
Load Testing Commerce
- 59 installs
- 41 repo stars
- Updated March 13, 2026
- finsilabs/awesome-ecommerce-skills
Simulate realistic shopper traffic on catalog and checkout with k6 or Artillery to find bottlenecks and set performance baselines before a flash sale.
About
Builds realistic browse-to-checkout load scenarios in k6 and Artillery, including think time and test payment tokens, and interprets results against p95 targets. A developer uses it before Black Friday, infra changes, or new checkout releases.
- k6 ramping-arrival-rate scenarios and Artillery YAML for browse/checkout flows against staging
- CI workflow, per-step p95 analysis, and platform-specific guidance for Shopify/WooCommerce/headless
Load Testing Commerce by the numbers
- 59 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,168 of 2,153 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 3, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/finsilabs/awesome-ecommerce-skills --skill load-testing-commerceAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 59 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 41 |
| Last updated | March 13, 2026 |
| Repository | finsilabs/awesome-ecommerce-skills ↗ |
What it does
Simulate realistic shopper traffic on catalog and checkout with k6 or Artillery to find bottlenecks and set performance baselines before a flash sale.
Files
Load Testing — Commerce
Overview
Load testing e-commerce applications requires more than hammering an endpoint with concurrent requests. Realistic test scenarios simulate actual user behavior: browsing the catalog, searching for products, adding items to a cart, and completing checkout — including the think time between actions. This skill covers building realistic shopping scenarios in k6 and Artillery, interpreting results to find bottlenecks, and establishing performance baselines before major sales events.
When to Use This Skill
- When preparing for a flash sale, Black Friday, or seasonal traffic spike
- When deploying a major infrastructure change (new database, CDN, checkout service)
- When establishing performance SLOs and baselines for a new storefront
- When a production incident was caused by load and you need to reproduce it in staging
- When a new checkout feature is being released and its performance impact is unknown
Core Instructions
Step 1: Determine your platform and what you can test
| Platform | Load Testing Scope | Recommended Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Shopify | Shopify's infrastructure scales automatically — you cannot overload it meaningfully | Test your theme's frontend performance with Google PageSpeed Insights and Lighthouse CI; test any custom apps or storefronts you host separately |
| WooCommerce | You own the server — load testing is critical before sales events | Use Loader.io (free tier: 1 target, 10K connections/test) against your staging site; or k6/Artillery for detailed scenario testing |
| BigCommerce | BigCommerce scales automatically — platform infrastructure is not a concern | Test your theme's frontend performance with PageSpeed Insights; test any custom middleware or headless layer you host |
| Custom / Headless | Full control — load testing is your responsibility | Use k6 (open-source, scriptable) or Artillery (YAML-based) with realistic shopping scenarios against a staging environment |
Step 2: Platform-specific load testing
---
Shopify
Shopify's infrastructure handles virtually any traffic spike. Your load testing focus is the frontend experience:
1. Run Google PageSpeed Insights on your most critical pages (product page, collection page, checkout):
- Go to pagespeed.web.dev and test your product and collection pages
- Target a Performance score of 75+ on mobile; address any red/orange recommendations before your sale
2. Check Shopify's built-in performance report:
- Go to Online Store → Themes and click View report
- This shows your store's Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, FID) based on real user data
- A poor LCP score on mobile almost always means the hero image needs
fetchpriority="high"or compression
3. Audit your installed apps before a sale:
- Go to Apps in your Shopify admin and review every app injecting scripts into your storefront
- Each third-party script adds 50–200ms; remove unused apps and disable any that load synchronously
4. For Shopify Plus — notify Shopify support before major launches:
- Submit a flash sale notification through your Plus support channel at least 48 hours before the event
- Shopify can pre-allocate resources and monitor your store during the event
---
WooCommerce
WooCommerce runs on your hosting infrastructure. Test against a staging environment that mirrors your production configuration (same PHP version, same MySQL version, same caching stack).
Quick load test with Loader.io (no code required):
1. Sign up at loader.io (free tier: 1 target, 10K connections per test) 2. Click New Test and enter your staging URL 3. Configure a ramp test: start at 0 clients, ramp to your expected peak traffic over 60 seconds, hold for 120 seconds 4. Loader.io provides a verification token — add it to a page on your staging site to confirm ownership 5. Run the test against your checkout page specifically — product browse is usually cached; checkout hits the database
Interpret results:
- Response time under 3 seconds at peak: acceptable
- Error rate above 1%: investigate server logs for PHP fatal errors, database timeouts, or memory exhaustion
- If the server struggles at lower than expected traffic: upgrade your hosting tier or add Redis Object Cache before the sale
Before your test, ensure your staging stack is properly configured:
- Redis Object Cache is active (Settings → Redis — green status)
- WP Rocket page cache is enabled and has warmed the most-visited product pages
- You're testing against the same server size you'll run in production
---
Custom / Headless
For custom storefronts, use k6 or Artillery against a staging environment that mirrors production.
Important before you start:
- Always test against staging, never production
- Use test-mode payment tokens (Stripe:
tok_visa) — never run load tests against real payment processors - Tag test orders with a recognizable email domain (e.g.,
@test-load.invalid) so you can bulk-delete them after - Reserve test products with unlimited inventory so the checkout scenario doesn't fail due to oversells
k6 realistic shopping scenarios:
k6 uses a ramping-arrival-rate executor to control requests per second (more realistic than VU-based approaches). Typical e-commerce traffic distribution: 60% browse, 25% product detail, 10% cart, 5% checkout.
// k6/commerce-load-test.js
import http from 'k6/http';
import { check, sleep } from 'k6';
import { SharedArray } from 'k6/data';
const BASE_URL = __ENV.BASE_URL || 'https://staging.mystore.com';
const products = new SharedArray('products', function() {
return JSON.parse(open('./data/products.json')); // array of {id, defaultVariantId}
});
export const options = {
scenarios: {
catalog_browsing: {
executor: 'ramping-arrival-rate',
startRate: 0, timeUnit: '1s',
preAllocatedVUs: 50, maxVUs: 200,
stages: [
{ target: 60, duration: '2m' }, // Ramp up
{ target: 60, duration: '5m' }, // Steady state
{ target: 0, duration: '1m' }, // Ramp down
],
exec: 'catalogBrowsing',
},
checkout_flow: {
executor: 'ramping-arrival-rate',
startRate: 0, timeUnit: '1s',
preAllocatedVUs: 10, maxVUs: 50,
stages: [
{ target: 5, duration: '2m' },
{ target: 5, duration: '5m' },
{ target: 0, duration: '1m' },
],
exec: 'checkoutFlow',
},
},
thresholds: {
'http_req_duration{scenario:checkout_flow}': ['p(95)<3000'],
'http_req_failed{scenario:checkout_flow}': ['rate<0.01'],
'http_req_duration{scenario:catalog_browsing}': ['p(95)<1000'],
},
};
export function catalogBrowsing() {
http.get(`${BASE_URL}/api/collections/featured`, { tags: { step: 'homepage' } });
sleep(2 + Math.random() * 3); // Think time: 2–5s
const categories = ['t-shirts', 'hoodies', 'accessories'];
const category = categories[Math.floor(Math.random() * categories.length)];
http.get(`${BASE_URL}/api/collections/${category}?page=1&sort=popular`, { tags: { step: 'category' } });
sleep(3 + Math.random() * 5);
}
export function checkoutFlow() {
const product = products[Math.floor(Math.random() * products.length)];
// View product
const productRes = http.get(`${BASE_URL}/api/products/${product.id}`, { tags: { step: 'view_product' } });
check(productRes, { 'product page 200': r => r.status === 200 });
sleep(2 + Math.random() * 3);
// Add to cart
const cartRes = http.post(`${BASE_URL}/api/cart`, JSON.stringify({
items: [{ productId: product.id, variantId: product.defaultVariantId, quantity: 1 }],
}), { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, tags: { step: 'add_to_cart' } });
check(cartRes, { 'add to cart 200': r => r.status === 200 });
const cart = JSON.parse(cartRes.body);
sleep(1 + Math.random() * 2);
// Start checkout
const checkoutRes = http.post(`${BASE_URL}/api/checkout/start`, JSON.stringify({
cartId: cart.id,
customer: { email: `test-${Math.random().toString(36).slice(7)}@test-load.invalid` },
}), { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, tags: { step: 'start_checkout' } });
check(checkoutRes, { 'checkout start 200': r => r.status === 200 });
const checkout = JSON.parse(checkoutRes.body);
sleep(5 + Math.random() * 10); // Think time: filling form
// Place order
const orderRes = http.post(`${BASE_URL}/api/checkout/complete`, JSON.stringify({
checkoutId: checkout.id,
paymentToken: 'tok_visa', // Stripe test token
shippingMethodId: checkout.shippingMethods[0]?.id,
}), { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, tags: { step: 'place_order' } });
check(orderRes, { 'order placed 201': r => r.status === 201 });
}Artillery YAML config (alternative to k6 — good for API-focused testing):
# artillery/commerce-load-test.yml
config:
target: "{{ $processEnvironment.BASE_URL }}"
phases:
- name: "Warm-up"
duration: 60
arrivalRate: 5
- name: "Ramp up"
duration: 120
arrivalRate: 5
rampTo: 50
- name: "Peak load"
duration: 300
arrivalRate: 50
- name: "Spike"
duration: 30
arrivalRate: 200
- name: "Recovery"
duration: 60
arrivalRate: 20
processor: "./processors/commerce-helpers.js"
scenarios:
- name: "Browse catalog"
weight: 60
flow:
- get:
url: "/api/collections/all?page=1"
capture:
json: "$.products[0].id"
as: "productId"
- think: 3
- get:
url: "/api/products/{{ productId }}"
- name: "Complete checkout"
weight: 10
flow:
- function: "generateCheckoutData"
- post:
url: "/api/cart"
json:
productId: "{{ productId }}"
quantity: 1
capture:
json: "$.id"
as: "cartId"
- think: 8
- post:
url: "/api/checkout/start"
json:
cartId: "{{ cartId }}"
email: "{{ email }}"
capture:
json: "$.checkoutId"
as: "checkoutId"
- think: 10
- post:
url: "/api/checkout/complete"
json:
checkoutId: "{{ checkoutId }}"
paymentToken: "tok_visa"
expect:
- statusCode: 201Run the test and capture a baseline:
k6 run \
--env BASE_URL=https://staging.mystore.com \
--out json=results/baseline-$(date +%Y%m%d).json \
k6/commerce-load-test.jsAnalyze results per step using tags:
# Overall summary (k6 outputs this automatically at end of run)
# Per-step breakdown from the JSON output
cat results/baseline-*.json | jq '
[.data_points[] | select(.type=="Point" and .metric=="http_req_duration")]
| group_by(.tags.step)
| map({step: .[0].tags.step, p95_ms: (map(.value) | sort | .[length * 0.95 | floor])})
'Scale targets for e-commerce:
- Catalog pages p95 < 1000ms
- Product detail p95 < 1500ms
- Checkout flow p95 < 3000ms
- Error rate < 1% at peak
Run load tests in CI before major releases (GitHub Actions):
# .github/workflows/load-test.yml
name: Load Test (Pre-Release)
on:
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
target_url:
description: 'Staging URL to test'
required: true
default: 'https://staging.mystore.com'
jobs:
load-test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Install k6
run: |
curl -s https://dl.k6.io/key.gpg | sudo apt-key add -
echo "deb https://dl.k6.io/deb stable main" | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/k6.list
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install k6
- name: Run load test
env:
BASE_URL: ${{ github.event.inputs.target_url }}
run: k6 run --env BASE_URL=$BASE_URL --out json=results.json k6/commerce-load-test.js
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: load-test-results
path: results.jsonBest Practices
- Simulate think time between steps — real users pause between actions; removing think time creates an unrealistically high request rate that doesn't reflect production patterns
- Use test-mode payment tokens — always use Stripe's
tok_visaor equivalent test tokens; never run load tests against real payment processors - Run against staging, not production — load tests consume resources and can degrade service for real customers
- Profile at 1.5×, 2×, and 3× expected peak — run multiple tests at different load levels to find your system's inflection point before the actual sale
- Monitor the database and cache during tests — watch for connection pool exhaustion, Redis evictions, and lock wait times in your DB; application-tier throughput can look fine while the database is saturated
- Tag test orders for easy cleanup — use a consistent test email domain (
@test-load.invalid) so you can bulk-delete test data after runs:DELETE FROM orders WHERE email LIKE '%@test-load.invalid'
Common Pitfalls
| Problem | Solution |
|---|---|
| Checkout scenario fails because products are sold out | Reserve test products with unlimited inventory; use a separate is_load_test_product flag and filter them from real catalog pages |
| Loader.io test passes but production still slows down | Staging may not mirror production load — confirm Redis Object Cache is active, MySQL version matches, and the server size is the same |
| k6 VUs exhausted before reaching target RPS | Use ramping-arrival-rate executor (controls RPS) instead of ramping-vus (controls concurrent users); increase preAllocatedVUs and maxVUs |
| Alert noise during planned load tests | Add a load test flag to your monitoring system (Datadog tag, Grafana annotation) to suppress non-critical alerts during the scheduled test window |
| Results not reproducible between runs | Use a SharedArray with a fixed dataset file instead of Math.random() product generation; fix the test data set before the run |
Related Skills
- @flash-sale-scaling
- @monitoring-alerting-commerce
- @database-optimization-commerce
- @bot-protection
{
"context": "Tests whether the agent writes an Artillery load test configuration that follows the skill's guidance on phase structure, scenario weights, response capture for request chaining, and processor-based test data generation.",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "Warm-up phase",
"max_score": 7,
"description": "Artillery config includes a warm-up phase (low arrivalRate, e.g., 5 rps, ~60s duration)"
},
{
"name": "Ramp-up phase",
"max_score": 7,
"description": "Artillery config includes a ramp-up phase with a `rampTo` field going from low to ~50 rps"
},
{
"name": "Peak load phase",
"max_score": 7,
"description": "Artillery config includes a sustained peak load phase (~50 rps for ~300s duration)"
},
{
"name": "Spike phase",
"max_score": 7,
"description": "Artillery config includes a brief spike phase with significantly higher arrivalRate (e.g., 200 rps for ~30s)"
},
{
"name": "Recovery phase",
"max_score": 7,
"description": "Artillery config includes a recovery phase after the spike with reduced arrivalRate"
},
{
"name": "Browse scenario weight 60",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "The catalog browsing scenario has a weight of 60"
},
{
"name": "Checkout scenario weight",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "The checkout scenario has a weight of 20 (or close to 20)"
},
{
"name": "Response capture",
"max_score": 11,
"description": "At least one scenario uses `capture` with a `json` path expression to extract a value (e.g., productId, cartId) from a response and passes it to a later step"
},
{
"name": "Processor file exists",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "A processor JavaScript file exists at artillery/processors/commerce-helpers.js (or referenced path)"
},
{
"name": "Processor generates email",
"max_score": 10,
"description": "The processor function sets context.vars.email to a unique address using a non-production domain (e.g., @test.invalid)"
},
{
"name": "Processor generates productId",
"max_score": 10,
"description": "The processor function sets context.vars.productId (or similar) to a dynamically generated product identifier"
},
{
"name": "Think time in checkout",
"max_score": 7,
"description": "The checkout flow includes at least one `think` step between requests to simulate form-filling or user delay"
}
]
}
Product Launch Stress Test: Artillery Configuration for Commerce API
Problem/Feature Description
Rova, a direct-to-consumer electronics brand, is launching a limited-edition product drop that is expected to attract a surge of simultaneous buyers. Their backend is a REST API that handles catalog browsing, product search, cart operations, and checkout. The ops team wants to validate API stability under both sustained peak load and brief traffic spikes (the kind caused when a social media post goes viral mid-launch). They have chosen Artillery as their load testing tool.
The team needs a complete Artillery load test setup that covers the full commerce flow: browsing the catalog, searching for the product, and completing checkout. The test must handle state across request steps (for example, using a cart ID returned from one API call in the next), generate realistic per-user data without collisions, and simulate the characteristic shape of a product launch traffic curve.
Output Specification
Produce a complete Artillery load test configuration in artillery/commerce-load-test.yml and a supporting processor module at artillery/processors/commerce-helpers.js. The configuration should model realistic multi-phase traffic and realistic user flows.
Also write a test-design-notes.md explaining: how the scenario weights were chosen, why think time (think steps) values were set the way they are, and how the processor generates unique user data per virtual user.
{
"context": "Tests whether the agent implements performance baseline comparison tooling following the skill's guidance on metric extraction (p95/p99), regression threshold (>20% P95 increase triggers exit code 1), custom Trend metrics, search thresholds, and latency histogram analysis.",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "Reads p(95) metric",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "The compare-results.ts script reads the p(95) value from http_req_duration.values['p(95)'] (or equivalent path) for both baseline files"
},
{
"name": "Reads p(99) metric",
"max_score": 8,
"description": "The compare-results.ts script reads the p(99) value from http_req_duration.values['p(99)'] (or equivalent path)"
},
{
"name": "Reads error rate",
"max_score": 8,
"description": "The compare-results.ts script reads the error rate from http_req_failed.values.rate"
},
{
"name": ">20% P95 triggers exit 1",
"max_score": 12,
"description": "The compare-results.ts script calls process.exit(1) (or equivalent) when the P95 latency has increased by more than 20% between the two baselines"
},
{
"name": "Outputs comparison table",
"max_score": 8,
"description": "The script outputs a human-readable comparison (e.g., console.table or formatted output) showing before/after values"
},
{
"name": "Custom Trend metric",
"max_score": 10,
"description": "The k6/search-performance.js script creates a custom Trend metric (using 'new Trend(...)' from 'k6/metrics') to track search latency"
},
{
"name": "Search p95 threshold",
"max_score": 10,
"description": "The k6/search-performance.js script defines a threshold for the custom search metric at p(95)<500 (e.g., 'p(95)<500')"
},
{
"name": "Histograms over averages",
"max_score": 10,
"description": "The analysis-notes.md explicitly explains why P95 or P99 percentiles are used rather than averages for regression detection (addresses that averages can hide tail latency regressions)"
},
{
"name": "Reads RPS/throughput metric",
"max_score": 8,
"description": "The compare-results.ts script also reads the requests-per-second rate (http_reqs.values.rate or equivalent)"
},
{
"name": "Script handles given input files",
"max_score": 17,
"description": "The compare-results.ts script can be invoked with the two provided JSON file paths as arguments (or reads them by path) and produces output comparing them"
}
]
}
Performance Regression Gate: Baseline Comparison Tooling
Problem/Feature Description
Vanta Commerce has been running load tests before major releases for six months but has no automated way to know if a new deployment made performance worse. The team currently eyeballs charts and often misses subtle regressions — for example, a checkout p99 that crept up by 30% over three releases while the average stayed flat. They want to introduce a performance regression gate: a script that compares a new k6 test run against a stored baseline and fails the build if performance has degraded beyond an acceptable threshold.
The team also wants to extend their existing k6 search performance script to properly track per-endpoint search latency as a named custom metric (separate from the global http_req_duration), so the regression gate can be more precise. Currently all metrics are lumped together, making it impossible to pinpoint which endpoint regressed.
Output Specification
Produce the following files:
1. scripts/compare-results.ts — A TypeScript script that reads two k6 JSON result files and compares their performance metrics. It should output a comparison table and exit with a non-zero status code when performance has degraded significantly.
2. k6/search-performance.js — A k6 script for search endpoint performance testing that uses a named custom metric to track search latency separately from overall request duration. Include appropriate thresholds.
3. analysis-notes.md — Document which metrics the comparison script evaluates, what threshold triggers a failure, and justify your choice of which statistical measure to use for regression detection.
Input Files
The following k6 JSON result files are provided. Extract them before beginning.
=============== FILE: results/baseline-20260301.json =============== { "metrics": { "http_req_duration": { "values": { "p(95)": 820, "p(99)": 1450, "avg": 310 } }, "http_req_failed": { "values": { "rate": 0.002 } }, "http_reqs": { "values": { "rate": 145.3 } }, "vus_max": { "values": { "max": 200 } } } }
=============== FILE: results/baseline-20260312.json =============== { "metrics": { "http_req_duration": { "values": { "p(95)": 1100, "p(99)": 2200, "avg": 335 } }, "http_req_failed": { "values": { "rate": 0.008 } }, "http_reqs": { "values": { "rate": 139.1 } }, "vus_max": { "values": { "max": 200 } } } }
{
"context": "Tests whether the agent writes a k6 load test that follows the skill's guidance on realistic traffic distribution, executor choice, think time simulation, payment token safety, test data cleanup strategy, request tagging, and scenario thresholds.",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "Catalog browse weight",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "The catalog/browsing scenario is assigned a weight of 60 (or 60% of traffic)"
},
{
"name": "Checkout weight",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "The checkout scenario is assigned a weight of 5 (or approximately 5% of traffic)"
},
{
"name": "ramping-arrival-rate executor",
"max_score": 10,
"description": "Uses 'ramping-arrival-rate' as the executor (not 'ramping-vus' or 'constant-vus')"
},
{
"name": "Checkout p95 threshold",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "Defines a threshold for checkout p(95) latency at or below 3000ms (e.g., 'p(95)<3000')"
},
{
"name": "Catalog p95 threshold",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "Defines a threshold for catalog/browsing p(95) latency at or below 1000ms (e.g., 'p(95)<1000')"
},
{
"name": "Checkout error rate threshold",
"max_score": 8,
"description": "Defines a threshold for checkout error rate below 1% (e.g., 'rate<0.01')"
},
{
"name": "SharedArray usage",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "Uses SharedArray (from 'k6/data') to load test product data from a JSON file"
},
{
"name": "Think time present",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "Includes sleep() calls between request steps in at least the checkout flow (not zero sleep)"
},
{
"name": "Test payment token",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "Uses 'tok_visa' (or another Stripe test token) as the payment token in checkout — does NOT use a real card number or empty token"
},
{
"name": "Test email domain",
"max_score": 9,
"description": "Test user emails use a non-production domain (e.g., '@test.invalid', '@test-load.invalid', or similar .invalid TLD) to enable cleanup"
},
{
"name": "Step tagging",
"max_score": 10,
"description": "At least one HTTP request in the checkout flow uses a 'tags' object with a 'step' property (e.g., {step: 'view_product'})"
}
]
}
Flash Sale Readiness: k6 Load Test for Storefront
Problem/Feature Description
Finsi, a mid-sized online clothing retailer, is preparing for their annual summer sale — historically their largest traffic event of the year, driving 8× normal traffic. The engineering team wants to validate that the checkout flow and product catalog can handle the expected surge without degrading response times for shoppers. In previous years, the checkout service experienced latency spikes during peak periods that caused abandoned carts and lost revenue.
The team needs a realistic k6 load test that simulates how shoppers actually behave across the storefront — from browsing the catalog to completing a purchase — so they can identify bottlenecks before the event. The test must reflect real shopping patterns (most visitors browse; a small fraction actually buy) and must not interfere with the payment processor or leave test garbage in the production order database.
Output Specification
Write a k6 load test script in k6/checkout-flow.js that simulates realistic multi-user shopping behavior. The script should include:
- Multiple scenario functions exported from the same file, covering different user journeys
- Scenario configuration with executor settings, ramp-up/steady-state/ramp-down stages, and weights that reflect realistic traffic distribution
- Performance thresholds appropriate for checkout and catalog workloads
- A
data/products.jsonfile with at least 3 sample product objects (each withidanddefaultVariantIdfields) for use as test data - A
load-test-plan.mdsummarizing the test design decisions, including: why the chosen executor was selected, how think time values were chosen, and how test users/orders can be cleaned up after the run
{
"name": "finsi/load-testing-commerce",
"version": "0.1.0",
"summary": "Load testing checkout and catalog with realistic shopping behavior simulation",
"skills": {
"load-testing-commerce": {
"path": "SKILL.md"
}
}
}