
Web Severity Scoring
- 182 installs
- 381 repo stars
- Updated August 4, 2026
- community-access/accessibility-agents
Ranking web accessibility violations by user impact and legal risk so teams prioritize fixes, tune SLAs, and report compliance posture to stakeholders.
About
Implements web accessibility severity scoring that weights violations by user harm, reach, and compliance exposure, turning raw audit output into prioritized fix queues and executive summaries so teams remediate the highest-risk WCAG issues first.
- Impact-based violation ranking
- Compliance-oriented triage model
- Prioritization for fix backlogs
- Stakeholder-ready severity reports
- Aligns audits to release decisions
Web Severity Scoring by the numbers
- 182 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #831 of 2,153 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/community-access/accessibility-agents --skill web-severity-scoringAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 182 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 381 |
| Last updated | August 4, 2026 |
| Repository | community-access/accessibility-agents ↗ |
What it does
Ranking web accessibility violations by user impact and legal risk so teams prioritize fixes, tune SLAs, and report compliance posture to stakeholders.
Files
<!-- CANONICAL SOURCE: .github/skills/web-severity-scoring/SKILL.md -- Edit the canonical source; sync to Gemini via scripts/check-gemini-sync.ps1 -->
Web Severity Scoring
Severity Scoring Formula
Page Score = 100 - (sum of weighted findings)
Weights:
Critical (high confidence, both sources): -15 points
Critical (high confidence, single source): -10 points
Critical (medium confidence): -7 points
Critical (low confidence): -3 points
Serious (high confidence): -7 points
Serious (medium confidence): -5 points
Serious (low confidence): -2 points
Moderate (high confidence): -3 points
Moderate (medium confidence): -2 points
Moderate (low confidence): -1 point
Minor: -1 point
Floor: 0 (minimum score)Score Grades
| Score | Grade | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | A | Excellent - minor or no issues, meets WCAG AA |
| 75-89 | B | Good - some issues, mostly meets WCAG AA |
| 50-74 | C | Needs Work - multiple issues, partial WCAG AA compliance |
| 25-49 | D | Poor - significant accessibility barriers |
| 0-24 | F | Failing - critical barriers, likely unusable with AT |
Confidence Levels
| Level | Weight | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| High | 100% | Confirmed by axe-core + agent, or definitively structural (missing alt, no labels, no lang) |
| Medium | 70% | Found by one source, likely issue (heading edge cases, questionable ARIA, possible keyboard traps) |
| Low | 30% | Possible issue, needs human review (alt text quality, reading order, context-dependent link text) |
Source Correlation
Issues found by both axe-core AND agent review are automatically upgraded to high confidence regardless of individual confidence ratings.
Scorecard Format
Single Page
## Accessibility Score
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Page | [URL] |
| Score | [0-100] |
| Grade | [A-F] |
| Critical | [count] |
| Serious | [count] |
| Moderate | [count] |
| Minor | [count] |Multi-Page
## Accessibility Scorecard
| Page | Score | Grade | Critical | Serious | Moderate | Minor |
|------|-------|-------|----------|---------|----------|-------|
| / | 82 | B | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| /login | 91 | A | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| /dashboard | 45 | D | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| **Average** | **72.7** | **C** | **2** | **6** | **8** | **4** |Cross-Page Pattern Classification
| Pattern Type | Definition | Remediation ROI |
|---|---|---|
| Systemic | Same issue on every audited page | Highest - usually layout/nav, fix once |
| Template | Same issue on pages sharing a component | High - fix the shared component |
| Page-specific | Unique to one page | Normal - fix individually |
Remediation Tracking
Change Classification
| Status | Definition |
|---|---|
| Fixed | Issue was in previous report but no longer present |
| New | Issue not in previous report, appears now |
| Persistent | Issue remains from previous report |
| Regressed | Issue was previously fixed but has returned |
Progress Metrics
- Issue reduction:
(fixed / previous_total) * 100 - Score change:
current_score - previous_score - Pages improved: count of pages with higher scores than previous audit
- Trend: improving (score up 5+), stable (within 5), declining (score down 5+)
Issue Severity Categories
Critical
- No keyboard access to essential functionality
- Missing form labels on required fields
- Images conveying critical information have no alt text
- Color is the sole means of conveying information
- Keyboard traps with no escape
Serious
- Missing skip navigation
- Poor heading hierarchy (skipped levels)
- Focus not visible on interactive elements
- Form errors not programmatically associated
- Missing ARIA on custom widgets
Moderate
- Redundant ARIA on semantic elements
- Suboptimal heading structure (multiple H1s)
- Missing autocomplete on identity fields
- Links to new tabs without warning
- Missing table captions
Minor
- Redundant title attributes
- Suboptimal button text
- Missing landmark roles where semantic elements exist
- Decorative images with non-empty alt text