Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
atlassian avatar

Twg Operational Health

  • 8 installs
  • 8 repo stars
  • Updated August 5, 2026
  • atlassian/twg-cli

twg-operational-health is a TWG CLI workflow skill for on-call handoffs, reliability and incident reviews, and operational-risk readouts.

About

This TWG CLI workflow skill produces operational-health readouts: on-call handoffs, reliability and incident/PIR reviews, Assets and laptop-refresh candidates, capacity and staffing views, and meeting summaries. A developer uses it when taking over on-call or assessing operational risk across a service, team, or org. It resolves the operational scope first, then clusters incidents and follow-up into patterns with owners and next actions.

  • Produces on-call handoffs, HOT/reliability reviews, and incident/PIR readouts
  • Covers Assets/laptop refresh, capacity/staffing, and meeting-recording summaries
  • Clusters incidents into failure themes and ties each to concrete follow-up and ownership

Twg Operational Health by the numbers

  • 8 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #2,245 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

twg-operational-health capabilities & compatibility

Capabilities
on call handoff · reliability review · incident analysis · capacity planning
Works with
atlassian · jira · confluence
Use cases
project management · research
From the docs

What twg-operational-health says it does

Use with the root `twg` skill for on-call handoffs, HOT/reliability reviews,
SKILL.md
Do not start with a broad cross-product inventory. Find the operational anchor
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/atlassian/twg-cli --skill twg-operational-health

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs8
repo stars8
Last updatedAugust 5, 2026
Repositoryatlassian/twg-cli

What it does

Produce on-call handoffs, reliability and incident reviews, and operational-risk readouts from Atlassian work data.

Who is it for?

engineers taking over on-call or reviewing operational health and reliability

Skip if: starting from a broad cross-product inventory, which the skill tells you to avoid

When should I use this skill?

the user is taking over on-call, needs a reliability/incident/PIR review, or wants an operational-risk readout

What you get

An operational-health readout with a first-hour on-call checklist, clustered failure themes, owners, and escalation map.

  • on-call first-hour checklist
  • reliability/incident review
  • capacity and staffing candidates

By the numbers

  • 6 recipe cards including on-call handoff, HOT review, and capacity/staffing

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

twg-operational-health

Use together with the root twg skill. Exact command grammar must come from live twg help, twg help <terms>, or twg help describe <path>.

Use When

  • "I'm taking over on-call"
  • "Reliability/HOT/incidents/PIR readout"
  • "Laptop refresh candidates"
  • "Windows laptops for testing"
  • "Team capacity or staffing candidates"
  • "Meeting recordings weekly summary"
  • "Open risks, blockers, overloaded people, operational health"

First Move

Resolve the operational scope and time window:

  • Service, component, team, customer, project, person, org, or asset domain.
  • Canonical anchors such as service/component records, HOT/incident/PIR issues,

runbooks, projects/goals, meeting recordings, or Assets object types.

  • Current owner, escalation path, status, recency, and known follow-up work.

Do not start with a broad cross-product inventory. Find the operational anchor first, then join only surfaces that answer the question.

Route Selection

  • On-call handoff: incidents/HOTs/PIRs, recent Jira follow-up, runbooks/docs,

linked projects, owners, and escalation paths.

  • Reliability review: HOT/incident/PIR records, linked follow-up, service or

component context, owners, comments, and current status.

  • Assets/laptop refresh: build the contributor list from work evidence first,

then inspect Assets schema/type metadata before AQL.

  • Capacity/staffing: combine related recent work, ownership, review influence,

docs, project/goal involvement, assigned open work, review queue, blockers, and current risks.

  • Meeting summaries: query recordings for the requested people/time scope, fetch

transcript preview first, and fetch full transcript only for central meetings.

Evidence Policy

  • Rank by impact, urgency, owner clarity, recurrence risk, and actionability.
  • Group incidents, HOTs, PIRs, blockers, and follow-up work into patterns rather

than listing every artifact independently.

  • Separate live risks from historical mentions.
  • For Assets, discover schema and object type first. Join people to devices using

discovered user-like attributes such as Calculated user before broad display name filters.

  • For staffing, do not recommend people solely from recent activity counts; blend

contribution centrality, ownership, expertise, availability/load signals, and project risk.

Recipe Cards

On-Call Handoff

Resolve team/service/component. Pull incidents/HOTs/PIRs, recent Jira follow-up, runbooks/docs, linked projects, and owners. Cluster symptoms into patterns and produce a first-hour checklist plus escalation map.

HOT / Reliability Review

Search/query HOTs, incidents, PIRs, linked follow-up work, service/component context, owners, comments, and status. Cluster by failure theme. Connect each theme to concrete follow-up and missing ownership.

Assets / Laptop Refresh

Build the contributor list from project/goal/Jira/PR/doc/activity evidence. Query Assets schema/type metadata before AQL. Join people to laptops using discovered user-like attributes, then rank by contribution centrality plus asset risk.

Windows Asset Candidates

Use Assets schema-first discovery. Confirm site, schema, object type, and owner or contact fields. Report confidence and gaps for each candidate.

Capacity / Staffing Candidates

Resolve project/topic/org. Identify people with related recent work, ownership, review influence, docs, and project/goal involvement. Check current load signals before recommending candidates.

Meeting Recording Summary

Query meetings/videos for the requested time window and people scope. Fetch transcript preview first. Fetch full transcript only for central recordings and write it to a file when needed. Summarize decisions, action items, themes, and gaps.

Output Shape

  • Lead with severity, urgency, or recommendation summary.
  • Inventory table with owner, status, recency, impact, confidence, and evidence.
  • Patterns/themes grouped across artifacts.
  • Ranked next actions and suggested owner for each.
  • Data gaps: missing transcripts, no asset match, stale update, ACL/auth gaps, or

weak ownership evidence.

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not fetch every transcript or page body.
  • Do not treat every incident mention as a live risk.
  • Do not join Assets by display-name guesses before inspecting schema/type fields.
  • Do not recommend staffing solely from recent activity counts.

Related skills

FAQ

What is the first move for operational health?

Resolve the operational scope and time window, find the operational anchor first, then join only surfaces that answer the question.

How are incidents presented?

Grouped into failure themes and patterns rather than listing every artifact, with each theme tied to follow-up and missing ownership.

Productivity & Planningmonitoringsupportinfra

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.