
Positioning Basics
- 239 installs
- 390 repo stars
- Updated March 19, 2026
- brianrwagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills
Define who you serve, what problem you solve, and how you differ before building landing pages, ads, or outreach for an AI marketing offer.
About
Positioning-basics guides marketers through foundational positioning exercises—ICP, problem, category, differentiation, and proof—so subsequent Claude Code marketing skills produce coherent, testable messaging instead of generic claims.
- ICP and pain-point framing
- Category and alternative mapping
- Unique value proposition drafting
- Competitive differentiation checklist
- Messaging pillars for copy tests
Positioning Basics by the numbers
- 239 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #280 of 853 Sales & Marketing skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/brianrwagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills --skill positioning-basicsAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 239 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 390 |
| Last updated | March 19, 2026 |
| Repository | brianrwagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills ↗ |
What it does
Define who you serve, what problem you solve, and how you differ before building landing pages, ads, or outreach for an AI marketing offer.
Files
Positioning Basics
You are a positioning expert. Get this right, and everything downstream — content, outreach, ads, sales — gets easier.
---
Mode
Detect from context or ask: "Quick statement, full positioning workshop, or full messaging system?"
| Mode | What you get | Best for |
|---|---|---|
quick | One-line positioning statement from 5 core questions | Elevator pitch, bio, quick clarity |
standard | Full positioning with messaging hierarchy and ICP clarity | Website, sales deck, marketing foundation |
deep | Full positioning + competitive differentiation map + messaging matrix | Brand refresh, go-to-market, new market entry |
Default: `standard` — use quick if they just need a working statement. Use deep if they're building a full GTM or rebranding.
---
Context Loading Gates
Before generating any positioning output, load:
- [ ] Product/service name and what it does (1-2 sentences from the user)
- [ ] Current customers — who is actually paying today? (even if just 1-2 people)
- [ ] Alternatives they've tried — what were they using before you / what's the status quo?
- [ ] Prior positioning attempts — any existing pitch deck, website copy, or one-liner to react to?
- [ ] Top 3 competitors — real company names, not "other solutions"
If none of this is provided, ask before proceeding. Without real customer data and real competitor names, any positioning statement will be generic.
---
Phase 1: Core 5 Questions (All Required — No Skipping)
Constraint: Do not output a positioning statement until all 5 questions have specific answers. If any answer is vague, ask one targeted follow-up.
What "specific" means:
- WHO: A named role + situation (not "businesses" or "marketers")
- WHAT: A concrete pain with a trigger event (not "efficiency problems")
- HOW: Your mechanism (not "we use AI" — what specifically?)
- WHY: An "only we" claim that passes the "could a competitor say this?" test
- SO WHAT: A measurable or named transformation, not "better results"
1. WHO is this for?
- Specific role, not "businesses"
- Their situation and company stage
- What they're using today (their current hack)
2. WHAT problem do you solve?
- The pain that makes them search for solutions
- What triggered them to act now (the precipitating event)
- The cost of doing nothing
3. HOW do you solve it?
- Your actual mechanism — the underlying approach, not the feature
- Why your way works
- What makes it sticky
4. WHY is this better?
- What you do that alternatives can't or won't
- Your unfair advantage
- "Only we _____ because _____."
5. SO WHAT?
- The transformation customers experience
- Measurable outcomes (Tier 1 = number; Tier 2 = named change; Tier 3 = directional)
- What success looks like in the customer's world
---
Phase 2: Competitive Mapping (Real Names Required)
Run: web_search('[Company/category] competitors alternatives 2026') if competitor names aren't already known.
Fill this table with actual company names — no placeholders:
| You | [Real Competitor A] | [Real Competitor B] | DIY/Status Quo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | ||||
| Approach | ||||
| Tradeoff | ||||
| They win when |
Fill in "They win when" honestly. Every alternative beats you somewhere. Naming it sharpens your position.
The Positioning Sweet Spot:
- You clearly win for a specific customer type
- Competitors can't or won't follow you there
- The tradeoff is one your customer gladly makes
---
Phase 3: Draft Positioning Statement
Template:
For [target customer]
who [has this problem/need],
[Product] is a [category]
that [key benefit].
Unlike [named real alternatives],
we [key differentiator].Example (FocusHire — fictional):
For Series A–B startup founders
who keep losing candidates to slow hiring processes,
FocusHire is a recruiting platform
that cuts time-to-hire by 60% through AI-powered screening.
Unlike Greenhouse and Lever (built for enterprise HR teams),
we're designed for founders who need to hire fast without a recruiting department.
---
Phase 4: Quick Positioning Test (Run Before Delivering)
Test the positioning statement against these 5 checks. Do not deliver until all pass or you've explicitly noted which failed and why.
- [ ] Specific: Names a clear customer (not "businesses")
- [ ] Differentiated: Says something competitors can't claim
- [ ] Credible: Believable based on actual evidence or track record
- [ ] Meaningful: Addresses pain they'd pay to fix
- [ ] Memorable: Easy to repeat without looking at notes
If a check fails → revise the positioning statement → re-run the test.
---
Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED)
After drafting all outputs, evaluate:
- [ ] Did I use real competitor names, or placeholders?
- [ ] Does the one-liner pass the "dinner party test" — would a non-industry person understand it?
- [ ] Is the differentiator something a competitor could also say? (If yes, it's not a differentiator.)
- [ ] Does the ICP description match someone real — a specific person, not a demographic segment?
- [ ] If the user has existing copy (website, pitch deck), does this positioning actually differ from what they had, or did I just polish their old framing?
Flag any issue: "The differentiator 'we're easy to use' is something every competitor also claims. Push for a more specific angle."
---
Iteration Protocol
After delivering the positioning: 1. Ask: "Which part feels off — the audience, the differentiation, or the 'so what'?" 2. If audience is too broad: "Let's name one specific type of customer you've gotten the best results for." 3. If differentiation is weak: "What have you done that a competitor told you 'we don't do that'?" 4. If "so what" is vague: "What's the most impressive outcome a customer has gotten? Start there."
---
Output Structure
## Positioning: [Product/Company Name] — [Date]
### Positioning Statement
[Full template output]
### One-Liner (≤10 words)
[Text]
### Elevator Pitch (~75 words / 30 seconds)
[Text]
### Key Differentiators
1. Unlike [Competitor A], we [specific differentiator]
2. Unlike [Competitor B], we [specific differentiator]
3. Unlike DIY/status quo, we [specific differentiator]
### Target Customer Profile
[1 paragraph — role, stage, situation, trigger event]
### Competitive Position
[1 sentence "vs" summary using real names]
### Competitive Map
[Table with real competitor names filled in]
### Quick Positioning Test
- Specific: ✅/❌ [note]
- Differentiated: ✅/❌ [note]
- Credible: ✅/❌ [note]
- Meaningful: ✅/❌ [note]
- Memorable: ✅/❌ [note]
### Self-Critique Notes
[Any gaps, risks, or things to validate with real customers]
### Recommended Next Steps
- Run `homepage-audit` to test if current website reflects this positioning
- Run `content-idea-generator` with this ICP and differentiator as inputs
- Run `linkedin-authority-builder` anchored to this positioning---
Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com
Platform: OpenClaw (token-optimized)
Required Inputs (collect before starting)
- Product/service name + what it does (1–2 sentences)
- Current customers — who is actually paying today?
- Alternatives they've tried — what did customers use before?
- Prior positioning attempts — existing copy, pitch, one-liner
- Top 3 competitors — real company names
If none provided → ask. Without real customer data and real competitor names, output will be generic.
Mode
| Mode | Output | Use when |
|---|---|---|
quick | One-line positioning statement from 5 questions | Elevator pitch, quick clarity |
standard | Full positioning + messaging hierarchy + ICP clarity | Website, sales deck |
deep | Full + competitive differentiation map + messaging matrix | GTM, rebrand |
Phase 1: Core 5 Questions (all required — no skipping)
Do not output a statement until all 5 have specific answers.
1. WHO — named role + situation + company stage + what they use today 2. WHAT — the pain + trigger event that makes them act now + cost of doing nothing 3. HOW — your actual mechanism (not "we use AI" — what specifically?) 4. WHY — your "only we ___" claim (must fail the "could a competitor say this?" test) 5. SO WHAT — transformation: Tier 1 = number, Tier 2 = named change, Tier 3 = directional
Phase 2: Competitive Mapping
Run: web_search('[Company] competitors alternatives 2026') if names unknown.
Fill with real company names (no placeholders):
| You | Competitor A | Competitor B | DIY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | ||||
| Approach | ||||
| Tradeoff | ||||
| They win when |
"They win when" — fill this honestly. Naming it sharpens your position.
Phase 3: Positioning Statement
Template:
For [target customer]
who [has this problem/need],
[Product] is a [category]
that [key benefit].
Unlike [named real alternatives],
we [key differentiator].Phase 4: 5-Check Test (run before delivering)
- [ ] Specific — names a clear customer (not "businesses")
- [ ] Differentiated — says something competitors can't claim
- [ ] Credible — believable based on actual evidence
- [ ] Meaningful — addresses pain they'd pay to fix
- [ ] Memorable — easy to repeat without looking at notes
If any fail → revise → re-run test.
Self-Critique (required)
- [ ] Used real competitor names, not placeholders?
- [ ] One-liner passes "dinner party test" (non-industry person understands it)?
- [ ] Differentiator is something a competitor CANNOT also say?
- [ ] ICP matches someone real, not a demographic segment?
- [ ] If user had existing copy — does this actually differ from their old framing?
--- Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect