
Very Long Text Summarization
- 143 installs
- 178 repo stars
- Updated July 14, 2026
- erichowens/some_claude_skills
Chunk, map, and reduce documents exceeding context limits into faithful summaries for specs, logs, contracts, and research corpora inside agent sessions.
About
Teaches agents to summarize very long texts via chunking and staged reduction so code assistants can extract decisions, risks, and action items from large specs, transcripts, and log dumps without losing critical detail.
- Hierarchical map-reduce summarization
- Chunk boundary and overlap tuning
- Faithfulness checks for dense sources
- Token budget aware condensation
- Reusable prompts for logs and specs
Very Long Text Summarization by the numbers
- 143 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #3,442 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill very-long-text-summarizationAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 143 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 178 |
| Last updated | July 14, 2026 |
| Repository | erichowens/some_claude_skills ↗ |
What it does
Chunk, map, and reduce documents exceeding context limits into faithful summaries for specs, logs, contracts, and research corpora inside agent sessions.
Files
Very Long Text Summarization
Processes texts too large for a single context window using hierarchical multi-pass extraction with armies of cheap models. Produces structured knowledge maps, indexed summaries, and skill drafts — not just prose compression.
---
When to Use
✅ Use for:
- Professional handbooks and textbooks (100-1000+ pages)
- Career biographies and memoirs (extracting expertise patterns)
- Large codebases (architecture-level understanding)
- Research paper collections (synthesizing findings across papers)
- Any text exceeding a single context window (~100K tokens)
❌ NOT for:
- Short documents (<10 pages) — just read them directly
- Real-time conversation summarization (use auto-compact patterns)
- Code documentation generation (use
technical-writer) - Simple TL;DR requests (not worth the multi-pass overhead)
---
Architecture: Three-Pass Hierarchical Extraction
flowchart TD
D[Document] --> C[Chunk into segments]
C --> P1["Pass 1: Haiku army\n(parallel extraction)"]
P1 --> I[Intermediate summaries]
I --> P2["Pass 2: Sonnet synthesis\n(merge + structure)"]
P2 --> S[Structured knowledge map]
S --> P3["Pass 3: Opus refinement\n(optional, for skill drafts)"]
P3 --> O[Final output]Pass 1: Chunked Extraction (Haiku Army)
Split the document into overlapping chunks (~4K tokens each, 500 token overlap). Deploy one Haiku call per chunk in parallel. Each extracts:
extraction_template:
summary: "2-3 sentence summary of this section"
key_claims: ["list of factual claims or assertions"]
processes: ["any step-by-step procedures described"]
decisions: ["any decision points or heuristics mentioned"]
failures: ["any failures, mistakes, or anti-patterns described"]
aha_moments: ["any insights, realizations, or conceptual breakthroughs"]
metaphors: ["any metaphors or mental models used"]
temporal: ["any 'things changed when...' or 'before X, after Y' patterns"]
quotes: ["notable direct quotes worth preserving"]
references: ["any citations, links, or cross-references"]Cost: ~$0.001 per chunk. A 300-page book (~150K tokens) = ~38 chunks = ~$0.04 total for Pass 1.
Parallelism: All chunks run simultaneously. A 300-page book completes Pass 1 in ~3 seconds (wall clock), not 3 minutes.
Pass 2: Synthesis (Sonnet)
Feed all Pass 1 extractions into one or more Sonnet calls. Sonnet merges, deduplicates, and structures the knowledge.
synthesis_template:
document_summary: "1-2 paragraph executive summary"
knowledge_map:
core_concepts:
- concept: "name"
definition: "what it means in this domain"
relationships: ["connects to concept X because..."]
processes:
- name: "process name"
steps: ["ordered steps"]
decision_points: ["where choices are made"]
common_mistakes: ["what goes wrong"]
expertise_patterns:
- pattern: "what experts do differently"
novice_mistake: "what novices do instead"
aha_moment: "the insight that bridges the gap"
temporal_evolution:
- period: "date range"
paradigm: "what was believed/practiced"
change_trigger: "what caused the shift"
key_metaphors:
- metaphor: "how practitioners think about X"
maps_to: "the underlying structure it represents"
index:
- topic: "topic name"
chunk_ids: [3, 7, 12] # Which original chunks cover this
summary: "1 sentence"Cost: ~$0.02-0.05 depending on extraction volume. The index preserves traceability back to specific book sections.
Pass 3: Refinement (Opus, Optional)
For skill-draft output mode: Opus takes the knowledge map and produces a SKILL.md following the skill-architect template. This is the "crystallize skill from handbook" pipeline.
Cost: ~$0.10. Only run when the output is a skill draft.
---
Chunking Strategy
Semantic Chunking (Preferred)
Split on document structure — chapter boundaries, section headings, paragraph breaks. Preserves semantic coherence within each chunk.
def semantic_chunk(text: str, max_tokens: int = 4000, overlap: int = 500) -> list[str]:
"""Split text on structural boundaries with overlap."""
# Split on headings, then merge short sections
sections = split_on_headings(text) # ##, ###, etc.
chunks = []
current = ""
for section in sections:
if count_tokens(current + section) > max_tokens:
chunks.append(current)
# Overlap: keep the last ~500 tokens
current = get_last_n_tokens(current, overlap) + section
else:
current += section
if current:
chunks.append(current)
return chunksFixed-Size Chunking (Fallback)
For unstructured text without headings. Split on paragraph boundaries, targeting ~4K tokens with 500-token overlap.
Why Overlap?
Concepts that span chunk boundaries need to appear in both chunks to be extracted. Without overlap, you lose cross-boundary knowledge.
---
Output Modes
Mode 1: Summary
Produces a structured summary with executive overview, key concepts, and index.
Use for: Quick understanding of a long document. Reading a handbook before a meeting.
Mode 2: Knowledge Map
Produces the full knowledge map: concepts, processes, expertise patterns, temporal evolution, metaphors. Machine-readable (YAML/JSON) for downstream processing.
Use for: Feeding into skill creation, domain meta-skill development, or cross-document analysis.
Mode 3: Skill Draft
Produces a SKILL.md following the skill-architect template, with the handbook's expertise encoded as decision trees, anti-patterns, and shibboleths.
Use for: Converting professional handbooks into Claude skills. The KE pipeline.
---
Cost Model
| Document Size | Pages | Chunks | Pass 1 (Haiku) | Pass 2 (Sonnet) | Pass 3 (Opus) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article | 10 | 4 | $0.004 | $0.01 | — | $0.014 |
| Chapter | 30 | 10 | $0.01 | $0.02 | — | $0.03 |
| Handbook | 300 | 38 | $0.04 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.19 |
| Textbook | 800 | 100 | $0.10 | $0.10 | $0.10 | $0.30 |
| Encyclopedia | 2000+ | 250+ | $0.25 | $0.20 | $0.10 | $0.55 |
Processing time is dominated by the longest single Haiku call (~2-3s). With full parallelism, even a 2000-page text completes Pass 1 in under 5 seconds.
---
Anti-Patterns
Single-Pass Summarization
Wrong: Feed the entire document into one Opus call. Why: Exceeds context window, or attention dilution produces weak extraction on such long input. Right: Hierarchical multi-pass. Cheap parallel extraction → expensive synthesis.
Summarization Without Structure
Wrong: Produce a 2-paragraph prose summary of a 300-page handbook. Why: The structure IS the knowledge. A flat summary loses the decision trees, failure patterns, and temporal evolution that make skills valuable. Right: Structured knowledge map with indexed access back to source sections.
Skipping Overlap
Wrong: Chunk on hard boundaries with no overlap. Why: Cross-boundary concepts get split and lost. Right: 500-token overlap between chunks. Each chunk includes the tail of the previous chunk.
Ignoring Source Traceability
Wrong: Produce extractions without tracking which chunk they came from. Why: When a claim seems wrong, you need to verify it against the source. Without traceability, you can't. Right: Every extraction carries a chunk_id linking back to the original text segment.
Changelog: very-long-text-summarization
v1.0.0 (2026-02-05)
Created
- Three-pass hierarchical extraction (Haiku army → Sonnet synthesis → Opus refinement)
- Structured knowledge map output (concepts, processes, expertise patterns, temporal evolution, metaphors)
- Three output modes: summary, knowledge-map, skill-draft
- Semantic chunking with overlap
- Cost model (~$0.19 for a 300-page handbook)
- Anti-patterns: single-pass, unstructured output, no overlap, no traceability
- Designed for processing professional handbooks and biographies for skill extraction