
Impl Review
- 8 installs
- 3.5k repo stars
- Updated August 5, 2026
- brave/brave-core
impl-review is a Claude Code skill that implements review feedback on a brave-core PR by checking out the branch, applying requested changes, running preflight, committing, and pushing.
About
This skill implements reviewer feedback on a brave-core pull request. A developer uses it to check out a PR's branch, apply exactly the changes reviewers requested, run preflight checks, commit, and push. It fetches all review and issue comments, presents a plan for confirmation, makes only the requested changes as new commits, and posts a summary comment.
- Checks out a PR branch and implements the reviewer's requested changes
- Runs preflight checks, commits as new commits, and pushes
- Scopes changes strictly to review feedback with no while-I'm-here cleanups
Impl Review by the numbers
- 8 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #839 of 1,352 Code Review & Quality skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
impl-review capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- code review · pr feedback · preflight
- Works with
- github
- Use cases
- code review · testing
What impl-review says it does
Checkout a PR's branch, implement the reviewer's feedback, run preflight checks, commit, and push.
CRITICAL: Only make changes the reviewer explicitly asks for.
ALWAYS create a NEW separate commit** — never amend existing commits.
npx skills add https://github.com/brave/brave-core --skill impl-reviewAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 8 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 3.5k |
| Last updated | August 5, 2026 |
| Repository | brave/brave-core ↗ |
What it does
Check out a PR branch, apply exactly the reviewer's requested changes, run preflight, commit as new commits, and push.
Who is it for?
Applying only the reviewer-requested changes to an open brave-core PR and pushing them as new commits
Skip if: Closed or merged PRs, or making refactors the reviewer did not request
When should I use this skill?
On triggers impl-review, implement review, implement review feedback, address review comments
What you get
Reviewer-requested changes implemented, validated by preflight, committed as new commits, pushed, and summarized on the PR.
- new commit addressing review feedback
- PR summary comment
By the numbers
- 10-step workflow
Files
Implement Review Feedback
Checkout a PR's branch, implement the reviewer's feedback, run preflight checks, commit, and push.
Arguments
- `<pr-number>` (required) — The PR number in brave/brave-core to implement
review feedback for.
Confirmation
Always ask for user confirmation before implementing changes, before committing/pushing, and before posting comments on GitHub.
Steps
1. Parse Arguments
Extract the PR number from the arguments. It must be a numeric value. If no PR number is provided, ask the user for one.
2. Fetch PR Details
gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --repo brave/brave-core --json headRefName,title,body,state,files,baseRefNameExtract:
- Branch name (
headRefName) — the branch to checkout - Title — for context
- State — must be
OPEN(abort if closed/merged) - Base branch — for understanding the diff context
- Changed files — to understand what the PR modifies
If the PR is not open, inform the user and stop.
3. Fetch Review Comments
Fetch review data from the PR:
gh api repos/brave/brave-core/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/reviews --paginate
gh api repos/brave/brave-core/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/comments --paginate
gh api repos/brave/brave-core/issues/$PR_NUMBER/comments --paginateThis provides:
- Reviews (approve/request changes/comment)
- Inline code review comments (with file paths and line numbers)
- Issue-level discussion comments
4. Analyze Review Feedback
Parse the review comments to understand what changes are requested:
1. Identify actionable feedback — Focus on explicit change requests from reviewers. Ignore:
- Approvals without change requests
- Informational comments that don't require action
- Comments that have already been addressed (check commit timestamps vs
comment timestamps)
2. Categorize each requested change:
- Which file(s) need modification
- What specific change is requested
- Whether it affects production code, test code, or both
3. Present the plan:
- How many review comments were found
- Which are actionable vs already addressed
- What changes you plan to make for each
- Ask for user confirmation before proceeding
5. Checkout the Branch
git fetch origin
git checkout <headRefName>
git pull origin <headRefName>Ensure you're on the correct branch and up to date with the remote.
6. Implement Changes
CRITICAL: Only make changes the reviewer explicitly asks for.
- Do NOT make any additional changes — no "while I'm here" cleanups, no extra
refactoring, no renaming things the reviewer didn't mention
- If the reviewer asks you to fix one thing, fix exactly that one thing and
nothing else
- Every extra change risks introducing issues and makes the reviewer's job
harder
- Read the full source files for context before making changes (don't just look
at the diff)
- Apply the same coding standards as the rest of the codebase
7. Run Preflight Checks
Invoke the preflight skill to validate all changes:
/preflightThis runs: best practices check, format, gn_check, presubmit, build, and affected tests.
If preflight fails:
- Fix the issues it identifies
- Re-run preflight until it passes
- All fixes should still be scoped to the review feedback (don't fix unrelated
issues)
8. Commit and Push
Before committing, show the user a summary of all changes (files modified, diff stats) and ask for confirmation. If the user rejects, stop without committing.
ALWAYS create a NEW separate commit — never amend existing commits.
git add <changed-files>
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
Address review: <brief description of changes>
EOF
)"
git pushCommit message guidelines:
- Start with "Address review:" prefix
- Briefly describe what feedback was addressed
- Keep under 72 characters for subject line
- DO NOT include any
Co-Authored-Byline - DO NOT use
--no-verifyor--no-gpg-signflags
If multiple logical units of review feedback were addressed, consider separate commits for each.
9. Post PR Comment
Show the draft comment to the user and ask for confirmation before posting. If the user rejects, skip posting.
Post a summary comment on the PR:
gh pr comment $PR_NUMBER --repo brave/brave-core --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
Fixed: <description of what was changed>
<For each review point addressed, briefly note what was done>
EOF
)"10. Report Summary
Output a summary to the user:
- PR number and title
- Number of review comments addressed
- What changes were made
- Preflight result (pass/fail)
- Commit SHA
- Link to the PR
---
Important Rules
1. Minimal changes — Only implement what reviewers explicitly ask for 2. New commits only — Never amend; separate commits let reviewers track what changed 3. No attribution — No Co-Authored-By lines in commits 4. User confirmation — Present the plan before implementing, confirm before committing, confirm before posting comments 5. Preflight required — All changes must pass preflight before pushing
---
Example Usage
/impl-review 12345Asks for confirmation before implementing, committing, and posting.
Related skills
FAQ
Does it make extra cleanups?
No. It only makes changes the reviewer explicitly asks for, with no while-I'm-here cleanups, extra refactoring, or renaming.
Does it amend commits?
No. It always creates new separate commits so reviewers can track what changed, and never amends.