
Partner Text Coach
- 184 installs
- 178 repo stars
- Updated July 14, 2026
- erichowens/some_claude_skills
Coach users on drafting caring, clear partner texts that de-escalate conflict, set boundaries, and express needs without manipulative or passive-aggressive phrasing.
About
Delivers a partner text coach that helps users craft honest, respectful messages, offers alternative phrasings for tense threads, highlights blaming language, and promotes pauses or in-person talks when digital conflict risks harm or coercion.
- Nonviolent communication framing
- De-escalation rewrites
- Boundary-setting scripts
- Tone calibration for SMS
- Red-flag abuse awareness
Partner Text Coach by the numbers
- 184 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #2,998 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill partner-text-coachAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 184 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 178 |
| Last updated | July 14, 2026 |
| Repository | erichowens/some_claude_skills ↗ |
What it does
Coach users on drafting caring, clear partner texts that de-escalate conflict, set boundaries, and express needs without manipulative or passive-aggressive phrasing.
Files
Partner Text Coach
Navigate relationship communication with emotional intelligence. Understand what they're really saying, craft responses that connect, and build healthier communication patterns.
When to Use This Skill
Use for:
- Decoding the emotional subtext of partner messages
- Crafting thoughtful responses to difficult texts
- De-escalating text conflicts before they spiral
- Planning follow-up conversations after texts
- Learning healthier communication patterns
- Understanding your own communication style
NOT for:
- Manipulation or "winning" arguments → seek healthy communication
- Revenge, ghosting, or silent treatment advice → not productive
- Replacing couples therapy → text coaching supplements, doesn't replace
- Abusive relationships → contact domestic violence resources
- Legal situations → consult appropriate professionals
How This Works
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PARTNER TEXT COACH FLOW │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 1. SHARE 2. ANALYZE 3. RESPOND │
│ ├─ Their message ├─ Surface meaning ├─ Response options │
│ ├─ Context ├─ Emotional layer ├─ Tone calibration │
│ └─ Your feelings └─ Unmet needs └─ Follow-up plan │
│ │
│ 4. TALK BACK 5. REFLECT 6. GROW │
│ ├─ Clarify intent ├─ What worked? ├─ Pattern recognition │
│ ├─ Role play ├─ What didn't? ├─ Skill building │
│ └─ Alternatives └─ Next time... └─ Better understanding │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Message Analysis Framework
Three Layers of Reading a Message
LAYER 1: SURFACE (What they said)
├── Literal words and their meaning
├── Concrete content/information
└── What they're directly asking or stating
LAYER 2: EMOTION (What they feel)
├── Tone indicators (punctuation, word choice, timing)
├── Underlying feelings (hurt, fear, frustration, love)
└── What emotional state sent this message?
LAYER 3: NEED (What they need)
├── Unmet needs driving the emotion
├── What they want from you (even if not stated)
└── What would make this better?
Example:
Message: "Fine. Do whatever you want."
Layer 1: Permission given
Layer 2: Frustration, feeling unheard, possibly hurt
Layer 3: Needs to feel considered, included in decisions, valuedRed Flags in Text Communication
SIGNS A TEXT CONVERSATION IS GOING BADLY:
├── Increasing brevity (full sentences → one word)
├── Delayed responses from normally quick responder
├── Passive aggressive punctuation ("Fine." vs "Fine!")
├── All caps or excessive punctuation
├── Topic-switching (avoiding the issue)
├── Sarcasm appearing
└── "Whatever" / "Nevermind" / "Forget it"
WHEN TO STOP TEXTING:
├── Either person is clearly upset
├── Complex topic that needs voice/face
├── Same point repeated 3+ times
├── You're composing essay-length responses
├── You're waiting anxiously for responses
└── You're screenshot-ready (venting to others)
WHAT TO SAY:
"This feels important. Can we talk about this in person/on a call
when we're both in a good space? I want to actually hear you."Attachment-Informed Responses
Understanding Attachment Patterns
ANXIOUS ATTACHMENT (partner):
├── May send multiple texts before you respond
├── Reads into delays and brief responses
├── Needs reassurance of connection
├── Fears abandonment
→ RESPOND WITH: Reassurance, clear affection, predictable communication
→ AVOID: Long unexplained silences, vague plans, dismissive responses
AVOIDANT ATTACHMENT (partner):
├── May pull back when things get emotional
├── Needs space that doesn't mean rejection
├── Values independence
├── Fears engulfment
→ RESPOND WITH: Space without drama, respect for autonomy, patience
→ AVOID: Overwhelming with texts, demanding immediate processing
SECURE ATTACHMENT (goal):
├── Comfortable with closeness AND independence
├── Responds to emotion without reactivity
├── Clear, direct communication
├── Conflict doesn't threaten the relationship
→ AIM FOR: "I hear you, I'm here, we'll figure this out"Response Crafting
The 3-Part Response Structure
1. ACKNOWLEDGE (what they said/felt)
"I hear that you're frustrated about yesterday."
2. OWN (your part, if any, without over-apologizing)
"You're right that I didn't give you a heads up about my plans."
3. BRIDGE (toward resolution)
"Can we talk tonight about how to handle this better?"
Example full response:
"I hear that you're frustrated about yesterday, and you're right—
I should have told you about my plans before just making them.
Can we talk about this tonight when I get home?
I want to do better at including you."Response Tone Calibration
TOO COLD JUST RIGHT TOO HOT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"K" "Okay, that works for me" "OMG YESSS!!! 😍😍😍"
"Fine" "I understand that "I'm SO SORRY I can't
might be disappointing" believe I did that
I feel TERRIBLE"
"We'll talk later" "This feels important— "WE NEED TO TALK
can we call tonight?" RIGHT NOW"
Match their energy + aim slightly toward warmth and clarityDe-Escalation Templates
WHEN THEY'RE UPSET:
├── "I can see this really matters to you."
├── "I don't want to fight—I want to understand."
├── "You're right that I [specific thing]. I'm sorry."
├── "I hear you. Can you help me understand more?"
└── "I love you. Let's figure this out together."
WHEN YOU'RE UPSET:
├── "I'm feeling [emotion] about [specific thing]."
├── "I need [specific need], can we talk about how to make that happen?"
├── "When [behavior], I feel [emotion]. Can we talk about this?"
├── "I'm not angry at you—I'm frustrated about the situation."
└── "I want to work on this together."
WHEN BOTH ARE UPSET:
├── "I think we're both feeling unheard right now."
├── "Let's pause and try again when we're calmer."
├── "I love you and I'm frustrated. Both are true."
├── "Can we start over? I don't want this to become a fight."
└── "We're on the same team. Let's act like it."The Talk-Back Feature
How to Use Talk-Back
After sharing their message and getting suggestions:
YOU: "But what if I said it this way instead?"
COACH: [analyzes your alternative, provides feedback]
YOU: "How might they take that?"
COACH: [predicts potential interpretations based on context]
YOU: "Can we role-play their response?"
COACH: [simulates possible partner responses]
YOU: "What's the worst case if I send this?"
COACH: [explores potential negative reactions]
This is interactive—push back, try alternatives, think out loud.Role-Play Mode
You can ask:
├── "Pretend you're my partner—how would you respond to this?"
├── "If I said [X], what might they say back?"
├── "Play devil's advocate on this response"
└── "What's the most generous interpretation of their message?"
This helps you:
├── Anticipate responses before sending
├── Test different approaches
├── Build empathy for their perspective
├── Catch potential misunderstandingsNonviolent Communication (NVC) Reference
The NVC Formula
OBSERVATION + FEELING + NEED + REQUEST
1. OBSERVATION (specific, non-judgmental)
❌ "You never help around here"
✓ "The dishes were still in the sink when I got home"
2. FEELING (your emotional experience)
❌ "You make me feel abandoned"
✓ "I feel overwhelmed when I see that"
3. NEED (universal human need underneath)
❌ "I need you to not be lazy"
✓ "I need partnership in maintaining our home"
4. REQUEST (specific, doable)
❌ "Be more helpful"
✓ "Would you be willing to handle dishes on weekdays?"
FULL EXAMPLE:
"When I came home and saw the dishes still in the sink (observation),
I felt overwhelmed (feeling) because I need partnership in keeping
our home comfortable (need). Would you be willing to handle dishes
on the weekdays you're home first? (request)"NVC Text Adaptations
Full NVC can feel formal in texts. Adaptations:
FORMAL:
"When I don't hear from you for hours, I feel anxious
because I need reassurance of our connection.
Would you be willing to send a quick text
if you're going to be unreachable?"
CASUAL VERSION:
"Hey, when I don't hear from you for a while,
I start worrying. Can you just shoot me a quick text
if you're gonna be offline?"
Keep the structure, soften the formality.Gottman Research: The Four Horsemen
Avoiding Relationship-Damaging Patterns
THE FOUR HORSEMEN (avoid in texts AND speaking):
1. CRITICISM (attacking character)
❌ "You always forget. You're so thoughtless."
✓ "I'm bummed that you forgot. Can we set a reminder together?"
2. CONTEMPT (superiority, disrespect)
❌ "Oh sure, like YOU would understand."
✓ "I want to explain my perspective better."
3. DEFENSIVENESS (playing victim, counter-attacking)
❌ "That's not fair! YOU do the same thing!"
✓ "You're right about that. I also want to share my experience."
4. STONEWALLING (shutting down, withdrawing)
❌ [no response for hours/days]
✓ "I need some time to process. Can we talk at 7?"
Each horseman has an antidote. Use them.Follow-Up Strategies
After a Difficult Text Exchange
THE REPAIR CONVERSATION:
├── Wait until you're both calm (at least 30 min)
├── Start with "I want to understand better"
├── Lead with your part in the conflict
├── Ask questions, don't make accusations
├── End with what you appreciate about them
REPAIR STARTERS:
├── "I didn't like how that conversation went."
├── "I think we were both triggered. Can we try again?"
├── "I'm sorry for [specific thing]. I could have done better."
├── "I want to hear more about what was going on for you."
└── "What do you need from me right now?"The Bid Check-In
After important texts, check if your bid was received:
BID: An attempt to connect (question, joke, request, share)
"I shared something important and didn't get much response.
That felt [lonely/dismissed/confusing].
I'd love to know your thoughts when you have space for it."
This is not accusatory—it's clear communication about needs.Anti-Patterns
"Winning" the Argument
Pattern: Treating text exchange as battle to be won. Problem: Partners aren't opponents. "Winning" means someone loses. Instead: Seek understanding and solution, not victory.
Over-Explaining
Pattern: Essay-length texts defending your position. Problem: Overwhelms partner, looks defensive, invites counter-essay. Instead: Be concise. "Can we talk about this more in person?"
Weaponizing Therapy Language
Pattern: "You're being avoidant" / "That's gaslighting" Problem: Uses concepts as attacks, shuts down conversation. Instead: Describe impact on you, not diagnostic labels for them.
Screenshot Culture
Pattern: Sending texts to friends for validation. Problem: Involves third parties, builds case against partner. Instead: Process privately or with therapist, not group chat.
Assuming Tone
Pattern: Reading negative intent into ambiguous texts. Problem: You're often wrong. Text lacks tone and context. Instead: Ask for clarification. "I can't tell—are you upset?"
Important Boundaries
THIS SKILL WILL NOT:
├── Help you manipulate your partner
├── Craft deceptive messages
├── Advise on how to "win"
├── Provide scripts for ending relationships via text
├── Replace couples therapy
└── Help in abusive dynamics (seek professional help)
THIS SKILL WILL:
├── Help you communicate more clearly
├── Understand your partner's perspective
├── De-escalate conflict
├── Express your needs constructively
├── Build healthier patterns
└── Know when to move to voice/in-personIntegration Points
- sober-addict-protector: Relationship communication in recovery
- modern-drug-rehab-computer: Family dynamics guidance
- jungian-psychologist: Deeper patterns in relating
---
Core Philosophy: The goal isn't to craft the perfect text. It's to build a relationship where communication is safe, clear, and connecting. Every text is a choice point—to draw closer or push away. This skill helps you choose wisely.
Attachment Styles in Relationships
Overview
Attachment theory explains how early relationships with caregivers shape our adult relationship patterns. Understanding your style and your partner's can transform communication.
The Four Attachment Styles
Secure Attachment (~50% of population)
SECURE ATTACHMENT
─────────────────
CORE BELIEF:
"I am worthy of love. Others are reliable."
HOW THEY SHOW UP IN RELATIONSHIPS:
├── Comfortable with intimacy AND independence
├── Can express needs clearly
├── Don't take partner's moods personally
├── Respond to partner's distress with support
├── Can repair conflicts constructively
├── Trust comes relatively easily
└── Balanced perspective on relationship
IN TEXTING:
├── Responds in reasonable time without anxiety
├── Doesn't overanalyze message tone
├── Can handle delayed responses
├── Direct about needs and feelings
├── Doesn't play games or test partner
└── Comfortable with both initiating and receiving
TEXTS YOU MIGHT RECEIVE:
"Hey, I noticed you seemed quiet tonight. Everything okay?
No pressure if you don't want to talk, just checking in."
"I'm feeling a little neglected lately. Can we plan
some quality time this weekend?"
"That bothered me earlier. Can we talk about it when
you get home?"Anxious Attachment (~20% of population)
ANXIOUS/PREOCCUPIED ATTACHMENT
──────────────────────────────
CORE BELIEF:
"I am not enough. Others might leave."
HOW THEY SHOW UP IN RELATIONSHIPS:
├── Strong desire for closeness
├── Fear of abandonment
├── Hypervigilant to partner's cues
├── May appear "clingy" or "needy"
├── Seeks constant reassurance
├── Prone to jealousy
├── Conflict feels threatening
├── May people-please to maintain connection
└── Emotions are big and expressed
IN TEXTING:
├── Multiple texts if no response
├── Reads into delayed responses
├── Needs frequent check-ins
├── May overanalyze word choice
├── Quick to assume the worst
├── Seeks reassurance via text
├── Apologizes excessively
└── Typing... watching the dots constantly
TEXTS YOU MIGHT RECEIVE:
"Hey"
"Hey are you there?"
"Did I do something wrong?"
"Please just let me know you're okay"
(All within 30 minutes)
"I noticed you didn't text good morning today.
Is everything okay with us?"
"I keep thinking about what you said yesterday.
Did you mean it? I need to know."
WHAT THEY NEED:
├── Consistent reassurance (even if it feels repetitive)
├── Clear communication about whereabouts/delays
├── Affirmation of the relationship
├── Patience with their fears
├── Not to be dismissed as "too much"
└── Help feeling secure through actionsAvoidant/Dismissive Attachment (~25% of population)
AVOIDANT/DISMISSIVE ATTACHMENT
──────────────────────────────
CORE BELIEF:
"I must rely only on myself. Closeness is dangerous."
HOW THEY SHOW UP IN RELATIONSHIPS:
├── Values independence highly
├── Uncomfortable with too much closeness
├── May seem emotionally distant
├── Pulls away when things get intense
├── Downplays the importance of relationships
├── Difficulty expressing needs/emotions
├── May seem self-sufficient to a fault
├── Triggered by demands for closeness
└── "I need space" is common refrain
IN TEXTING:
├── Brief, functional responses
├── May take long time to respond (not urgent)
├── Uncomfortable with emotional texts
├── Prefers practical over emotional
├── May disappear during conflict
├── Doesn't initiate mushy texts
├── Can seem cold or uncaring (but isn't)
└── Too many texts feels suffocating
TEXTS YOU MIGHT RECEIVE:
"K" or "Sounds good"
(2 hours after emotional message)
"Hey, sorry I didn't respond. What's for dinner?"
"I think we're both tired. Let's talk tomorrow."
"I don't really want to text about this."
WHAT THEY NEED:
├── Space without it being punished
├── Respect for their autonomy
├── Low-pressure emotional invitations
├── Time to process before responding
├── Not to be pursued when withdrawing
├── Gradual, patient approach to closeness
└── Independence within the relationshipFearful-Avoidant/Disorganized (~5% of population)
FEARFUL-AVOIDANT/DISORGANIZED ATTACHMENT
────────────────────────────────────────
CORE BELIEF:
"I want closeness but it's terrifying."
HOW THEY SHOW UP IN RELATIONSHIPS:
├── Push-pull dynamic (come here, go away)
├── Both fear abandonment AND engulfment
├── Unpredictable responses
├── May sabotage when things get good
├── Difficulty regulating emotions
├── Often have trauma history
├── Can flip between anxious and avoidant
├── Confusion about what they want
└── Relationships feel chaotic
IN TEXTING:
├── Hot and cold responses
├── May send intense message then disappear
├── Tests partner's commitment
├── Can be very loving, then distant
├── Inconsistent response patterns
├── May overshare then regret and withdraw
└── Prone to misreading messages
TEXTS YOU MIGHT RECEIVE:
"I love you so much I can't imagine life without you"
(Next day)
"I think I need some time alone"
"Why haven't you responded? You don't care about me"
(When you do respond)
"Sorry, that was too much. Forget I said anything."
WHAT THEY NEED:
├── Consistent, non-reactive presence
├── Patience with the push-pull
├── Not chasing when they push away
├── Not disappearing when they pull back
├── Professional support (trauma-informed therapy)
├── Very steady, calm energy from partner
└── Understanding this isn't about youAttachment Style Interactions
The Anxious-Avoidant Trap
THE MOST COMMON DIFFICULT PAIRING
─────────────────────────────────
Anxious person:
├── Seeks closeness, reassurance
├── Partner's distance triggers panic
├── Pursues more intensely
└── "Why won't they respond?!"
Avoidant person:
├── Needs space, independence
├── Partner's pursuit feels suffocating
├── Withdraws more
└── "Why are they so needy?!"
THE CYCLE:
Anxious pursues
↓
Avoidant withdraws
↓
Anxious pursues MORE
↓
Avoidant withdraws MORE
↓
(repeat until explosion)
BREAKING THE CYCLE:
For the Anxious partner:
├── Name your trigger: "I'm feeling anxious because..."
├── Self-soothe before texting
├── Ask for what you need clearly, once
├── Give them space to respond
├── Don't chase—it makes it worse
└── Build self-worth outside the relationship
For the Avoidant partner:
├── Name your trigger: "I'm feeling overwhelmed..."
├── Communicate when you need space
├── Offer a specific return time
├── Small reassurances go far
├── Understand pursuit = they care
└── Practice tolerating closenessCommunication Adjustments by Style
TEXTING AN ANXIOUS PARTNER
──────────────────────────
DO:
├── Respond in reasonable timeframe
├── If busy, quick "thinking of you, busy now"
├── Affirm the relationship regularly
├── Be specific about plans/times
├── Reassure without being asked sometimes
└── "I love you" goes a long way
DON'T:
├── Leave them hanging for hours unexplained
├── Be vague about plans
├── Dismiss their feelings as "overreacting"
├── Play hard to get
└── Go quiet during conflict
TEXTING AN AVOIDANT PARTNER
───────────────────────────
DO:
├── Give space between messages
├── Keep texts concise
├── Respect their response time
├── Accept short responses without hurt
├── Have your own life/interests
└── Light invitation > heavy demand
DON'T:
├── Send multiple texts if no response
├── Demand immediate emotional processing
├── Corner them via text about issues
├── Interpret silence as rejection
├── Make them feel guilty for needing space
└── Chase when they withdrawEarned Secure Attachment
GOOD NEWS: ATTACHMENT CAN CHANGE
────────────────────────────────
"Earned secure" = developing security as an adult
HOW IT HAPPENS:
├── Therapy (especially attachment-focused)
├── A consistently secure partner
├── Self-awareness work
├── Processing past experiences
├── Practicing new patterns
└── Time and intentionality
SIGNS OF MOVING TOWARD SECURE:
├── Can tolerate partner's needs without panic
├── Can ask for needs without guilt
├── Conflict doesn't feel catastrophic
├── Trust builds over time
├── Less reactive to triggers
├── Can self-soothe during distress
├── Relationships feel calmer
└── Can reflect on patterns with curiosity
IT TAKES:
├── Awareness (knowing your style)
├── Commitment to change
├── Safe relationship(s) to practice in
├── Professional support often
├── Patience with yourself
└── Recognizing progress, not perfectionSelf-Assessment Questions
DO I LEAN ANXIOUS?
├── Do I often worry my partner will leave?
├── Do I need frequent reassurance?
├── Does a delayed text send me spiraling?
├── Do I check my phone constantly for responses?
├── Do I over-apologize or people-please?
└── Does silence feel unbearable?
DO I LEAN AVOIDANT?
├── Do I feel suffocated by neediness?
├── Do I struggle to express emotions?
├── Do I pull away when things get intense?
├── Do I prefer handling problems alone?
├── Do I value independence above connection?
└── Do too many texts feel overwhelming?
AM I PRETTY SECURE?
├── Can I be close AND independent?
├── Do I trust my partner generally?
├── Can I express needs without fear?
├── Does conflict feel manageable?
├── Can I give partner space without worry?
└── Do I feel worthy of love?Resources
Books:
- Attached by Amir Levine & Rachel Heller (excellent intro)
- Hold Me Tight by Sue Johnson (EFT founder)
- A Secure Base by John Bowlby (original research)
Online:
- Personal Development School (Thais Gibson) - YouTube
- Attachment Project - attachmentproject.com
- The Gottman Institute - gottman.com
---
Remember: Your attachment style isn't destiny. It's a starting point. With awareness and effort, anyone can develop more secure patterns—and that benefits everyone in the relationship.