
Search Strategy
- 4.4k installs
- 23.1k repo stars
- Updated July 28, 2026
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
search-strategy is an agent skill for decompose natural language questions into targeted multi-source search queries and orchestration plans.
About
The search-strategy skill Query decomposition and multi-source search orchestration. Breaks natural language questions into targeted searches per source, translates queries into source-specific syntax, ranks results by relevance, and handles ambiguity and fallback strategies. If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md. The core intelligence behind enterprise search. Transforms a single natural language question into parallel, source-specific searches and produces ranked, deduplicated results. Turn this: `` "What did we decide about the API migration timeline?" `` Into targeted searches across every connected source: `` ~~chat: "API migration timeline decision" (semantic) + "API migration" in: engineering after:2025-01-01 ~~knowledge base: semantic search "API migration timeline decision" ~~project tracker: text search "API migration" in relevant workspace `` Into targeted searches across every connected source: ~~chat: "API migration timeline decision" (semantic) + "API migration" in: engineering after:2025-01-01 ~~knowledge base: semantic search "API migration timeline decision" ~~project tracker: text search "API migration" i.
- Keywords: Core terms that must appear in results
- Entities: People, projects, teams, tools (use memory system if available)
- Intent signals: Decision words, status words, temporal markers
- Constraints: Time ranges, source hints, author filters
- Negations: Things to exclude
Search Strategy by the numbers
- 4,381 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +197 installs in the week ending Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #120 of 3,301 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: MEDIUM risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
search-strategy capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- keywords: core terms that must appear in results · entities: people, projects, teams, tools (use me · intent signals: decision words, status words, te · constraints: time ranges, source hints, author f · negations: things to exclude
- Use cases
- research · web search
What search-strategy says it does
The core intelligence behind enterprise search. Transforms a single natural language question into parallel, source-specific searches and produces ranked, deduplicated results.
"What did we decide about the API migration timeline?"
Into targeted searches across every connected source:
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill search-strategyAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 4.4k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 23.1k |
| Security audit | 3 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | July 28, 2026 |
| Repository | anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins ↗ |
How do I decompose natural language questions into targeted multi-source search queries and orchestration plans with documented agent guidance?
Decompose natural language questions into targeted multi-source search queries and orchestration plans.
Who is it for?
Developers who need productivity & planning help during idea work.
Skip if: Skip when the task falls outside Productivity & Planning scope described in SKILL.md.
When should I use this skill?
Decompose natural language questions into targeted multi-source search queries and orchestration plans.
What you get
Completed productivity & planning workflow aligned with SKILL.md steps and validation.
- Decomposed search sub-queries
- Ranked multi-source results
- Deduplicated answer sets
By the numbers
- Keywords: Core terms that must appear in results
- Entities: People, projects, teams, tools (use memory system if available)
- Intent signals: Decision words, status words, temporal markers
Files
Search Strategy
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
The core intelligence behind enterprise search. Transforms a single natural language question into parallel, source-specific searches and produces ranked, deduplicated results.
The Goal
Turn this:
"What did we decide about the API migration timeline?"Into targeted searches across every connected source:
~~chat: "API migration timeline decision" (semantic) + "API migration" in:#engineering after:2025-01-01
~~knowledge base: semantic search "API migration timeline decision"
~~project tracker: text search "API migration" in relevant workspaceThen synthesize the results into a single coherent answer.
Query Decomposition
Step 1: Identify Query Type
Classify the user's question to determine search strategy:
| Query Type | Example | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Decision | "What did we decide about X?" | Prioritize conversations (~~chat, email), look for conclusion signals |
| Status | "What's the status of Project Y?" | Prioritize recent activity, task trackers, status updates |
| Document | "Where's the spec for Z?" | Prioritize Drive, wiki, shared docs |
| Person | "Who's working on X?" | Search task assignments, message authors, doc collaborators |
| Factual | "What's our policy on X?" | Prioritize wiki, official docs, then confirmatory conversations |
| Temporal | "When did X happen?" | Search with broad date range, look for timestamps |
| Exploratory | "What do we know about X?" | Broad search across all sources, synthesize |
Step 2: Extract Search Components
From the query, extract:
- Keywords: Core terms that must appear in results
- Entities: People, projects, teams, tools (use memory system if available)
- Intent signals: Decision words, status words, temporal markers
- Constraints: Time ranges, source hints, author filters
- Negations: Things to exclude
Step 3: Generate Sub-Queries Per Source
For each available source, create one or more targeted queries:
Prefer semantic search for:
- Conceptual questions ("What do we think about...")
- Questions where exact keywords are unknown
- Exploratory queries
Prefer keyword search for:
- Known terms, project names, acronyms
- Exact phrases the user quoted
- Filter-heavy queries (from:, in:, after:)
Generate multiple query variants when the topic might be referred to differently:
User: "Kubernetes setup"
Queries: "Kubernetes", "k8s", "cluster", "container orchestration"Source-Specific Query Translation
~~chat
Semantic search (natural language questions):
query: "What is the status of project aurora?"Keyword search:
query: "project aurora status update"
query: "aurora in:#engineering after:2025-01-15"
query: "from:<@UserID> aurora"Filter mapping:
| Enterprise filter | ~~chat syntax |
|---|---|
from:sarah | from:sarah or from:<@USERID> |
in:engineering | in:engineering |
after:2025-01-01 | after:2025-01-01 |
before:2025-02-01 | before:2025-02-01 |
type:thread | is:thread |
type:file | has:file |
~~knowledge base (Wiki)
Semantic search — Use for conceptual queries:
descriptive_query: "API migration timeline and decision rationale"Keyword search — Use for exact terms:
query: "API migration"
query: "\"API migration timeline\"" (exact phrase)~~project tracker
Task search:
text: "API migration"
workspace: [workspace_id]
completed: false (for status queries)
assignee_any: "me" (for "my tasks" queries)Filter mapping:
| Enterprise filter | ~~project tracker parameter |
|---|---|
from:sarah | assignee_any or created_by_any |
after:2025-01-01 | modified_on_after: "2025-01-01" |
type:milestone | resource_subtype: "milestone" |
Result Ranking
Relevance Scoring
Score each result on these factors (weighted by query type):
| Factor | Weight (Decision) | Weight (Status) | Weight (Document) | Weight (Factual) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keyword match | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Freshness | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Authority | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Completeness | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
Authority Hierarchy
Depends on query type:
For factual/policy questions:
Wiki/Official docs > Shared documents > Email announcements > Chat messagesFor "what happened" / decision questions:
Meeting notes > Thread conclusions > Email confirmations > Chat messagesFor status questions:
Task tracker > Recent chat > Status docs > Email updatesHandling Ambiguity
When a query is ambiguous, prefer asking one focused clarifying question over guessing:
Ambiguous: "search for the migration"
→ "I found references to a few migrations. Are you looking for:
1. The database migration (Project Phoenix)
2. The cloud migration (AWS → GCP)
3. The email migration (Exchange → O365)"Only ask for clarification when:
- There are genuinely distinct interpretations that would produce very different results
- The ambiguity would significantly affect which sources to search
Do NOT ask for clarification when:
- The query is clear enough to produce useful results
- Minor ambiguity can be resolved by returning results from multiple interpretations
Fallback Strategies
When a source is unavailable or returns no results:
1. Source unavailable: Skip it, search remaining sources, note the gap 2. No results from a source: Try broader query terms, remove date filters, try alternate keywords 3. All sources return nothing: Suggest query modifications to the user 4. Rate limited: Note the limitation, return results from other sources, suggest retrying later
Query Broadening
If initial queries return too few results:
Original: "PostgreSQL migration Q2 timeline decision"
Broader: "PostgreSQL migration"
Broader: "database migration"
Broadest: "migration"Remove constraints in this order: 1. Date filters (search all time) 2. Source/location filters 3. Less important keywords 4. Keep only core entity/topic terms
Parallel Execution
Always execute searches across sources in parallel, never sequentially. The total search time should be roughly equal to the slowest single source, not the sum of all sources.
[User query]
↓ decompose
[~~chat query] [~~email query] [~~cloud storage query] [Wiki query] [~~project tracker query]
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
(parallel execution)
↓
[Merge + Rank + Deduplicate]
↓
[Synthesized answer]Related skills
Forks & variants (1)
Search Strategy has 1 known copy in the catalog totaling 65 installs. They canonicalize to this original listing.
- smithery.ai - 65 installs
How it compares
search-strategy is an agent skill for decompose natural language questions into targeted multi-source search queries and orchestration plans, not a generic alternative.
FAQ
Who is search-strategy for?
Developers using Productivity & Planning workflows with agent-guided SKILL.md steps.
When should I use search-strategy?
Decompose natural language questions into targeted multi-source search queries and orchestration plans.
Is search-strategy safe to install?
Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.