
Business Analyst
- 38 installs
- 7 repo stars
- Updated May 20, 2026
- daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill
Run business analysis: elicit requirements with MoSCoW, map as-is/to-be BPMN processes, and produce BRDs, FRDs, and INVEST user stories.
About
Runs a structured business analysis workflow covering requirements elicitation, as-is/to-be process mapping, data-driven analysis, and BRD/FRD documentation. A developer or analyst uses it to gather requirements, write user stories, or map business processes.
- BRD/FRD templates and INVEST user stories with acceptance criteria
- BPMN process modeling and gap/change-impact analysis
Business Analyst by the numbers
- 38 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,739 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 29, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill --skill business-analystAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 38 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 7 |
| Last updated | May 20, 2026 |
| Repository | daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill ↗ |
What it does
Run business analysis: elicit requirements with MoSCoW, map as-is/to-be BPMN processes, and produce BRDs, FRDs, and INVEST user stories.
Files
Business Analyst
Overview
Run a structured business analysis workflow for requirements elicitation, process modeling, stakeholder alignment, and solution validation. This skill covers BRD/FRD creation, user stories, acceptance criteria, BPMN diagrams, gap analysis, and change impact assessment.
Features
- Requirements elicitation techniques (interviews, workshops, observation, document analysis)
- BRD and FRD document templates with section-by-section guidance
- User story writing with INVEST criteria and acceptance criteria patterns
- BPMN process modeling with swimlane diagrams
- Gap analysis framework and change impact assessment templates
Usage
1. Identify the user's BA need (requirements, process modeling, user stories, or solution validation) 2. Follow the corresponding workflow below 3. Produce structured outputs: BRD/FRD documents, user stories, BPMN diagrams, or gap analysis reports
Examples
- User: "Gather requirements for a new feature"
Agent: Runs Requirements Elicitation workflow, conducts stakeholder interviews, produces BRD with functional and non-functional requirements
- User: "Map our order fulfillment process"
Agent: Runs Process Modeling workflow, creates BPMN diagram with swimlanes, identifies bottlenecks and handoff points
- User: "Write user stories for login"
Agent: Runs User Story Writing workflow, produces stories with INVEST criteria and Given/When/Then acceptance criteria
When to Use
- Elicit and document business requirements (BRD, FRD, user stories)
- Map as-is/to-be processes and run gap or impact analysis
- Facilitate workshops and translate between business and technical teams
- Produce cost-benefit, SWOT, or root-cause analysis for business decisions
Workflow Selection
- User wants to gather or document requirements → Workflow 1: Requirements Elicitation
- User wants to map or improve a process → Workflow 2: Business Process Analysis
- User wants to evaluate a business decision → Workflow 3: Data-Driven Business Analysis
- User wants to produce documentation → Workflow 4: Documentation & Communication
When NOT to Use
- Dashboard design, metric catalogs, or analytical SQL → use
bi-analyst - Data platform or enterprise architecture decisions → use
data-architect - Cross-service system design, ADRs, architecture review → use
senior-system-architecture - Customer support SLAs, billing ops, or CS health scoring → use
customer-ops-specialist - Revenue recognition, month-end close, or ASC 606 contract analysis → use
senior-revenue-accountant - UX flows, wireframes, and design handoff → use
product-designer - Labeling/RLHF platform product roadmap and quality systems → use
product-management-human-data-platform - Cross-team program execution, RAID, exec status → use
technical-program-manager - MSA, SaaS, vendor/customer contract redlines → use
commercial-counsel - HR operational processes and employee lifecycle checklists → use
people-operations-specialist - Strategy, issue trees, steerCo business cases → use
business-consultant - Business model research, TAM, competitor monetization → use
business-model-researcher
Core Workflows
1. Requirements Elicitation
Step-by-step process:
1. Prepare
- Review existing documentation, systems, and pain points
- Identify stakeholders (sponsors, users, implementers)
- Define scope boundaries (in-scope, out-of-scope)
2. Elicit
- Interview key stakeholders using open-ended questions
- Observe users in their current workflow (shadowing)
- Review existing reports, data, and system outputs
- Run workshops for complex or cross-functional needs
3. Analyze & consolidate
- Group requirements by theme (functional, non-functional, technical)
- Resolve conflicts between stakeholders
- Prioritize using MoSCoW or weighted scoring
4. Validate
- Walk through requirements with stakeholders
- Confirm understanding with prototypes or examples
- Get formal sign-off before proceeding
2. Business Process Analysis
Analysis workflow:
1. Map the current state (as-is)
- Identify actors, steps, decisions, and handoffs
- Note time spent, pain points, and error rates
- Document data inputs and outputs at each step
2. Identify gaps and inefficiencies
- Redundancies, manual workarounds, bottlenecks
- Missing integrations, duplicate data entry
- Compliance risks or audit gaps
3. Design the future state (to-be)
- Streamline or automate steps
- Eliminate non-value-add activities
- Define new roles, systems, and data flows
4. Plan the transition
- Phased rollout vs big-bang
- Change impact assessment
- Training and communication plan
3. Data-Driven Business Analysis
Analytical techniques:
| Technique | When to Use | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-benefit analysis | Evaluate initiatives | ROI, payback period, NPV |
| SWOT analysis | Strategic planning | Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats |
| Root cause analysis | Problem diagnosis | 5 Whys, fishbone diagram |
| Process mining | Understand actual vs documented process | Bottleneck map, variant analysis |
| Benchmarking | Compare performance | Gap vs industry leaders |
4. Documentation & Communication
Key documents:
| Document | Purpose | Audience |
|---|---|---|
| Business Requirements Document (BRD) | What the business needs and why | Business stakeholders, project sponsor |
| Functional Requirements Document (FRD) | How the system should behave | Developers, QA, solution architects |
| User Stories | Feature from user perspective | Agile team, product owner |
| Process Flow | Visual step-by-step workflow | All stakeholders |
| Data Dictionary | Definitions of fields and terms | Technical team, data consumers |
Data-Driven Business Analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Simple ROI
ROI = (Benefit - Cost) / Cost × 100%Multi-Year Analysis
| Year | Cost | Benefit | Net | Discounted (10%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | $100K | $0 | -$100K | -$100K |
| 1 | $20K | $80K | +$60K | +$54.5K |
| 2 | $20K | $100K | +$80K | +$66.1K |
| 3 | $20K | $120K | +$100K | +$75.1K |
| NPV | +$95.7K |
Payback period: Year 1 (cumulative turns positive)
Cost Categories
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| One-time | Software licenses, implementation, training, migration |
| Recurring | Subscription fees, maintenance, support, hosting |
| Hidden | Change management, productivity dip during transition, technical debt |
| Opportunity | What you could have done with the same resources |
Benefit Categories
| Category | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Revenue increase | New sales, upsell, reduced churn |
| Cost reduction | Labor savings, error reduction, automation |
| Risk mitigation | Compliance fines avoided, audit readiness |
| Strategic | Market positioning, customer satisfaction, employee retention |
SWOT Analysis
Template
| Strengths (Internal, Positive) | Weaknesses (Internal, Negative) |
|---|---|
| What do we do well? | What could we improve? |
| What resources do we have? | Where do we lack resources? |
| What do others see as our strengths? | What do others see as our weaknesses? |
| Opportunities (External, Positive) | Threats (External, Negative) |
|---|---|
| What trends could we exploit? | What obstacles do we face? |
| What changes create openings? | What are competitors doing? |
| What customer needs are unmet? | What regulatory risks exist? |
Action mapping:
- Strengths + Opportunities → Invest/Grow
- Strengths + Threats → Defend
- Weaknesses + Opportunities → Fix gaps
- Weaknesses + Threats → Avoid/Mitigate
Root Cause Analysis
5 Whys
Problem: Orders are shipping late.
Why? → Warehouse backlog.
Why? → Picking takes longer than planned.
Why? → Items are not in expected locations.
Why? → Receiving team doesn't update bin locations.
Why? → No process requires bin location confirmation.
Root cause: Missing receiving process step.Fishbone (Ishikawa) Diagram
Categories to investigate:
- People: Skills, training, staffing
- Process: Steps, handoffs, approvals
- Technology: Systems, integrations, data quality
- Data: Accuracy, timeliness, completeness
- Environment: Market, regulation, competition
- Materials: Suppliers, inputs, quality
Forecasting Techniques
| Technique | When | Formula/Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Trend line | Stable growth | Linear regression on historical data |
| Moving average | Smoothing volatility | Average of last N periods |
| Seasonal decomposition | Repeating patterns | Decompose into trend + seasonal + residual |
| Scenario planning | High uncertainty | Best case, expected case, worst case |
Forecast accuracy metrics:
- MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error):
mean(|actual - forecast| / actual) - Bias: Systematic over/under-forecasting
Benchmarking
Internal Benchmarking
Compare across teams, regions, or time periods
External Benchmarking
| Source | What It Provides |
|---|---|
| Industry reports | Averages by sector (Gartner, Forrester) |
| Peer networks | Informal comparisons with similar companies |
| Public filings | Competitor performance metrics |
| Benchmarking services | Standardized comparisons (APQC, etc.) |
Benchmarking Steps
1. Define what to benchmark (KPI, process, cost) 2. Identify comparison sources 3. Normalize for scale/context 4. Identify gaps 5. Set improvement targets
Process Improvement
Lean Principles
1. Define value from customer perspective 2. Map value stream — every step from request to delivery 3. Create flow — eliminate waiting and batching 4. Establish pull — produce only what is needed 5. Pursue perfection — continuous improvement
Six Sigma DMAIC
| Phase | Activities |
|---|---|
| Define | Problem statement, scope, stakeholders, goal |
| Measure | Baseline metrics, data collection plan |
| Analyze | Root cause, statistical validation |
| Improve | Solution design, pilot, implementation |
| Control | Monitor, standardize, sustain gains |
Kaizen Event (Rapid Improvement)
- Duration: 3-5 days
- Team: 5-8 people from affected areas
- Output: Implemented improvements, documented new standard
Documentation & Communication
Business Requirements Document (BRD)
Template Structure
# [Project Name] — Business Requirements Document
## 1. Executive Summary
- Business problem and opportunity
- Proposed solution at a high level
- Expected benefits and success criteria
## 2. Business Objectives
| Objective | Metric | Target | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reduce order processing time | Avg minutes per order | <5 min | 6 months |
## 3. Scope
### In Scope
- [Requirement area 1]
- [Requirement area 2]
### Out of Scope
- [Explicitly excluded item 1]
## 4. Stakeholders
| Role | Name | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Project Sponsor | [Name] | Budget approval, escalation |
| Business Owner | [Name] | Requirements sign-off |
| End Users | [Group] | Validation, training |
## 5. Current State
[Process description, pain points, supporting data]
## 6. Future State
[Desired outcomes, process changes, user experience]
## 7. Functional Requirements
| ID | Requirement | Priority | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| FR-001 | [Description] | Must | [Measurable criteria] |
## 8. Non-Functional Requirements
- Performance: [e.g., page load <2s]
- Security: [e.g., SSO, role-based access]
- Availability: [e.g., 99.5% uptime]
- Compliance: [e.g., GDPR, SOX]
## 9. Constraints & Assumptions
- Budget limit: $XXX
- Timeline: Must launch by [date]
- Assumption: User volume will not exceed X
## 10. Risks
| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data migration delays | High | Medium | Start migration early, plan rollback |
## 11. Appendix
- Glossary
- Reference documents
- Approval signaturesFunctional Requirements Document (FRD)
Template Structure
# [Project Name] — Functional Requirements Document
## 1. Introduction
- Purpose and audience (developers, QA, architects)
- Relationship to BRD
## 2. System Context
[Diagram showing system boundaries and interfaces]
## 3. Functional Requirements
### 3.1 [Feature Area]
#### FR-001: [Requirement name]
**Description:** [Detailed description]
**User stories:** [As a... I want... so that...]
**Acceptance criteria:**
- [Criterion 1]
- [Criterion 2]
**Business rules:**
- [Rule 1]
- [Rule 2]
**Data requirements:**
- Inputs: [Fields, sources]
- Outputs: [Fields, destinations]
**UI/UX notes:** [Wireframe references, interaction patterns]
**Error handling:** [Invalid input, system failure]
## 4. Data Dictionary
| Field | Type | Description | Source | Valid Values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| customer_id | UUID | Unique customer identifier | CRM | Valid UUID format |
## 5. Interface Requirements
- API contracts
- File formats
- Integration touchpoints
## 6. Business Rules Engine
| Rule ID | Condition | Action | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-001 | Order value > $10K | Require manager approval | High |Presentation Framework
Pyramid Principle (Barbara Minto)
1. Start with the answer (main recommendation) 2. Group supporting arguments (3-5 key reasons) 3. Provide evidence (data, examples, logic)
SCQA for Business Presentations
- Situation: Context everyone agrees on
- Complication: The problem or change
- Question: What should we do?
- Answer: The recommendation with supporting data
Slide Structure
Slide 1: Title + Main Recommendation
Slide 2: The Problem (data + impact)
Slide 3: Options Considered
Slide 4: Recommended Approach + Why
Slide 5: Implementation Plan
Slide 6: Risks & Mitigation
Slide 7: Ask (decision, resources, next steps)Business-Technical Translation
Common Translation Gaps
| Business Says | Technical Interpretation | Clarifying Question |
|---|---|---|
| "Real-time" | Sub-second? 5 minutes? Daily? | "What decision depends on this speed?" |
| "All users" | Internal only? Customers? Partners? | "Who needs access and from where?" |
| "Easy to use" | Few clicks? No training? Mobile? | "Can you walk me through a typical use case?" |
| "Flexible reporting" | Self-serve? Custom SQL? Export? | "What does the end user do with the data?" |
| "Secure" | Encryption? Access control? Audit? | "What compliance requirements apply?" |
Glossaries
Maintain a shared glossary:
| Term | Business Definition | Technical Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| Active customer | Made a purchase in last 90 days | last_order_date >= NOW() - 90 days |
| Revenue | Gross merchandise value, net of returns | SUM(order_total) WHERE status != 'returned' |
Communication Templates
Requirement Change Request
## Change Request
**Date:** [Date]
**Requested by:** [Name]
**Priority:** Low / Medium / High / Critical
**Current requirement:** [What exists]
**Proposed change:** [What should change]
**Business justification:** [Why]
**Impact on scope:** [Add / Remove / Modify]
**Impact on timeline:** [Days added/removed]
**Impact on cost:** [Additional budget needed]
**Approved by:** __________ **Date:** __________Weekly Status Update
## [Project] Status — Week of [Date]
### Overall Health: 🟢 On Track / 🟡 At Risk / 🔴 Off Track
### This Week
- [Accomplishment 1]
- [Accomplishment 2]
### Next Week
- [Planned activity 1]
### Blockers
- [Blocker] — Owner: [Name]
### Decisions Needed
- [Decision] — From: [Stakeholder] — By: [Date]Requirements & Process Analysis
Requirements Elicitation Techniques
| Technique | Best For | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Interviews | Deep understanding, sensitive topics | Time-consuming, potential bias |
| Workshops | Cross-functional alignment, complex systems | Scheduling difficulty, groupthink risk |
| Observation (shadowing) | Understanding actual vs stated behavior | Time-intensive, may alter behavior |
| Document analysis | Existing systems, regulatory requirements | May be outdated or incomplete |
| Surveys | Large user base, quantitative needs | Low response rate, shallow insights |
| Prototyping | Clarifying ambiguous requirements | May anchor users on design too early |
Interview Guidelines
Before the interview:
- Send agenda and context 24 hours ahead
- Prepare 5-10 open-ended questions
- Identify the decision-maker vs. influencer vs. user
Sample questions:
- "Walk me through how you currently do X from start to finish."
- "What takes the most time or causes the most frustration?"
- "If you could wave a wand, what would change?"
- "What happens when this process breaks?"
- "Who else is involved, and what do they need?"
During the interview:
- Listen 80%, talk 20%
- Ask "why" at least 3 times (5 Whys technique)
- Capture exact quotes for later reference
- Sketch the process live if possible
After the interview:
- Send summary within 24 hours
- Confirm accuracy with the interviewee
- Log requirements in shared tracker
Prioritization Frameworks
MoSCoW
| Priority | Definition | Decision Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Must have | Critical for launch; project fails without it | "Would we cancel the project if this were excluded?" |
| Should have | Important but not critical; workarounds exist | "Painful to defer, but possible" |
| Could have | Desirable if capacity allows | "Nice to have" |
| Won't have | Explicitly excluded (this phase) | "Out of scope for now" |
Weighted Scoring
Score = Σ (Criterion Weight × Rating)Example criteria:
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Business value | 30% |
| User impact | 25% |
| Implementation cost | 20% |
| Time to deliver | 15% |
| Strategic alignment | 10% |
Process Modeling
BPMN 2.0 Core Elements
[Start Event] → [Task] → [Gateway (decision)] → [Task] → [End Event]
↓ ↑
[Pool: Team A] [Pool: Team B]| Symbol | Meaning | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| Circle | Start/End event | Process boundaries |
| Rounded rectangle | Task/Activity | Work performed |
| Diamond | Gateway | Decision, parallel, or merge |
| Rectangle with + | Sub-process | Complex step detailed elsewhere |
| Swimlane | Pool/Lane | Organizational boundaries |
| Arrow | Sequence flow | Order of activities |
| Dashed arrow | Message flow | Cross-pool communication |
As-Is vs To-Be Analysis Template
## Process: [Name]
### As-Is State
| Step | Actor | Time | Pain Point |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Receive request | Support | 5 min | Email, no tracking |
| 2. Log in system | Support | 10 min | Manual data entry |
**Issues identified:**
- Manual handoffs cause delays
- No visibility into status
- Duplicate data entry
### To-Be State
| Step | Actor | Time | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Auto-create ticket | System | 0 min | Integration triggers ticket |
| 2. Route automatically | System | 0 min | Rules-based routing |
**Expected benefits:**
- 50% reduction in handling time
- Real-time status visibility
- Zero duplicate entryGap Analysis
Current vs Future State Matrix
| Capability | Current State | Future State | Gap | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-service reporting | Manual requests to BI team | Automated dashboards with filters | No self-service capability | High |
| Data integration | 3 separate Excel files | Single source of truth in warehouse | No integration layer | High |
| Mobile access | Desktop only | Responsive web + app | No mobile support | Medium |
Gap Resolution Strategies
| Gap Type | Strategy | Example |
|---|---|---|
| People | Hire, train, or restructure | Train users on self-service tools |
| Process | Redesign workflow | Implement approval automation |
| Technology | Build, buy, or integrate | Purchase CRM, integrate with ERP |
| Data | Clean, migrate, or master | Implement MDM for customer data |
User Story Format
Standard Template
As a [type of user],
I want [some goal],
so that [some reason/benefit].Acceptance criteria (Given-When-Then):
Given [precondition]
When [action]
Then [expected result]Example:
As a sales manager,
I want to see pipeline by stage and rep,
so that I can forecast revenue and coach underperformers.
Acceptance criteria:
Given I am on the sales dashboard
When I select a date range and team
Then I see pipeline value broken down by stage and rep
And I can drill into individual opportunitiesINVEST Checklist (Good User Stories)
| Attribute | Test |
|---|---|
| Independent | Can be delivered without other stories |
| Negotiable | Details can be discussed and refined |
| Valuable | Delivers business value |
| Estimable | Team can estimate effort |
| Small | Fits in a single sprint |
| Testable | Clear pass/fail criteria |
Workshop Facilitation
Workshop Types
| Type | Duration | Purpose | Activities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | 2-4 hours | Understand current state | Process mapping, pain point identification |
| Design | 4-8 hours | Design future state | To-be process, role definition |
| Prioritization | 2-3 hours | Rank requirements | Dot voting, weighted scoring |
| Review | 1-2 hours | Validate deliverables | Walkthrough, feedback capture |
Facilitation Tips
- Set ground rules: No devices, one conversation at a time, all ideas valid
- Use timeboxes: 10-15 min per activity
- Capture visibly: Whiteboard or shared screen
- Balance voices: Actively draw out quiet participants
- Park lot: Capture off-topic ideas for later
- Close with actions: Who does what by when
Tools & Frameworks
Requirements Management Tools
| Tool | Best For | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Jira | Agile teams, issue tracking | User stories, sprints, integrations |
| Azure DevOps | Microsoft ecosystem | Work items, boards, repos |
| Confluence | Documentation, wiki | BRDs, process docs, collaboration |
| Notion | Lightweight, flexible | Databases, docs, project tracking |
| Aha! | Product management | Roadmaps, strategy, ideas |
| Visio / Lucidchart | Diagrams, process modeling | BPMN, flowcharts, ER diagrams |
| Miro / Mural | Workshops, brainstorming | Sticky notes, voting, templates |
Excel for Business Analysis
Essential Functions
| Function | Use Case |
|---|---|
VLOOKUP / XLOOKUP | Merge data from multiple tables |
INDEX-MATCH | Flexible lookups |
SUMIFS / COUNTIFS | Conditional aggregation |
PIVOT TABLE | Quick summarization and slicing |
DATA VALIDATION | Restrict input values |
CONDITIONAL FORMATTING | Highlight exceptions |
TEXT TO COLUMNS | Parse combined fields |
REMOVE DUPLICATES | Clean datasets |
Analysis Templates
Stakeholder RACI Matrix:
| Sponsor | PM | Dev | QA | BA |
Requirements | A/R | C | I | I | R |
Sign-off | A | R | C | C | R |
A = Accountable, R = Responsible, C = Consulted, I = InformedRisk Register:
| ID | Risk | Probability | Impact | Score | Mitigation | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R01 | Delayed vendor delivery | Medium | High | 6 | Identify backup vendor | PM |
Workshop Facilitation Tools
In-Person
- Whiteboard + markers (multiple colors)
- Sticky notes (3 colors minimum)
- Timer (visible to all)
- Parking flip chart
Remote
- Miro or Mural for collaborative whiteboard
- Zoom/Teams with breakout rooms
- Poll Everywhere or Mentimeter for voting
- Google Docs for live note-taking
Facilitation Techniques
| Technique | Purpose | How |
|---|---|---|
| Brainwriting | Generate ideas quietly first | Everyone writes silently, then shares |
| Dot voting | Prioritize options | Each person gets 3-5 dots to place |
| Affinity mapping | Group related ideas | Sort sticky notes into themes |
| Round robin | Ensure equal participation | Go around the room, one idea each |
| Timeboxing | Keep moving | 5-10 min per activity, strict timer |
Data Analysis Tools for BAs
| Tool | When | Skill Level |
|---|---|---|
| Excel / Google Sheets | Small data (<1M rows), quick analysis | Beginner |
| SQL | Medium data, structured sources | Intermediate |
| Python (pandas) | Large data, reproducible analysis | Intermediate |
| Power BI / Tableau | Visualization, dashboards | Intermediate |
| R | Statistical analysis, forecasting | Advanced |
BPMN Modeling Tools
| Tool | Best For | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Lucidchart | Collaboration, sharing | Freemium |
| Draw.io (diagrams.net) | Free, simple | Free |
| Bizagi | Enterprise BPM | Freemium |
| Camunda | Execution + modeling | Open source |
| Visio | Microsoft integration | Paid |
BA Certification Paths
| Certification | Focus | Provider |
|---|---|---|
| CBAP | Comprehensive BA practice | IIBA |
| CCBA | Mid-level BA | IIBA |
| ECBA | Entry-level BA | IIBA |
| PMI-PBA | BA within project management | PMI |
| BCS Business Analysis | UK-focused | BCS |
Communication Best Practices
- Subject line = action + topic
- BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) in first 2 sentences
- Bullets, not paragraphs
- Clear ask or decision needed
Meetings
- Agenda sent 24 hours ahead
- Start and end on time
- Document decisions and action items
- Follow-up email within 2 hours
Status Reporting
- Lead with health indicator (red/yellow/green)
- Focus on exceptions, not routine progress
- Quantify impact when possible
- Ask for help when blocked