Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
bobmatnyc avatar

Condition Based Waiting

  • 137 installs
  • 63 repo stars
  • Updated July 18, 2026
  • bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills

Implement condition-based waits in agent and browser automation so flows pause until UI state, API responses, or files meet criteria instead of fixed sleeps.

About

condition-based-waiting from bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills teaches agents to wait until explicit conditions are met—DOM elements, HTTP status, file presence—rather than arbitrary sleeps. It reduces flaky automation in browser, CLI, and multi-step agent workflows during implementation.

  • Predicate-based wait loops
  • Avoids brittle fixed delays
  • Handles async UI and APIs
  • Improves agent reliability
  • Patterns for timeout and retry

Condition Based Waiting by the numbers

  • 137 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #680 of 2,715 Automation & Workflows skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 1, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills --skill condition-based-waiting

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs137
repo stars63
Last updatedJuly 18, 2026
Repositorybobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills

What it does

Implement condition-based waits in agent and browser automation so flows pause until UI state, API responses, or files meet criteria instead of fixed sleeps.

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Condition-Based Waiting

Overview

Flaky tests often guess at timing with arbitrary delays. This creates race conditions where tests pass on fast machines but fail under load or in CI.

Core principle: Wait for the actual condition you care about, not a guess about how long it takes.

When to Use

digraph when_to_use {
    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" [shape=diamond];
    "Testing timing behavior?" [shape=diamond];
    "Document WHY timeout needed" [shape=box];
    "Use condition-based waiting" [shape=box];

    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" -> "Testing timing behavior?" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Document WHY timeout needed" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Use condition-based waiting" [label="no"];
}

Use when:

  • Tests have arbitrary delays (setTimeout, sleep, time.sleep())
  • Tests are flaky (pass sometimes, fail under load)
  • Tests timeout when run in parallel
  • Waiting for async operations to complete

Don't use when:

  • Testing actual timing behavior (debounce, throttle intervals)
  • Always document WHY if using arbitrary timeout

Core Pattern

// ❌ BEFORE: Guessing at timing
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 50));
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

// ✅ AFTER: Waiting for condition
await waitFor(() => getResult() !== undefined);
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

Quick Patterns

ScenarioPattern
Wait for eventwaitFor(() => events.find(e => e.type === 'DONE'))
Wait for statewaitFor(() => machine.state === 'ready')
Wait for countwaitFor(() => items.length >= 5)
Wait for filewaitFor(() => fs.existsSync(path))
Complex conditionwaitFor(() => obj.ready && obj.value > 10)

Implementation

Generic polling function:

async function waitFor<T>(
  condition: () => T | undefined | null | false,
  description: string,
  timeoutMs = 5000
): Promise<T> {
  const startTime = Date.now();

  while (true) {
    const result = condition();
    if (result) return result;

    if (Date.now() - startTime > timeoutMs) {
      throw new Error(`Timeout waiting for ${description} after ${timeoutMs}ms`);
    }

    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 10)); // Poll every 10ms
  }
}

See @example.ts for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (waitForEvent, waitForEventCount, waitForEventMatch).

For detailed patterns, implementation guide, and common mistakes, see @references/patterns-and-implementation.md

Real-World Impact

From debugging session (2025-10-03):

  • Fixed 15 flaky tests across 3 files
  • Pass rate: 60% → 100%
  • Execution time: 40% faster
  • No more race conditions

Related skills

Automation & Workflowsagentsautomation

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.