Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
forcedotcom avatar

Platform Custom Lightning Type Generate

  • 2.2k installs
  • 763 repo stars
  • Updated July 24, 2026
  • forcedotcom/sf-skills

Generates valid Salesforce custom Lightning Type metadata via the sf CLI so developers can define and deploy custom Lightning component types without hand-authoring XML.

About

platform-custom-lightning-type-generate is a Salesforce sf-skills entry that generates valid custom Lightning Type metadata for a Salesforce DX project. It uses a CLI-template-first workflow to produce correct XML structure and deploy it, avoiding the common errors of hand-authored metadata. A Salesforce developer reaches for it to scaffold and ship custom Lightning types without wrestling with raw .meta.xml files.

  • Generate custom Lightning Type metadata
  • sf CLI template-first workflow
  • Valid XML structure and deployment
  • Salesforce DX project conventions

Platform Custom Lightning Type Generate by the numbers

  • 2,238 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +563 installs in the week ending Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #228 of 4,386 Backend & APIs skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Security screen: LOW risk (skills.sh audit)
  • Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/forcedotcom/sf-skills --skill platform-custom-lightning-type-generate

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs2.2k
repo stars763
Security audit3 / 3 scanners passed
Last updatedJuly 24, 2026
Repositoryforcedotcom/sf-skills

What it does

Generates valid Salesforce custom Lightning Type metadata via the sf CLI so developers can define and deploy custom Lightning component types without hand-authoring XML.

Who is it for?

Salesforce devs generating custom Lightning type metadata

Skip if: Non-Salesforce projects

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when you need to:

  • Create Custom Lightning Types (CLTs) for structured inputs/outputs
  • Generate JSON Schema-based type definitions for Lightning Platform
  • Configure CLTs for Einstein Agent actions
  • Set up editor and renderer configurations for custom UI
  • Create CLTs with widget/mosaic/fragment rendition
  • Troubleshoot deployment errors related to Custom Lightning Types

Specification

CustomLightningType Metadata Specification

Overview & Purpose

Custom Lightning Types (CLTs) are JSON Schema-based type definitions used by the Lightning Platform (including Einstein Agent actions) to describe structured inputs/outputs and drive editor/renderer experiences.

Configuration

  • Choose referenced CLT pattern for nested objects - When you need a reusable or separately deployed nested type, create a CLT for that shape and reference it with "lightning:type": "c__<CLTName>". That string is the referenced type’s `lightning:type` value / FQN / registered identifier — not the JSON Schema title.
  • Choose standard Lightning types when the structure is simple and can be expressed with properties and supported primitive lightning:type identifiers.
  • Choose Apex class types (@apexClassType/...) when the structure already exists server-side and you want the Apex class to define the shape.
  • Include editor/renderer config only when you need custom UI behavior (custom LWC input/output components). Otherwise, omit.

Critical Rules (Read First)

  • CRITICAL: NEVER include the `"$schema"` field in schema.json
  • Salesforce CLT validator WILL REJECT schemas with this field, even if it's a valid JSON Schema $schema declaration.
  • Root object schemas MUST include:
  • "type": "object"
  • "title"
  • "lightning:type": "lightning__objectType"
  • "unevaluatedProperties": false
  • "unevaluatedProperties" is enforced as false by the CLT metaschema. Do not set it to true.
  • Root object schemas MUST NOT include "examples" when "unevaluatedProperties": false is set.
  • Nested objects (inside `properties`) MUST NOT set "lightning:type": "lightning__objectType".
  • Nested objects can be: references to other CLTs using c__<CLTName> syntax.
  • List/array properties are highly restricted by the CLT metaschema:
  • CRITICAL LIMITATION: the CLT metaschema may reject the items keyword entirely. Treat items as disallowed by default.
  • Root-level arrays (direct children of the root properties):
  • MUST include "lightning:type": "lightning__listType"
  • MUST NOT include "items"
  • OPTIONAL "type": "array"
  • Nested arrays (arrays inside nested objects) are the most common failure:
  • MUST include "type": "array"
  • MUST NOT include "lightning:type": "lightning__listType"
  • MUST NOT include "items"
  • When `"unevaluatedProperties": false` is set, any unknown keyword will fail validation. Prefer removing keywords over relaxing strictness.
  • Apex class CLTs are minimal:
  • Include only title, description (optional), and lightning:type set to @apexClassType/....
  • Do not add type, properties, required, or unevaluatedProperties.

Additional CLT Metaschema Validations

  • Org namespace validation: titles/descriptions and other string fields may be validated to ensure you are not using an org namespace in places that are disallowed.
  • Lightning type validation: CLTs are validated to prevent referencing internal namespaces (for example, disallowing types from internal namespaces like sfdc_cms where not permitted).
  • Object type validation: the CLT root is validated to ensure lightning:type is exactly lightning__objectType.

Primitive Types & Constraints

When you need the full list of supported primitive lightning:type identifiers, their constraints, and the allowed property-level keywords, read assets/primitive-types-and-constraints.md in this skill's directory.

Generation Workflow

1. Confirm the CLT approach

  • If referencing Apex: capture the exact class reference (@apexClassType/namespace__ClassName$InnerClass).
  • If using standard primitives: list the fields, their Lightning primitive types, and which fields are required.

2. Draft `schema.json`

  • DO NOT include `"$schema"` at the top
  • Start with the root object structure (required root fields).
  • Add properties using valid primitive lightning:type identifiers.
  • For nested-object properties, use CLT Reference pattern:
  • "lightning:type": "c__<CLTName>" to reference another CLT
  • The referenced CLT must be deployed to the org before the parent CLT.
  • For Apex-based nested objects: Use @apexClassType/... when structure exists server-side.
  • If the prompt explicitly requires true nested object output, prefer an Apex-based CLT (@apexClassType/...) for deploy-safe nested structures.
  • For arrays: follow the strict list rules (avoid items; avoid lightning:type on nested arrays).
  • Before deployment, verify exact lightning:type spellings (for example, use lightning__richTextType, not misspelled variants).

3. (Optional) Draft `editor.json` (only if custom UI is required)

  • Supported shape: Top-level editor object with editor.componentOverrides and editor.layout.
  • Top-level editor object.
  • Use editor.componentOverrides for component overrides.
  • Use editor.layout for layout.
  • DEPRECATED: Do NOT use propertyRenderers or view — these are legacy keys. Always use componentOverrides and layout instead.
  • Root override pattern (most common for fully custom editing UI):
  • editor.componentOverrides["$"] = { "definition": "c/<yourEditorComponent>", "attributes": { ... } }
  • When passing schema data into a custom LWC, use attribute mapping with the {!$attrs.<name>} syntax: e.g. "attributes": { "myField": "{!$attrs.value}" } so the runtime binds schema values to your component's attributes.
  • CRITICAL: The <name> in {!$attrs.<name>} must be a property defined in your type schema. For example, if your schema has a property called temperature, use {!$attrs.temperature}, not {!$attrs.value} unless value is an actual property.
  • Property-level override pattern (for individual fields):
  • editor.componentOverrides["<propertyName>"] = { "definition": "es_property_editors/<...>" }
  • Valid editor components (examples): es_property_editors/inputText, es_property_editors/inputNumber, es_property_editors/inputRichText, es_property_editors/inputImage, es_property_editors/inputTextarea. Do not use es_property_editors/inputList.
  • Collection editor (for root-level lightning__listType properties): Use a collection-level override so the list is edited by a custom component: collection.editor.componentOverrides["$"] = { "definition": "c/<yourCollectionEditorComponent>" }. Alternatively, use editor.layout with lightning/propertyLayout and attributes.property = "<listPropertyName>" for default list editing.
  • Layout pattern:
  • editor.layout.definition = "lightning/verticalLayout"
  • editor.layout.children[*].definition = "lightning/propertyLayout" with attributes.property = "<propertyName>"
  • CRITICAL: lightning/propertyLayout only accepts the property attribute. Do NOT add label, title, or any other attributes — these will fail validation with additionalProperties: false errors.
  • Avoid known-invalid patterns:
  • Do not use es_property_editors/inputList.
  • Do not use itemSchema attributes.

4. (Optional) Draft `renderer.json` (only if custom UI or mosaic rendition is required)

  • Supported shape: Top-level renderer object with renderer.componentOverrides and renderer.layout.
  • Top-level renderer object.
  • Use renderer.componentOverrides for component overrides.
  • Use renderer.layout for layout.
  • DEPRECATED: Do NOT use propertyRenderers or view — these are legacy keys. Always use componentOverrides and layout instead.
  • Root override pattern (most common for fully custom rendering UI):
  • renderer.componentOverrides["$"] = { "definition": "c/<yourRendererComponent>", "attributes": { ... } }
  • Use {!$attrs.<name>} in attribute mappings when binding schema data to custom renderer component attributes.
  • CRITICAL: Attribute mappings like {!$attrs.propertyName} must reference properties that actually exist in your type schema. Referencing non-existent properties will fail validation.
  • Type matching: Attribute values must match the expected type for the component. For example, if a component expects a string attribute, passing an integer will fail validation.
  • Widget renderer pattern (for widget rendition):
  • When to use: Use this when users request "mosaic", "widget", "fragment", or "cross-platform rendering" for their CLT.
  • Structure: renderer.componentOverrides["$"] = { "type": "mosaic", "definition": "tile/mosaic", "children": [ /* UEM tree of blocks and regions */ ] }
  • REQUIRED workflow:
  • STOP: Do NOT attempt to create the widget renderer yourself.
  • MANDATORY FIRST STEP: You MUST fetch the reference file references/widget-rendition.md located in this skill's directory before proceeding.
  • Follow the complete workflow documented in widget-rendition.md using the generated CLT schema as the grounding schema.
  • The widget-rendition.md reference contains the full widget generation workflow: discovering UEM blocks via discoverUiComponents, calling getUiComponentSchemas, building the UEM tree, and writing renderer.json.
  • Do not attempt to generate widget rendition without first fetching the widget-rendition.md reference file.
  • Property-level override pattern:
  • renderer.componentOverrides["<propertyName>"] = { "definition": "es_property_editors/outputText" | "es_property_editors/outputNumber" | "es_property_editors/outputImage" | ... }. Valid renderer components (examples): es_property_editors/outputText, es_property_editors/outputNumber, es_property_editors/outputImage. Avoid input-style components in the renderer.
  • Layout pattern for renderer:
  • renderer.layout.definition = "lightning/verticalLayout"
  • renderer.layout.children[*].definition = "lightning/propertyLayout" with attributes.property = "<propertyName>"
  • CRITICAL: Same as editor layouts, lightning/propertyLayout only accepts the property attribute. Do NOT add label, title, or any other attributes.
  • Collection renderer (for root-level lightning__listType properties): Use collection.renderer.componentOverrides["$"] = { "definition": "c/<yourListRendererComponent>" } or es_property_editors/genericListTypeRenderer to render the list.

5. Place files in the correct bundle structure

  • lightningTypes/<TypeName>/schema.json
  • (Optional) lightningTypes/<TypeName>/lightningDesktopGenAi/editor.json
  • (Optional) lightningTypes/<TypeName>/lightningDesktopGenAi/renderer.json
  • For Gen AI / Copilot the standard path is lightningDesktopGenAi/. Other targets (e.g. Experience Builder, Mobile Copilot, Enhanced Web Chat) use different subfolders when supported: experienceBuilder/, lightningMobileGenAi/, enhancedWebChat/.

6. Configure custom LWC components (if using custom components)

  • CRITICAL: Custom LWC components referenced in editor/renderer configs MUST have the correct target configuration in their -meta.xml files:
  • For editor components (c/<componentName> used in editor.json): The LWC's -meta.xml file must include <target>lightning__AgentforceInput</target>
  • For renderer components (c/<componentName> used in renderer.json): The LWC's -meta.xml file must include <target>lightning__AgentforceOutput</target>
  • Without the correct target, deployment will fail with: Invalid target configuration. To use 'c/componentName' as a renderer/editor, your js-meta.xml file must include valid target 'lightning__AgentforceOutput/Input'.
  • Example -meta.xml for a renderer component:
     <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
     <LightningComponentBundle xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
         <apiVersion>60.0</apiVersion>
         <isExposed>true</isExposed>
         <targets>
             <target>lightning__AgentforceOutput</target>
         </targets>
     </LightningComponentBundle>

Common Deployment Errors

Error / SymptomLikely CauseFix
Schema validation fails due to unknown keywordunevaluatedProperties: false + disallowed keyword (commonly examples, items)Remove the offending keyword; keep schema minimal
Nested object validation failureOrg/channel validation rejects nested object typing in LightningTypeBundleUse CLT reference (c__<CLTName>) or Apex class types
Invalid CLT referenceReferenced CLT doesn't exist in org or incorrect syntaxDeploy the referenced CLT first; c__<CLTName> must match the referenced type’s `lightning:type` value / FQN / registered identifier, not title
Invalid or misspelled lightning:type (for example, lightning__richtextType instead of lightning__richTextType)Incorrect generated type nameCross-check all lightning:type values against supported type names and correct them before deployment
Array property rejectedUse of items (or lightning:type in nested arrays) rejected by validatorFor nested arrays: keep only type: "array". For root arrays: use minimal structure; remove items if rejected
Apex-based CLT rejectedExtra fields added (e.g., type, properties)Use only title, optional description, and lightning:type
Editor config rejectedUse of invalid patterns (es_property_editors/inputList, itemSchema) or unrecognized top-level keysUse editor.componentOverrides and editor.layout; keep config minimal
additionalProperties error on layout attributesAdding label or other attributes to lightning/propertyLayoutOnly use property attribute in lightning/propertyLayout. Remove label, title, or any other attributes
Invalid target configuration for custom LWCCustom LWC component's -meta.xml missing required target (lightning__AgentforceInput or lightning__AgentforceOutput)Add correct target to LWC's -meta.xml: use lightning__AgentforceInput for editors, lightning__AgentforceOutput for renderers
Attribute mapping doesn't exist in type schemaUsing {!$attrs.propertyName} where propertyName is not defined in schemaEnsure all attribute mappings reference actual properties in your type schema's properties section
additionalProperties error with deprecated keysUsing propertyRenderers or view in editor/renderer configReplace deprecated propertyRenderers with componentOverrides and view with layout
Type mismatch in component attributesPassing wrong type for component attribute (e.g., integer instead of string)Ensure attribute values match the expected type defined by the component

Verification Checklist

  • [ ] Root schema has type: "object", title, lightning:type: "lightning__objectType", and unevaluatedProperties: false
  • [ ] Root schema does not include examples when strict validation is enabled
  • [ ] No nested object includes lightning:type: "lightning__objectType"
  • [ ] Arrays are defined minimally (especially nested arrays)
  • [ ] Only supported primitive lightning:type identifiers are used for leaf properties
  • [ ] Apex class CLTs contain only title/description and lightning:type: "@apexClassType/..."
  • [ ] Bundle structure and filenames match Lightning Types requirements
  • [ ] Editor config uses only allowed patterns (no es_property_editors/inputList, no itemSchema); use valid components (e.g. es_property_editors/inputText, es_property_editors/inputNumber) or custom c/ components
  • [ ] Renderer config uses output-style components (e.g. es_property_editors/outputText, es_property_editors/outputNumber) where applicable, not input editors
  • [ ] Layout configurations use lightning/propertyLayout with ONLY the property attribute (no label, title, or other attributes)
  • [ ] All attribute mappings ({!$attrs.propertyName}) reference properties that exist in the type schema
  • [ ] Custom LWC components have correct targets in -meta.xml: lightning__AgentforceInput for editors, lightning__AgentforceOutput for renderers
  • [ ] Root schema does NOT include "$schema" field

Related skills

FAQ

Is Platform Custom Lightning Type Generate safe to install?

skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.

Backend & APIsbackendintegrations

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.