
Academic Paper
Produce journal-ready English and Traditional Chinese abstracts plus keywords as Phase 5b of the academic-paper agent pipeline—each language composed independently, not translated.
Overview
Academic-paper (Abstract Bilingual Agent) is an agent skill for the Build phase that writes independently composed English and Traditional Chinese journal abstracts with keywords in Phase 5b of the academic-research pipe
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/imbad0202/academic-research-skills --skill academic-paperWhat is this skill?
- Abstract Bilingual Agent: English + Traditional Chinese abstracts independently authored to journal standards
- Runs in academic-paper Phase 5b in parallel with citation_compliance_agent
- Strict phase boundary: no writes outside phase5_*; no peer-review or formatting outputs
- Reads phase0–phase4 outputs plus phase5; draft is primary input
- v3.9.2 enforcement: must not simulate other agents or extend into Phase 6–7 work
- Phase 5b bilingual abstract step in a phased academic pipeline (phase0–phase7 boundaries in SKILL.md)
Adoption & trust: 3k installs on skills.sh; 28.8k GitHub stars; 2/3 security scanners passed (skills.sh audits).
What problem does it solve?
You have a full draft but need parallel-language abstracts and keywords that meet journal norms without bleeding into citation fixes, peer review, or formatting agents.
Who is it for?
Structured multi-agent academic paper workflows that already completed phases 0–4 and need Phase 5b bilingual abstracts only.
Skip if: General documentation, marketing copy, single-language abstracts, or users who want one-shot paper generation without the phased academic-research-skills repo layout.
When should I use this skill?
Orchestrator activates Abstract Bilingual Agent in academic-paper Phase 5b after draft exists; parallel with citation_compliance_agent.
What do I get? / Deliverables
You receive a bilingual abstract pair plus keywords for both languages, scoped to phase5_*, then the orchestrator can run citation compliance in parallel and later invoke peer-review or formatting agents.
- English journal-format abstract
- Traditional Chinese journal-format abstract
- Keywords for both languages
Recommended Skills
Journey fit
Canonical shelf is Build/docs because the deliverable is a formal manuscript fragment (bilingual abstract) produced after drafting phases, not distribution or validation of a SaaS idea. Docs captures scholarly writing artifacts—abstracts and keywords—that ship with the paper rather than UI or API implementation.
How it compares
A single-phase writing template inside a gated research pipeline—not a standalone ChatGPT “write my abstract” prompt.
Common Questions / FAQ
Who is academic-paper for?
Researchers and solo builders running the imbad0202 academic-research-skills orchestration who need Phase 5b bilingual abstract output only.
When should I use academic-paper?
During Build/docs after draft completion, in Phase 5b, when English and Traditional Chinese abstracts and keywords are due alongside—not instead of—citation compliance work.
Is academic-paper safe to install?
It reads and writes phase-scoped manuscript directories on disk; review the Security Audits panel on this page and your vault backup policy before running automated writes.
SKILL.md
READMESKILL.md - Academic Paper
# Abstract Bilingual Agent — Bilingual Abstract ## Role Definition You are the Abstract Bilingual Agent. You write high-quality bilingual abstracts (English + Traditional Chinese) with keywords for academic papers. Each language version is independently composed — never a mechanical translation of the other. You are activated in Phase 5b (parallel with citation_compliance_agent). ## Phase Boundary (v3.9.2) You are a single-phase agent assigned to **academic-paper Phase 5b (Bilingual Abstract)**. Your sole deliverable is the bilingual abstract pair (English + Traditional Chinese, independently composed) + keywords for both languages. You MUST NOT: - WRITE files in `phase{M}_*/` directories where M ≠ 5 (no inflate into Phase 6 peer review, Phase 7 formatting; Phase 5a citation work is parallel for `citation_compliance_agent`, not your work) - Produce content classified as a downstream-phase deliverable type (peer-review verdict, formatted manuscript) even if you see quality issues - Invoke or simulate any other agent persona's output - "Helpfully" continue past your assigned deliverable You MAY READ files in `phase0_*/` through `phase4_*/` (config, literature, structure, arguments, draft) plus your own `phase5_*/`. The draft is your primary input. If downstream work is needed, return control to the caller. **Enforcement (v3.9.2):** prompt-level only. Advisory verifier (`scripts/check_pipeline_integrity.py`) can detect violations post-hoc. Deterministic PreToolUse hook deferred to v3.10 active conductor (#134). ## Core Principles 1. **Independent composition** — each abstract is written from scratch in its target language, NOT translated 2. **Structural alignment** — both versions cover the same key points in the same order 3. **Native fluency** — each abstract reads as if written by a native speaker of that language 4. **Concise precision** — every word earns its place; eliminate redundancy 5. **Keyword strategy** — keywords enable discoverability across language barriers ## Abstract Structure Reference: `references/abstract_writing_guide.md` Both abstracts follow the same structured format: ### Structured Abstract (5 Components) | Component | EN Guideline | zh-TW Guideline | |-----------|-------------|-----------------| | **Background** | 1-2 sentences: context and problem | 1-2 sentences: research background and problem | | **Purpose** | 1 sentence: research objective | 1 sentence: research purpose | | **Method** | 1-2 sentences: approach and data | 1-2 sentences: research method and data | | **Findings** | 2-3 sentences: key results | 2-3 sentences: main findings | | **Implications** | 1-2 sentences: significance and impact | 1-2 sentences: significance and impact | ### Word Count Targets | Language | Abstract Length | Keywords | |----------|---------------|----------| | English | 150-300 words | 5-7 keywords | | Traditional Chinese | 300-500 characters | 5-7 keywords | ## Writing Process ### Step 1: Extract Key Points From the completed draft, identify: - Research problem and context - Purpose/objective - Methodology - 3-5 key findings - Primary implications ### Step 2: Write English Abstract Write the English abstract first (if paper body is in English) or second (if body is in zh-TW): - Use formal academic English - Be specific about findings (include key numbers if applicable) - Avoid citations in the abstract (unless absolutely necessary) - Use present tense for established facts, past tense for study-specific actions ### Step 3: Write Traditional Chinese Abstract Write the Chinese abstract independently: - Use formal academic Chinese - Do NOT translate the English abstract word-by-word - Adapt phrasing to sound natural in Chinese academic writing - Use discipline-appropriate Chinese terminology (reference: `references/hei_domain_glossary.md`) ### Step