existing       │
│  PDG  = Program Dependency Graph              ← existing       │
│  RG   = Reason Graph (WHY layer)              ← THIS SKILL     │
│                                                                │
│  The RG stores ReasonNodes (goals/tasks), links them to code   │
│  symbols via typed edges, enforces contracts (DbC), and        │
│  detects when code drifts from its original purpose.           │
│                                                                │
│  Storage: .icpg/reason.db (SQLite, per-project, gitignored)   │
│  CLI: icpg init | create | record | query | drift | bootstrap │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

---

Core Principle

Intent first, code second. Before writing or modifying code, query the reason graph to understand WHY existing code was written, WHAT constraints it must preserve, and WHETHER your change duplicates prior work.

---

The 3 Canonical Pre-Task Queries

Every agent MUST run these before writing code:

#QueryCommandWhat It Answers
1search_prior_workicpg query prior "<goal>"Has this been attempted before? Prevents duplication.
2get_constraintsicpg query constraints <file>What invariants apply to files I'll touch? Prevents breakage.
3get_risk_profileicpg query risk <symbol>Is this symbol fragile? Drift history, ownership changes.

---

ReasonNode — The Core Primitive

Each ReasonNode captures a stated purpose with a formal contract:

id              UUID
goal            Natural language: what is this trying to achieve
decision_type   business_goal | arch_decision | task | workaround | constraint | patch
scope           Files/modules expected to be touched
owner           Human or agent accountable
status          proposed | executing | fulfilled | drifted | abandoned
source          manual | commit | inferred | agent-session

FORMAL CONTRACT (Design by Contract):
  preconditions    What must be true before this intent executes
  postconditions   What must be true when fulfilled
  invariants       What must remain true throughout and after

Drift = predicate failure. A symbol has drifted when its current behavior no longer satisfies the postconditions of the ReasonNode that created it, or when an invariant is violated.

---

Six Edge Types

CREATES      Reason  → Symbol   (this intent created this function)
MODIFIES     Reason  → Symbol   (this intent changed this function)
REQUIRES     Reason  → Reason   (B depends on A being done first)
DUPLICATES   Reason  → Reason   (these two goals overlap)
VALIDATED_BY Reason  → Test     (this test proves the intent was satisfied)
DRIFTS_FROM  Symbol  → Reason   (this symbol no longer does what it was made for)

---

6-Dimension Drift Model

DimensionWhat It MeansDetection
Spec driftSymbol checksum changed without a MODIFIES edgeCompare stored vs current checksum
Decision driftPostconditions no longer holdEvaluate predicates against codebase
Ownership drift>3 different owners without coherent oversightCount unique owners on edges
Test driftVALIDATED_BY tests missing or failingCheck test file existence + run
Usage driftSymbol used outside original scopeGrep for imports beyond scope
Dependency driftDownstream REQUIRES reasons have driftedTraverse REQUIRES edges

Run icpg drift check to scan all dimensions. Each produces a 0-1 severity score.

---

CLI Reference

Setup

icpg init                          # Create .icpg/ and database
icpg bootstrap --days 90           # Infer ReasonNodes from git history
icpg bootstrap --days 90 --no-llm  # Without LLM (commit-message only)

Create & Record

icpg create "Add JWT auth" --scope src/auth/ --owner feature-auth --type task
icpg record --reason <id> --base main         # Record symbols from git diff
icpg record --reason <id> --edge-type MODIFIES # Record as modifications

Query (the 3 canonical queries)

icpg query prior "user authentication"     # 1. Duplicate detection
icpg query constraints src/auth/service.ts  # 2. Invariants for file
icpg query risk validateToken              # 3. Symbol risk profile
icpg query context src/auth/service.ts     # All intents for a file
icpg query blast <reason-id>               # Full blast radius

Drift

icpg drift check          # Full scan across all dimensions
icpg drift resolve <id>   # Mark drift event resolved

Status

icpg status               # Stats: reasons, symbols, edges, drift

---

Storage

Per-project, gitignored, zero infrastructure:

.icpg/
  reason.db       SQLite database (4 tables: reasons, symbols, edges, drift_events)
  .gitignore      Contains: *
  chroma/         ChromaDB vectors (if chromadb installed)
  tfidf_cache.json  TF-IDF fallback cache
  .current-intent   Marker file for active intent (used by Stop hook)

Install options:

pip install ./scripts/icpg            # Core (zero deps)
pip install "./scripts/icpg[vectors]"  # + ChromaDB for duplicate detection
pip install "./scripts/icpg[all]"      # + ChromaDB + scikit-learn + openai

---

Workflow: Before Any Code Change

0. INTENT       → icpg create (or identify existing intent)
1. DEDUP        → icpg query prior (check for duplicate work)
2. CONSTRAINTS  → icpg query constraints (understand invariants)
3. RISK         → icpg query risk (check fragile symbols)
4. LOCATE       → search_graph to find symbols (code-graph skill)
5. CHANGE       → Make the edit (PreToolUse hook shows context)
6. RECORD       → icpg record (link symbols to intent)
7. DRIFT CHECK  → icpg drift check (verify no unintended drift)
8. VERIFY       → Run tests, lint, typecheck

Step 0 is non-negotiable for autonomous agents. Every change must be linked to a stated purpose. Without an intent, there's nothing to measure drift against.

---

Hook Integration

PreToolUse Hook (automatic context injection)

Add to .claude/settings.json:

{
  "hooks": {
    "PreToolUse": [{
      "matcher": "Edit|Write",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "scripts/icpg-pre-edit.sh",
        "timeout": 3,
        "statusMessage": "Checking intent context..."
      }]
    }]
  }
}

Before every file edit, agents see:

═══ iCPG CONTEXT ═══
INTENTS for src/auth/service.ts:
  [>] a1b2c3d4 — User authentication with JWT tokens
      Owner: feature-auth | Status: executing
      Invariants: 2
CONSTRAINTS for src/auth/service.ts:
  From intent: User authentication with JWT tokens
    INV: file_exists("src/auth/middleware.ts")
    POST: test_exists("src/auth/__tests__/service.test.ts")
PRESERVE function signatures unless your task requires changing them.
═══════════════════

Stop Hook (automatic symbol recording)

After implementation passes tests, auto-records symbols:

{
  "hooks": {
    "Stop": [{
      "hooks": [
        {"type": "command", "command": "scripts/tdd-loop-check.sh", "timeout": 60},
        {"type": "command", "command": "scripts/icpg-stop-record.sh", "timeout": 5}
      ]
    }]
  }
}

---

Agent Teams Integration

Updated Pipeline (agent-teams + iCPG)

 0. INTENT       Team lead creates ReasonNode from feature spec
 0b. DEDUP       icpg query prior — check for duplicate intents
 1. SPEC         Feature agent writes spec
 2. SPEC-REVIEW  Quality agent reviews spec + intent alignment
 3. TESTS (RED)  Feature agent writes tests
 4. RED-VERIFY   Quality agent verifies tests fail
 5. IMPLEMENT    Feature agent codes (PreEdit hook shows context)
 5b. RECORD      Auto-record symbols → intent (Stop hook)
 5c. DRIFT-CHECK Quality agent verifies no scope drift
 6. GREEN-VERIFY Quality agent verifies tests pass + coverage
 7. VALIDATE     Lint + typecheck + full suite
 8. CODE-REVIEW  Review agent (sees intent context per file)
 9. SECURITY     Security agent
10. BRANCH-PR    Merger agent (PR includes intent traceability)

Agent Responsibilities

AgentiCPG Action
Team Leadicpg create when creating task chains. icpg query prior to check duplicates.
Feature Agenticpg query constraints before implementing. Writes .icpg/.current-intent for auto-recording.
Quality Agenticpg drift check during GREEN verify. Verifies scope alignment.
Review AgentSees intent context via PreToolUse hook when reviewing files.
Merger AgentIncludes intent traceability in PR description.

---

Bootstrapping from Git History

For existing codebases, infer ReasonNodes from commit history:

icpg bootstrap --days 90 --verbose

This will: 1. Get commits from last 90 days 2. Cluster by temporal proximity (2-hour window) 3. Infer intent via LLM (Claude or OpenAI) or commit message parsing 4. Create ReasonNodes with source: "inferred", confidence: 0.6-0.8 5. Extract symbols from changed files, create CREATES edges 6. Run duplicate detection against existing ReasonNodes

Quality note: Inferred intents are marked low-confidence. Review and promote high-value ones manually.

---

Contract Predicates

Predicates are structured assertions over codebase state:

file_exists("src/auth/middleware.ts")
test_exists("src/auth/__tests__/service.test.ts")
symbol_count("src/auth/") <= 15
function_signature("validateToken") == "(token: string) => Promise<User>"

Contracts can be:

  • Hand-authored for high-risk ReasonNodes
  • LLM-inferred via icpg create --infer-contracts
  • Heuristic (scope → file_exists, test → test_exists)

---

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternDo This Instead
Coding without stating intenticpg create before every non-trivial change
Assuming your change is isolatedicpg query constraints + icpg query risk first
Rebuilding what already existsicpg query prior to check for prior work
Leaving intent in 'executing' foreverUpdate status to 'fulfilled' when done
Ignoring drift eventsicpg drift check weekly, resolve or create new intents
Storing full source in symbolsStore signature + checksum only — read source from files
Skipping bootstrap on existing reposicpg bootstrap --days 90 to build initial graph

Related skills

FAQ

What are the three canonical pre-task queries?

search_prior_work (has this been attempted), get_constraints (what invariants apply), and get_risk_profile (is this symbol fragile).

How is drift defined?

A symbol has drifted when its behavior no longer satisfies the ReasonNode's postconditions or an invariant is violated, scanned across six dimensions.

AI & Agent Buildingagentsautomation

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.