Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
bahayonghang avatar

Deep Research Pro

  • 8 installs
  • 16 repo stars
  • Updated August 3, 2026
  • bahayonghang/my-claude-code-settings

Deep-research-pro is a Claude Code skill that turns a topic into a grounded, cited research report from multiple current web sources.

About

Deep-research-pro turns an open-ended topic into a grounded, cited research deliverable using multiple web sources. A developer or analyst uses it to compare options, map a landscape, or write a briefing backed by current sources. It decomposes the topic into sub-questions, deep-reads strong sources, marks uncertainty, and outputs a structured report with citations.

  • Breaks a topic into 3-5 sub-questions and searches with source discipline
  • Deep-reads the strongest sources and synthesizes rather than concatenates
  • Produces a structured cited report with executive summary and sources

Deep Research Pro by the numbers

  • 8 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #2,245 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

deep-research-pro capabilities & compatibility

Free; uses the environment's existing web tools

Capabilities
research · web search
Use cases
research · web search
Pricing
Free
From the docs

What deep-research-pro says it does

Use this skill to turn an open-ended topic into a grounded, cited research deliverable.
SKILL.md
Aim for roughly 8-20 unique sources total unless the user requested a very lightweight answer.
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/bahayonghang/my-claude-code-settings --skill deep-research-pro

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs8
repo stars16
Last updatedAugust 3, 2026
Repositorybahayonghang/my-claude-code-settings

What it does

Investigate or compare a current topic across multiple web sources and produce a cited report.

Who is it for?

Cited briefings, landscape mapping, and decision support backed by current web sources

Skip if: Offline codebase questions, casual opinions, or when the user forbids web access

When should I use this skill?

The user asks to research, compare, or deep-dive a topic with current sources and citations

What you get

A structured, cited report that distinguishes fact, inference, and uncertainty.

  • Cited research report with executive summary, key findings, and sources

By the numbers

  • 3-5 sub-questions per topic
  • roughly 8-20 unique sources
  • 5 quality rules

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Deep Research Pro

Use this skill to turn an open-ended topic into a grounded, cited research deliverable. The goal is not to dump links. The goal is to answer the user's real question with evidence, recency awareness, and explicit uncertainty.

When to use

Use this skill when the user wants:

  • current information
  • topic comparison or landscape mapping
  • a cited briefing, memo, or report
  • decision support backed by multiple sources
  • research on markets, companies, policy, science, or technology

Do not use this skill when:

  • the task is purely local to the repo or codebase
  • the user explicitly says not to browse
  • the user only wants a quick opinion with no sourcing

Workflow

1. Lock the research objective

Extract or infer:

  • topic
  • user goal: learn, decide, write, compare, or monitor
  • preferred depth: quick brief, standard report, or deep dive
  • expected output: chat answer, outline, memo, or saved file

Ask at most 1-2 clarifying questions only if the answer would materially change the search plan or final deliverable. If not, proceed with reasonable defaults and state them.

2. Break the topic into sub-questions

Create 3-5 sub-questions that cover the topic from different angles, such as:

  • definition and scope
  • current state and recent developments
  • evidence, metrics, or outcomes
  • major players or competing schools
  • risks, limitations, or open questions

Do not search blindly for the top-level topic only.

3. Search with source discipline

Use the current environment's available web tools. Prefer primary and high-signal sources in this order:

1. official documentation, regulators, standards bodies, company filings, papers, or datasets 2. reputable journalism or domain publications 3. expert analysis and industry commentary

For each sub-question:

  • try 2-3 focused query variants
  • collect multiple independent sources
  • prefer recent sources when the topic is time-sensitive
  • capture source title, publisher, URL, and date

Aim for roughly 8-20 unique sources total unless the user requested a very lightweight answer.

4. Deep-read the strongest sources

Do not rely on snippets alone. Open and read the most relevant pages in full.

For each key source, extract:

  • the core claim
  • the concrete evidence or data point
  • publication date
  • why it matters to the user's goal

If a claim appears only once, treat it as provisional instead of established.

5. Synthesize, do not concatenate

Combine the evidence into a structured answer that:

  • answers the user's actual question
  • distinguishes fact, inference, and uncertainty
  • highlights disagreements across sources
  • calls out missing data when evidence is thin

If the user asks for recommendations, make it explicit which parts come from sources and which parts are your synthesis.

6. Deliver in the right format

Default output structure:

# {Topic}

## Executive Summary
- 3-5 high-signal findings

## Key Findings
### {Theme 1}
...
### {Theme 2}
...

## Risks / Open Questions
...

## Sources
1. [Title](url) — source type, date

If the user asked for a saved report, write it to a user-specified path or a workspace-relative path. Do not assume a personal home-directory convention.

Quality rules

1. Every non-trivial factual claim should be source-backed. 2. Prefer exact dates over vague recency words like "recently". 3. Mark single-source claims, missing numbers, and unresolved conflicts. 4. Do not invent statistics, quotes, or consensus. 5. If browsing is unavailable, say that current verification could not be completed instead of pretending the answer is current.

Failure and fallback

  • If the topic is too broad, narrow it to the user's likely goal and state the

narrowed scope.

  • If relevant sources are low quality, say the evidence base is weak.
  • If the topic is highly time-sensitive, explicitly date-stamp the conclusion.
  • If the user wants a simple answer after the research pass, compress the report

into a short briefing instead of dumping the full notes.

Example prompts

  • Research the current state of nuclear fusion commercialization
  • Compare Rust vs Go for backend services in 2026 with sources
  • 帮我调研一下 AI coding agent 的市场格局,给出带来源总结
  • What's the latest on the US housing market?

Related skills

FAQ

How many sources does it aim for?

Roughly 8-20 unique sources total unless a lightweight answer was requested.

Does it invent statistics?

No, it does not invent statistics, quotes, or consensus, and marks single-source claims.

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.