
Project Stage Detect
- 229 installs
- 23.6k repo stars
- Updated May 21, 2026
- donchitos/claude-code-game-studios
For development and infrastructure management.
About
project-stage-detect is an AI coding tool that enhances development workflows. Builders use it for infrastructure, integration, and platform development within the catalog ecosystem.
- project-stage-detect
- Development
Project Stage Detect by the numbers
- 229 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,682 of 4,347 Backend & APIs skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios --skill project-stage-detectAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 229 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 23.6k |
| Last updated | May 21, 2026 |
| Repository | donchitos/claude-code-game-studios ↗ |
What it does
For development and infrastructure management.
Files
Project Stage Detection
This skill scans your project to determine its current development stage, completeness of artifacts, and gaps that need attention. It's especially useful when:
- Starting with an existing project
- Onboarding to a codebase
- Checking what's missing before a milestone
- Understanding "where are we?"
---
Workflow
1. Scan Key Directories
Analyze project structure and content:
Design Documentation (design/):
- Count GDD files in
design/gdd/*.md - Check for game-concept.md, game-pillars.md, systems-index.md
- If systems-index.md exists, count total systems vs. designed systems
- Analyze completeness (Overview, Detailed Design, Edge Cases, etc.)
- Count narrative docs in
design/narrative/ - Count level designs in
design/levels/
Source Code (src/):
- Count source files (language-agnostic)
- Identify major systems (directories with 5+ files)
- Check for core/, gameplay/, ai/, networking/, ui/ directories
- Estimate lines of code (rough scale)
Production Artifacts (production/):
- Check for active sprint plans
- Look for milestone definitions
- Find roadmap documents
Prototypes (prototypes/):
- Count prototype directories
- Check for READMEs (documented vs undocumented)
- Assess if prototypes are archived or active
Architecture Docs (docs/architecture/):
- Count ADRs (Architecture Decision Records)
- Check for overview/index documents
Tests (tests/):
- Count test files
- Estimate test coverage (rough heuristic)
2. Classify Project Stage
Based on scanned artifacts, determine stage. Check production/stage.txt first — if it exists, use its value (explicit override from /gate-check). Otherwise, auto-detect using these heuristics (check from most-advanced backward):
| Stage | Indicators |
|---|---|
| Concept | No game concept doc, brainstorming phase |
| Systems Design | Game concept exists, systems index missing or incomplete |
| Technical Setup | Systems index exists, engine not configured |
| Pre-Production | Engine configured, src/ has <10 source files |
| Production | src/ has 10+ source files, active development |
| Polish | Explicit only (set by /gate-check Production → Polish gate) |
| Release | Explicit only (set by /gate-check Polish → Release gate) |
3. Collaborative Gap Identification
DO NOT just list missing files. Instead, ask clarifying questions:
- "I see combat code (
src/gameplay/combat/) but nodesign/gdd/combat-system.md. Was this prototyped first, or should we reverse-document?" - "You have 15 ADRs but no architecture overview. Should I create one to help new contributors?"
- "No sprint plans in
production/. Are you tracking work elsewhere (Jira, Trello, etc.)?" - "I found a game concept but no systems index. Have you decomposed the concept into individual systems yet, or should we run
/map-systems?" - "Prototypes directory has 3 projects with no READMEs. Were these experiments, or do they need documentation?"
4. Generate Stage Report
Use template: .claude/docs/templates/project-stage-report.md
Report structure:
# Project Stage Analysis
**Date**: [date]
**Stage**: [Concept/Systems Design/Technical Setup/Pre-Production/Production/Polish/Release]
**Stage Confidence**: [PASS — clearly detected / CONCERNS — ambiguous signals / FAIL — critical gaps block progress]
## Completeness Overview
- Design: [X%] ([N] docs, [gaps])
- Code: [X%] ([N] files, [systems])
- Architecture: [X%] ([N] ADRs, [gaps])
- Production: [X%] ([status])
- Tests: [X%] ([coverage estimate])
## Gaps Identified
1. [Gap description + clarifying question]
2. [Gap description + clarifying question]
## Recommended Next Steps
[Priority-ordered list based on stage and role]5. Role-Filtered Recommendations (Optional)
If user provided a role argument (e.g., /project-stage-detect programmer):
Programmer:
- Focus on architecture docs, test coverage, missing ADRs
- Code-to-docs gaps
Designer:
- Focus on GDD completeness, missing design sections
- Prototype documentation
Producer:
- Focus on sprint plans, milestone tracking, roadmap
- Cross-team coordination docs
General (no role):
- Holistic view of all gaps
- Highest-priority items across domains
6. Request Approval Before Writing
Collaborative protocol:
I've analyzed your project. Here's what I found:
[Show summary]
Gaps identified:
1. [Gap 1 + question]
2. [Gap 2 + question]
Recommended next steps:
- [Priority 1]
- [Priority 2]
- [Priority 3]
May I write the full stage analysis to production/project-stage-report.md?Wait for user approval before creating the file.
---
Example Usage
# General project analysis
/project-stage-detect
# Programmer-focused analysis
/project-stage-detect programmer
# Designer-focused analysis
/project-stage-detect designer---
Follow-Up Actions
After generating the report, suggest relevant next steps:
- Concept exists but no systems index? →
/map-systemsto decompose into systems - Missing design docs? →
/reverse-document design src/[system] - Missing architecture docs? →
/architecture-decisionor/reverse-document architecture - Prototypes need documentation? →
/reverse-document concept prototypes/[name] - No sprint plan? →
/sprint-plan - Approaching milestone? →
/milestone-review
---
Collaborative Protocol
This skill follows the collaborative design principle:
1. Question First: Ask about gaps, don't assume 2. Present Options: "Should I create X, or is it tracked elsewhere?" 3. User Decides: Wait for direction 4. Show Draft: Display report summary 5. Get Approval: "May I write to production/project-stage-report.md?"
Never silently write files. Always show findings and ask before creating artifacts.