
Developer Education Lead
- 27 installs
- 7 repo stars
- Updated May 20, 2026
- daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill
Leads developer education: audience and skills-gap analysis, learning paths, workshops, hands-on labs, certification, and success metrics.
About
An agent skill for developer education leadership, covering audience and skills-gap analysis, learning-path and curriculum design, workshops, hands-on labs, certification, and success metrics. An operator uses it when building a developer training program, onboarding engineers to a platform, or planning launch enablement.
- Learning paths, cohort programs, and hands-on labs
- Certification/badging and success metrics like time-to-first-success
Developer Education Lead by the numbers
- 27 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #951 of 1,879 Documentation skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 29, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill --skill developer-education-leadAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 27 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 7 |
| Last updated | May 20, 2026 |
| Repository | daemon-blockint-tech/agentic-enteprises-skill ↗ |
What it does
Leads developer education: audience and skills-gap analysis, learning paths, workshops, hands-on labs, certification, and success metrics.
Files
Developer Education Lead
When to Use
- Define who to teach (personas, prerequisites, regional/language needs)
- Design learning paths — beginner → production-ready
- Build curriculum — modules, outcomes, assessments, capstones
- Plan live programs — workshops, office hours, cohort bootcamps
- Create labs and sandboxes — safe, reproducible exercises
- Launch certification or badging with clear rubrics
- Coordinate launch enablement with product and docs
- Measure program health — completion, NPS, time-to-first-success, support deflection
- Train internal instructors and SME contributors
When NOT to Use
- One-off API reference or runbook →
tech-writer-researcher - Customer ticket triage and support KB fixes →
product-support-specialist,support-engineer - All-hands or press messaging →
communication-lead - Product PRD or roadmap →
product-designer,business-analyst - Implement platform features →
senior-software-engineer,ai-engineer - HR employee onboarding →
people-operations-specialist
Related skills
| Need | Skill |
|---|---|
| Documentation IA and style | tech-writer-researcher |
| Launch comms calendar | communication-lead |
| Product launch readiness | deployment-strategist |
| Support deflection metrics | product-support-specialist |
| Multi-team training rollout program | technical-program-manager |
| Prompt/agent education for builders | prompt-engineer |
| Platform architecture narrative | applied-ai-architect-commercial-enterprise |
Core Workflows
1. Needs assessment
Personas, jobs-to-be-done, gap analysis.
See `references/needs_assessment.md`.
2. Curriculum and learning paths
Outcomes, sequencing, prerequisites.
See `references/curriculum_learning_paths.md`.
3. Workshops and delivery
Formats, facilitation, cohort ops.
See `references/workshop_delivery.md`.
4. Labs, sandboxes, and assessments
Hands-on quality and integrity.
See `references/labs_assessments.md`.
5. Metrics and iteration
KPIs, surveys, content refresh.
See `references/metrics_iteration.md`.
6. Stakeholder and launch alignment
Eng, product, docs, support, community.
See `references/stakeholder_alignment.md`.
Outputs
- Learner persona and JTBD summary
- Learning path map — modules, duration, prerequisites
- Module spec — objectives, outline, lab, assessment
- Workshop run-of-show — agenda, materials, facilitator notes
- Certification rubric — pass criteria, retake policy
- Program scorecard — quarterly KPIs and backlog
Principles
- Outcome-first — start from what learners can do, not feature lists
- Practice over slides — optimize time-on-keyboard
- Progressive disclosure — match cognitive load to persona level
- Docs are not curriculum — tutorials need pedagogy, not just accuracy
- Measure transfer — success is production usage or support reduction, not views alone
Curriculum and learning paths
Table of contents
1. Learning outcomes 2. Module structure 3. Sequencing 4. Certification paths
Learning outcomes
Write outcomes as observable behaviors:
- Bad: "Understand authentication"
- Good: "Implement OAuth client-credentials flow and rotate secrets per policy"
Use Bloom levels — remember → apply → build → teach.
Each module: 3–5 outcomes max.
Module structure
| Section | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Why it matters | Motivation, 2 min read |
| Concepts | Minimal theory |
| Guided lab | Step-by-step with checkpoints |
| Challenge lab | Fewer hints |
| Reference links | Deep docs (tech-writer-researcher) |
| Assessment | Quiz or practical task |
Target 60–90 min self-paced per module; flag if longer.
Sequencing
Rules:
1. Dependencies first — auth before data APIs 2. Happy path before edge cases 3. Local/dev before production concerns 4. Security woven in — not only final "security module"
Publish path variants:
- Fast track (experienced)
- Standard (default)
- Fundamentals (true beginner)
Certification paths
If offering badge/cert:
| Element | Definition |
|---|---|
| Required modules | Ordered list |
| Capstone project | Rubric-scored |
| Proctored vs take-home | Integrity model |
| Expiry / recert | API version drift |
| Appeals | Human review process |
Align cert topics with real job tasks, not trivia.
Labs, sandboxes, and assessments
Table of contents
1. Lab design 2. Sandbox hygiene 3. Assessments 4. Academic integrity
Lab design
Good lab properties:
- Reproducible — script or container; pinned versions
- Inspectable — clear success criteria (URL returns 200, test passes)
- Incremental — checkpoint commits or steps
- Forgiving — reset command documented
- Realistic — mirrors prod patterns, not toy APIs only
Avoid labs that require undocumented secrets or production access.
Pair with tech-writer-researcher for reference accuracy; education owns pedagogy.
Sandbox hygiene
| Control | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Isolated accounts/projects | Blast radius |
| TTL on resources | Cost control |
| Quota alerts | Prevent runaway |
| No real PII | Compliance |
| Teardown automation | Clean state |
Document cost estimate per learner per lab run.
Assessments
| Type | Use |
|---|---|
| Knowledge check | Terminology, when-to-use |
| Practical task | Build/deploy in sandbox |
| Code review rubric | Capstone quality |
| Pair observation | Certification integrity |
Rubrics use levels (meets / exceeds / not yet) with concrete signals.
Provide sample solutions and common mistake notes for graders.
Academic integrity
- Rotate challenge prompts periodically
- Use private test cases for autograder
- Plagiarism policy for public cohorts
- Proctoring only when credential has external value
Balance integrity with open learning — share concepts, vary implementations.
Metrics and iteration
Table of contents
1. North-star metrics 2. Program metrics 3. Content health 4. Iteration cadence
North-star metrics
Pick 1–2 per program:
| Metric | Definition |
|---|---|
| Time-to-first-success | Median time from account to first successful API/task |
| Support deflection | Ticket rate drop on trained topics |
| Activation | % completing onboarding path who ship feature |
| Cert completion | % started who pass capstone |
| Confidence score | Post-module survey (validated instrument) |
Tie to product OKRs where possible.
Program metrics
| Metric | Diagnostic use |
|---|---|
| Enrollment → start | Marketing/prereq friction |
| Start → module 1 complete | Opening difficulty |
| Per-module drop-off | Rewrite that module |
| Lab retry rate | Unclear instructions or flaky infra |
| Workshop NPS | Facilitator/materials |
| Pass rate on assessment | Too easy/hard |
Segment by persona, region, language.
Content health
Quarterly audit:
- Broken links, deprecated APIs
- SME review for accuracy
- Learner feedback themes
- Comparison to current product UI
Sync with tech-writer-researcher content audit — avoid duplicate ownership; education flags pedagogy gaps, docs flags accuracy.
Iteration cadence
| Cadence | Action |
|---|---|
| Weekly | Office hours themes → backlog |
| Monthly | Module patch releases |
| Quarterly | Path roadmap review |
| Per major release | Launch enablement bundle with communication-lead |
Publish changelog for curriculum so internal teams know what changed.
Needs assessment
Table of contents
1. Personas 2. Jobs to be done 3. Gap analysis 4. Prioritization
Personas
| Persona | Typical background | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| New hire (internal) | SWE generalist | Ship on platform in 30 days |
| External app developer | Web/mobile | Integrate API/SDK in prod |
| Partner / SI | Enterprise integrator | Certify and implement for clients |
| Power user | Existing customer | Advanced patterns, migration |
| Support → builder | CS/SRE curious | Reduce escalations via depth |
Document prerequisites per persona (language, cloud, security basics).
Jobs to be done
Frame as verbs:
- "When I first authenticate, I want to see a working call in <10 min"
- "When I debug a failed deploy, I want to find the right log and fix"
- "When I go to production, I want to know compliance and limits"
Interview 5–8 learners per persona; synthesize themes.
Gap analysis
| Signal source | What to extract |
|---|---|
| Support tickets | Top "how do I" clusters |
| Docs analytics | High bounce, low completion |
| Community forums | Repeated confusion |
| Sales/SE | Deal blockers from skill gaps |
| Engineering | Onboarding friction for new teams |
Map gaps to module candidates with severity (blocks adoption vs nice-to-have).
Prioritization
Score modules:
| Factor | Weight |
|---|---|
| Reach (# learners affected) | High |
| Revenue or adoption impact | High |
| Effort to build (SME time, lab infra) | Medium |
| Risk if wrong (security, data) | Gate |
Publish NOW / NEXT / LATER roadmap for curriculum team and tech-writer-researcher.
Stakeholder alignment
Table of contents
1. RACI-style map 2. Launch enablement 3. Docs vs education 4. Community and partners
RACI-style map
| Activity | Education | Docs | Eng | Product | Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curriculum outcomes | A/R | C | C | A | I |
| API reference accuracy | I | A/R | C | I | I |
| Labs/sandboxes | A/R | C | R | I | I |
| Launch webinar | A | C | C | A | I |
| Certification policy | A | I | C | A | I |
| Ticket-driven gaps | C | C | I | I | R |
A = accountable, R = responsible, C = consulted, I = informed.
Launch enablement
T-6 to T+2 weeks (adapt):
| When | Deliverable |
|---|---|
| T-6 | Persona + message for launch |
| T-4 | Module or workshop draft; SME review |
| T-2 | Facilitator dry run; lab freeze |
| T0 | Live workshop + async path live |
| T+2 | Survey, metrics snapshot, FAQ update |
Align dates with communication-lead and deployment-strategist customer-facing readiness.
Docs vs education
Docs (tech-writer-researcher) | Education (this skill) |
|---|---|
| Accurate reference | Teaches path to competence |
| Searchable, versioned | Sequenced, assessed |
| Maintained per release | Cohort and events |
Link, don't duplicate — curriculum links to canonical docs; docs link to "get started" path.
Community and partners
- Office hours with community moderators
- Partner train-the-trainer kits (NDA-safe)
- Hackathon starter labs not full curriculum
- Feedback loop from champions to backlog
Escalate policy questions (data use, cert branding) to legal/comms — education drafts, does not approve.
Workshops and delivery
Table of contents
1. Formats 2. Run of show 3. Facilitation 4. Cohort operations
Formats
| Format | Best for | Size |
|---|---|---|
| Live demo + Q&A | Launch, executive visibility | 50–500 |
| Hands-on workshop | Skill transfer | 15–30 |
| Cohort bootcamp | Deep onboarding | 10–25 |
| Office hours | Unblocking | Open |
| Recorded + async lab | Scale, time zones | Unlimited |
| Train-the-trainer | Internal SMEs | 5–15 |
Pick format from persona urgency and lab infra cost.
Run of show
Template (90 min workshop):
| Time | Activity |
|---|---|
| 0–10 | Goals, prerequisites check |
| 10–25 | Concept + live demo (one path) |
| 25–65 | Guided lab (breakouts if large) |
| 65–80 | Challenge + show-and-tell |
| 80–90 | Next steps, survey, resources |
Materials checklist: slides (sparse), lab repo, solution branch, troubleshooting doc, backup instructor.
Facilitation
- Two instructors for >20 when hands-on
- TAs for ratio ~1:8 during lab
- Parking lot for deep tangents
- Version pins on lab day — no surprise API changes
- Accessibility — captions, screen-reader-friendly docs, pace
Train facilitators with facilitator guide, not learner guide.
Cohort operations
- Application or manager nomination (if limited seats)
- Pre-work module due 48h before
- Slack/Discord channel with rules
- Daily stand-down for multi-day cohorts
- Certificate issued after rubric pass within 14 days
Track no-shows and drop-off step for curriculum fixes.