Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
getsentry avatar

Code Review

  • 157 installs
  • 898 repo stars
  • Updated August 3, 2026
  • getsentry/sentry-skills

This is a copy of code-review by getsentry - installs and ranking accrue to the original listing.

Run a structured Sentry-style code review on a diff or PR, surfacing reliability, observability, security, and maintainability issues before merge.

About

Encodes Sentry’s code review expectations for agents reviewing pull requests: inspect diffs for failure modes, missing instrumentation, unsafe patterns, and test gaps, then return prioritized comments teams can apply before merging to production branches.

  • Diff-focused review checklist
  • Observability and error-handling gaps
  • Security and data-handling red flags
  • Test coverage and regression risk notes
  • Actionable, severity-ranked feedback

Code Review by the numbers

  • 157 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-skills --skill code-review

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs157
repo stars898
Last updatedAugust 3, 2026
Repositorygetsentry/sentry-skills

What it does

Run a structured Sentry-style code review on a diff or PR, surfacing reliability, observability, security, and maintainability issues before merge.

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Sentry Code Review

Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects.

Review Checklist

Identifying Problems

Look for these issues in code changes:

  • Runtime errors: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access
  • Performance: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations
  • Side effects: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components
  • Backwards compatibility: Breaking API changes without migration path
  • ORM queries: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance
  • Security vulnerabilities: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure

Design Assessment

  • Do component interactions make logical sense?
  • Does the change align with existing project architecture?
  • Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals?

Test Coverage

Every PR should have appropriate test coverage:

  • Functional tests for business logic
  • Integration tests for component interactions
  • End-to-end tests for critical user paths

Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code.

Long-Term Impact

Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve:

  • Database schema modifications
  • API contract changes
  • New framework or library adoption
  • Performance-critical code paths
  • Security-sensitive functionality

Feedback Guidelines

Tone

  • Be polite and empathetic
  • Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism
  • Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?"

Approval

  • Approve when only minor issues remain
  • Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences
  • Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code

Common Patterns to Flag

Python/Django

# Bad: N+1 query
for user in users:
    print(user.profile.name)  # Separate query per user

# Good: Prefetch related
users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile')

TypeScript/React

// Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect
useEffect(() => {
  fetchData(userId);
}, []);  // userId not in deps

// Good: Include all dependencies
useEffect(() => {
  fetchData(userId);
}, [userId]);

Security

# Bad: SQL injection risk
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")

# Good: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id])

References

Related skills

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.