
Money Save
- 26 installs
- 794 repo stars
- Updated July 20, 2026
- iamzifei/show-me-the-money
Save the current business state - conclusions, ruled-out paths, open hypotheses, and next skill - to disk so future sessions can resume.
About
A skill that writes the conversation's confirmed business decisions to a structured, per-project snapshot on disk. A developer uses it to checkpoint state so a later session can restore it.
- Per-project isolation by directory name
- Persists conclusions, ruled-out paths, and next move
Money Save by the numbers
- 26 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +3 installs in the week ending Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #1,940 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/iamzifei/show-me-the-money --skill money-saveAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 26 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 794 |
| Last updated | July 20, 2026 |
| Repository | iamzifei/show-me-the-money ↗ |
What it does
Save the current business state - conclusions, ruled-out paths, open hypotheses, and next skill - to disk so future sessions can resume.
Files
/money-save — Business State Checkpoint
Your job is to take the conclusions reached in the current conversation and write them to disk in a structured, recoverable format. Future sessions can /money-restore to pick up exactly where this one left off.
You do not run diagnoses. You do not give business advice. You only persist state.
---
Why this exists
Show Me The Money's pipeline is supposed to operate like a private business operator that knows your context. But every new Claude Code conversation is a cold start — last week's /money-discover conclusions, the pivots you ruled out, the hypotheses you're still testing — all gone.
Saving turns a one-shot tool into a continuous operator. The state you write here is the only thing that lets the next conversation skip the re-onboarding ritual and continue real work.
---
Triggers
| Command | Behavior |
|---|---|
/money-save | Save what's been decided in the current conversation. Title auto-extracted. |
/money-save <title> | Save with an explicit title, e.g. /money-save pricing locked at $29 |
/money-save list | List all snapshots for the current project |
/money-save list <project> | List snapshots for a specific project |
/money-save --slug <project> | Save under a non-default project name |
Natural-language equivalents (any of these → run /money-save):
- English: "save this", "checkpoint this", "remember this", "lock it in", "snapshot before we continue"
- 中文: "保存", "存档", "记下来", "这个结论留着", "存一份"
---
Project isolation
Every snapshot belongs to a project. A project separates one business from another — what you decide for MusicAPI should never bleed into KolFind's diagnosis history.
Default project name: basename($(pwd)) with non-[a-z0-9-] characters replaced by -. If the user runs /money-save from ~/Dev/musicapi, the project becomes musicapi.
Explicit override: --slug my-project.
Fallback: if you're in $HOME or somewhere generic, the project is default.
In conversation, refer to it as business or project — never "slug" (that's the internal identifier).
---
Workflow
Step 1 — Decide if there's anything worth saving
Before writing anything, scan the conversation for actual decisions. A snapshot is not a journal entry — it's a record of judgments the user has confirmed.
Worth saving if the conversation contains any of:
- A pricing decision the user accepted
- An idea or pivot the user explicitly ruled out
- A hypothesis the user wants to test next sprint
- A clear "next-skill" handoff (e.g., "do
/money-productnext") - A diagnosis root cause the user agreed with
If nothing of substance happened, refuse cleanly:
Nothing to save yet — no decisions confirmed in this conversation. Run/money-discover,/money-strategy, or another diagnostic skill first, then come back.
Never write empty or filler snapshots.
Step 2 — Extract or confirm a title
Pull a noun-phrase title from the conversation, ≤ 24 characters. Examples:
pricing locked at $29ruled out enterprise pivotMVP scope frozen首单获客渠道是 [niche forum]定价从 $9 拉到 $29
If the user gave an explicit title via /money-save <title>, use theirs verbatim.
Step 3 — Build the path
~/.smtm/sessions/{project}/{YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS}-{title-slug}.md- Timestamp: local time, format
20260503-141522 - title-slug: lowercase, spaces →
-, punctuation stripped, CJK characters preserved - If a same-second collision somehow occurs, append a 4-char random suffix:
-a7k2
mkdir -p the directory first if it doesn't exist.
Step 4 — Write the snapshot
YAML frontmatter + markdown body. Both fixed-format. Other skills will parse this — do not improvise the schema.
---
slug: {project}
timestamp: {ISO 8601 with timezone, e.g. 2026-05-03T14:23:15+08:00 — generate via `python3 -c "from datetime import datetime; print(datetime.now().astimezone().isoformat(timespec='seconds'))"` or equivalent. Never use the basic-format variant 20260503T142315+0800.}
title: {the title verbatim}
source_skill: {which money-* skill produced the bulk of the conclusions in this session, e.g. money-discover. If multiple, comma-separated.}
status: {in-progress | resolved | abandoned}
next_skill: {recommended next skill name, or empty if not yet decided}
---
## Business state
{One paragraph. What is the current state of this business? What brought the user to /money this conversation? Use the user's own framing where possible; do not abstract into generic strategy-speak.}
## Confirmed conclusions
- {Conclusion 1, one line. Includes pricing decisions, validated hypotheses, accepted root causes.}
- {Conclusion 2}
- ...
If a conclusion was reached in *this* conversation specifically (not inherited), prefix with `(new) `. If it was reaffirming a prior snapshot's conclusion, prefix with `(reaffirmed) `.
## Ruled out
- {Direction the user explicitly decided NOT to pursue, with one-line reason.}
- {e.g. "Won't pivot to enterprise — sales cycle too long for solo founder."}
- {If empty, write `(none yet)`.}
## Open hypotheses
- {Assumption that needs validation in the next sprint, with how it'll be tested.}
- {e.g. "Hypothesis: niche-forum traffic will convert at >2%. Test: 5 posts over 2 weeks, track signups via UTM."}
- {If empty, write `(none yet)`.}
## Next move
{One paragraph or a bullet. Which skill picks up from here? What action does the user take first?}
E.g. "Next: /money-product to build the landing page. First action: register the domain musicapi.ai."
## Notes
{Anything else worth preserving — links, doc paths, edge-case considerations. Optional. If empty, write `(none)`.}Step 5 — Confirm to the user
Print a short confirmation in the user's chosen language:
✅ Saved as<title>under project<project>.
File: ~/.smtm/sessions/<project>/<filename>.md>
Resume next time with /money-restore from this directory.---
List mode
/money-save list and /money-save list <project> enumerate snapshots:
musicapi (5 snapshots):
1. 2026-05-03 14:23 pricing locked at $29 (resolved, from money-strategy)
2. 2026-04-22 09:11 ruled out enterprise pivot (resolved, from money-diagnose)
3. 2026-04-15 16:40 MVP scope frozen (in-progress, from money-product)
...Sort by filename timestamp, newest first.
---
Edge cases
- No decisions yet → Refuse cleanly per Step 1. Do not invent content.
- Same project, same second → Append 4-char random suffix.
- iCloud-synced sessions directory → Do not rely on file
mtime; sort exclusively by theYYYYMMDD-HHMMSSprefix in the filename. - User runs `/money-save` from a freshly-cloned repo with no decisions → Same as "no decisions yet" — refuse.
- User-facing language — match the user's chosen language (English or 中文). Map internal field names (slug, source_skill, next_skill) to user-friendly terms in conversation:
slug → 项目/business,source_skill → from,next_skill → next.
---
Principles
- State, not narrative — Snapshots are checkpoints, not journals. Bullet > paragraph.
- User's words, not yours — Quote the user's framing where possible. Do not paraphrase decisions into corporate-speak.
- Append-only — Never overwrite an existing snapshot. Every save is a new file.
- Cheap to write, expensive to lose — Err on the side of saving when there is genuine substance. But never save filler.
---
Value Quantification (Required After Each Successful Save)
After confirming the snapshot was written, append:
---
### 📊 What this checkpoint is worth
- 💾 **Captured** — {N confirmed conclusions, M ruled-out directions, K open hypotheses}
- ⏱ **Saves you next time** — ~15-30 minutes of re-onboarding and re-explaining context to the AI
- ⚠️ **Risk avoided** — Re-deciding something you already decided — the most common solo-founder leak. The AI doesn't remember between sessions unless you save
- 🔁 **Resume with** — `/money-restore` from this directory in any future Claude Code sessionUse the actual counts from the snapshot. If only 1 conclusion was captured, the value is real but smaller — show it honestly. Never inflate.
If the user has saved ≥3 snapshots in this project, append a second line:
💡 You now have {N} snapshots in{project}. Run/money-reportif you want a single deliverable merging them — useful for sharing with co-founders or for your own multi-month review.