
Data Center Design Execution Lead
- 31 installs
- 7 repo stars
- Updated May 20, 2026
- daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill
Leads data center design and build: site and tier selection, power and cooling architecture, physical layout, commissioning, and operational handoff.
About
An agent skill for data center design and build execution, covering site and tier selection, capacity and density planning, power and cooling architecture, physical layout, and commissioning. An operator uses it when planning a new or expanded facility, reviewing MEP and rack layouts, or sizing power/cooling for GPU density.
- Power/cooling architecture and containment for GPU or HPC density
- Standards alignment (TIA-942, Uptime tiers) and commissioning
Data Center Design Execution Lead by the numbers
- 31 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #784 of 1,039 Cloud & Infrastructure skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 29, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill --skill data-center-design-execution-leadAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 31 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 7 |
| Last updated | May 20, 2026 |
| Repository | daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill ↗ |
What it does
Leads data center design and build: site and tier selection, power and cooling architecture, physical layout, commissioning, and operational handoff.
Files
Data Center Design Execution Lead
When to Use
- Define requirements for a new data hall, cage, or colo deployment
- Compare build vs colo vs cloud extension for a workload footprint
- Size power, cooling, and rack count for current and 3–5 year growth
- Review mechanical/electrical single-line diagrams and rack elevations
- Plan hot/cold aisle, containment, and cable pathways
- Specify network demarc, cross-connects, and latency to cloud regions
- Run design → procurement → install → commissioning → handoff
- Prepare acceptance tests and operations runbooks for facilities team
When NOT to Use
- Terraform, cloud networking, managed Kubernetes →
infrastructure-engineer - Helm, cluster add-ons, pod troubleshooting →
cluster-deployment-engineer - Application integration ADRs →
senior-system-architecture - Multi-team software program RAID →
technical-program-manager - SOC 2 control catalog without facility scope →
compliance-engineer - Physical security policy program only →
cybersecurity,information-security-engineer - Executive comms for launches →
communication-lead - Utilization, GPU supply forecast, consolidation, refresh →
data-center-compute-supply-efficiency - Multi-site roadmap, portfolio funding, steering →
data-center-portfolio-planning-execution-lead - Delivery schedule, rack-ready gates, construction RAID →
senior-data-center-capacity-delivery-manager
Related skills
| Need | Skill |
|---|---|
| Hybrid on-prem virtualization patterns | infrastructure-engineer |
| Workloads hosted in on-prem K8s | cluster-deployment-engineer |
| Large build program coordination | technical-program-manager |
| Physical/logical security controls | cybersecurity, information-security-engineer |
| Compliance evidence for facilities | compliance-engineer |
| Stakeholder and exec updates | communication-lead |
| Rollout of apps into new site | deployment-strategist |
| Compute supply and resource efficiency | data-center-compute-supply-efficiency |
| Enterprise DC portfolio planning | data-center-portfolio-planning-execution-lead |
| Capacity delivery program | senior-data-center-capacity-delivery-manager |
| On-site install, labeling, acceptance | field-services-engineer |
Core Workflows
1. Requirements and site strategy
Capture:
- Workload type (enterprise IT, HPC/GPU, edge)
- Availability target (tier intent, RTO/RPO for facility)
- Growth: racks, kW, network ports by year
- Constraints: geography, latency to users/cloud, sustainability, budget
Decide: own build, colo cage, or cloud-only with small edge.
See `references/facility_requirements.md`.
2. Power and cooling
- Design power chain: utility → ATS/STS → UPS → PDU → rack
- Size for peak kW/rack (air vs liquid, GPU trays)
- Cooling: CRAC/CRAH, containment, setpoints per ASHRAE class
- Target PUE and measurement points
See `references/power_cooling.md`.
3. Physical layout
- Rack rows, aisle width, floor load (lbs/sq ft)
- Hot/cold containment; overhead vs underfloor delivery
- Cable trays, fiber pathways, ladder rack
- Staging, spares, and restricted zones
See `references/physical_layout.md`.
4. Network and connectivity
- Meet-me room, carrier diversity, cross-connect model
- Core/distribution/toR switching for facility (distinct from app network design in cloud)
- Latency and bandwidth to primary cloud region for hybrid
See `references/network_connectivity.md`.
5. Execution and commissioning
| Phase | Deliverables |
|---|---|
| Design | BoM, drawings, capacity model sign-off |
| Procure | Long-lead gear tracked (switching, PDUs, genset) |
| Install | MEP fit-out, rack/stack, labeling standard |
| Commission | IST/FAT, red-tag clearance, integrated tests |
| Handoff | DCIM, monitoring, as-built, ops training |
See `references/execution_commissioning.md`.
6. Operations handoff
- DCIM asset records match labels and diagrams
- Environmental and power alarms to NOC
- Maintenance windows and vendor SLAs documented
- Runbooks: escort, smart hands, emergency power-down
See `references/operations_handoff.md`.
Output standards
- Capacity table: rack ID, kW design, weight, network Uplinks
- One-line diagram summary (power and cooling) with margins noted
- Commissioning checklist with pass/fail and owner
- Risks: single points of failure, lead-time items, permit dependencies
When to load references
- Site, tier, capacity →
references/facility_requirements.md - Power, UPS, cooling, PUE →
references/power_cooling.md - Racks, aisles, containment →
references/physical_layout.md - Carriers, MMR, hybrid links →
references/network_connectivity.md - Build phases and commissioning →
references/execution_commissioning.md - DCIM and ops →
references/operations_handoff.md
Execution and commissioning
Table of contents
1. Phase plan 2. Long-lead tracking 3. Commissioning tests
Phase plan
| Phase | Gate |
|---|---|
| Concept | Signed capacity model and tier intent |
| Detailed design | MEP + IT drawings, BoM, permits submitted |
| Procurement | Critical path items ordered |
| Construction | MEP complete, inspection passed |
| IT install | Racks, PDUs, cabling, labeling |
| Commissioning | IST complete, punch list closed |
| Handoff | Ops sign-off, DCIM populated |
Use technical-program-manager for multi-vendor RAID across civil, MEP, and IT trades.
Long-lead tracking
Typical long-lead (order early):
- Generators, switchgear, UPS modules
- Core switches, fiber panels
- Custom containment, CDUs for liquid cooling
- Permits and utility power upgrades
Weekly critical-path review until install complete.
Commissioning tests
| Test | Pass criteria |
|---|---|
| Power failover | ATS/UPS transfer; no unplanned IT shutdown |
| Cooling failure | Redundant unit carries load; alarms fire |
| Redundant paths | Lose A or B feed; dual-cord hosts stay up |
| Network | Loop-free; BGP/WAN failover if applicable |
| Integrated | Full rack load soak 24–72h |
Document results; attach to handoff package. Red-tag unresolved life-safety items before energizing.
Facility requirements
Table of contents
1. Decision matrix 2. Tier intent 3. Capacity model
Decision matrix
| Factor | Own build | Colo cage | Cloud |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capex | High | Medium (commit) | OpEx |
| Time to capacity | 12–24+ months | 3–9 months | Days–weeks |
| Control | Full | Contractual | Provider |
| GPU/HPC density | Custom liquid possible | Depends on colo | Instance types |
Use cloud for elastic burst; use facility for data residency, latency, or sustained high kW/rack.
Tier intent
Align business RTO/RPO with facility design (Uptime Institute tier concepts, TIA-942):
| Intent | Typical facility features |
|---|---|
| Basic | Single path power/cooling; office-grade risk |
| Redundant components | N+1 cooling; dual PDUs to rack |
| Concurrently maintainable | Separate distribution paths; maintenance without shutdown |
| Fault tolerant | 2N or 2(N+1) for critical chain; min 96h fuel (if on-site gen) |
Document actual design vs marketing tier claims—gap analysis for insurance and audits.
Capacity model
Spreadsheet rows per year:
| Year | Racks | kW/rack (design) | Total kW | Network 100G ports | Floor sq ft |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y0 | 20 | 8 | 160 | 40 | … |
| Y3 | 40 | 12 | 480 | 80 | … |
Include growth headroom (20–30% power, 15% cooling) before ordering switch gear and PDUs.
Validate floor loading and ceiling height for cabinet depth and overhead cable tray.
Network and connectivity
Table of contents
1. Demarc and carriers 2. Fabric roles 3. Hybrid to cloud
Demarc and carriers
- MMR: carrier handoff; diverse entry paths where tier requires
- Cross-connects: colo order lead time; label both ends
- Diverse paths: separate conduits/building entries; document shared risk (single bridge, etc.)
Contract: SLA for repair, LOA/CFA process, demarc extension standards.
Fabric roles
| Layer | Facility scope |
|---|---|
| Core | Inter-row, exit to WAN |
| Distribution | Aggregation to top-of-rack |
| ToR | Server and storage NICs |
Out-of-band management network: separate switches/VLAN; no shared fate with production under failure.
Software-defined overlays and cloud networking → infrastructure-engineer.
Hybrid to cloud
Document for each site:
- Primary cloud region and dedicated link (DX, ExpressRoute, Partner Interconnect, etc.)
- Bandwidth, latency RTT, failover path
- Encryption (MACsec, IPsec) and ownership
Latency-sensitive apps: place in region or site within RTT budget.
Operations handoff
Table of contents
1. DCIM and monitoring 2. Runbooks 3. Maintenance
DCIM and monitoring
Minimum DCIM records per rack:
- Asset ID, U positions, kW nameplate, weight
- Power feed (A/B), PDU circuit
- Network ports (switch, port, VLAN intent link)
Monitor and alert:
- Inlet temperature, humidity per row
- PDU branch current vs threshold
- UPS battery health, fuel level (if gen)
- Leak detection (liquid cooling)
Integrate to NOC; severity aligned with incident-management-engineer if shared ops model.
Runbooks
| Scenario | Outline |
|---|---|
| Smart hands | Escort, media ship, visual inspection |
| Emergency power-down | Order of shutdown; customer notification |
| Carrier outage | Failover WAN; colo ticket template |
| Thermal event | Row isolation, load shed policy |
Maintenance
- Quarterly: torque checks, filter replacement, alarm test
- Annual: UPS battery test, thermal imaging, failover drill
- Vendor SLAs: response time, parts depot, escalation
Facilities owns MEP; IT owns racks and cabling above PDU—RACI in handoff doc.
After handoff, K8s and app deploy → cluster-deployment-engineer.
Physical layout
Table of contents
1. Rack standards 2. Aisle and containment 3. Labeling
Rack standards
- 42U common; confirm depth (800–1200 mm) for GPU and cable bend radius
- Weight: populate bottom-heavy; check floor point loads vs slab rating
- PDU placement: vertical PDUs vs rack PDUs; leave service space
- Spares: 1–2 racks per hall for break/fix and staging
Aisle and containment
| Pattern | When |
|---|---|
| Hot aisle / cold aisle | Default air-cooled |
| Cold aisle containment | Higher density, stable intake temp |
| Hot aisle containment | Exhaust to return plenum |
| Liquid (CDU in row) | GPU blocks, rear-door HX |
Minimum aisle width per fire code and cabinet door swing; keep escape paths clear.
Cable management: separate fiber and copper trays; maintain bend radius; color code A/B paths.
Labeling
Standardize before install:
- Rack:
DC-HALL-ROW-RU(e.g.DC1-A04-R12) - Ports: TIA-606 style; match DCIM and switch config
- Power: PDU circuit → rack feed documented in as-built
As-built drawings updated within 30 days of substantial completion.
Power and cooling
Table of contents
1. Power chain 2. Rack density 3. Cooling and PUE
Power chain
Utility → (gen optional) → ATS/STS → UPS → PDU (rack/row) → C13/C19 → IT load| Element | Design notes |
|---|---|
| UPS | Runtime at full load; battery refresh schedule |
| PDU | Metered, switched where needed; A+B feeds for dual-cord servers |
| STS | Transfer time within equipment tolerance |
Margin: Plan facility at 80% of nameplate for sustained IT load; burst for GPU per vendor guidance.
Rack density
| Profile | kW/rack (indicative) | Cooling |
|---|---|---|
| General compute | 5–8 | Air, hot aisle containment |
| Dense compute | 10–15 | Enhanced air or rear-door HX |
| GPU/HPC | 20–70+ | Direct liquid, immersion, or specialty |
Mismatch (high kW in low-density hall) causes thermal trips and stranded space.
Cooling and PUE
- PUE = total facility power / IT equipment power; measure at defined points consistently
- Setpoints: ASHRAE A1–A4 classes; wider bands save energy if hardware allows
- Containment reduces bypass air; blanking panels mandatory
- Humidity and filtration per equipment specs
Commissioning: heat load bank or staged IT rollout; trend inlet/outlet temps per rack row.