Code Review
- 3 installs
- 1.6k repo stars
- Updated August 4, 2026
- clickhouse/clickhouse-java
Review clickhouse-java changes for correctness, compatibility, API stability, and missing tests.
About
Reviews changes in the clickhouse-java repo for correctness, compatibility, API stability, and missing tests. A developer uses it when reviewing pull requests, commits, diffs, or patches.
- Focuses on API stability and compatibility
- Flags missing test coverage
Code Review by the numbers
- 3 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #923 of 1,352 Code Review & Quality skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/clickhouse/clickhouse-java --skill code-reviewAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 3 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 1.6k |
| Last updated | August 4, 2026 |
| Repository | clickhouse/clickhouse-java ↗ |
What it does
Review clickhouse-java changes for correctness, compatibility, API stability, and missing tests.
Files
Code Review
Required context
Before reviewing, read:
AGENTS.mddocs/ai-review.md
If the review touches client-v2 or jdbc-v2, also read:
docs/features.md
Review workflow
1. Identify the changed module and any compatibility-sensitive surfaces. 2. Check correctness, regressions, API and behavior stability, JDBC or R2DBC semantics, and missing focused tests before style suggestions. 3. Use common Java and driver behavior as a comparison aid, but preserve existing project behavior unless the change is intentionally user-visible. 4. Report findings first, ordered by severity, then open questions or assumptions, then a brief summary.
Final response requirements
State:
- what changed
- whether compatibility risk exists
- what tests were run, or why they were not run
- whether docs should change
If no issues are found, say so explicitly and mention residual risk or testing gaps.
Related skills
Improve Codebase ArchitectureSafely deepen clusters of shallow modules into cohesive, testable units while respecting their external dependencies.566k196k
Caveman ReviewGet ultra-compressed, one-line code review comments that cut noise while keeping every actionable fix.270k94.7kCodebase DesignShared vocabulary for designing deep modules: improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable.266k196kCavecrewDelegate coding tasks to specialized subagents that return compressed output, keeping the main context window usable for much longer sessions.220k94.7kCode ReviewReviews a branch or PR diff on two axes at once: conformance to coding standards plus a code-smell baseline, and whether it actually implements the original spec.201k196k
Requesting Code ReviewDispatch a consistent, high-signal code reviewer subagent that catches plan deviations and quality issues before merging or continuing development.183k264k