
Speckit Orchestrator
Orchestrate spec-kit workflows so an agent produces spec, plan, tasks, and quality checklists in `.specify` and `specs/{N}-{name}/` before implementation.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market --skill speckit-orchestratorWhat is this skill?
- Step-by-step spec-kit artifact model: spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md
- Per-feature `specs/{N}-{short-name}/` directories with themed checklists (requirements, ux, api, security)
- `.specify/` infrastructure for scripts, templates, and project memory/constitution
- Companion reference docs artifact-structure with beginner complexity (~800 estimated tokens)
- Quality validation folders under `checklists/` separate from implementation tasks
Adoption & trust: 1 installs on skills.sh; 304 GitHub stars; 3/3 security scanners passed (skills.sh audits); trending (+100% hot-view momentum).
Recommended Skills
Journey fit
Canonical shelf is Validate because spec-kit starts by locking user-facing scope (what and why) before technical plan and tasks. Scope subphase fits feature specification, constitution memory, and requirements checklists that bound what gets built.
Common Questions / FAQ
Is Speckit Orchestrator safe to install?
skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.
SKILL.md
READMESKILL.md - Speckit Orchestrator
# Spec-Kit Artifact Structure ## Overview Spec-kit uses a step-by-step approach to organizing specification, planning, and implementation artifacts. This document defines the purpose and structure of each artifact type. ## Directory Structure ``` project-root/ ├── .specify/ # Spec-kit infrastructure │ ├── scripts/ # Workflow automation scripts │ ├── templates/ # Artifact templates │ └── memory/ # Project context and constitution │ └── specs/ # Feature specifications └── {N}-{short-name}/ # Feature directory ├── spec.md # What & Why (user-focused) ├── plan.md # How (technical design) ├── tasks.md # Implementation tasks ├── checklists/ # Quality validation checklists │ ├── requirements.md # Spec quality validation │ ├── ux.md # UX requirements validation │ ├── api.md # API requirements validation │ └── security.md # Security requirements validation ├── research.md # Technical research & decisions ├── data-model.md # Entity definitions ├── quickstart.md # Test scenarios └── contracts/ # API contracts ├── openapi.yaml └── graphql/ ``` > **Note: Claude Code Plan Mode Namespace** > > Claude Code's native Plan Mode (v2.0.51+) creates a `plan.md` file at the > **project root** when users enter plan mode via `Shift+Tab` or `--permission-mode plan`. > Spec-kit plans are intentionally stored in `specs/{feature}/plan.md` to avoid > collision. When searching for scope artifacts: > 1. Always check `specs/*/plan.md` first (spec-kit feature plans) > 2. Then check root `plan.md` (may be Claude Plan Mode artifact) > > The two systems are complementary: Claude Plan Mode is for exploratory planning, > while spec-kit plans are structured implementation blueprints. ## Core Artifacts ### spec.md - Feature Specification **Purpose**: Define WHAT users need and WHY, without implementation details. **Audience**: Business stakeholders, product managers, non-technical reviewers. **Structure**: ```markdown # Feature Name ## Overview - Problem statement - User value proposition ## User Scenarios - Who uses it - Primary flows - User goals ## Functional Requirements - What must it do (testable) - Acceptance criteria ## Success Criteria - Measurable outcomes - Technology-agnostic metrics - User-facing goals ## Success Criteria (Optional) - Performance expectations - Security considerations - Accessibility needs ## Edge Cases (Optional) - Boundary conditions - Error scenarios - Fallback behaviors ## Dependencies & Assumptions (Optional) - External dependencies - Documented assumptions ``` **Key Principles**: - No technology choices (no "React", "PostgreSQL", "REST API") - Focus on user value, not system internals - Measurable, testable requirements - Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers ### plan.md - Implementation Plan **Purpose**: Define HOW to build the feature technically. **Audience**: Developers, technical leads, architects. **Structure**: ```markdown # Implementation Plan: Feature Name ## Technical Context - Tech stack decisions - Architecture choices - Libraries and frameworks ## Constitution Check - Alignment with project principles - Gate evaluation ## Phase 0: Research - Technical unknowns - Best practices research - Decision rationale ## Phase 1: Design - Data model - API contracts - Integration points ## Phase 2: Implementation - Component structure - Service layer - Infrastructure needs ``` **Key Principles**: - T