
Twg Operational Health
- 8 installs
- 8 repo stars
- Updated August 5, 2026
- atlassian/twg-cli
twg-operational-health is a TWG CLI workflow skill for on-call handoffs, reliability and incident reviews, and operational-risk readouts.
About
This TWG CLI workflow skill produces operational-health readouts: on-call handoffs, reliability and incident/PIR reviews, Assets and laptop-refresh candidates, capacity and staffing views, and meeting summaries. A developer uses it when taking over on-call or assessing operational risk across a service, team, or org. It resolves the operational scope first, then clusters incidents and follow-up into patterns with owners and next actions.
- Produces on-call handoffs, HOT/reliability reviews, and incident/PIR readouts
- Covers Assets/laptop refresh, capacity/staffing, and meeting-recording summaries
- Clusters incidents into failure themes and ties each to concrete follow-up and ownership
Twg Operational Health by the numbers
- 8 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #2,245 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
twg-operational-health capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- on call handoff · reliability review · incident analysis · capacity planning
- Works with
- atlassian · jira · confluence
- Use cases
- project management · research
What twg-operational-health says it does
Use with the root `twg` skill for on-call handoffs, HOT/reliability reviews,
Do not start with a broad cross-product inventory. Find the operational anchor
npx skills add https://github.com/atlassian/twg-cli --skill twg-operational-healthAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 8 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 8 |
| Last updated | August 5, 2026 |
| Repository | atlassian/twg-cli ↗ |
What it does
Produce on-call handoffs, reliability and incident reviews, and operational-risk readouts from Atlassian work data.
Who is it for?
engineers taking over on-call or reviewing operational health and reliability
Skip if: starting from a broad cross-product inventory, which the skill tells you to avoid
When should I use this skill?
the user is taking over on-call, needs a reliability/incident/PIR review, or wants an operational-risk readout
What you get
An operational-health readout with a first-hour on-call checklist, clustered failure themes, owners, and escalation map.
- on-call first-hour checklist
- reliability/incident review
- capacity and staffing candidates
By the numbers
- 6 recipe cards including on-call handoff, HOT review, and capacity/staffing
Files
twg-operational-health
Use together with the root twg skill. Exact command grammar must come from live twg help, twg help <terms>, or twg help describe <path>.
Use When
- "I'm taking over on-call"
- "Reliability/HOT/incidents/PIR readout"
- "Laptop refresh candidates"
- "Windows laptops for testing"
- "Team capacity or staffing candidates"
- "Meeting recordings weekly summary"
- "Open risks, blockers, overloaded people, operational health"
First Move
Resolve the operational scope and time window:
- Service, component, team, customer, project, person, org, or asset domain.
- Canonical anchors such as service/component records, HOT/incident/PIR issues,
runbooks, projects/goals, meeting recordings, or Assets object types.
- Current owner, escalation path, status, recency, and known follow-up work.
Do not start with a broad cross-product inventory. Find the operational anchor first, then join only surfaces that answer the question.
Route Selection
- On-call handoff: incidents/HOTs/PIRs, recent Jira follow-up, runbooks/docs,
linked projects, owners, and escalation paths.
- Reliability review: HOT/incident/PIR records, linked follow-up, service or
component context, owners, comments, and current status.
- Assets/laptop refresh: build the contributor list from work evidence first,
then inspect Assets schema/type metadata before AQL.
- Capacity/staffing: combine related recent work, ownership, review influence,
docs, project/goal involvement, assigned open work, review queue, blockers, and current risks.
- Meeting summaries: query recordings for the requested people/time scope, fetch
transcript preview first, and fetch full transcript only for central meetings.
Evidence Policy
- Rank by impact, urgency, owner clarity, recurrence risk, and actionability.
- Group incidents, HOTs, PIRs, blockers, and follow-up work into patterns rather
than listing every artifact independently.
- Separate live risks from historical mentions.
- For Assets, discover schema and object type first. Join people to devices using
discovered user-like attributes such as Calculated user before broad display name filters.
- For staffing, do not recommend people solely from recent activity counts; blend
contribution centrality, ownership, expertise, availability/load signals, and project risk.
Recipe Cards
On-Call Handoff
Resolve team/service/component. Pull incidents/HOTs/PIRs, recent Jira follow-up, runbooks/docs, linked projects, and owners. Cluster symptoms into patterns and produce a first-hour checklist plus escalation map.
HOT / Reliability Review
Search/query HOTs, incidents, PIRs, linked follow-up work, service/component context, owners, comments, and status. Cluster by failure theme. Connect each theme to concrete follow-up and missing ownership.
Assets / Laptop Refresh
Build the contributor list from project/goal/Jira/PR/doc/activity evidence. Query Assets schema/type metadata before AQL. Join people to laptops using discovered user-like attributes, then rank by contribution centrality plus asset risk.
Windows Asset Candidates
Use Assets schema-first discovery. Confirm site, schema, object type, and owner or contact fields. Report confidence and gaps for each candidate.
Capacity / Staffing Candidates
Resolve project/topic/org. Identify people with related recent work, ownership, review influence, docs, and project/goal involvement. Check current load signals before recommending candidates.
Meeting Recording Summary
Query meetings/videos for the requested time window and people scope. Fetch transcript preview first. Fetch full transcript only for central recordings and write it to a file when needed. Summarize decisions, action items, themes, and gaps.
Output Shape
- Lead with severity, urgency, or recommendation summary.
- Inventory table with owner, status, recency, impact, confidence, and evidence.
- Patterns/themes grouped across artifacts.
- Ranked next actions and suggested owner for each.
- Data gaps: missing transcripts, no asset match, stale update, ACL/auth gaps, or
weak ownership evidence.
Anti-Patterns
- Do not fetch every transcript or page body.
- Do not treat every incident mention as a live risk.
- Do not join Assets by display-name guesses before inspecting schema/type fields.
- Do not recommend staffing solely from recent activity counts.
Related skills
FAQ
What is the first move for operational health?
Resolve the operational scope and time window, find the operational anchor first, then join only surfaces that answer the question.
How are incidents presented?
Grouped into failure themes and patterns rather than listing every artifact, with each theme tied to follow-up and missing ownership.