Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
beita6969 avatar

Paper Analysis

  • 18 installs
  • 869 repo stars
  • Updated June 8, 2026
  • beita6969/scienceclaw

Paper Analysis is a skill that reads, summarizes, and critically analyzes scientific papers to extract findings, methodology, and limitations.

About

Provides a framework to read, summarize, and critically analyze scientific papers from a PDF, URL, or DOI. A researcher uses it to extract findings, assess methodology and validity, compare papers, and produce quick or deep structured reviews. It includes domain-specific checklists for RCTs, observational studies, machine-learning papers, and qualitative research.

  • Reads, summarizes, and critically analyzes scientific papers
  • Structured deep-analysis framework covering methodology, validity, and limitations
  • Domain checklists for RCTs, observational, ML, and qualitative studies

Paper Analysis by the numbers

  • 18 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #1,016 of 1,879 Documentation skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

paper-analysis capabilities & compatibility

Free; fetches papers via public sources and Semantic Scholar

Capabilities
paper summary · methodology critique · paper comparison
Use cases
research · documentation · pdf parsing
Pricing
Free
From the docs

What paper-analysis says it does

Systematic scientific paper reading, summarization, and critical analysis.
SKILL.md
Distinguish between what the paper claims and what the evidence supports
SKILL.md
Extract key findings, methodology, limitations, and contributions.
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/beita6969/scienceclaw --skill paper-analysis

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs18
repo stars869
Last updatedJune 8, 2026
Repositorybeita6969/scienceclaw

What it does

Summarize and critically analyze scientific papers, extracting findings, methodology, and limitations.

Who is it for?

Summarizing a paper, critiquing methodology, and comparing studies

Skip if: Non-academic writing; it is built around scientific paper structure and critique

When should I use this skill?

A user shares a paper and asks to summarize, critique methodology, or extract findings

What you get

A structured summary or critical review of a paper with findings, methodology assessment, and limitations.

  • Quick ~200-word summary
  • Deep structured critical analysis
  • Multi-paper comparison table

By the numbers

  • 6-section deep-analysis framework
  • ~200-word quick summary target

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Paper Analysis

Systematic scientific paper reading, summarization, and critical analysis.

Paper Acquisition

1. If user provides a DOI: fetch via https://doi.org/DOI or Semantic Scholar API 2. If user provides arXiv ID: fetch via https://arxiv.org/abs/ID 3. If user provides a URL: use web_fetch to extract content 4. If user provides a PDF file: read directly or use summarize skill

Analysis Framework

Quick Summary (default)

Provide in ~200 words:

  • Research question / objective
  • Method (1-2 sentences)
  • Key findings (2-3 bullet points)
  • Main contribution
  • One key limitation

Deep Analysis

When requested, provide structured analysis:

1. Paper Metadata
  • Title, authors, year, journal/venue, DOI
  • Citation count (via Semantic Scholar)
2. Research Context
  • Problem statement and motivation
  • Research gap being addressed
  • Theoretical framework
3. Methodology Assessment
  • Study design (experimental/observational/computational/theoretical)
  • Sample/dataset description
  • Variables (independent, dependent, controls)
  • Analysis methods
  • Reproducibility assessment (data/code availability)
4. Results Evaluation
  • Key findings with effect sizes and confidence intervals
  • Statistical significance vs practical significance
  • Figures and tables interpretation
  • Are results consistent with claims?
5. Critical Assessment

Check for:

  • Internal validity: confounds, selection bias, measurement error
  • External validity: generalizability, ecological validity
  • Statistical issues: multiple comparisons, p-hacking, small N
  • Logical issues: correlation ≠ causation, survivorship bias
  • Reporting issues: selective reporting, missing negative results
  • Methodological rigor: appropriate controls, blinding, randomization
6. Contribution & Impact
  • Novelty assessment
  • Practical implications
  • Theoretical implications
  • Future directions suggested

Comparison Mode

When comparing multiple papers:

DimensionPaper APaper BPaper C
Research Question
Method
Sample Size
Key Finding
Limitation
Strength

Domain-Specific Checklists

RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial)

  • CONSORT checklist compliance
  • Randomization method, allocation concealment
  • Blinding (single/double/triple)
  • ITT vs per-protocol analysis
  • Dropout rates and handling

Observational Studies

  • STROBE checklist
  • Confounding control methods
  • Selection bias assessment

Machine Learning Papers

  • Train/val/test split methodology
  • Baseline comparisons
  • Ablation studies
  • Statistical significance of improvements
  • Computational cost reporting
  • Code/data availability

Qualitative Research

  • Sampling strategy (purposive, theoretical, snowball)
  • Data saturation
  • Coding methodology (thematic, grounded theory)
  • Reflexivity and positionality
  • Member checking / triangulation

Output Style

  • Use academic but accessible language
  • Cite specific sections/figures/tables from the paper
  • Distinguish between what the paper claims and what the evidence supports
  • Flag any red flags clearly but diplomatically

Related skills

FAQ

What inputs does it accept?

A DOI, arXiv ID, URL, or PDF file of the paper.

Does it have domain-specific rigor checks?

Yes, checklists for RCTs (CONSORT), observational studies (STROBE), machine-learning papers, and qualitative research.

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.