
Patent Analysis
- 16 installs
- 869 repo stars
- Updated June 8, 2026
- beita6969/scienceclaw
patent-analysis is a skill that guides prior-art search, claim interpretation, freedom-to-operate assessment, and IP strategy for scientific inventions.
About
This skill guides a structured patent landscape analysis: prior-art search, claim interpretation, freedom-to-operate assessment, and IP strategy for scientific inventions. A developer or researcher uses it when evaluating whether an invention is novel or clears existing patents. It outputs prior-art tables, claim charts, and invention disclosures, and flags that legal opinions require a patent attorney.
- Runs prior-art and novelty searches across Google Patents, USPTO, Espacenet, WIPO PatentScope and Lens.org
- Produces claim charts, FTO opinions and invention disclosures
- 9-item quality checklist with a disclaimer to consult a registered patent attorney
Patent Analysis by the numbers
- 16 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #2,096 of 3,280 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
patent-analysis capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- prior art search · claim analysis · freedom to operate · patent landscape
- Use cases
- research
What patent-analysis says it does
Conducts patent landscape analysis including prior art searches, patent claim interpretation, freedom-to-operate assessment, and intellectual property strategy for scientific inventions
Search patent databases systematically: Google Patents, USPTO (PatFT/AppFT), Espacenet, WIPO PatentScope.
Recommendation to consult registered patent attorney for legal opinions
npx skills add https://github.com/beita6969/scienceclaw --skill patent-analysisAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 16 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 869 |
| Last updated | June 8, 2026 |
| Repository | beita6969/scienceclaw ↗ |
What it does
Assess the novelty and freedom-to-operate of a scientific invention before filing a patent.
Who is it for?
Researchers scoping the novelty and IP landscape of a scientific invention
Skip if: Drafting legally binding patent applications, which require a registered patent attorney
When should I use this skill?
The user mentions patents, prior art, freedom to operate, IP protection, or technology licensing
What you get
A prior-art table, claim charts, an FTO opinion summary, and an invention disclosure draft.
- prior-art results table
- claim charts
- freedom-to-operate opinion summary
By the numbers
- 9-item quality checklist
- 7-step methodology
Files
When to Trigger
Activate this skill when the user mentions:
- Patent search, prior art, novelty search
- Patent claims, claim construction, claim interpretation
- Freedom to operate (FTO), infringement analysis
- Patent landscape, technology mapping, IP portfolio
- Provisional patent, utility patent, PCT application
- Licensing, royalties, technology transfer
- Patent classification (CPC, IPC), patent families
Step-by-Step Methodology
1. Define the invention - Clearly articulate the novel technical features. Distinguish the invention from the prior art. Identify the technical problem solved and the solution provided. 2. Prior art search - Search patent databases systematically: Google Patents, USPTO (PatFT/AppFT), Espacenet, WIPO PatentScope. Use keyword combinations, CPC/IPC classification codes, and citation analysis. Search non-patent literature (publications, conference papers) as well. 3. Landscape analysis - Map the patent landscape: identify key players, filing trends over time, geographic distribution, technology clusters. Use patent classification to categorize technologies. Identify white spaces (underpatented areas). 4. Claim analysis - Parse claims into elements. Identify independent vs. dependent claims. Map claim elements to technical features. For FTO: compare each element of relevant claims against the proposed product/method. 5. Novelty and non-obviousness assessment - Compare invention against closest prior art references. Identify elements that are novel (not found in any single reference) and non-obvious (not a trivial combination of references to a person of ordinary skill in the art). 6. IP strategy recommendation - Advise on filing strategy: provisional vs. utility, domestic vs. PCT, continuation and divisional applications. Consider timing (grace periods, priority dates). Evaluate trade secret vs. patent protection trade-offs. 7. Documentation - Prepare invention disclosure with: title, inventors, technical field, background, description of embodiments, and claims outline. Note that legal patent drafting requires a registered patent attorney.
Key Databases and Tools
- Google Patents - Free full-text patent search
- USPTO PatFT / AppFT - US Patent and Trademark Office
- Espacenet - European Patent Office database
- WIPO PatentScope - International PCT applications
- Lens.org - Open patent and scholarly search
- CPC / IPC classification - Technology classification systems
Output Format
- Prior art results as a table: patent number, title, filing date, assignee, relevance summary.
- Claim charts: claim element in left column, prior art reference in right column.
- Patent landscape as a technology map or filing trend chart.
- FTO opinion summary: clear / potential risk / likely infringement (with caveats).
- Invention disclosure following standard institutional templates.
Quality Checklist
- [ ] Multiple patent databases searched (not just one)
- [ ] Both patent and non-patent prior art considered
- [ ] Classification codes (CPC/IPC) used to ensure comprehensive search
- [ ] Claims parsed element by element for accurate analysis
- [ ] Filing dates and priority dates correctly identified
- [ ] Patent family relationships traced (equivalents in other jurisdictions)
- [ ] Disclaimer: analysis is informational, not legal advice
- [ ] Recommendation to consult registered patent attorney for legal opinions
- [ ] Geographic scope of patent rights identified
Related skills
FAQ
Which patent databases does this skill search?
Google Patents, USPTO PatFT/AppFT, Espacenet, WIPO PatentScope, and Lens.org.
Can it replace a patent attorney?
No. The skill notes the analysis is informational and recommends consulting a registered patent attorney for legal opinions and drafting.