
Meta Analysis
- 17 installs
- 869 repo stars
- Updated June 8, 2026
- beita6969/scienceclaw
meta-analysis is a Claude skill that performs quantitative meta-analysis with effect size calculation, forest plots, funnel plots, and heterogeneity assessment.
About
This skill performs quantitative meta-analysis in Python. It calculates pooled effect sizes with a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model, assesses heterogeneity (I-squared), detects publication bias, and generates forest and funnel plots. Developers use it to combine results from multiple studies into a synthesized estimate.
- Quantitative meta-analysis with pooled effect sizes and heterogeneity assessment
- DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model, forest plots, and funnel plots
- Effect-size table covering SMD, OR, RR, RD, HR, and Fisher's z
Meta Analysis by the numbers
- 17 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,286 of 2,065 Data Science & ML skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
meta-analysis capabilities & compatibility
Free; requires Python with NumPy, SciPy, and Matplotlib.
- Capabilities
- ml pipeline · math computation · medical qa
- Use cases
- data analysis · research
- Pricing
- Free
What meta-analysis says it does
Perform quantitative meta-analysis with effect size calculation, forest plots, funnel plots, and heterogeneity assessment.
DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis.
Generate a funnel plot to assess publication bias.
npx skills add https://github.com/beita6969/scienceclaw --skill meta-analysisAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 17 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 869 |
| Last updated | June 8, 2026 |
| Repository | beita6969/scienceclaw ↗ |
What it does
Combine results from multiple studies into pooled effect sizes with heterogeneity, publication-bias, forest, and funnel-plot output.
Who is it for?
Combining study results, pooling effect sizes, assessing publication bias, and creating forest/funnel plots.
Skip if: Systematic review protocols (use systematic-review) or single-study statistics (use statsmodels-stats).
When should I use this skill?
A user asks to combine multiple studies, pool effect sizes, or assess heterogeneity or publication bias.
What you get
Returns a pooled effect estimate with CI, I-squared heterogeneity, and forest/funnel plots.
- Pooled effect estimate with CI
- Forest plot
- Funnel plot
By the numbers
- 7 effect-size types tabulated
- 6 example use-case prompts listed
Files
Meta-Analysis
Quantitative synthesis of results from multiple studies. Calculates pooled effect sizes, assesses heterogeneity, detects publication bias, and generates forest and funnel plots.
When to Use
- "Combine these study results into a meta-analysis"
- "Calculate the pooled odds ratio from these trials"
- "Create a forest plot of these effect sizes"
- "Test for publication bias with a funnel plot"
- "What's the heterogeneity (I²) across these studies?"
- "Run a random-effects meta-analysis"
When NOT to Use
- Designing a systematic review protocol (use systematic-review)
- Searching for studies (use literature-search)
- Single-study statistical analysis (use statsmodels-stats)
- Narrative literature review (use paper-writing)
Effect Size Types
| Outcome Type | Effect Size | Formula | Use When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous | SMD (Cohen's d / Hedges' g) | $(M_1 - M_2) / S_p$ | Comparing means across studies with different scales |
| Continuous | Mean Difference (MD) | $M_1 - M_2$ | Same outcome measure across all studies |
| Binary | Odds Ratio (OR) | $(a \times d) / (b \times c)$ | Case-control studies, binary outcomes |
| Binary | Risk Ratio (RR) | $(a/(a+b)) / (c/(c+d))$ | Cohort studies, clinical trials |
| Binary | Risk Difference (RD) | $R_1 - R_2$ | Absolute risk reduction |
| Time-to-event | Hazard Ratio (HR) | From Cox model | Survival analysis |
| Correlation | Fisher's z | $0.5 \ln((1+r)/(1-r))$ | Correlation studies |
Core Analysis with Python
Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
def meta_analysis_random_effects(effects, variances, study_names=None):
"""
DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis.
Args:
effects: array of effect sizes (log-OR, SMD, etc.)
variances: array of within-study variances
study_names: optional list of study labels
Returns:
dict with pooled estimate, CI, heterogeneity stats
"""
effects = np.array(effects, dtype=float)
variances = np.array(variances, dtype=float)
k = len(effects)
# Fixed-effect weights
w_fe = 1.0 / variances
pooled_fe = np.sum(w_fe * effects) / np.sum(w_fe)
# Cochran's Q
Q = np.sum(w_fe * (effects - pooled_fe) ** 2)
df = k - 1
p_heterogeneity = 1 - stats.chi2.cdf(Q, df)
# tau-squared (DerSimonian-Laird)
C = np.sum(w_fe) - np.sum(w_fe ** 2) / np.sum(w_fe)
tau2 = max(0, (Q - df) / C)
# I-squared
I2 = max(0, (Q - df) / Q * 100) if Q > 0 else 0
# Random-effects weights
w_re = 1.0 / (variances + tau2)
pooled_re = np.sum(w_re * effects) / np.sum(w_re)
se_pooled = np.sqrt(1.0 / np.sum(w_re))
ci_lower = pooled_re - 1.96 * se_pooled
ci_upper = pooled_re + 1.96 * se_pooled
z = pooled_re / se_pooled
p_value = 2 * (1 - stats.norm.cdf(abs(z)))
return {
'pooled_effect': pooled_re,
'se': se_pooled,
'ci_lower': ci_lower,
'ci_upper': ci_upper,
'z': z,
'p_value': p_value,
'tau2': tau2,
'I2': I2,
'Q': Q,
'Q_df': df,
'Q_p': p_heterogeneity,
'k': k,
'model': 'DerSimonian-Laird random-effects'
}Forest Plot
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.patches as mpatches
def forest_plot(effects, ci_lower, ci_upper, study_names, pooled, pooled_ci,
xlabel='Effect Size', title='Forest Plot', output_path='forest_plot.png'):
"""Generate a publication-quality forest plot."""
k = len(effects)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, max(4, k * 0.4 + 2)))
y_positions = list(range(k, 0, -1))
# Individual studies
for i, y in enumerate(y_positions):
ax.plot(effects[i], y, 'ks', markersize=8)
ax.plot([ci_lower[i], ci_upper[i]], [y, y], 'k-', linewidth=1.5)
# Pooled estimate (diamond)
diamond_y = 0
diamond_half_h = 0.3
diamond = plt.Polygon([
[pooled_ci[0], diamond_y],
[pooled, diamond_y + diamond_half_h],
[pooled_ci[1], diamond_y],
[pooled, diamond_y - diamond_half_h]
], closed=True, facecolor='steelblue', edgecolor='black')
ax.add_patch(diamond)
# Reference line at null effect
ax.axvline(x=0, color='gray', linestyle='--', linewidth=0.8)
# Labels
yticks = y_positions + [diamond_y]
ylabels = study_names + ['Pooled']
ax.set_yticks(yticks)
ax.set_yticklabels(ylabels)
ax.set_xlabel(xlabel)
ax.set_title(title)
ax.set_ylim(-1, k + 1.5)
fig.tight_layout()
fig.savefig(output_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
print(f"Forest plot saved: {output_path}")
return figFunnel Plot (Publication Bias)
def funnel_plot(effects, se_values, pooled_effect,
xlabel='Effect Size', output_path='funnel_plot.png'):
"""Generate a funnel plot to assess publication bias."""
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(6, 5))
ax.scatter(effects, se_values, c='black', s=30, zorder=3)
# Pseudo-confidence region
se_range = np.linspace(0.001, max(se_values) * 1.1, 100)
ci_low = pooled_effect - 1.96 * se_range
ci_high = pooled_effect + 1.96 * se_range
ax.fill_betweenx(se_range, ci_low, ci_high, alpha=0.1, color='gray')
ax.axvline(pooled_effect, color='red', linestyle='--', linewidth=1)
ax.set_xlabel(xlabel)
ax.set_ylabel('Standard Error')
ax.set_title('Funnel Plot')
ax.invert_yaxis() # Convention: smaller SE at top
fig.tight_layout()
fig.savefig(output_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
print(f"Funnel plot saved: {output_path}")
return figPublication Bias Tests
Egger's Regression Test
def egger_test(effects, se_values):
"""Egger's test for funnel plot asymmetry."""
precision = 1.0 / np.array(se_values)
standardized = np.array(effects) / np.array(se_values)
slope, intercept, r, p, se = stats.linregress(precision, standardized)
return {'intercept': intercept, 'se': se, 'p_value': p,
'interpretation': 'Significant asymmetry' if p < 0.10 else 'No significant asymmetry'}Begg's Rank Correlation Test
def begg_test(effects, variances):
"""Begg-Mazumdar rank correlation test."""
standardized = effects / np.sqrt(variances)
tau, p = stats.kendalltau(standardized, variances)
return {'tau': tau, 'p_value': p}Trim-and-Fill Method
- Identifies and imputes missing studies from funnel plot asymmetry
- Re-estimates the pooled effect including imputed studies
- Use
statsmodelsormetafor(R) for implementation
Heterogeneity Interpretation
| I² Value | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 0-25% | Low heterogeneity |
| 25-50% | Moderate heterogeneity |
| 50-75% | Substantial heterogeneity |
| 75-100% | Considerable heterogeneity |
When I² > 50%, investigate sources: 1. Subgroup analysis: Split by study design, population, intervention dose 2. Meta-regression: Model effect size as function of study-level covariates 3. Sensitivity analysis: Leave-one-out, exclude high risk-of-bias studies
Reporting Standards
Follow PRISMA 2020 for reporting meta-analyses. Include: 1. Number of studies (k) and total participants (N) 2. Pooled effect size with 95% CI 3. Heterogeneity: Q statistic (df, p), I², tau² 4. Model type: fixed-effect vs. random-effects with justification 5. Publication bias assessment results 6. Forest plot and funnel plot as figures
Best Practices
1. Use random-effects model by default (studies rarely share a true common effect) 2. Always report both Q and I² for heterogeneity 3. Log-transform ORs and RRs before pooling; back-transform for reporting 4. Use Hedges' g rather than Cohen's d for small-sample correction 5. Minimum 5-10 studies for reliable funnel plot interpretation 6. Never fabricate study data or effect sizes
Zero-Hallucination Rule
- ALL study-level data must come from tool results or user-provided data
- NEVER generate fictional study names, sample sizes, or effect sizes
- If insufficient data for meta-analysis, say so explicitly
Related skills
FAQ
Which model does it use?
The DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model, plus fixed-effect weights and Cochran's Q.
What plots does it generate?
Publication-quality forest plots and funnel plots for publication bias assessment.