Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
apify avatar

Bug Triage

  • 11 installs
  • 2.6k repo stars
  • Updated August 4, 2026
  • apify/actors-mcp-server

bug-triage is a Claude skill that triages open GitHub bug issues for the Apify MCP server and drafts responses for approval before posting.

About

This skill triages open GitHub bug issues on the apify/apify-mcp-server repo. It fetches issues and their comments with the gh CLI, categorizes each one (known fix, not our bug, duplicate, needs info, stale, actionable bug), and drafts concise developer-to-developer replies. A maintainer uses it to keep the bug queue clean, and it only comments, closes, or edits issues after explicit user approval.

  • Triages open GitHub bug issues on apify/apify-mcp-server via the gh CLI
  • Analyzes root causes, drafts developer-to-developer responses, and posts only after explicit approval
  • Ships a category matrix and a list of common recurring root causes

Bug Triage by the numbers

  • 11 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #1,469 of 2,715 Automation & Workflows skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

bug-triage capabilities & compatibility

Free; requires an authenticated gh CLI.

Capabilities
issue triage · bug report response · github issue management
Works with
github
Use cases
debugging · documentation
Runs
Runs locally
Pricing
Free
From the docs

What bug-triage says it does

Triage open bug issues on `apify/apify-mcp-server`. Analyze, draft responses, get approval, post.
SKILL.md
**MANDATORY: Wait for explicit user approval before posting anything.** Never post, close, or modify an issue without the user saying yes.
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/apify/actors-mcp-server --skill bug-triage

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs11
repo stars2.6k
Last updatedAugust 4, 2026
Repositoryapify/actors-mcp-server

What it does

Triage open GitHub bug issues on the Apify MCP server repo and draft approved responses.

Who is it for?

Maintainers of the apify/apify-mcp-server repo keeping the open bug queue triaged and answered.

Skip if: Repos other than apify/apify-mcp-server, or fixing bugs in code rather than responding to issues.

When should I use this skill?

When handling incoming bug reports, responding to GitHub issues, or cleaning up stale bugs on the Apify MCP server.

What you get

Each open bug issue is categorized, given a drafted developer response, and acted on only after explicit approval.

  • Categorized bug issues
  • Drafted developer-to-developer issue responses

By the numbers

  • 6-category triage matrix (known fix, not our bug, duplicate, needs info, stale, actionable bug)
  • 5 common recurring root causes documented

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Bug Triage

Triage open bug issues on apify/apify-mcp-server. Analyze, draft responses, get approval, post.

Permissions

  • Read-only by default: listing issues (gh issue list), viewing details and comments (gh issue view) — do these automatically, no need to ask.
  • Write requires approval: commenting (gh issue comment), closing (gh issue close), editing (gh issue edit) — always present the draft and wait for explicit user approval before executing.

Step 0: Parse arguments

$ARGUMENTS controls scope:

InputBehavior
623 641 639Triage specific issue numbers
--label bugTriage all open issues with label (default: bug)
--allTriage all open bug-labeled issues
_(empty)_Same as --all

Step 1: Fetch issues

Use the arguments parsed in Step 0 to determine what to fetch.

If specific issue numbers were provided, skip the list queries and fetch each issue directly:

gh issue view <number> --repo apify/apify-mcp-server --comments

Otherwise (label mode, --all, or empty), fetch open bug reports. Use the label from Step 0 (default: bug). Bug reports come in two forms — find both:

1. By label: issues with the parsed label 2. By title prefix: issues with [Bug] in the title (the bug report template adds this, but the label isn't always applied)

# By label (use the label from Step 0, default: bug)
gh issue list --repo apify/apify-mcp-server --label <label> --state open --json number,title,labels,createdAt,body --limit 30

# By title prefix (catches unlabeled bug reports)
gh issue list --repo apify/apify-mcp-server --state open --search "[Bug] in:title" --json number,title,labels,createdAt,body --limit 30

Merge both lists and deduplicate by issue number.

For each issue, fetch full details including all comments (comments often contain the real context):

gh issue view <number> --repo apify/apify-mcp-server --comments

Always read comments before drafting a response. Previous team members may have already replied, asked for details, or provided workarounds. Don't duplicate existing responses.

Step 2: Categorize each issue

Assign one of these categories:

CategoryCriteriaTypical action
Known fixRoot cause is clear, documented fix existsDraft response with fix, optionally close
Not our bugServer logs show it works; issue is in the MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cowork, etc.)Explain findings, suggest workaround
DuplicateSame root cause as another open issueComment with link, close as duplicate
Needs infoNo logs, no config, vague descriptionAsk for specifics
StaleWe asked for info, no reply for 2+ weeksClose with helpful pointer
Actionable bugReal server-side bug we need to fixAcknowledge, investigate further

Common root causes (from past triage)

These patterns recur. Check for them first:

1. SSE endpoint removed (April 1, 2026): Users on /sse URLs get connection failures. Fix: switch to https://mcp.apify.com (streamable HTTP).

2. "Tools connected but Claude ignores them": MCP server logs show successful handshake and tools/list, but Claude doesn't use the tools in conversation. This is a Claude Desktop/Cowork behavior, not an Apify server bug. Users need to explicitly ask Claude to use Apify tools.

3. "Unable to connect to extension server": Claude Desktop extension install issues. Usually caused by corrupted npx cache, Claude silently downgrading the extension, or Node.js not on the GUI app's PATH. Fix: use the remote server https://mcp.apify.com as a custom connector.

4. npx cache corruption: Stale cache prevents stdio server from starting. Fix: rm -rf ~/.npm/_npx (macOS/Linux) or rmdir /s /q %LOCALAPPDATA%\npm-cache\_npx (Windows).

5. Claude Desktop connector downgrade: Claude Desktop silently downgrades connectors to older versions. Fix: remove and re-add the connector.

Step 3: Draft response

Style rules:

  • Developer-to-developer, plain language
  • Concise — 3-8 lines typical, no fluff
  • Acknowledge the issue and apologize briefly if the user is stuck
  • Reference documentation when a fix or troubleshooting guide exists
  • If the server works correctly (logs prove it), say so clearly
  • If closing, explain why and point to where to go next

Key documentation links:

  • Setup guide: https://docs.apify.com/platform/integrations/mcp
  • Claude Desktop troubleshooting: https://docs.apify.com/platform/integrations/claude-desktop#troubleshooting
  • Configurator: https://mcp.apify.com

Use Apify MCP tools (search-apify-docs, fetch-apify-docs) to find the right doc link if the issue touches a topic not covered above.

The default recommendation for connection issues is the remote server:

Add a custom connector in Claude Desktop with URL https://mcp.apify.com and follow the OAuth flow.

Step 4: Present and get approval

Present each issue to the user with: 1. Issue number + title + link (https://github.com/apify/apify-mcp-server/issues/<number>) 2. Category (from Step 2) 3. Summary — one line on what's going on 4. Proposed response — the draft comment in a blockquote 5. Proposed action — comment only / comment + close / close as duplicate of #X / skip

MANDATORY: Wait for explicit user approval before posting anything. Never post, close, or modify an issue without the user saying yes.

Step 5: Post

After approval:

# Comment only
gh issue comment <number> --repo apify/apify-mcp-server --body "<response>"

# Comment + close
gh issue comment <number> --repo apify/apify-mcp-server --body "<response>" && \
gh issue close <number> --repo apify/apify-mcp-server

# Close as duplicate
gh issue comment <number> --repo apify/apify-mcp-server --body "Closing as a duplicate of #<other> — same root cause. We'll track and update there." && \
gh issue close <number> --repo apify/apify-mcp-server

Then move to the next issue. After the last one, print a summary table:

IssueCategoryAction taken
#623Known fixCommented, SSE migration
#639DuplicateClosed as dup of #641
.........

Related skills

FAQ

Does this skill post to GitHub automatically?

No. Listing and viewing are read-only, but commenting, closing, or editing an issue always requires explicit user approval first.

How does it find bug reports?

It fetches issues both by label and by the [Bug] title prefix using gh issue list, then merges and deduplicates by issue number.

Automation & Workflowssupportmonitoring

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.