
Architecture To Issues
- 1 installs
- 2 repo stars
- Updated June 19, 2026
- andrewtliem/ai-native-app-builder-skills
Architecture to Issues is a Claude Code skill that breaks a PRD and architecture plan into small, ordered implementation issues with acceptance criteria and verification steps.
About
Architecture to Issues is a Claude skill that turns a PRD and architecture plan into a backlog of small, ordered implementation issues. A developer uses it before coding to split work into reviewable units, each with a goal, dependencies, likely files, acceptance criteria, and verification steps. It marks what AI may implement versus what the human must judge, avoiding giant issues like 'build the whole app'.
- Breaks a PRD and architecture plan into small, ordered implementation issues that AI agents or students can work on one
- Each issue defines goal, dependencies, likely files, acceptance criteria, verification steps, and risk level
- Separates what AI may implement from what the human must judge, keeping each issue reviewable in one sitting
Architecture To Issues by the numbers
- 1 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #2,479 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 7, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
architecture-to-issues capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- planning · project management
- Use cases
- planning · project management
What architecture-to-issues says it does
Use this skill to break a PRD and architecture plan into small, ordered implementation issues that AI agents or students can work on one at a time.
Use before coding.
Do not create giant issues like “build the whole app”.
npx skills add https://github.com/andrewtliem/ai-native-app-builder-skills --skill architecture-to-issuesAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 1 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 2 |
| Last updated | June 19, 2026 |
| Repository | andrewtliem/ai-native-app-builder-skills ↗ |
What it does
Break a PRD and architecture plan into small, ordered implementation issues before coding.
Who is it for?
Turning a PRD and architecture into a dependency-ordered backlog before coding.
Skip if: Creating giant issues like 'build the whole app'; issues must be reviewable in one sitting.
When should I use this skill?
After prd-to-architecture and before coding, when a backlog with clear acceptance criteria is needed.
What you get
Work becomes small ordered issues, each with acceptance criteria, verification, and separated human judgment.
- docs/ai-native/05-issues.md with ordered implementation issues
By the numbers
- 6-step process from identify layers to keep issues reviewable
- 5-item quality checklist
Files
Architecture to Issues
Stage: Phase 2 — Design the System
Purpose
Use this skill to break a PRD and architecture plan into small, ordered implementation issues that AI agents or students can work on one at a time.
Shared Principles
These skills are based on two YouTube talks about AI-native software engineering, interpreted through ATL’s own teaching perspective.
- Shift left on intent: clarify goals, users, constraints, tradeoffs, and success before coding.
- Delegate tasks, not judgment: AI may draft, compare, or implement; the student remains responsible for decisions.
- Verification is the bottleneck: every output must include checks, acceptance criteria, or evidence.
- No vibe coding: do not jump from idea directly to generated code without intent, design, and review.
- Small loops beat big guesses: move one step at a time, verify, then continue.
- AI amplifies the system: unclear intent creates faster confusion; clear intent creates faster learning.
When to Use
- Use after
prd-to-architecture. - Use before coding.
- Use when students need a backlog with clear acceptance criteria.
- Do not create giant issues like “build the whole app”.
Inputs
- PRD.
- Architecture Plan.
- Deadline or project milestone, if known.
Process
1. Identify implementation layers: setup, data model, UI shell, core flows, validation, tests, deployment. 2. Split work into small issues. 3. Order issues by dependency. 4. For each issue, define goal, context, likely files, acceptance criteria, verification steps, and risk level. 5. Mark what AI may implement and what the student must judge. 6. Keep each issue reviewable in one sitting.
Artifact Discipline
This skill must not only answer in chat. It must produce or update a project file so the next skill has a stable source of truth.
- Write/update this file:
docs/ai-native/05-issues.md - Artifact title: Implementation Issues
- Read these previous artifacts first:
docs/ai-native/03-prd.mddocs/ai-native/04-architecture.md- If the project does not have
docs/ai-native/, create it. - If the target file already exists, update it carefully instead of creating a duplicate.
- Do not draft from memory: follow the Source Loading Protocol below before writing this file.
- End the response with a short
Saved artifact:line naming the file path. - Do not continue to the next skill until the user or student confirms this artifact is acceptable.
Source Loading Protocol
Before producing this skill's output, the agent must explicitly load the upstream artifact files from the current project. Do not rely on pasted chat history if the files exist.
1. Check whether each required upstream file exists:
docs/ai-native/03-prd.mddocs/ai-native/04-architecture.md
2. Read every existing required file before drafting this artifact. 3. If a required upstream file is missing, stop and ask the student to run the previous skill or provide the missing file. Do not silently recreate or guess the missing source of truth. 4. In the saved artifact, include a short Sources Read section listing the files actually read. 5. If the student pasted newer content than the saved file, ask whether to update the upstream artifact first before continuing.
Output Format
# Implementation Issues
## Issue 1: ...
**Goal:** ...
**Depends on:** none / Issue X
**Likely Files:** ...
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- ...
**Verification:**
- ...
**AI Can Help With:** ...
**Student Must Judge:** ...
**Risk Level:** Low / Medium / High
## Issue 2: ...
...Final Response Contract
When this skill finishes, respond briefly and include:
Saved artifact: docs/ai-native/05-issues.md
Next recommended skill: <next-skill-or-human-review>If you cannot write the file, say exactly why and do not pretend the artifact was saved.
Quality Checklist
- [ ] Each issue has one main goal.
- [ ] Issues are ordered.
- [ ] Acceptance criteria are checkable.
- [ ] Verification steps are included.
- [ ] Human judgment is separated from AI work.
Common Pitfalls
1. Making issues too large. If it cannot be reviewed clearly, split it. 2. No verification step. Every issue needs evidence. 3. Letting AI own judgment. Student decides if the issue satisfies intent.
Student Prompt Template
Use `architecture-to-issues`.
Here is my PRD and Architecture Plan: [paste].
Create ordered implementation issues. Each issue must include goal, dependencies, likely files, acceptance criteria, verification steps, AI-can-help-with, student-must-judge, and risk level.
Save or update the artifact at `docs/ai-native/05-issues.md`. End with `Saved artifact: docs/ai-native/05-issues.md` and the next recommended skill.
Before drafting, read the required upstream artifact files listed in the skill. If any are missing, stop and report which file is missing.Related skills
FAQ
When do I run architecture-to-issues?
After prd-to-architecture and before coding, when you need a backlog with clear acceptance criteria.
How big should each issue be?
Each issue should be reviewable in one sitting; if it cannot be reviewed clearly, split it.