
Marginaleffects
- 16 installs
- 3.2k repo stars
- Updated August 4, 2026
- brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills
marginaleffects is a skill that documents the marginaleffects R and Python package for interpreting statistical models via predictions, comparisons, slopes, and hypothesis tests.
About
This skill is a reference manual for the marginaleffects R and Python package and its companion book Model to Meaning. It helps a developer interpret statistical models through predictions, comparisons, slopes, and hypothesis tests using a five-question framework. A researcher uses it to choose estimands like ATE, ATT, or CATE, compute risk ratios or odds ratios, and do causal inference with G-computation.
- Manual for the marginaleffects R and Python package
- Five-question framework: quantity, grid, aggregation, uncertainty, test
- Covers ATE/ATT/CATE, contrasts, counterfactuals, and G-computation
Marginaleffects by the numbers
- 16 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,320 of 2,064 Data Science & ML skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
marginaleffects capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- marginal effects · causal inference · model interpretation · data analysis
- Use cases
- data analysis · research
- Pricing
- Free
What marginaleffects says it does
Manual for the marginaleffects R and Python package, and guide to the book "Model to Meaning".
Every interpretation task can be decomposed into five disciplined questions:
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills --skill marginaleffectsAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 16 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 3.2k |
| Last updated | August 4, 2026 |
| Repository | brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills ↗ |
What it does
Interpret statistical models with the marginaleffects package to compute predictions, comparisons, slopes, and causal estimands like ATE, ATT, and CATE.
Who is it for?
Choosing and computing estimands (ATE, ATT, CATE), contrasts, and counterfactuals from fitted models.
Skip if: Fitting the underlying models themselves or non-statistical tasks.
When should I use this skill?
Asking about predictions, comparisons, slopes, marginal effects, treatment effects, or causal inference with G-computation.
What you get
Produces correct estimands and code for predictions, comparisons, slopes, and hypothesis tests in R or Python.
By the numbers
- 5-question interpretation framework
- 13 book chapters referenced
Files
marginaleffects
Primary source of information: https://marginaleffects.com Free book, case studies, and vignettes are available there.
Package manual for R and Python, plus a guide to the companion book.
Book: Model to Meaning: How to Interpret Statistical Models in R and Python
- Author: Vincent Arel-Bundock (2026)
- Publisher: CRC Press
- Free online: https://marginaleffects.com (primary source with many case studies and vignettes)
- Print: https://routledge.com/9781032908724
Core framework: Five questions for every analysis
Every interpretation task can be decomposed into five disciplined questions:
1. Quantity: What estimand? (predictions, comparisons, slopes, or tests) 2. Predictors (Grid): Where to evaluate? (observed values, counterfactual scenarios, balanced grids) 3. Aggregation: Over whom? (unit-level, group means with by=, weighted averages) 4. Uncertainty: Which inference method? (delta method, robust SE, bootstrap, Bayesian) 5. Test: What hypothesis? (null tests, equivalence, pairwise contrasts)
Quick start
Chapter summaries: Read chapters/<chapter>.qmd Function reference: Read man/r/<function>.md or man/python/<function>.md
When to use this skill
- User asks about predictions, comparisons, slopes, or marginal effects
- User needs help choosing estimands (ATE, ATT, CATE, risk difference, odds ratio)
- User asks about marginaleffects function syntax or arguments
- User wants to interpret model results or test hypotheses
- User mentions counterfactual analysis, G-computation, or causal inference
- User references Model to Meaning chapters
Instructions
1. Classify the request:
- Conceptual: Which estimand? How to interpret? → Use
chapters/ - Implementation: Function syntax, arguments, code → Use
man/r/orman/python/ - Mixed: Start with conceptual framing, then provide code
2. Read the relevant source files:
- Book chapters:
chapters/framework.qmd,chapters/predictions.qmd,chapters/comparisons.qmd,chapters/slopes.qmd,chapters/hypothesis.qmd, etc. - R reference:
man/r/predictions.md,man/r/comparisons.md,man/r/slopes.md,man/r/hypotheses.md,man/r/datagrid.md - Python reference:
man/python/predictions.md,man/python/comparisons.md,man/python/slopes.md,man/python/hypotheses.md
3. Apply the five-question framework to organize your response:
- Help user define the estimand (Quantity)
- Clarify where to evaluate it (Grid)
- Determine aggregation level (Aggregation)
- Recommend uncertainty quantification (Uncertainty)
- Specify hypothesis if testing (Test)
4. Provide concrete code examples using the correct function for their language (R or Python)
Available resources
Book chapters (chapters/)
| File | Topic | Chapter focus |
|---|---|---|
framework.qmd | Five-question framework (start here) | Defines the five questions and core quantities (predictions, comparisons, slopes) for turning models into intuitive estimands. |
predictions.qmd | Predicted values and expected outcomes | Defines predictions, grids, aggregation, and tests with predictions()/avg_predictions(). |
comparisons.qmd | Counterfactual comparisons, ATE, ATT, risk ratios | Defines counterfactual comparisons, effect functions, grids, and aggregation with comparisons()/avg_comparisons(). |
slopes.qmd | Marginal effects, partial derivatives | Defines slopes as partial derivatives, conditional on predictors; uses slopes()/avg_slopes(). |
hypothesis.qmd | Hypothesis testing and equivalence | Null vs equivalence tests for any quantity using hypothesis and equivalence arguments. |
interactions.qmd | Interaction effects and effect modification | Interprets heterogeneity and nonlinearity with interactions and polynomials using predictions, comparisons, and slopes. |
categorical.qmd | Categorical predictors and contrasts | Applies the framework to categorical/ordinal outcomes with predictions and comparisons by outcome level. |
experiments.qmd | Experimental designs | ATE in experiments and factorial designs via avg_comparisons() and robust SEs. |
gcomputation.qmd | G-computation and causal inference | G-computation steps for ATE/ATT/ATU/CATE with counterfactual prediction grids. |
uncertainty.qmd | Inference methods (delta, bootstrap, Bayesian) | Delta method, bootstrap, simulation, conformal prediction, and robust/clustered standard errors via inferences()/vcov. |
mrp.qmd | Multilevel regression and poststratification | Multilevel models and poststratification with predictions and comparisons in mixed effects. |
ml.qmd | Machine learning models | Model auditing with predictions, comparisons, and slopes for ML frameworks. |
challenge.qmd | The interpretation challenge | Defines analysis goals, estimands, and why coefficients need transformation. |
R function reference (man/r/)
Core functions (includes avg_* variants): predictions.md, comparisons.md, slopes.md, hypotheses.md Grids: datagrid.md Plots: plot_predictions.md, plot_comparisons.md, plot_slopes.md Utilities: posterior_draws.md, inferences.md, get_dataset.md
Python function reference (man/python/)
Core: predictions.md, avg_predictions.md, comparisons.md, avg_comparisons.md, slopes.md, avg_slopes.md, hypotheses.md Grids: datagrid.md Plots: plot_predictions.md, plot_comparisons.md, plot_slopes.md Model fitting: fit_statsmodels.md, fit_sklearn.md, fit_linearmodels.md
Examples
Logit model example
R:
library(marginaleffects)
# Fit logistic regression
mod <- glm(am ~ hp + wt, data = mtcars, family = binomial)
# Average marginal effects (slopes on probability scale)
avg_slopes(mod)
# Predicted probabilities at specific values
predictions(mod, newdata = datagrid(hp = c(100, 150, 200), wt = 3))
# Average treatment effect: compare hp = 150 vs hp = 100
avg_comparisons(mod, variables = list(hp = c(100, 150)))
# Risk ratio for a 50-unit increase in hp
avg_comparisons(mod, variables = list(hp = 50), comparison = "ratio")Python:
import marginaleffects as me
import statsmodels.formula.api as smf
# Fit logistic regression
mod = smf.logit("am ~ hp + wt", data=me.get_dataset("mtcars")).fit()
# Average marginal effects
me.avg_slopes(mod)
# Predicted probabilities at specific values
me.predictions(mod, newdata=me.datagrid(mod, hp=[100, 150, 200], wt=3))
# Average treatment effect: compare hp = 150 vs hp = 100
me.avg_comparisons(mod, variables={"hp": [100, 150]})User asks about choosing an estimand: → Read chapters/framework.qmd and chapters/comparisons.qmd, explain the five-question framework, recommend the appropriate quantity (e.g., avg_comparisons() for ATE).
User asks how to compute marginal effects: → Read man/r/slopes.md or man/python/slopes.md, provide syntax with relevant arguments.
User wants to test treatment effect heterogeneity: → Read chapters/comparisons.qmd for CATE concepts, then man/r/hypotheses.md for testing syntax with by= groups.
User asks about counterfactual grids: → Read chapters/framework.qmd (Predictors section) and man/r/datagrid.md for datagrid() usage.
Best practices
- Ask about language preference: If the user hasn't specified R or Python, ask which they prefer before providing code examples
- Always frame responses using the five-question framework when appropriate
- Cite specific sections from summaries or manuals
- Mention
get_dataset()when users need example data - For mixed requests, start with conceptual framing then show implementation
marginaleffects - Built-in Package Skill
Source: https://github.com/vincentarelbundock/marginaleffects
The marginaleffects R/Python package includes a built-in SKILL.md for AI agents. Covers predictions, comparisons, slopes, marginal effects, ATE/ATT/CATE, hypothesis testing, contrasts, counterfactuals, risk ratios, odds ratios, and causal inference with G-computation.
Related skills
FAQ
What is the five-question framework?
Every interpretation task is decomposed into quantity, predictors/grid, aggregation, uncertainty, and test.
Does it support R and Python?
Yes, it provides function references for both R (man/r/) and Python (man/python/).