
Beamer Presentation
- 1 installs
- 3.2k repo stars
- Updated August 4, 2026
- brycewang-stanford/awesome-agent-skills-for-empirical-research
Beamer Presentation Creator is a skill that produces academic LaTeX Beamer slide decks for conference, seminar, and job-market talks.
About
Beamer Presentation Creator is a skill that builds academic slide decks in LaTeX Beamer. A developer or researcher uses it to turn a paper or project into conference, seminar, or job-market talk slides with a structured frame layout and clean theme. It provides duration-based slide structures and a ready-to-edit LaTeX template.
- Generates LaTeX Beamer academic presentation slides
- Time-boxed structures for conference, seminar, and job-market talks
- Ships a metropolis-themed slide template with title, motivation, and results frames
Beamer Presentation by the numbers
- 1 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,366 of 1,879 Documentation skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
beamer-presentation capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- presentation builder · latex slides
- Use cases
- presentations · documentation
What beamer-presentation says it does
This skill helps economists create professional academic presentations using LaTeX Beamer.
It provides templates for conference talks, job market presentations, and seminar presentations with proper structure and clean aesthetics.
npx skills add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-agent-skills-for-empirical-research --skill beamer-presentationAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 1 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 3.2k |
| Last updated | August 4, 2026 |
| Repository | brycewang-stanford/awesome-agent-skills-for-empirical-research ↗ |
What it does
Convert an empirical paper into a structured LaTeX Beamer talk for a conference, seminar, or job-market presentation.
Who is it for?
Researchers converting an empirical paper into a Beamer talk
When should I use this skill?
Preparing conference, seminar, or job-market presentation slides in LaTeX
What you get
- LaTeX Beamer .tex source
- structured slide deck
By the numbers
- 3 presentation duration structures (15-20, 45-60, 90 min)
Files
Beamer Presentation Creator
Purpose
This skill helps economists create professional academic presentations using LaTeX Beamer. It provides templates for conference talks, job market presentations, and seminar presentations with proper structure and clean aesthetics.
When to Use
- Preparing conference presentations
- Creating job market talk slides
- Making seminar/workshop presentations
- Converting a paper into presentation slides
Instructions
Step 1: Understand the Context
Ask the user: 1. What type of presentation? (20-min conference, 90-min seminar, job market) 2. What's the paper/project about? 3. What's the target audience expertise level? 4. Do they have specific style preferences?
Step 2: Structure by Time
| Duration | Structure |
|---|---|
| 15-20 min | Motivation (2) → Question (1) → Method (2) → Results (3-4) → Conclusion (1) |
| 45-60 min | Add literature review, more results detail, robustness |
| 90 min | Full seminar with theoretical framework, extensive empirics |
Step 3: Follow Presentation Best Practices
- One idea per slide
- Minimal text - use bullets of 3-6 words
- Big fonts - minimum 20pt for content
- Consistent colors - use a limited palette
- Reveal incrementally using
\pauseor<+->for complex slides
Example Output
\documentclass[aspectratio=169, 11pt]{beamer}
% ============================================
% THEME AND APPEARANCE
% ============================================
% Clean minimal theme
\usetheme{metropolis}
\usecolortheme{default}
% Or for a more traditional look:
% \usetheme{Madrid}
% \usecolortheme{whale}
% Custom colors
\definecolor{darkblue}{RGB}{0, 51, 102}
\definecolor{lightgray}{RGB}{245, 245, 245}
\setbeamercolor{frametitle}{bg=darkblue, fg=white}
\setbeamercolor{title}{fg=darkblue}
\setbeamercolor{structure}{fg=darkblue}
% Remove navigation symbols
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
% Frame numbers
\setbeamertemplate{footline}[frame number]
% ============================================
% PACKAGES
% ============================================
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\pgfplotsset{compat=1.17}
% ============================================
% TITLE PAGE
% ============================================
\title{The Effect of X on Y: \\Evidence from Z}
\subtitle{Short and Descriptive}
\author{Your Name}
\institute{Your University}
\date{Conference Name \\ Month Year}
\begin{document}
% Title slide
\begin{frame}[plain]
\titlepage
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% MOTIVATION (2-3 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Motivation: Why This Matters}
\begin{itemize}
\item<1-> \textbf{Big picture:} [One sentence on broad relevance]
\item<2-> \textbf{Specific puzzle:} [What we don't know]
\item<3-> \textbf{Stakes:} [Why should we care?]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\only<4>{
\begin{block}{Key Statistic}
\Large \textbf{X\%} of [outcome] can be explained by [factor]
\end{block}
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{What We Know (and Don't Know)}
\textbf{Previous literature:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Author et al. (2020): Finding 1
\item Other Author (2019): Finding 2
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Gap we fill:}
\begin{itemize}
\item[\textcolor{red}{?}] [Open question our paper addresses]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% RESEARCH QUESTION (1 slide)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{This Paper}
\begin{center}
\Large
\textbf{Research Question:} \\[1em]
Does [X] cause [Y]? \\[2em]
\end{center}
\textbf{Preview of findings:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Main result in plain language
\item Key magnitude: [Quantitative summary]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% EMPIRICAL STRATEGY (2-3 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Data}
\textbf{Sources:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Dataset 1: [Description, years, N]
\item Dataset 2: [Description, matching method]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Sample:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Unit of observation: [What is an observation?]
\item Final sample: [N] observations, [Time period]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Identification Strategy}
\textbf{Challenge:} [Endogeneity concern in one sentence]
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Solution:} We exploit [natural experiment / instrument / RDD]
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Key assumption:} [Identification assumption in plain language]
\begin{equation*}
Y_{it} = \alpha + \beta \cdot \text{Treatment}_{it} + \gamma X_{it} + \mu_i + \delta_t + \varepsilon_{it}
\end{equation*}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% RESULTS (3-5 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Main Result}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{figures/main_result.pdf}
\end{center}
\vspace{0.5em}
\textbf{Takeaway:} [One sentence interpretation]
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Main Result: Regression Table}
\begin{table}
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\toprule
& (1) & (2) & (3) \\
& OLS & + Controls & + FE \\
\midrule
Treatment & 0.052*** & 0.048*** & 0.041** \\
& (0.012) & (0.011) & (0.015) \\
\midrule
Controls & No & Yes & Yes \\
Fixed Effects & No & No & Yes \\
N & 10,000 & 9,850 & 9,850 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\textbf{Economic magnitude:} 1 SD increase in X $\rightarrow$ Y\% increase in outcome
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Robustness Checks}
\begin{itemize}
\item[\checkmark] Alternative specifications
\item[\checkmark] Placebo tests
\item[\checkmark] Different sample cuts
\item[\checkmark] [Other relevant checks]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
$\rightarrow$ Results robust across specifications
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% CONCLUSION (1 slide)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Takeaways}
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Finding 1:} [Main result]
\item \textbf{Finding 2:} [Secondary result]
\item \textbf{Implication:} [Policy/theory takeaway]
\end{enumerate}
\vspace{2em}
\begin{center}
\Large Thank you! \\[0.5em]
\normalsize your.email@university.edu
\end{center}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% APPENDIX
% ============================================
\appendix
\begin{frame}[noframenumbering]{Appendix: Additional Results}
[Backup slides for Q\&A]
\end{frame}
\end{document}Theme Recommendations
| Audience | Theme | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Academic | metropolis | Clean, modern, minimal |
| Conference | Madrid | Traditional, professional |
| Job market | default with custom colors | Safe, customizable |
| Policy | CambridgeUS | Authoritative look |
Best Practices
1. One message per slide - if you need more, split it 2. Use figures over tables when possible 3. Highlight key numbers in results tables 4. Build complex slides incrementally with \pause 5. Prepare backup slides for anticipated questions 6. Practice timing - 1-2 minutes per slide max
Common Pitfalls
- ❌ Too much text on slides
- ❌ Reading slides word-for-word
- ❌ Tables with too many columns
- ❌ Skipping the roadmap/preview
- ❌ Ending with "Questions?" instead of takeaways
References
Changelog
v1.0.0
- Initial release with conference talk template
Beamer Presentation Creator
Purpose
This skill helps economists create professional academic presentations using LaTeX Beamer. It provides templates for conference talks, job market presentations, and seminar presentations with proper structure and clean aesthetics.
When to Use
- Preparing conference presentations
- Creating job market talk slides
- Making seminar/workshop presentations
- Converting a paper into presentation slides
Instructions
Step 1: Understand the Context
Ask the user: 1. What type of presentation? (20-min conference, 90-min seminar, job market) 2. What's the paper/project about? 3. What's the target audience expertise level? 4. Do they have specific style preferences?
Step 2: Structure by Time
| Duration | Structure |
|---|---|
| 15-20 min | Motivation (2) → Question (1) → Method (2) → Results (3-4) → Conclusion (1) |
| 45-60 min | Add literature review, more results detail, robustness |
| 90 min | Full seminar with theoretical framework, extensive empirics |
Step 3: Follow Presentation Best Practices
- One idea per slide
- Minimal text - use bullets of 3-6 words
- Big fonts - minimum 20pt for content
- Consistent colors - use a limited palette
- Reveal incrementally using
\pauseor<+->for complex slides
Example Output
\documentclass[aspectratio=169, 11pt]{beamer}
% ============================================
% THEME AND APPEARANCE
% ============================================
% Clean minimal theme
\usetheme{metropolis}
\usecolortheme{default}
% Or for a more traditional look:
% \usetheme{Madrid}
% \usecolortheme{whale}
% Custom colors
\definecolor{darkblue}{RGB}{0, 51, 102}
\definecolor{lightgray}{RGB}{245, 245, 245}
\setbeamercolor{frametitle}{bg=darkblue, fg=white}
\setbeamercolor{title}{fg=darkblue}
\setbeamercolor{structure}{fg=darkblue}
% Remove navigation symbols
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
% Frame numbers
\setbeamertemplate{footline}[frame number]
% ============================================
% PACKAGES
% ============================================
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\pgfplotsset{compat=1.17}
% ============================================
% TITLE PAGE
% ============================================
\title{The Effect of X on Y: \\Evidence from Z}
\subtitle{Short and Descriptive}
\author{Your Name}
\institute{Your University}
\date{Conference Name \\ Month Year}
\begin{document}
% Title slide
\begin{frame}[plain]
\titlepage
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% MOTIVATION (2-3 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Motivation: Why This Matters}
\begin{itemize}
\item<1-> \textbf{Big picture:} [One sentence on broad relevance]
\item<2-> \textbf{Specific puzzle:} [What we don't know]
\item<3-> \textbf{Stakes:} [Why should we care?]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\only<4>{
\begin{block}{Key Statistic}
\Large \textbf{X\%} of [outcome] can be explained by [factor]
\end{block}
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{What We Know (and Don't Know)}
\textbf{Previous literature:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Author et al. (2020): Finding 1
\item Other Author (2019): Finding 2
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Gap we fill:}
\begin{itemize}
\item[\textcolor{red}{?}] [Open question our paper addresses]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% RESEARCH QUESTION (1 slide)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{This Paper}
\begin{center}
\Large
\textbf{Research Question:} \\[1em]
Does [X] cause [Y]? \\[2em]
\end{center}
\textbf{Preview of findings:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Main result in plain language
\item Key magnitude: [Quantitative summary]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% EMPIRICAL STRATEGY (2-3 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Data}
\textbf{Sources:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Dataset 1: [Description, years, N]
\item Dataset 2: [Description, matching method]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Sample:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Unit of observation: [What is an observation?]
\item Final sample: [N] observations, [Time period]
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Identification Strategy}
\textbf{Challenge:} [Endogeneity concern in one sentence]
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Solution:} We exploit [natural experiment / instrument / RDD]
\vspace{1em}
\textbf{Key assumption:} [Identification assumption in plain language]
\begin{equation*}
Y_{it} = \alpha + \beta \cdot \text{Treatment}_{it} + \gamma X_{it} + \mu_i + \delta_t + \varepsilon_{it}
\end{equation*}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% RESULTS (3-5 slides)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Main Result}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{figures/main_result.pdf}
\end{center}
\vspace{0.5em}
\textbf{Takeaway:} [One sentence interpretation]
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Main Result: Regression Table}
\begin{table}
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\toprule
& (1) & (2) & (3) \\
& OLS & + Controls & + FE \\
\midrule
Treatment & 0.052*** & 0.048*** & 0.041** \\
& (0.012) & (0.011) & (0.015) \\
\midrule
Controls & No & Yes & Yes \\
Fixed Effects & No & No & Yes \\
N & 10,000 & 9,850 & 9,850 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\textbf{Economic magnitude:} 1 SD increase in X $\rightarrow$ Y\% increase in outcome
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Robustness Checks}
\begin{itemize}
\item[\checkmark] Alternative specifications
\item[\checkmark] Placebo tests
\item[\checkmark] Different sample cuts
\item[\checkmark] [Other relevant checks]
\end{itemize}
\vspace{1em}
$\rightarrow$ Results robust across specifications
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% CONCLUSION (1 slide)
% ============================================
\begin{frame}{Takeaways}
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Finding 1:} [Main result]
\item \textbf{Finding 2:} [Secondary result]
\item \textbf{Implication:} [Policy/theory takeaway]
\end{enumerate}
\vspace{2em}
\begin{center}
\Large Thank you! \\[0.5em]
\normalsize your.email@university.edu
\end{center}
\end{frame}
% ============================================
% APPENDIX
% ============================================
\appendix
\begin{frame}[noframenumbering]{Appendix: Additional Results}
[Backup slides for Q\&A]
\end{frame}
\end{document}Theme Recommendations
| Audience | Theme | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Academic | metropolis | Clean, modern, minimal |
| Conference | Madrid | Traditional, professional |
| Job market | default with custom colors | Safe, customizable |
| Policy | CambridgeUS | Authoritative look |
Best Practices
1. One message per slide - if you need more, split it 2. Use figures over tables when possible 3. Highlight key numbers in results tables 4. Build complex slides incrementally with \pause 5. Prepare backup slides for anticipated questions 6. Practice timing - 1-2 minutes per slide max
Common Pitfalls
- ❌ Too much text on slides
- ❌ Reading slides word-for-word
- ❌ Tables with too many columns
- ❌ Skipping the roadmap/preview
- ❌ Ending with "Questions?" instead of takeaways
References
Changelog
v1.0.0
- Initial release with conference talk template