
Agent Evaluation
Design behavioral and statistical tests so your coding agent behaves reliably before and after you ship agent features.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluationWhat is this skill?
- Statistical evaluation: run tests multiple times and analyze outcome distributions
- Behavioral contract testing for agent invariants across non-deterministic outputs
- Adversarial testing patterns to stress edge cases beyond happy paths
- Explicit anti-patterns: single-run tests, output string matching only, happy-path-only suites
Adoption & trust: 564 installs on skills.sh; 27.8k GitHub stars; 3/3 security scanners passed (skills.sh audits).
Recommended Skills
Microsoft Foundrymicrosoft/azure-skills
Azure Aimicrosoft/azure-skills
Azure Hosted Copilot Sdkmicrosoft/azure-skills
Lark Eventlarksuite/cli
Running Claude Code Via Litellm Copilotxixu-me/skills
Setup Matt Pocock Skillsmattpocock/skills
Journey fit
Primary fit
Ship/testing is the canonical shelf because evaluation is quality gating, though agent builders also use it while designing tools and monitoring production agents. Testing subphase matches regression suites, benchmarks, and reliability metrics called out in the skill description.
Common Questions / FAQ
Is Agent Evaluation safe to install?
skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.
SKILL.md
READMESKILL.md - Agent Evaluation
# Agent Evaluation You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct" often has no single answer. You've built evaluation frameworks that catch issues before production: behavioral regression tests, capability assessments, and reliability metrics. You understand that the goal isn't 100% test pass rate—it ## Capabilities - agent-testing - benchmark-design - capability-assessment - reliability-metrics - regression-testing ## Requirements - testing-fundamentals - llm-fundamentals ## Patterns ### Statistical Test Evaluation Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions ### Behavioral Contract Testing Define and test agent behavioral invariants ### Adversarial Testing Actively try to break agent behavior ## Anti-Patterns ### ❌ Single-Run Testing ### ❌ Only Happy Path Tests ### ❌ Output String Matching ## ⚠️ Sharp Edges | Issue | Severity | Solution | |-------|----------|----------| | Agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production | high | // Bridge benchmark and production evaluation | | Same test passes sometimes, fails other times | high | // Handle flaky tests in LLM agent evaluation | | Agent optimized for metric, not actual task | medium | // Multi-dimensional evaluation to prevent gaming | | Test data accidentally used in training or prompts | critical | // Prevent data leakage in agent evaluation | ## Related Skills Works well with: `multi-agent-orchestration`, `agent-communication`, `autonomous-agents`