Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
beita6969 avatar

Meta Analysis

  • 17 installs
  • 869 repo stars
  • Updated June 8, 2026
  • beita6969/scienceclaw

meta-analysis is a Claude skill that performs quantitative meta-analysis with effect size calculation, forest plots, funnel plots, and heterogeneity assessment.

About

This skill performs quantitative meta-analysis in Python. It calculates pooled effect sizes with a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model, assesses heterogeneity (I-squared), detects publication bias, and generates forest and funnel plots. Developers use it to combine results from multiple studies into a synthesized estimate.

  • Quantitative meta-analysis with pooled effect sizes and heterogeneity assessment
  • DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model, forest plots, and funnel plots
  • Effect-size table covering SMD, OR, RR, RD, HR, and Fisher's z

Meta Analysis by the numbers

  • 17 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #1,286 of 2,065 Data Science & ML skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

meta-analysis capabilities & compatibility

Free; requires Python with NumPy, SciPy, and Matplotlib.

Capabilities
ml pipeline · math computation · medical qa
Use cases
data analysis · research
Pricing
Free
From the docs

What meta-analysis says it does

Perform quantitative meta-analysis with effect size calculation, forest plots, funnel plots, and heterogeneity assessment.
SKILL.md
DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis.
SKILL.md
Generate a funnel plot to assess publication bias.
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/beita6969/scienceclaw --skill meta-analysis

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs17
repo stars869
Last updatedJune 8, 2026
Repositorybeita6969/scienceclaw

What it does

Combine results from multiple studies into pooled effect sizes with heterogeneity, publication-bias, forest, and funnel-plot output.

Who is it for?

Combining study results, pooling effect sizes, assessing publication bias, and creating forest/funnel plots.

Skip if: Systematic review protocols (use systematic-review) or single-study statistics (use statsmodels-stats).

When should I use this skill?

A user asks to combine multiple studies, pool effect sizes, or assess heterogeneity or publication bias.

What you get

Returns a pooled effect estimate with CI, I-squared heterogeneity, and forest/funnel plots.

  • Pooled effect estimate with CI
  • Forest plot
  • Funnel plot

By the numbers

  • 7 effect-size types tabulated
  • 6 example use-case prompts listed

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Meta-Analysis

Quantitative synthesis of results from multiple studies. Calculates pooled effect sizes, assesses heterogeneity, detects publication bias, and generates forest and funnel plots.

When to Use

  • "Combine these study results into a meta-analysis"
  • "Calculate the pooled odds ratio from these trials"
  • "Create a forest plot of these effect sizes"
  • "Test for publication bias with a funnel plot"
  • "What's the heterogeneity (I²) across these studies?"
  • "Run a random-effects meta-analysis"

When NOT to Use

  • Designing a systematic review protocol (use systematic-review)
  • Searching for studies (use literature-search)
  • Single-study statistical analysis (use statsmodels-stats)
  • Narrative literature review (use paper-writing)

Effect Size Types

Outcome TypeEffect SizeFormulaUse When
ContinuousSMD (Cohen's d / Hedges' g)$(M_1 - M_2) / S_p$Comparing means across studies with different scales
ContinuousMean Difference (MD)$M_1 - M_2$Same outcome measure across all studies
BinaryOdds Ratio (OR)$(a \times d) / (b \times c)$Case-control studies, binary outcomes
BinaryRisk Ratio (RR)$(a/(a+b)) / (c/(c+d))$Cohort studies, clinical trials
BinaryRisk Difference (RD)$R_1 - R_2$Absolute risk reduction
Time-to-eventHazard Ratio (HR)From Cox modelSurvival analysis
CorrelationFisher's z$0.5 \ln((1+r)/(1-r))$Correlation studies

Core Analysis with Python

Random-Effects Meta-Analysis

import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

def meta_analysis_random_effects(effects, variances, study_names=None):
    """
    DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis.

    Args:
        effects: array of effect sizes (log-OR, SMD, etc.)
        variances: array of within-study variances
        study_names: optional list of study labels

    Returns:
        dict with pooled estimate, CI, heterogeneity stats
    """
    effects = np.array(effects, dtype=float)
    variances = np.array(variances, dtype=float)
    k = len(effects)

    # Fixed-effect weights
    w_fe = 1.0 / variances
    pooled_fe = np.sum(w_fe * effects) / np.sum(w_fe)

    # Cochran's Q
    Q = np.sum(w_fe * (effects - pooled_fe) ** 2)
    df = k - 1
    p_heterogeneity = 1 - stats.chi2.cdf(Q, df)

    # tau-squared (DerSimonian-Laird)
    C = np.sum(w_fe) - np.sum(w_fe ** 2) / np.sum(w_fe)
    tau2 = max(0, (Q - df) / C)

    # I-squared
    I2 = max(0, (Q - df) / Q * 100) if Q > 0 else 0

    # Random-effects weights
    w_re = 1.0 / (variances + tau2)
    pooled_re = np.sum(w_re * effects) / np.sum(w_re)
    se_pooled = np.sqrt(1.0 / np.sum(w_re))

    ci_lower = pooled_re - 1.96 * se_pooled
    ci_upper = pooled_re + 1.96 * se_pooled
    z = pooled_re / se_pooled
    p_value = 2 * (1 - stats.norm.cdf(abs(z)))

    return {
        'pooled_effect': pooled_re,
        'se': se_pooled,
        'ci_lower': ci_lower,
        'ci_upper': ci_upper,
        'z': z,
        'p_value': p_value,
        'tau2': tau2,
        'I2': I2,
        'Q': Q,
        'Q_df': df,
        'Q_p': p_heterogeneity,
        'k': k,
        'model': 'DerSimonian-Laird random-effects'
    }

Forest Plot

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.patches as mpatches

def forest_plot(effects, ci_lower, ci_upper, study_names, pooled, pooled_ci,
                xlabel='Effect Size', title='Forest Plot', output_path='forest_plot.png'):
    """Generate a publication-quality forest plot."""
    k = len(effects)
    fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, max(4, k * 0.4 + 2)))

    y_positions = list(range(k, 0, -1))

    # Individual studies
    for i, y in enumerate(y_positions):
        ax.plot(effects[i], y, 'ks', markersize=8)
        ax.plot([ci_lower[i], ci_upper[i]], [y, y], 'k-', linewidth=1.5)

    # Pooled estimate (diamond)
    diamond_y = 0
    diamond_half_h = 0.3
    diamond = plt.Polygon([
        [pooled_ci[0], diamond_y],
        [pooled, diamond_y + diamond_half_h],
        [pooled_ci[1], diamond_y],
        [pooled, diamond_y - diamond_half_h]
    ], closed=True, facecolor='steelblue', edgecolor='black')
    ax.add_patch(diamond)

    # Reference line at null effect
    ax.axvline(x=0, color='gray', linestyle='--', linewidth=0.8)

    # Labels
    yticks = y_positions + [diamond_y]
    ylabels = study_names + ['Pooled']
    ax.set_yticks(yticks)
    ax.set_yticklabels(ylabels)
    ax.set_xlabel(xlabel)
    ax.set_title(title)
    ax.set_ylim(-1, k + 1.5)

    fig.tight_layout()
    fig.savefig(output_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
    print(f"Forest plot saved: {output_path}")
    return fig

Funnel Plot (Publication Bias)

def funnel_plot(effects, se_values, pooled_effect,
                xlabel='Effect Size', output_path='funnel_plot.png'):
    """Generate a funnel plot to assess publication bias."""
    fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(6, 5))

    ax.scatter(effects, se_values, c='black', s=30, zorder=3)

    # Pseudo-confidence region
    se_range = np.linspace(0.001, max(se_values) * 1.1, 100)
    ci_low = pooled_effect - 1.96 * se_range
    ci_high = pooled_effect + 1.96 * se_range
    ax.fill_betweenx(se_range, ci_low, ci_high, alpha=0.1, color='gray')
    ax.axvline(pooled_effect, color='red', linestyle='--', linewidth=1)

    ax.set_xlabel(xlabel)
    ax.set_ylabel('Standard Error')
    ax.set_title('Funnel Plot')
    ax.invert_yaxis()  # Convention: smaller SE at top

    fig.tight_layout()
    fig.savefig(output_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
    print(f"Funnel plot saved: {output_path}")
    return fig

Publication Bias Tests

Egger's Regression Test

def egger_test(effects, se_values):
    """Egger's test for funnel plot asymmetry."""
    precision = 1.0 / np.array(se_values)
    standardized = np.array(effects) / np.array(se_values)
    slope, intercept, r, p, se = stats.linregress(precision, standardized)
    return {'intercept': intercept, 'se': se, 'p_value': p,
            'interpretation': 'Significant asymmetry' if p < 0.10 else 'No significant asymmetry'}

Begg's Rank Correlation Test

def begg_test(effects, variances):
    """Begg-Mazumdar rank correlation test."""
    standardized = effects / np.sqrt(variances)
    tau, p = stats.kendalltau(standardized, variances)
    return {'tau': tau, 'p_value': p}

Trim-and-Fill Method

  • Identifies and imputes missing studies from funnel plot asymmetry
  • Re-estimates the pooled effect including imputed studies
  • Use statsmodels or metafor (R) for implementation

Heterogeneity Interpretation

I² ValueInterpretation
0-25%Low heterogeneity
25-50%Moderate heterogeneity
50-75%Substantial heterogeneity
75-100%Considerable heterogeneity

When I² > 50%, investigate sources: 1. Subgroup analysis: Split by study design, population, intervention dose 2. Meta-regression: Model effect size as function of study-level covariates 3. Sensitivity analysis: Leave-one-out, exclude high risk-of-bias studies

Reporting Standards

Follow PRISMA 2020 for reporting meta-analyses. Include: 1. Number of studies (k) and total participants (N) 2. Pooled effect size with 95% CI 3. Heterogeneity: Q statistic (df, p), I², tau² 4. Model type: fixed-effect vs. random-effects with justification 5. Publication bias assessment results 6. Forest plot and funnel plot as figures

Best Practices

1. Use random-effects model by default (studies rarely share a true common effect) 2. Always report both Q and I² for heterogeneity 3. Log-transform ORs and RRs before pooling; back-transform for reporting 4. Use Hedges' g rather than Cohen's d for small-sample correction 5. Minimum 5-10 studies for reliable funnel plot interpretation 6. Never fabricate study data or effect sizes

Zero-Hallucination Rule

  • ALL study-level data must come from tool results or user-provided data
  • NEVER generate fictional study names, sample sizes, or effect sizes
  • If insufficient data for meta-analysis, say so explicitly

Related skills

FAQ

Which model does it use?

The DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model, plus fixed-effect weights and Cochran's Q.

What plots does it generate?

Publication-quality forest plots and funnel plots for publication bias assessment.

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.