
Brainstorming
- 14 installs
- 4 repo stars
- Updated June 18, 2026
- doubleslashse/claude-marketplace
Run structured brainstorming sessions using Osborn's rules and a diverge-converge model to generate and then select ideas.
About
Provides brainstorming techniques balancing divergent idea generation with convergent selection. A facilitator uses it when running ideation sessions or helping a team generate solutions.
- Applies Osborn's rules: defer judgment, go for quantity
- Uses the diverge-converge model to select ideas
Brainstorming by the numbers
- 14 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #2,126 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Jul 29, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/doubleslashse/claude-marketplace --skill brainstormingAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 14 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 4 |
| Last updated | June 18, 2026 |
| Repository | doubleslashse/claude-marketplace ↗ |
What it does
Run structured brainstorming sessions using Osborn's rules and a diverge-converge model to generate and then select ideas.
Files
Brainstorming Skill
Overview
Brainstorming is a creative technique for generating ideas through group or individual thinking sessions. Effective brainstorming balances divergent thinking (generating many ideas) with convergent thinking (selecting the best ideas).
Core Principles
Osborn's Rules (Classic Brainstorming)
1. Defer Judgment: No criticism during idea generation 2. Go for Quantity: More ideas = more chances for good ones 3. Encourage Wild Ideas: They often contain seeds of innovation 4. Build on Ideas: Use "Yes, and..." to extend thoughts
Additional Best Practices
5. One Conversation at a Time: Focus and listen 6. Be Visual: Sketch, diagram, demonstrate 7. Stay Focused: Keep returning to the challenge 8. Time-Box: Constraints drive creativity
The Diverge-Converge Model
DIVERGE CONVERGE
Generate ideas Select ideas
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ GROAN /
\ ZONE /
\ /
──────────────────────────
• Quantity • Quality
• Expansive • Focused
• No judgment • Evaluation
• All ideas • Best ideasThe "Groan Zone" is the challenging transition between divergence and convergence.
Divergent Techniques
1. Classic Brainstorm
Free-flowing idea generation with one person capturing.
2. Brainwriting (6-3-5)
- 6 people write 3 ideas in 5 minutes
- Pass papers and build on others' ideas
- Repeat rounds
3. Round Robin
Each person contributes one idea in turn, building momentum.
4. Mind Mapping
Visual technique branching from central concept.
5. SCAMPER
Systematic modification prompts:
- Substitute
- Combine
- Adapt
- Modify
- Put to other use
- Eliminate
- Reverse
6. Random Entry
Use random words/images as stimulus for new connections.
7. Reverse Brainstorm
"How could we cause this problem?" then flip solutions.
8. Starbursting
Generate questions (Who? What? When? Where? Why? How?) rather than answers.
9. Role Storming
Brainstorm as someone else (customer, competitor, child).
10. Worst Possible Idea
Deliberately generate terrible ideas, then extract useful elements.
Convergent Techniques
1. Dot Voting
Each person gets N dots to distribute among ideas.
2. Affinity Mapping
Group related ideas into themes/clusters.
3. Four Categories
Sort ideas into: Now, Soon, Later, Never
4. Impact/Effort Matrix
Plot ideas on 2x2 grid.
5. Ranking
Force-rank top 5-10 ideas.
6. Criteria Weighting
Score ideas against predefined criteria.
7. Thumbs Up/Down
Quick consensus check.
Session Structures
Quick Burst (30 minutes)
00:00 - 00:05 Setup & Rules
00:05 - 00:15 Diverge (generate ideas)
00:15 - 00:25 Converge (group & vote)
00:25 - 00:30 Close (top 3 & next steps)Standard Session (60 minutes)
00:00 - 00:05 Setup & Rules
00:05 - 00:10 Warm-up / Energizer
00:10 - 00:25 Round 1: Free Brainstorm
00:25 - 00:35 Round 2: Prompted/Structured
00:35 - 00:45 Group & Theme
00:45 - 00:55 Vote & Prioritize
00:55 - 00:60 Close & ActionsExtended Session (90 minutes)
00:00 - 00:10 Setup & Context
00:10 - 00:15 Warm-up
00:15 - 00:30 Round 1: Individual Silent
00:30 - 00:45 Round 2: Group Building
00:45 - 00:60 Round 3: Technique (SCAMPER, etc.)
00:60 - 00:70 Clustering & Themes
00:70 - 00:80 Voting & Discussion
00:80 - 00:90 Actions & CloseFacilitation Tips
Starting Strong
- Have a clear, well-framed challenge
- Create energy with a warm-up
- Post rules visibly
- Use a timer
Maintaining Momentum
- Call out good examples of building
- Prompt when energy dips
- Change techniques if stuck
- Use provocations: "What if...?"
Managing Challenges
| Challenge | Response |
|---|---|
| Silent group | Try brainwriting first |
| One dominant voice | Use round robin |
| Going off-topic | Restate the challenge |
| Premature criticism | Remind of rules, park concerns |
| Running out of ideas | Change technique or perspective |
| Too many ideas | Use affinity mapping |
Closing Strong
- Celebrate quantity generated
- Make selection transparent
- Assign clear actions
- Thank participants
Quality of Ideas
Idea Attributes to Look For
Novel: Different from existing solutions Feasible: Possible to implement Valuable: Addresses the real need Complete: Can stand alone as concept
Characteristics of Good Sessions
- High quantity of ideas generated
- Diversity of idea types
- Some surprising/unexpected ideas
- Building on others' ideas visible
- Energy maintained throughout
Common Pitfalls
1. Production Blocking: Others can't share while one talks
- Solution: Use brainwriting or silent ideation first
2. Evaluation Apprehension: Fear of judgment
- Solution: Emphasize rules, anonymous submission
3. Social Loafing: Hiding in the group
- Solution: Individual ideation before group
4. Anchoring: Early ideas dominate
- Solution: Generate silently first, randomize sharing
5. Groupthink: Converging too quickly
- Solution: Extend divergence, assign devil's advocate
See techniques.md for detailed technique guides.
Brainstorming Techniques
Detailed guides for specific brainstorming methods.
Divergent Techniques
Technique: Brainwriting (6-3-5)
Best For: Balanced participation, introverts, avoiding anchoring
Setup:
- Paper/cards for each participant
- Timer
- Clear challenge statement visible
Process: 1. Each person writes 3 ideas (5 minutes) 2. Pass paper to the right 3. Read ideas, then add 3 more building on or new (5 minutes) 4. Repeat until papers return to original owner 5. Share highlights with group
Output: 6 people × 6 rounds × 3 ideas = 108 potential ideas
Variations:
- 6-3-5 Digital: Use shared doc, rotate sections
- Rapid 3-2-3: Faster rounds for energy
---
Technique: Mind Mapping
Best For: Exploring topic dimensions, visual thinkers
Setup:
- Large paper or whiteboard
- Central topic clearly stated
- Markers
Process: 1. Write central topic in middle 2. Draw main branches for major themes 3. Add sub-branches for ideas 4. Connect related items across branches 5. Use colors and images
Structure:
[Sub-topic]
│
[Sub-topic]───[Detail]
│
[Theme 1]───────────┼───────────[Theme 2]
│ │ │
│ [CENTRAL TOPIC] │
│ │ │
[Theme 4]───────────┼───────────[Theme 3]
│ │ │
[Sub-topic] [Sub-topic] [Sub-topic]---
Technique: SCAMPER
Best For: Systematic exploration, building on existing ideas
Process: For each letter, apply the lens to your topic:
S - Substitute
- What materials, components, or people could we substitute?
- What other process could we use?
- What if we changed the rules?
C - Combine
- What ideas could we combine?
- What could we merge or integrate?
- What if we combined purposes or objectives?
A - Adapt
- What else is like this?
- What could we copy from another industry?
- What ideas from the past could we adapt?
M - Modify/Magnify/Minimize
- What could we enlarge or make smaller?
- What could we exaggerate or understate?
- What could we add or streamline?
P - Put to Other Uses
- What else could this be used for?
- Who else could use this?
- How would a child/elder/expert use this?
E - Eliminate
- What could we remove?
- What's not necessary?
- What if we did less?
R - Reverse/Rearrange
- What if we reversed the order?
- What if we swapped roles?
- What if we did the opposite?
---
Technique: Random Entry/Forced Connections
Best For: Breaking mental blocks, fresh perspectives
Setup:
- Random word list or image cards
- Timer
Process: 1. Select random word/image 2. List attributes of the random element 3. Force connections to your challenge 4. Generate ideas from connections
Example:
- Challenge: "Improve employee onboarding"
- Random word: "Garden"
- Attributes: Growth, seasons, nurturing, roots, sunlight, weeding
- Forced connections:
- Growth → Progressive skill development
- Seasons → Quarterly check-ins
- Nurturing → Mentor program
- Roots → Deep company culture immersion
- Sunlight → Transparent information access
- Weeding → Removing obstacles
---
Technique: Reverse Brainstorm
Best For: Uncovering hidden assumptions, seeing problems differently
Process: 1. State the challenge normally 2. Flip it: "How could we cause this problem?" or "How could we make this worse?" 3. Generate reverse ideas enthusiastically 4. Flip each reverse idea back 5. Evaluate the positive versions
Example:
- Challenge: "How might we improve customer service?"
- Reversed: "How could we make customer service terrible?"
- Make customers wait hours
- Use confusing phone menus
- Give inconsistent answers
- Make it hard to reach humans
- Flipped back:
- Respond within minutes
- Simple, direct contact options
- Consistent, documented answers
- Easy human access
---
Technique: Role Storming
Best For: New perspectives, overcoming blocks
Setup:
- List of personas/characters
Personas to Try:
- Your best customer
- Your harshest critic
- A 5-year-old child
- Someone from 1900 / 2100
- A competitor
- A celebrity
- An expert from another field
- The CEO
- The front-line employee
Process: 1. Select a persona 2. Get into character mentally 3. Brainstorm as that person would 4. Capture ideas without judgment 5. Repeat with different personas
---
Convergent Techniques
Technique: Dot Voting
Best For: Democratic, quick prioritization
Setup:
- All ideas visible on wall/board
- Dot stickers (or markers) - typically 3-5 per person
Process: 1. Review all ideas briefly 2. Give each person N dots 3. Vote silently (can put multiple on one idea) 4. Count dots 5. Discuss top vote-getters
Variations:
- Weighted voting: Different colored dots for different criteria
- Secret voting: Vote on paper first, then reveal
- $100 voting: Allocate "money" across ideas
---
Technique: Affinity Mapping
Best For: Making sense of many ideas, finding themes
Process: 1. Spread all ideas out 2. Silently move similar ideas together 3. Don't discuss during clustering 4. Repeat until stable 5. Name each cluster 6. Discuss relationships between clusters
Tips:
- Let outliers remain unclustered if they don't fit
- Clusters of 3-7 items work well
- Names should capture essence, not just list
---
Technique: Impact/Effort Matrix
Best For: Practical prioritization, action planning
Setup:
HIGH IMPACT
│
┌────────────────────┼────────────────────┐
│ │ │
│ MAJOR PROJECTS │ QUICK WINS │
│ │ │
│ Worth doing but │ DO FIRST │
│ plan carefully │ │
│ │ │
HIGH├────────────────────┼────────────────────┤LOW
EFFORT │ EFFORT
│ │ │
│ MONEY PITS │ FILL-INS │
│ │ │
│ Avoid unless │ Do if time │
│ strategic │ permits │
│ │ │
└────────────────────┼────────────────────┘
│
LOW IMPACTProcess: 1. Draw 2x2 matrix 2. Place each idea based on:
- Impact: Effect on the goal
- Effort: Resources required
3. Focus on Quick Wins first 4. Plan Major Projects carefully 5. Consider Fill-Ins opportunistically 6. Avoid Money Pits
---
Technique: Criteria Weighting
Best For: Objective evaluation, complex decisions
Setup:
- Define 3-5 criteria
- Assign weight to each (totaling 100%)
Example Criteria:
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Customer impact | 30% |
| Feasibility | 25% |
| Cost | 20% |
| Strategic fit | 15% |
| Speed to implement | 10% |
Process: 1. Score each idea 1-5 on each criterion 2. Multiply score by weight 3. Sum weighted scores 4. Rank by total score 5. Discuss surprises
Template:
| Idea | Customer (30%) | Feasibility (25%) | Cost (20%) | Strategy (15%) | Speed (10%) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4 (1.2) | 3 (0.75) | 4 (0.8) | 5 (0.75) | 3 (0.3) | 3.8 |
| B | 5 (1.5) | 2 (0.5) | 2 (0.4) | 4 (0.6) | 2 (0.2) | 3.2 |
---
Technique: Now/Next/Later/Never
Best For: Action-oriented planning
Categories:
- Now: Start immediately (this week)
- Next: Start soon (this month)
- Later: Backlog (this quarter+)
- Never: Don't pursue (archive)
Process: 1. Present each idea briefly 2. Quick vote or discussion: which category? 3. Place in appropriate column 4. Review "Now" items for actions 5. Document "Next" items for future 6. Archive "Never" with brief rationale