
Communication Lead
- 27 installs
- 7 repo stars
- Updated May 20, 2026
- daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill
Plans communications strategy: messaging and narrative, executive and internal announcements, and launch and crisis communication plans.
About
An agent skill for communications leadership, covering messaging strategy, stakeholder and executive comms, internal announcements, and launch and incident communication plans. An operator uses it when planning org-wide comms, drafting company-wide messages, or designing change or crisis communications.
- Covers narrative development, approval workflows, and spokesperson Q&A prep
- Handles launch and incident communication plans
Communication Lead by the numbers
- 27 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #625 of 853 Sales & Marketing skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 29, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill --skill communication-leadAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 27 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 7 |
| Last updated | May 20, 2026 |
| Repository | daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill ↗ |
What it does
Plans communications strategy: messaging and narrative, executive and internal announcements, and launch and crisis communication plans.
Files
Communication Lead
When to Use
- Define messaging hierarchy: narrative, pillars, proof points, audience variants
- Plan comms for a launch, reorg, policy change, or transformation
- Draft executive updates, all-hands scripts, company-wide email/Slack posts
- Build crisis or incident message packs (holding lines, customer statements) with approval path
- Align product, sales, and support on what to say (and not say) externally
- Design comms cadence: weekly exec brief, monthly all-hands, incident updates
- Prepare spokesperson talking points and anticipated Q&A
When NOT to Use
- Issue trees, business cases, steerCo slide analysis →
business-consultant - Technical documentation, runbooks, API reference →
tech-writer-researcher - Severity model, paging, on-call, postmortem process →
incident-management-engineer - Outage rollback and deploy tactics →
deployment-strategist,devops - Individual support ticket responses →
support-engineer - Marketing campaign creative, paid media, SEO → route to marketing skills if present; stay factual/product-truth aligned here
- Contract, DPA, or legal risk language →
commercial-counsel - Security control design →
cybersecurity
Related skills
| Need | Skill |
|---|---|
| Executive deck storyline and business case | business-consultant |
| Long-form docs and research synthesis | tech-writer-researcher |
| Incident program, status page workflow | incident-management-engineer |
| Release rollout and stakeholder brief | deployment-strategist |
| Cross-team program coordination | technical-program-manager |
| Developer training and certification programs | developer-education-lead |
| Customer escalation and ticket comms | support-engineer |
| Exec/VIP and community escalation program | community-executive-escalations-program-manager |
| Security incident policy and enterprise IR | cybersecurity |
| Security advisory and CVD publication | technical-program-manager-security-cvd |
| Product positioning and UX copy | product-designer |
| Commercial terms in customer comms | commercial-counsel |
Core Workflows
1. Messaging framework
For any initiative, define:
1. Audience — who must hear, believe, and act 2. Objective — one outcome (e.g., adopt, reassure, comply) 3. Narrative — 2–3 sentence through-line (problem → direction → ask) 4. Key messages — 3–5 bullets, MECE, evidence-backed 5. Proof points — metrics, quotes, dates (no unverified claims) 6. Guardrails — what not to say; sensitive topics; legal review triggers
See `references/messaging_framework.md`.
2. Stakeholder and executive comms
| Artifact | Typical cadence | Lead with |
|---|---|---|
| Exec brief | Weekly | Decision or risk needing attention |
| SteerCo / leadership update | Per milestone | Status vs plan, blockers, asks |
| Board-style summary | Quarterly | Outcomes, risks, strategic choices |
Use pyramid structure: recommendation first, then support. Pair with business-consultant when the pack is primarily analytical.
See `references/stakeholder_comms.md`.
3. Internal communications
- All-hands — 30–45 min arc: context, wins, priorities, Q&A
- Change — why, what changes for whom, timeline, support channels
- Manager cascade — toolkit: email template, FAQ, office hours
Sequence: leaders briefed first → company announcement → team Q&A.
See `references/internal_comms.md`.
4. External communications
Align with product truth and legal review for:
- Customer email, in-app banners, changelog
- Partner or investor-facing notes (when approved)
- Blog or press statement (factual, attributable quotes only)
Never promise dates or features not shipped; coordinate with deployment-strategist for launch timing.
See `references/external_comms.md`.
5. Crisis and incident messaging
Separate process (incident-management-engineer) from words:
1. Confirm facts with incident commander; no speculation 2. Draft internal holding line → customer status → follow-up cadence 3. Route legal/comms/security approval per severity 4. Single source of truth doc; version messages
See `references/crisis_comms.md`.
6. Launch communications
| Phase | Comms focus |
|---|---|
| T-4 weeks | Internal preview, enablement, FAQ |
| T-1 week | Sales/support talk tracks |
| Launch | Coordinated send: email, blog, in-app, social (if approved) |
| T+1 week | Metrics, feedback loop, correction if needed |
See `references/launch_comms.md`.
Output standards
- One primary CTA per message
- Plain language; define acronyms once
- Accessible formatting (headings, short paragraphs)
- Version and timestamp on crisis or incident drafts
- Flag
[LEGAL REVIEW],[EXEC APPROVAL]where required
When to load references
- Messaging hierarchy →
references/messaging_framework.md - Exec and leadership updates →
references/stakeholder_comms.md - All-hands and change →
references/internal_comms.md - Customer and public →
references/external_comms.md - Incident statements →
references/crisis_comms.md - Feature or initiative launch →
references/launch_comms.md
Crisis and incident communications
Table of contents
1. Roles 2. Message ladder 3. Holding lines 4. Customer statement template
Roles
| Role | Owns |
|---|---|
| Incident commander | Facts, timeline, mitigation status |
| Comms lead | Wording, channels, approvals |
| Legal | Regulatory, customer contract, public statements |
| Security (if applicable) | Breach classification, law enforcement |
Comms does not invent technical root cause. Process design → incident-management-engineer.
Message ladder
1. Internal holding (Slack/email) — acknowledge, investigating, next update time 2. Customer status — impact scope, workaround, ETA if known 3. Resolution — what fixed, residual risk, prevention steps (high level) 4. Postmortem summary — blameless, customer-safe version when appropriate
Set update cadence upfront (e.g., every 30 min for SEV1 until stable).
Holding lines
Until facts confirmed:
- "We are aware of [symptom] affecting [scope]. Engineering is investigating."
- "We will update by [time] at [channel]."
- Avoid: root cause guesses, blame, competitor mentions.
Customer statement template
Subject: [Service] — [status: investigating | mitigated | resolved]
We are [investigating / have mitigated] an issue affecting [who/what].
Impact: [plain language]
Workaround: [if any]
Next update: [time and channel]
We apologize for the disruption and will share more when [condition].Version each draft; timestamp in filename. Archive approved text for audit.
External communications
Table of contents
1. Customer messaging 2. Channel checklist 3. Coordination RACI
Customer messaging
Email structure:
1. Subject — outcome or action (not internal codename) 2. Opening — who it's for and why now 3. What changed — bullets; link to docs 4. What they should do — one primary CTA 5. Support — how to get help
In-app: short headline + link; match email facts.
Changelog: factual; version/date; breaking changes first.
Channel checklist
Before send:
- [ ] Product/engineering sign-off on accuracy
- [ ] Support briefed with macro and ticket tags
- [ ] Sales talk track aligned (no stronger promises than email)
- [ ] Legal review if pricing, data, compliance, or forward-looking
- [ ] Localization plan if non-English markets material
Coordination RACI
| Activity | Comms lead | Product | Legal | Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Message draft | R/A | C | C | I |
| Factual accuracy | C | A | I | C |
| Send approval | A | C | C | I |
| Post-send FAQ | R | C | I | A |
R = responsible, A = accountable, C = consulted, I = informed.
For contract terms in notices, involve commercial-counsel.
Internal communications
Table of contents
1. All-hands structure 2. Change communications 3. Manager cascade kit
All-hands structure
| Block | Time | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Context | 5 min | Why we're here; link to strategy |
| Results | 10 min | Metrics that matter; celebrate teams |
| Priorities | 10 min | Next quarter focus; what we stop |
| Deep dive | 10 min | One topic only |
| Q&A | 10 min | Live; pre-collect anonymous questions |
Slides: insight titles, not topic labels. Recording: note retention policy.
Change communications
Sequence:
1. Leaders — full picture, talking points, anticipated objections 2. Managers — FAQ, how to answer team questions 3. Company — what changes, when, support resources 4. Follow-up — office hours, pulse survey if major change
Address: what's changing, what's not, timeline, where to get help.
Manager cascade kit
Provide:
- Email template (copy-paste with
[local detail]slots) - FAQ (10–15 questions)
- Escalation path for HR/legal/sensitive topics
- Do-not-share list (M&A, personnel, unreleased product)
Never announce individual performance or disciplinary actions in company-wide channels.
Launch communications
Table of contents
1. Timeline 2. Asset pack 3. Go/no-go comms gate
Timeline
| When | Activity |
|---|---|
| T-4w | Messaging framework; internal name and narrative |
| T-2w | Sales/support enablement deck; FAQ draft |
| T-1w | Final copy; legal if needed; dry-run all-hands snippet |
| T-0 | Coordinated publish (email, blog, in-app, social if approved) |
| T+1w | Listen: support tags, social; correction note if needed |
Sync ship date with deployment-strategist and technical-program-manager.
Asset pack
| Asset | Owner | Review |
|---|---|---|
| Key messages + FAQ | Comms | Product, Legal |
| Customer email | Comms | Product, Support |
| Blog / release note | Comms / Product | Legal if public claims |
| In-app copy | Product | Comms |
| Sales one-pager | Product marketing / PM | Comms |
| Support macros | Support | Comms |
Go/no-go comms gate
Block external send if:
- Feature not in production for stated segment
- Known SEV open without workaround documented
- Legal review incomplete for regulated claims
- Support not staffed for expected volume
Internal preview may proceed earlier with clear confidential label.
Messaging framework
Table of contents
1. Audience map 2. Message house 3. Proof and attribution 4. Tone and voice
Audience map
| Audience | Cares about | Channel | Success signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Executives | Risk, ROI, decisions | Brief, deck | Decision logged |
| Employees | Job impact, clarity | All-hands, Slack | Fewer repeat questions |
| Customers | Reliability, value | Email, status page | Churn/support volume stable |
| Partners | Roadmap, commitments | Partner brief | No surprise escalations |
Message house
[One narrative — 2 sentences max]
┌──────────┬──────────┬──────────┐
│ Pillar 1 │ Pillar 2 │ Pillar 3 │
└──────────┴──────────┴──────────┘
proof proof proofEach pillar: one claim + one proof point. Drop pillars that overlap.
Proof and attribution
- Use only verified metrics and dates
- Quotes: name, title, approval on file
- Forward-looking statements: legal review
- Competitor mentions: factual, sourced
Tone and voice
| Situation | Tone |
|---|---|
| Growth / launch | Confident, specific, customer-outcome led |
| Change / reorg | Empathetic, transparent on what is known |
| Incident | Calm, factual, action-oriented |
| Bad news | Direct, no burying; include next step |
Avoid: jargon stacks, passive voice for accountability, hype without substance.
Stakeholder and executive communications
Table of contents
1. Pyramid updates 2. Exec brief template 3. Alignment without overload
Pyramid updates
Lead with the so what in the first line:
Recommend: Delay GA one week to complete security review. Impact: Reduces launch risk; shifts revenue ~$X. Ask: Approve new date by EOD Friday.
Then: context, options considered, next steps.
For analytical depth (issue trees, models), use business-consultant references; this skill owns wording and cadence.
Exec brief template
| Section | Max length |
|---|---|
| Headline | 1 sentence |
| Status | Green / yellow / red + one line why |
| Decisions needed | Bullets with owner and deadline |
| Top risks | 3 max |
| Wins | 2–3 bullets |
| Appendix link | Optional detail |
Alignment without overload
- One source of truth doc per initiative; link from Slack/email
- Differentiate FYI vs action required in subject lines
- Pre-wire controversial messages with 1:1s before group send
- Record decisions in writing within 24h after meetings