Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
aws-samples avatar

Migration Readiness

  • 276 installs
  • 234 repo stars
  • Updated August 4, 2026
  • aws-samples/sample-well-architected-skills-and-steering

Migration Readiness is a Claude Code skill that assesses a workload's readiness to migrate to AWS by analyzing code, dependencies, and infrastructure and mapping components to the 7 Rs.

About

This skill assesses whether a workload is ready to migrate to AWS by analyzing its code, dependencies, configurations, and infrastructure. It discovers the application stack, maps internal and external dependencies, and assigns each component a 7 Rs strategy with code evidence. It flags blockers and high-risk dependencies and produces readiness findings by Well-Architected pillar plus a migration plan.

  • Assesses a workload's readiness to migrate to AWS from existing code and infrastructure
  • Maps components to the 7 Rs and flags blockers, high-risk dependencies, and migration waves
  • Produces evidence-backed findings with file and line references plus a migration plan

Migration Readiness by the numbers

  • 276 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #417 of 1,039 Cloud & Infrastructure skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

migration-readiness capabilities & compatibility

Capabilities
migration assessment · cloud audit
Works with
aws · terraform
Use cases
devops
From the docs

What migration-readiness says it does

Assess a workload's readiness to migrate to AWS by analyzing existing code, dependencies, configurations, and infrastructure to produce evidence-backed findings covering the 7 Rs, risks, and a migrati
SKILL.md
You MUST flag as BLOCKER: - OS-specific dependencies without cloud equivalents
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/aws-samples/sample-well-architected-skills-and-steering --skill migration-readiness

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs276
repo stars234
Last updatedAugust 4, 2026
Repositoryaws-samples/sample-well-architected-skills-and-steering

What it does

Assess a workload's readiness to migrate to AWS and produce a 7 Rs strategy with a migration plan.

Who is it for?

Evaluating whether an on-premises or other-cloud workload can move to AWS, with 7 Rs strategy and blockers.

Skip if: Architecture decision records, single-pillar assessments, cost optimization of existing AWS workloads, or a full cross-pillar WA review, per the not_for field.

When should I use this skill?

The user is planning to migrate a workload to AWS and needs a readiness assessment and migration plan.

What you get

Evidence-backed migration-readiness findings, a 7 Rs strategy per component, and a migration plan.

  • migration-readiness assessment
  • 7 Rs strategy per component
  • migration plan

By the numbers

  • evaluates the 7 Rs strategies
  • 6-step assessment workflow
  • version 2.0.0

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Migration Readiness Assessment

Step 1: Gather context

Ask the user:

What workload are you planning to migrate? Please share:
- Workload name and code packages/directories to analyze
- Current environment (on-premises, other cloud, colocation)
- Business drivers (cost, agility, compliance, end-of-life hardware, etc.)
- Timeline constraints (optional)

If context is already provided or you are in a codebase, proceed directly.

Step 2: Application Stack Discovery

Analyze the codebase to understand the current application stack.

You MUST examine:

  • Programming languages and runtimes (versions, compatibility with AWS services)
  • Frameworks and libraries (web frameworks, ORM, messaging)
  • Database technologies (relational, NoSQL, search, caching)
  • Middleware and message brokers
  • External service dependencies (APIs, SaaS integrations)
  • Configuration management (config files, environment variables, secrets)
  • Operating system dependencies and system-level requirements
  • Build and packaging systems (Maven, npm, pip, Docker)

For each component, document:

  • File path and line numbers
  • Technology and version
  • AWS equivalent or migration path
  • Migration complexity (simple lift, requires changes, requires rewrite)
  • Dependencies on other components

You MUST flag as BLOCKER:

  • OS-specific dependencies without cloud equivalents
  • Proprietary software with licensing restrictions (Oracle, specific Windows features)
  • Hardware-specific dependencies (FPGA, specific CPU instructions, USB dongles)
  • Hardcoded IP addresses or hostnames in application code
  • Local filesystem dependencies (shared network drives, local storage)

Step 3: Infrastructure Discovery

Analyze existing infrastructure configurations.

You MUST examine:

  • Server configurations (CPU, memory, storage requirements)
  • Network topology (VLANs, firewalls, load balancers, DNS)
  • Storage systems (SAN, NAS, local disk, file shares)
  • Database configurations (engine, version, size, replication)
  • Monitoring and alerting systems
  • Backup and DR configurations
  • Security controls (firewalls, IDS/IPS, WAF, certificates)
  • Existing IaC if any (Terraform, Ansible, Chef, Puppet)

For each infrastructure component, document:

  • Current configuration
  • AWS equivalent service
  • Migration approach (rehost, replatform, refactor)
  • Data volume and transfer considerations

Step 4: Dependency Mapping

Map all internal and external dependencies.

You MUST examine:

  • Service-to-service communication (protocols, ports, patterns)
  • Database connections (connection strings, pooling, multiple consumers)
  • Shared databases or data stores (multiple services writing/reading)
  • External API integrations (third-party services, partner APIs)
  • Network dependencies (latency-sensitive connections, VPN tunnels)
  • Batch job dependencies (scheduling, order of execution)
  • Authentication/authorization dependencies (LDAP, AD, SSO)

You MUST create a dependency diagram showing:

  • All services and their connections
  • Data flows and protocols
  • External dependencies
  • Migration wave groupings (what must move together)

You MUST flag as HIGH RISK:

  • Tight coupling between components that must move together (increases blast radius)
  • Shared databases accessed by multiple services (migration ordering constraint)
  • Latency-sensitive integrations that will span hybrid during migration
  • Hard dependencies on on-premises systems that cannot move (require hybrid connectivity)

---STOP--- Checkpoint: Discovery and dependency mapping complete — ready to determine migration strategy

Mapped the application stack ({X} components), infrastructure configurations, and dependency relationships. Identified {Y} blockers, {Z} high-risk dependencies (shared databases, latency-sensitive integrations), and migration wave groupings.

>

Shall I proceed with determining the migration strategy (7 Rs) for each component and assessing readiness by pillar?

Do NOT proceed past this point until the user explicitly confirms. ---

Step 5: Determine migration strategy (7 Rs)

For each component, evaluate which strategy fits based on code evidence:

StrategyWhen to useCode Indicators
RehostFast migration, minimal changesStandard OS, containerizable, no OS-specific deps
ReplatformSmall optimizations during moveSelf-managed DB → RDS, self-managed cache → ElastiCache
RefactorNeed cloud-native benefitsMonolith that should be decomposed, stateful → stateless
RepurchaseReplace with SaaSCommercial software with AWS/SaaS equivalent
RetireNo longer neededUnused code, deprecated services
RetainNot ready to moveHard dependencies, compliance blockers
RelocateVMware workloadsVMware-specific configurations

You MUST justify each recommendation with code evidence.

Step 6: Assess readiness by pillar

For each pillar, provide: Readiness (Ready/Conditionally Ready/Not Ready), Evidence (file:line), Gaps, Actions needed.

Operational Excellence Readiness

  • Is there IaC? (CloudFormation, Terraform, CDK, Ansible)
  • Are CI/CD pipelines in place? Can they target AWS?
  • Is monitoring portable or tied to specific tools?
  • Are operational procedures documented?

Security Readiness

  • Are there compliance requirements affecting region/service choice?
  • How are secrets managed? (hardcoded, vault, config files)
  • Are there network security dependencies needing equivalents?
  • Is identity management compatible with AWS IAM/Identity Center?

Reliability Readiness

  • What is the current availability? What's the target?
  • Are there HA mechanisms to replicate?
  • What's the acceptable downtime during migration?
  • Are backup/recovery procedures tested?

Performance Efficiency Readiness

  • Are there latency-sensitive integrations?
  • Are there hardware-specific dependencies?
  • What are current performance baselines?
  • Are there SLAs to maintain during cutover?

Cost Optimization Readiness

  • What's the current TCO? (hardware, licensing, ops, facilities)
  • Are there licensing implications? (BYOL, license-included, re-purchase)
  • Are there existing contracts or prepaid commitments?

Sustainability Readiness

  • Can migration reduce resource footprint?
  • Are there opportunities for Graviton/serverless?
  • Can managed services replace self-managed infrastructure?

Step 7: Risk Assessment

For each risk, assess using Impact × Likelihood:

Impact: Minor (schedule slip, minor rework) | Moderate (significant rework, extended hybrid period) | Severe (migration failure, data loss, extended outage)

Likelihood: Low (unlikely with proper planning) | Medium (possible without specific mitigation) | High (likely given current state)

ImpactLikelihoodRisk Level
SevereHighCritical
SevereMediumHigh
SevereLowHigh
ModerateHighHigh
ModerateMediumMedium
ModerateLowMedium
MinorHighMedium
MinorMediumLow
MinorLowLow

---STOP--- Checkpoint: Risk assessment complete — ready to produce the final migration assessment

Assessed {N} risks across the migration. Risk distribution: {X} Critical, {Y} High, {Z} Medium, {W} Low. Overall readiness: {Ready / Conditionally Ready / Not Ready}. Critical blockers and mitigations identified.

>

Shall I produce the full Migration Readiness assessment with migration plan and cost comparison?

Do NOT proceed past this point until the user explicitly confirms. ---

Step 8: Produce the assessment

# Migration Readiness Assessment: {Workload Name}

## Executive Summary
- **Date**: {date}
- **Packages Analyzed**: {list}
- **Recommended Strategy**: {primary strategy}
- **Overall Readiness**: {Ready / Conditionally Ready / Not Ready}
- **Estimated Effort**: {T-shirt size with justification}
- **Key Risks**: {top 3}
- **Critical Blockers**: {count and brief description}

## Application Stack Summary
| Component | Technology | Version | AWS Equivalent | Strategy | Complexity |
|-----------|-----------|---------|---------------|----------|------------|
| {name} | {tech} | {ver} | {aws service} | {7R} | {Low/Med/High} |

## Dependency Map
{PlantUML diagram showing service dependencies, data flows, and migration wave groupings}

## Readiness Scorecard
| Pillar | Readiness | Score (1-5) | Key Blocker | Action Needed |
|--------|-----------|-------------|-------------|---------------|
| Operational Excellence | {status} | {score} | {blocker} | {action} |
| Security | {status} | {score} | {blocker} | {action} |
| Reliability | {status} | {score} | {blocker} | {action} |
| Performance Efficiency | {status} | {score} | {blocker} | {action} |
| Cost Optimization | {status} | {score} | {blocker} | {action} |
| Sustainability | {status} | {score} | {blocker} | {action} |

## Critical Blockers
{For each: ID, description, evidence (file:line), impact on migration, resolution approach, effort}

## Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Evidence | Risk Level | Migration Impact | Mitigation | AWS Service |
|------|----------|------------|-----------------|------------|-------------|
| {risk} | {file:line} | {level} | {impact} | {mitigation} | {service} |

## Pre-Migration Checklist
{Ordered by priority — what must be done before migration starts}
- [ ] {action with evidence of why it's needed}

## Migration Plan

### Phase 1: Mobilize (Weeks 1-2)
| Task | Dependencies | AWS Service | Evidence |
|------|-------------|-------------|----------|
{Landing zone, connectivity, tooling setup}

### Phase 2: Migrate (Weeks 3-6)
| Wave | Components | Strategy | Data Volume | Downtime Window |
|------|-----------|----------|-------------|-----------------|
{Component migration waves based on dependency analysis}

### Phase 3: Optimize (Weeks 7-8)
| Optimization | Component | Expected Benefit | AWS Service |
|-------------|-----------|-----------------|-------------|
{Right-sizing, managed services, serverless, Graviton}

## AWS Services for Migration
| Category | Service | Purpose | Relevant Components |
|----------|---------|---------|-------------------|
| Server | AWS MGN | Rehost EC2 | {components} |
| Database | AWS DMS | Replicate with minimal downtime | {components} |
| Data | DataSync / Snowball | Large-scale transfer | {components} |
| Schema | AWS SCT | Schema conversion | {components} |
| Network | Direct Connect / VPN | Hybrid connectivity | {components} |
| Governance | Control Tower | Multi-account | All |

## Cost Comparison
| Category | Current (monthly est.) | AWS Estimated | Delta | Notes |
|----------|----------------------|---------------|-------|-------|
| Compute | {estimate} | {estimate} | {delta} | {basis} |
| Storage | {estimate} | {estimate} | {delta} | {basis} |
| Networking | {estimate} | {estimate} | {delta} | {basis} |
| Licensing | {estimate} | {estimate} | {delta} | {basis} |
| Operations | {estimate} | {estimate} | {delta} | {basis} |

## Next Steps
{Top 5 concrete actions the team should take this week to prepare}

Step 9: Offer follow-up

After delivering the assessment, offer:

Would you like me to:
- Design the AWS landing zone architecture?
- Create a detailed data migration plan for a specific database?
- Estimate AWS costs in detail for specific components?
- Build a pre-migration testing strategy?
- Design the hybrid connectivity architecture?
- Create IaC for the target AWS architecture?

Calibration Guidance

  • A workload already containerized with CI/CD and IaC is LARGELY READY — focus on AWS-specific optimizations and data migration planning
  • Every blocker and risk MUST have code evidence — don't flag "licensing risk" without checking actual dependencies
  • Migration strategy recommendations must be justified by code analysis (not assumptions)
  • "Cannot Determine" is valid for runtime characteristics not visible in code (e.g., actual data volumes, network latency requirements)
  • For shared databases, always flag the migration ordering constraint — this is the #1 cause of migration complexity
  • Cost estimates from static analysis are rough — acknowledge uncertainty and recommend AWS Pricing Calculator for precision
  • Acknowledge migration-ready aspects prominently (containerized, stateless, IaC already exists)

Related skills

FAQ

What migration framework does this skill use?

It classifies each component using the 7 Rs: rehost, replatform, refactor, repurchase, retire, retain, and relocate, justified with code evidence.

What does it flag as a blocker?

OS-specific dependencies without cloud equivalents, proprietary licensing restrictions, hardware-specific dependencies, hardcoded IPs, and local filesystem dependencies.

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.