
Venue Templates
- 14 installs
- 557 repo stars
- Updated April 4, 2026
- jimmc414/kosmos
Access LaTeX templates and submission guidelines for venues like Nature, Science, IEEE, ACM, NeurIPS, ICML, plus posters and grant proposals.
About
Provides venue-specific LaTeX templates and formatting requirements for major journals, conferences, posters, and grant agencies. A developer or researcher uses it when preparing manuscripts to meet submission guidelines.
- Templates for Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM, NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR
- Poster and NSF/NIH/DOE/DARPA grant formats
Venue Templates by the numbers
- 14 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #468 of 687 Office & Documents skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/jimmc414/kosmos --skill venue-templatesAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 14 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 557 |
| Last updated | April 4, 2026 |
| Repository | jimmc414/kosmos ↗ |
What it does
Access LaTeX templates and submission guidelines for venues like Nature, Science, IEEE, ACM, NeurIPS, ICML, plus posters and grant proposals.
Files
Venue Templates
Overview
Access comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues, academic conferences, research posters, and grant proposals. This skill provides ready-to-use templates and detailed specifications for successful academic submissions across disciplines.
Use this skill when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Preparing a manuscript for submission to a specific journal (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, etc.)
- Writing a conference paper with specific formatting requirements (NeurIPS, ICML, CHI, etc.)
- Creating an academic research poster for conferences
- Drafting grant proposals for federal agencies (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA) or private foundations
- Checking formatting requirements and page limits for target venues
- Customizing templates with author information and project details
- Verifying document compliance with venue specifications
Core Capabilities
1. Journal Article Templates
Access LaTeX templates and formatting guidelines for 50+ major scientific journals across disciplines:
Nature Portfolio:
- Nature, Nature Methods, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Machine Intelligence
- Nature Communications, Nature Protocols
- Scientific Reports
Science Family:
- Science, Science Advances, Science Translational Medicine
- Science Immunology, Science Robotics
PLOS (Public Library of Science):
- PLOS ONE, PLOS Biology, PLOS Computational Biology
- PLOS Medicine, PLOS Genetics
Cell Press:
- Cell, Neuron, Immunity, Cell Reports
- Molecular Cell, Developmental Cell
IEEE Publications:
- IEEE Transactions (various disciplines)
- IEEE Access, IEEE Journal templates
ACM Publications:
- ACM Transactions, Communications of the ACM
- ACM conference proceedings
Other Major Publishers:
- Springer journals (various disciplines)
- Elsevier journals (custom templates)
- Wiley journals
- BMC journals
- Frontiers journals
2. Conference Paper Templates
Conference-specific templates with proper formatting for major academic conferences:
Machine Learning & AI:
- NeurIPS (Neural Information Processing Systems)
- ICML (International Conference on Machine Learning)
- ICLR (International Conference on Learning Representations)
- CVPR (Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)
- AAAI (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence)
Computer Science:
- ACM CHI (Human-Computer Interaction)
- SIGKDD (Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining)
- EMNLP (Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)
- SIGIR (Information Retrieval)
- USENIX conferences
Biology & Bioinformatics:
- ISMB (Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology)
- RECOMB (Research in Computational Molecular Biology)
- PSB (Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing)
Engineering:
- IEEE conference templates (various disciplines)
- ASME, AIAA conferences
3. Research Poster Templates
Academic poster templates for conference presentations:
Standard Formats:
- A0 (841 × 1189 mm / 33.1 × 46.8 in)
- A1 (594 × 841 mm / 23.4 × 33.1 in)
- 36" × 48" (914 × 1219 mm) - Common US size
- 42" × 56" (1067 × 1422 mm)
- 48" × 36" (landscape orientation)
Template Packages:
- beamerposter: Classic academic poster template
- tikzposter: Modern, colorful poster design
- baposter: Structured multi-column layout
Design Features:
- Optimal font sizes for readability at distance
- Color schemes (colorblind-safe palettes)
- Grid layouts and column structures
- QR code integration for supplementary materials
4. Grant Proposal Templates
Templates and formatting requirements for major funding agencies:
NSF (National Science Foundation):
- Full proposal template (15-page project description)
- Project Summary (1 page: Overview, Intellectual Merit, Broader Impacts)
- Budget and budget justification
- Biographical sketch (3-page limit)
- Facilities, Equipment, and Other Resources
- Data Management Plan
NIH (National Institutes of Health):
- R01 Research Grant (multi-year)
- R21 Exploratory/Developmental Grant
- K Awards (Career Development)
- Specific Aims Page (1 page, most critical component)
- Research Strategy (Significance, Innovation, Approach)
- Biographical sketches (5-page limit)
DOE (Department of Energy):
- Office of Science proposals
- ARPA-E templates
- Technology Readiness Level (TRL) descriptions
- Commercialization and impact sections
DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency):
- BAA (Broad Agency Announcement) responses
- Heilmeier Catechism framework
- Technical approach and milestones
- Transition planning
Private Foundations:
- Gates Foundation
- Wellcome Trust
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)
- Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI)
Workflow: Finding and Using Templates
Step 1: Identify Target Venue
Determine the specific publication venue, conference, or funding agency:
Example queries:
- "I need to submit to Nature"
- "What are the requirements for NeurIPS 2025?"
- "Show me NSF proposal formatting"
- "I'm creating a poster for ISMB"Step 2: Query Template and Requirements
Access venue-specific templates and formatting guidelines:
For Journals:
# Load journal formatting requirements
Reference: references/journals_formatting.md
Search for: "Nature" or specific journal name
# Retrieve template
Template: assets/journals/nature_article.texFor Conferences:
# Load conference formatting
Reference: references/conferences_formatting.md
Search for: "NeurIPS" or specific conference
# Retrieve template
Template: assets/journals/neurips_article.texFor Posters:
# Load poster guidelines
Reference: references/posters_guidelines.md
# Retrieve template
Template: assets/posters/beamerposter_academic.texFor Grants:
# Load grant requirements
Reference: references/grants_requirements.md
Search for: "NSF" or specific agency
# Retrieve template
Template: assets/grants/nsf_proposal_template.texStep 3: Review Formatting Requirements
Check critical specifications before customizing:
Key Requirements to Verify:
- Page limits (varies by venue)
- Font size and family
- Margin specifications
- Line spacing
- Citation style (APA, Vancouver, Nature, etc.)
- Figure/table requirements
- File format (PDF, Word, LaTeX source)
- Anonymization (for double-blind review)
- Supplementary material limits
Step 4: Customize Template
Use helper scripts or manual customization:
Option 1: Helper Script (Recommended):
python scripts/customize_template.py \
--template assets/journals/nature_article.tex \
--title "Your Paper Title" \
--authors "First Author, Second Author" \
--affiliations "University Name" \
--output my_nature_paper.texOption 2: Manual Editing:
- Open template file
- Replace placeholder text (marked with comments)
- Fill in title, authors, affiliations, abstract
- Add your content to each section
Step 5: Validate Format
Check compliance with venue requirements:
python scripts/validate_format.py \
--file my_paper.pdf \
--venue "Nature" \
--check-allValidation Checks:
- Page count within limits
- Font sizes correct
- Margins meet specifications
- References formatted correctly
- Figures meet resolution requirements
Step 6: Compile and Review
Compile LaTeX and review output:
# Compile LaTeX
pdflatex my_paper.tex
bibtex my_paper
pdflatex my_paper.tex
pdflatex my_paper.tex
# Or use latexmk for automated compilation
latexmk -pdf my_paper.texReview checklist:
- [ ] All sections present and properly formatted
- [ ] Citations render correctly
- [ ] Figures appear with proper captions
- [ ] Page count within limits
- [ ] Author guidelines followed
- [ ] Supplementary materials prepared (if needed)
Integration with Other Skills
This skill works seamlessly with other scientific skills:
Scientific Writing
- Use scientific-writing skill for content guidance (IMRaD structure, clarity, precision)
- Apply venue-specific templates from this skill for formatting
- Combine for complete manuscript preparation
Literature Review
- Use literature-review skill for systematic literature search and synthesis
- Apply appropriate citation style from venue requirements
- Format references according to template specifications
Peer Review
- Use peer-review skill to evaluate manuscript quality
- Use this skill to verify formatting compliance
- Ensure adherence to reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, etc.)
Research Grants
- Cross-reference with research-grants skill for content strategy
- Use this skill for agency-specific templates and formatting
- Combine for comprehensive grant proposal preparation
LaTeX Posters
- This skill provides venue-agnostic poster templates
- Use for conference-specific poster requirements
- Integrate with visualization skills for figure creation
Template Categories
By Document Type
| Category | Template Count | Common Venues |
|---|---|---|
| Journal Articles | 30+ | Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM, Cell Press |
| Conference Papers | 20+ | NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI, ISMB |
| Research Posters | 10+ | A0, A1, 36×48, various packages |
| Grant Proposals | 15+ | NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, foundations |
By Discipline
| Discipline | Supported Venues |
|---|---|
| Life Sciences | Nature, Cell Press, PLOS, ISMB, RECOMB |
| Physical Sciences | Science, Physical Review, ACS, APS |
| Engineering | IEEE, ASME, AIAA, ACM |
| Computer Science | ACM, IEEE, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR |
| Medicine | NEJM, Lancet, JAMA, BMJ |
| Interdisciplinary | PNAS, Nature Communications, Science Advances |
Helper Scripts
query_template.py
Search and retrieve templates by venue name, type, or keywords:
# Find templates for a specific journal
python scripts/query_template.py --venue "Nature" --type "article"
# Search by keyword
python scripts/query_template.py --keyword "machine learning"
# List all available templates
python scripts/query_template.py --list-all
# Get requirements for a venue
python scripts/query_template.py --venue "NeurIPS" --requirementscustomize_template.py
Customize templates with author and project information:
# Basic customization
python scripts/customize_template.py \
--template assets/journals/nature_article.tex \
--output my_paper.tex
# With author information
python scripts/customize_template.py \
--template assets/journals/nature_article.tex \
--title "Novel Approach to Protein Folding" \
--authors "Jane Doe, John Smith, Alice Johnson" \
--affiliations "MIT, Stanford, Harvard" \
--email "[email protected]" \
--output my_paper.tex
# Interactive mode
python scripts/customize_template.py --interactivevalidate_format.py
Check document compliance with venue requirements:
# Validate a compiled PDF
python scripts/validate_format.py \
--file my_paper.pdf \
--venue "Nature" \
--check-all
# Check specific aspects
python scripts/validate_format.py \
--file my_paper.pdf \
--venue "NeurIPS" \
--check page-count,margins,fonts
# Generate validation report
python scripts/validate_format.py \
--file my_paper.pdf \
--venue "Science" \
--report validation_report.txtBest Practices
Template Selection
1. Verify currency: Check template date and compare with latest author guidelines 2. Check official sources: Many journals provide official LaTeX classes 3. Test compilation: Compile template before adding content 4. Read comments: Templates include helpful inline comments
Customization
1. Preserve structure: Don't remove required sections or packages 2. Follow placeholders: Replace marked placeholder text systematically 3. Maintain formatting: Don't override venue-specific formatting 4. Keep backups: Save original template before customization
Compliance
1. Check page limits: Verify before final submission 2. Validate citations: Use correct citation style for venue 3. Test figures: Ensure figures meet resolution requirements 4. Review anonymization: Remove identifying information if required
Submission
1. Follow instructions: Read complete author guidelines 2. Include all files: LaTeX source, figures, bibliography 3. Generate properly: Use recommended compilation method 4. Check output: Verify PDF matches expectations
Common Formatting Requirements
Page Limits (Typical)
| Venue Type | Typical Limit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Nature Article | 5 pages | ~3000 words excluding refs |
| Science Report | 5 pages | Figures count toward limit |
| PLOS ONE | No limit | Unlimited length |
| NeurIPS | 8 pages | + unlimited refs/appendix |
| ICML | 8 pages | + unlimited refs/appendix |
| NSF Proposal | 15 pages | Project description only |
| NIH R01 | 12 pages | Research strategy |
Citation Styles by Venue
| Venue | Citation Style | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Numbered (superscript) | Nature style |
| Science | Numbered (superscript) | Science style |
| PLOS | Numbered (brackets) | Vancouver |
| Cell Press | Author-year | Cell style |
| ACM | Numbered | ACM style |
| IEEE | Numbered (brackets) | IEEE style |
| APA journals | Author-year | APA 7th |
Figure Requirements
| Venue | Resolution | Format | Color |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nature | 300+ dpi | TIFF, EPS, PDF | RGB or CMYK |
| Science | 300+ dpi | TIFF, PDF | RGB |
| PLOS | 300-600 dpi | TIFF, EPS | RGB |
| IEEE | 300+ dpi | EPS, PDF | RGB or Grayscale |
Resources
Bundled Resources
References (in references/):
journals_formatting.md: Comprehensive journal formatting requirementsconferences_formatting.md: Conference paper specificationsposters_guidelines.md: Research poster design and sizinggrants_requirements.md: Grant proposal requirements by agency
Templates (in assets/):
journals/: Journal article LaTeX templatesposters/: Research poster templatesgrants/: Grant proposal templates
Scripts (in scripts/):
query_template.py: Search and retrieve templatescustomize_template.py: Customize with author infovalidate_format.py: Check compliance with requirements
External Resources
Journal Author Guidelines:
- Nature: https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors
- Science: https://www.science.org/content/page/instructions-authors
- PLOS: https://plos.org/resources/for-authors/
- Cell Press: https://www.cell.com/author-guidelines
Conference Formatting:
- NeurIPS: https://neurips.cc/Conferences/2024/CallForPapers
- ICML: https://icml.cc/Conferences/2024/StyleAuthorInstructions
- CVPR: https://cvpr.thecvf.com/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuidelines
Grant Resources:
- NSF PAPPG: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg
- NIH Forms: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/how-to-apply-application-guide.html
- DOE Funding: https://science.osti.gov/grants
Example Usage
Example 1: Nature Article Submission
User: "I need to prepare a manuscript for Nature"
Response:
1. Load Nature formatting requirements (references/journals_formatting.md)
2. Retrieve Nature template (assets/journals/nature_article.tex)
3. Key requirements:
- Length: ~3000 words, ~5 pages
- Format: Single column, 12pt font
- Citations: Numbered superscript (Nature style)
- Figures: 300+ dpi, RGB color
4. Customize template with your title, authors, affiliations
5. Compile and validate against requirementsExample 2: NeurIPS Conference Paper
User: "What are the formatting requirements for NeurIPS?"
Response:
From references/conferences_formatting.md:
- Page limit: 8 pages main text + unlimited references/appendix
- Format: Two-column, 10pt font
- Template: neurips_2024.sty (official style file)
- Anonymization: Required for initial submission
- Citations: Numbered (brackets)
- Figures: High resolution, colorblind-safe recommendedExample 3: NSF Proposal
User: "Help me format an NSF proposal"
Response:
NSF requirements (from references/grants_requirements.md):
- Project Description: 15 pages maximum
- Project Summary: 1 page (Overview, Intellectual Merit, Broader Impacts)
- Budget Justification: 3-5 pages
- Biographical Sketch: 3 pages per senior personnel
- Font: Minimum 10pt, Times Roman or similar
- Margins: 1 inch all sides
Template: assets/grants/nsf_proposal_template.texExample 4: Conference Poster
User: "I need to create a poster for ISMB"
Response:
ISMB poster specifications:
- Size: Typically A0 portrait (33.1 × 46.8 inches)
- Recommended template: beamerposter or tikzposter
- Font sizes: Title 60-85pt, Headers 36-48pt, Body 24-32pt
- Include: QR code for paper/supplementary materials
Available templates:
- assets/posters/beamerposter_academic.tex
- assets/posters/tikzposter_research.texUpdates and Maintenance
Template Currency:
- Templates updated annually or when venues release new guidelines
- Last updated: 2024
- Check official venue sites for most current requirements
Reporting Issues:
- Template compilation errors
- Outdated formatting requirements
- Missing venue templates
- Incorrect specifications
Summary
The venue-templates skill provides comprehensive access to:
1. 50+ publication venue templates across disciplines 2. Detailed formatting requirements for journals, conferences, posters, grants 3. Helper scripts for template discovery, customization, and validation 4. Integration with other scientific writing skills 5. Best practices for successful academic submissions
Use this skill whenever you need venue-specific formatting guidance or templates for academic publishing.
% NIH Specific Aims Page Template
% THE MOST CRITICAL PAGE OF YOUR NIH PROPOSAL
% 1 page maximum - strictly enforced
% Last updated: 2024
\documentclass[11pt,letterpaper]{article}
% Formatting
\usepackage[margin=0.5in]{geometry} % 0.5 inch minimum margins
\usepackage{helvet} % Arial-like font
\renewcommand{\familydefault}{\sfdefault}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{soul} % For highlighting (remove in final version)
% Remove page numbers (optional)
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}
% Optional: Highlight template text to remind yourself to replace
% Remove \hl{} and color in final version
\definecolor{highlight}{RGB}{255,255,200}
\sethlcolor{highlight}
% ====================
% SPECIFIC AIMS PAGE
% ====================
\begin{center}
\textbf{\large Your Project Title Here: Concise and Descriptive}
\end{center}
\vspace{0.3cm}
% OPENING PARAGRAPH: The Hook and Gap
% 2-3 sentences establishing significance and the knowledge gap
\textbf{[Disease/condition]} affects \textbf{[number]} people worldwide and results in \textbf{[burden: mortality, morbidity, cost]}. \textbf{[Current treatment/understanding]} has improved outcomes, but \textbf{[limitation/gap]} remains a critical barrier to \textbf{[desired outcome]}. Understanding \textbf{[specific mechanism/relationship]} is essential for \textbf{[future advance: therapy, prevention, diagnosis]}.
\vspace{0.2cm}
% LONG-TERM GOAL
% 1 sentence on your overarching research vision
Our \textbf{long-term goal} is to \textbf{[overarching vision: develop cure, understand mechanism, improve treatment]} for \textbf{[disease/population]}.
\vspace{0.2cm}
% OBJECTIVE AND CENTRAL HYPOTHESIS
% 1-2 sentences on what THIS proposal will accomplish
The \textbf{objective} of this proposal is to \textbf{[specific objective for this project]}. Our \textbf{central hypothesis} is that \textbf{[clearly stated, testable hypothesis]}.
\vspace{0.2cm}
% RATIONALE
% 2-3 sentences explaining WHY you expect success (preliminary data!)
This hypothesis is based on our \textbf{preliminary data} showing that \textbf{[key preliminary finding 1]} and \textbf{[key preliminary finding 2]}. These findings suggest that \textbf{[mechanistic explanation or expected outcome]}.
\vspace{0.2cm}
% TRANSITION TO AIMS
% 1 sentence introducing the specific aims
To test this hypothesis and achieve our objective, we will pursue the following \textbf{Specific Aims}:
\vspace{0.3cm}
% ====================
% SPECIFIC AIM 1
% ====================
\noindent\textbf{Specific Aim 1: [Concise, active verb title describing what you'll do].}
\textit{Working Hypothesis:} \hl{State testable hypothesis for this aim.}
We will \textbf{[approach/method]} to determine \textbf{[what you'll learn]}. We will use \textbf{[model system/approach]} to test whether \textbf{[specific prediction]}.
\textbf{Expected Outcome:} We expect to find that \textbf{[predicted result]}. This outcome will demonstrate that \textbf{[significance of finding]} and will be \textbf{[positive/negative/innovative/transformative]} because \textbf{[why it matters]}.
\vspace{0.3cm}
% ====================
% SPECIFIC AIM 2
% ====================
\noindent\textbf{Specific Aim 2: [Title of second aim].}
\textit{Working Hypothesis:} \hl{Testable hypothesis for Aim 2.}
Building on Aim 1, we will \textbf{[approach]} to \textbf{[objective]}. We will employ \textbf{[method/technique]} in \textbf{[model/population]} to test the hypothesis that \textbf{[specific prediction]}.
\textbf{Expected Outcome:} These studies will reveal \textbf{[predicted finding]}. This is significant because \textbf{[impact on field/understanding]}.
\vspace{0.3cm}
% ====================
% SPECIFIC AIM 3 (OPTIONAL)
% ====================
\noindent\textbf{Specific Aim 3: [Title of third aim].}
\textit{Working Hypothesis:} \hl{Testable hypothesis for Aim 3.}
To translate findings from Aims 1-2, we will \textbf{[approach]} to determine \textbf{[translational objective]}. We will \textbf{[method]} using \textbf{[clinically relevant model/patient samples]} to test whether \textbf{[translational prediction]}.
\textbf{Expected Outcome:} We anticipate that \textbf{[result]}, which will provide \textbf{[proof-of-concept/validation/mechanism]} for \textbf{[therapeutic/diagnostic/preventive strategy]}.
\vspace{0.3cm}
% ====================
% PAYOFF PARAGRAPH
% ====================
% 2-3 sentences on IMPACT, INNOVATION, and FUTURE DIRECTIONS
\textbf{Impact and Innovation:} This project is \textbf{innovative} because it \textbf{[novel aspect: new concept, method, approach, application]}. The proposed research is \textbf{significant} because it will \textbf{[advance the field by...]} and will ultimately lead to \textbf{[long-term impact: improved treatment, new therapeutic target, diagnostic tool]}. Upon completion of these studies, we will be positioned to \textbf{[next steps: clinical trial, mechanistic studies, therapeutic development]}.
\vspace{0.5cm}
% ====================
% ALTERNATIVE STRUCTURE (if preferred)
% ====================
% Some successful Specific Aims pages use this alternative structure:
% - Open with hook (same as above)
% - State long-term goal and objective (same)
% - Present central hypothesis with 2-3 supporting pieces of preliminary data
% - Then state: "We will test this hypothesis through three Specific Aims:"
% - List aims more concisely (1-2 sentences each, plus expected outcome)
% - Conclude with payoff paragraph emphasizing innovation, significance, impact
\end{document}
% ====================
% TIPS FOR WRITING SPECIFIC AIMS
% ====================
% 1. START WITH A HOOK
% - Open with the big picture: disease burden, societal cost, mortality
% - Use compelling statistics
% - Make it clear why anyone should care
% 2. IDENTIFY THE GAP
% - What's currently known?
% - What's the critical barrier or unknown?
% - Why does it matter?
% 3. STATE YOUR HYPOTHESIS EXPLICITLY
% - Clear, testable hypothesis
% - Not "We hypothesize that we will study..." (that's not a hypothesis!)
% - "We hypothesize that [mechanism] causes [outcome]"
% 4. SHOW PRELIMINARY DATA
% - Demonstrate feasibility
% - Prove you're not starting from scratch
% - Build confidence in your approach
% 5. THREE AIMS (TYPICALLY)
% - Can be 2 or 4, but 3 is most common
% - Aims should be related but somewhat independent
% - Failure of one aim shouldn't sink the whole project
% - Aims can build on each other (Aim 1 → Aim 2 → Aim 3)
% 6. EACH AIM SHOULD HAVE:
% - Clear title (active verb)
% - Working hypothesis
% - Approach/method
% - Expected outcome
% - Significance/impact
% 7. END WITH PAYOFF
% - Innovation: What's new/different?
% - Significance: Why does it matter?
% - Impact: What will change?
% - Future: Where does this lead?
% 8. COMMON MISTAKES TO AVOID
% - Too much background (this is not a mini-review)
% - Vague hypotheses or objectives
% - Missing expected outcomes
% - No preliminary data mentioned
% - Too ambitious (can't do it all in 5 years)
% - Not addressing innovation and significance
% - Poor logical flow between aims
% - Exceeding 1 page (auto-reject!)
% 9. FORMATTING RULES (STRICTLY ENFORCED)
% - 1 page maximum (including all text, no figures typically)
% - Arial 11pt minimum (or equivalent)
% - 0.5 inch margins minimum
% - Any spacing (single, 1.5, double acceptable)
% - No smaller fonts allowed (even for superscripts/subscripts)
% 10. REVISION STRATEGY
% - Write, get feedback, revise 10+ times
% - Every word must earn its place
% - Test on non-specialist colleagues
% - Read aloud to check flow
% - Have it reviewed by successful R01 holders
% - Mock study section review
% ====================
% EXAMPLES OF STRONG OPENING SENTENCES
% ====================
% DISEASE BURDEN APPROACH:
% "Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects 6.7 million Americans and will cost $345 billion in 2023,
% yet no disease-modifying therapies exist."
% MECHANISTIC GAP APPROACH:
% "Despite decades of research, the molecular mechanisms driving metastasis remain poorly understood,
% limiting our ability to develop effective therapies for the 90% of cancer deaths caused by metastatic disease."
% TRANSLATIONAL APPROACH:
% "Current immunotherapies fail in 70% of patients with melanoma, largely because we cannot predict
% who will respond, highlighting an urgent need for biomarkers of treatment response."
% ====================
% REMEMBER
% ====================
% The Specific Aims page is often the ONLY page reviewers read carefully before
% forming their initial opinion. A weak Specific Aims page can doom an otherwise
% excellent proposal. Invest the time to make it compelling, clear, and concise.
% Get feedback from:
% - Successful R01 awardees in your field
% - Grant writing office at your institution
% - Colleagues who've served on NIH study sections
% - Non-specialists (if they can't understand it, reviewers may struggle too)
% NSF Research Proposal Template
% For NSF Standard Grant Proposals
% Last updated: 2024
% Based on NSF PAPPG (Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide)
\documentclass[11pt,letterpaper]{article}
% Required formatting
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry} % 1 inch margins required
\usepackage{times} % Times Roman font (11pt minimum)
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{cite}
\usepackage{hyperref}
% Single spacing (NSF allows single spacing)
\usepackage{setspace}
\singlespacing
% Page numbers
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\fancyhf{}
\rhead{\thepage}
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
\begin{document}
% ====================
% PROJECT SUMMARY (1 page maximum)
% ====================
\section*{Project Summary}
\subsection*{Overview}
Provide a concise 1-2 paragraph description of the proposed research. This should be understandable to a scientifically literate reader who is not a specialist in your field.
\subsection*{Intellectual Merit}
Describe how the project advances knowledge within its field and across different fields. Address:
\begin{itemize}
\item How the project advances understanding in the field
\item Innovative aspects of the research
\item Qualifications of the research team
\item Adequacy of resources
\end{itemize}
\subsection*{Broader Impacts}
Describe the potential benefits to society and contributions to desired societal outcomes. Address one or more of the following:
\begin{itemize}
\item Advancing discovery and understanding while promoting teaching and learning
\item Broadening participation of underrepresented groups in STEM
\item Disseminating broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding
\item Benefits to society (economic development, health, quality of life, national security, etc.)
\item Developing the scientific workforce and enhancing research infrastructure
\end{itemize}
\newpage
% ====================
% PROJECT DESCRIPTION (15 pages maximum)
% ====================
\section*{Project Description}
\section{Introduction and Background}
\subsection{Current State of Knowledge}
Provide context for your proposed research. Review relevant literature and establish what is currently known in the field.
\subsection{Knowledge Gap}
Clearly identify the gap in current knowledge or understanding that your project will address. Explain why this gap is significant.
\subsection{Preliminary Work and Feasibility}
Describe any preliminary work that demonstrates the feasibility of your approach. Highlight your team's qualifications and prior accomplishments.
\section{Research Objectives and Hypotheses}
\subsection{Overall Goal}
State the overarching long-term goal of your research program.
\subsection{Specific Objectives}
List 2-4 specific, measurable objectives for this project:
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Objective 1:} Clearly stated objective
\item \textbf{Objective 2:} Second objective
\item \textbf{Objective 3:} Third objective
\end{enumerate}
\subsection{Hypotheses}
State your testable hypotheses explicitly.
\section{Research Plan}
\subsection{Objective 1: [Title]}
\subsubsection{Rationale}
Explain why this objective is important and how it addresses the knowledge gap.
\subsubsection{Approach and Methods}
Describe in detail how you will accomplish this objective. Include:
\begin{itemize}
\item Experimental design or computational approach
\item Methods and procedures
\item Data collection and analysis
\item Controls and validation
\end{itemize}
\subsubsection{Expected Outcomes}
Describe what results you expect and how they will advance the field.
\subsubsection{Potential Challenges and Alternatives}
Identify potential obstacles and describe alternative approaches.
\subsection{Objective 2: [Title]}
[Repeat same structure as Objective 1]
\subsection{Objective 3: [Title]}
[Repeat same structure as Objective 1]
\section{Timeline and Milestones}
Provide a detailed timeline showing when each objective will be addressed:
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|p{3cm}|p{3cm}|p{3cm}|}
\hline
\textbf{Activity} & \textbf{Year 1} & \textbf{Year 2} & \textbf{Year 3} \\
\hline
Objective 1 activities & Months 1-6: ... & & \\
\hline
Objective 2 activities & Months 7-12: ... & Months 13-18: ... & \\
\hline
Objective 3 activities & & Months 19-24: ... & Months 25-36: ... \\
\hline
Publications & & Submit paper 1 & Submit papers 2-3 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\section{Broader Impacts}
\textit{Note: Broader Impacts must be substantive, not perfunctory. Integrate throughout proposal.}
\subsection{Educational Activities}
Describe specific educational activities integrated with the research:
\begin{itemize}
\item Curriculum development
\item Training of graduate and undergraduate students
\item K-12 outreach programs
\item Public science communication
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Broadening Participation}
Describe concrete efforts to broaden participation of underrepresented groups:
\begin{itemize}
\item Recruitment strategies
\item Mentoring programs
\item Partnerships with minority-serving institutions
\item Measurable outcomes
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Dissemination and Outreach}
Describe plans for broad dissemination:
\begin{itemize}
\item Open-access publications
\item Data and code sharing (repositories, licenses)
\item Conference presentations and workshops
\item Public engagement activities
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Societal Benefits}
Explain potential benefits to society:
\begin{itemize}
\item Economic development
\item Health and quality of life improvements
\item Environmental sustainability
\item National security (if applicable)
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Assessment of Broader Impacts}
Describe how you will measure the success of broader impacts activities. Include specific, measurable outcomes.
\section{Results from Prior NSF Support}
\textit{Required if PI or co-PI has received NSF funding in the past 5 years}
\subsection{Award Title and Number}
Award Number: NSF-XXXXX, Amount: \$XXX,XXX, Period: MM/YY - MM/YY
\subsection{Intellectual Merit}
Summarize research accomplishments and findings from prior award.
\subsection{Broader Impacts}
Describe broader impacts activities and outcomes from prior award.
\subsection{Publications}
List publications resulting from prior NSF support (up to 5 most significant):
\begin{enumerate}
\item Author, A.A., et al. (Year). Title. \textit{Journal}, vol(issue), pages.
\end{enumerate}
\newpage
% ====================
% REFERENCES CITED (No page limit)
% ====================
\section*{References Cited}
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{ref1}
Author, A.A., \& Author, B.B. (2023). Article title. \textit{Journal Name}, \textit{45}(3), 123-145.
\bibitem{ref2}
Author, C.C., Author, D.D., \& Author, E.E. (2022). Book title. Publisher.
\bibitem{ref3}
Author, F.F., et al. (2021). Another article. \textit{Nature}, \textit{590}, 234-238.
% Add more references as needed
\end{thebibliography}
\newpage
% ====================
% BUDGET JUSTIFICATION (3-5 pages typical)
% Note: Budget is submitted separately in NSF's systems
% This justifies the budget requests
% ====================
\section*{Budget Justification}
\subsection*{A. Senior Personnel}
\textbf{PI Name (X\% academic year, Y summer months):} Justify percent effort and role in project. Summer salary calculated as X/9 of academic year salary.
\textbf{Co-PI Name (X\% academic year):} Justify role and effort.
\subsection*{B. Other Personnel}
\textbf{Postdoctoral Researcher (1.0 FTE, Years 1-3):} Justify need for postdoc, qualifications required, and role in project. Salary: \$XX,XXX/year.
\textbf{Graduate Student (2 students, Years 1-3):} Justify need, training opportunities, and project contributions. Stipend: \$XX,XXX/year per student.
\textbf{Undergraduate Researchers (2 students/year):} Describe research training opportunities. Hourly wage: \$XX/hour.
\subsection*{C. Fringe Benefits}
List fringe benefit rates for each personnel category as determined by institution.
\subsection*{D. Equipment (\$5,000+)}
\textbf{Instrument Name (\$XX,XXX):} Justify need, explain why existing equipment inadequate, describe how it enables proposed research.
\subsection*{E. Travel}
\textbf{Domestic Conference Travel (\$X,XXX/year):} Justify conference attendance for dissemination (1-2 conferences/year for PI and students).
\textbf{Field Work Travel (\$X,XXX):} If applicable, justify field site visits.
\subsection*{F. Participant Support Costs}
\textit{If hosting workshop, summer program, etc.}
Stipends, travel, and per diem for XX participants attending [workshop/program name].
\subsection*{G. Other Direct Costs}
\textbf{Materials and Supplies (\$X,XXX/year):} Itemize major categories (e.g., chemicals, consumables, software licenses).
\textbf{Publication Costs (\$X,XXX):} Budget for open-access publication fees (estimate X papers @ \$X,XXX each).
\textbf{Subaward to Partner Institution (\$XX,XXX):} Justify collaboration and subaward amount.
\textbf{Other:} Justify any other costs.
\subsection*{H. Indirect Costs}
Calculated at XX\% of Modified Total Direct Costs (institution's negotiated rate).
\newpage
% ====================
% DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN (2 pages maximum)
% ====================
\section*{Data Management Plan}
\subsection*{Types of Data}
Describe the types of data to be generated by the project:
\begin{itemize}
\item Experimental data (e.g., measurements, observations)
\item Computational data (e.g., simulation results, models)
\item Metadata describing data collection and processing
\end{itemize}
\subsection*{Data and Metadata Standards}
Describe standards to be used for data format and metadata:
\begin{itemize}
\item File formats (e.g., HDF5, NetCDF, CSV)
\item Metadata standards (e.g., Dublin Core, domain-specific standards)
\item Documentation of data collection and processing
\end{itemize}
\subsection*{Policies for Access and Sharing}
Describe how data will be made accessible:
\begin{itemize}
\item Repository for data deposition (e.g., Dryad, Zenodo, domain-specific archive)
\item Timeline for public release (immediately upon publication, or within X months)
\item Access restrictions (if any) and justification
\item Embargo periods (if applicable)
\end{itemize}
\subsection*{Policies for Re-use, Redistribution}
Describe terms for re-use:
\begin{itemize}
\item Licensing (e.g., CC0, CC-BY, specific data use agreement)
\item Attribution requirements
\item Restrictions on commercial use (if any)
\end{itemize}
\subsection*{Plans for Archiving and Preservation}
Describe long-term preservation strategy:
\begin{itemize}
\item Repository selection (long-term, stable repositories)
\item Preservation period (minimum 3-5 years post-project)
\item Data formats for long-term preservation
\item Institutional commitments
\end{itemize}
\subsection*{Roles and Responsibilities}
Identify who is responsible for data management implementation.
\end{document}
% ====================
% ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS (submitted separately in NSF system)
% ====================
% 1. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH (3 pages per person)
% - Use NSF-approved format (SciENcv or NSF template)
% - Professional preparation
% - Appointments
% - Products (up to 5 most relevant, up to 5 other significant)
% - Synergistic activities
% 2. CURRENT AND PENDING SUPPORT
% - All current and pending support for all senior personnel
% - Use NSF format
% - Check for overlap with proposed project
% 3. FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, AND OTHER RESOURCES
% - Describe available facilities and equipment
% - Computational resources
% - Laboratory space
% - Other resources supporting the project
% ====================
% FORMATTING CHECKLIST
% ====================
% ☐ Margins: 1 inch on all sides
% ☐ Font: Times Roman 11pt or larger (or equivalent)
% ☐ Line spacing: Single spacing acceptable
% ☐ Project Summary: 1 page, includes Overview, Intellectual Merit, Broader Impacts
% ☐ Project Description: 15 pages maximum
% ☐ References Cited: No page limit, consistent formatting
% ☐ Biographical Sketches: 3 pages per person, NSF-approved format
% ☐ Budget Justification: Detailed and reasonable
% ☐ Data Management Plan: 2 pages maximum
% ☐ Current & Pending: Complete and accurate
% ☐ Facilities: Adequate resources described
% ☐ Broader Impacts: Substantive and integrated throughout
% ☐ All required sections included
% ====================
% SUBMISSION NOTES
% ====================
% 1. Submit through Research.gov or Grants.gov
% 2. Follow your institution's internal deadlines (usually 3-5 days before NSF deadline)
% 3. Obtain institutional approval before submission
% 4. Ensure all senior personnel have NSF IDs
% 5. Budget prepared in NSF's system (separate from this document)
% 6. Check program-specific requirements (may differ from standard grant)
% 7. Contact Program Officer for guidance (encouraged but not required)
% Nature Journal Article Template
% For submission to Nature family journals
% Last updated: 2024
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
% Packages
\usepackage[margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{lineno} % Line numbers for review
\usepackage[super]{natbib} % Superscript citations
% Line numbering (required for submission)
\linenumbers
% Title and Authors
\title{Insert Your Title Here: Concise and Descriptive}
\author{
First Author\textsuperscript{1}, Second Author\textsuperscript{1,2}, Third Author\textsuperscript{2,*}
}
\date{}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
% Affiliations
\noindent
\textsuperscript{1}Department Name, Institution Name, City, State/Province, Postal Code, Country \\
\textsuperscript{2}Second Department/Institution \\
\textsuperscript{*}Correspondence: [email protected]
% Abstract
\begin{abstract}
\noindent
Write a concise abstract of 150-200 words summarizing the main findings, significance, and conclusions of your work. The abstract should be self-contained and understandable without reading the full paper. Focus on what you did, what you found, and why it matters. Avoid jargon and abbreviations where possible.
\end{abstract}
% Main Text
\section*{Introduction}
% 2-3 paragraphs setting the context
Provide background on the research area, establish the importance of the problem, and identify the knowledge gap your work addresses. Nature papers should emphasize broad significance beyond a narrow specialty.
State your main research question or objective clearly.
Briefly preview your approach and key findings.
\section*{Results}
% Primary results section
% Organize by finding, not by experiment
% Reference figures/tables as you describe results
\subsection*{First major finding}
Describe your first key result. Reference Figure~\ref{fig:example} to support your findings.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
% Include your figure here
% \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{figure1.pdf}
\caption{{\bf Figure title in bold.} Detailed figure caption explaining what is shown, experimental conditions, sample sizes (n), statistical tests, and significance levels. Panels should be labeled (a), (b), etc. if multiple panels are present.}
\label{fig:example}
\end{figure}
\subsection*{Second major finding}
Describe your second key result objectively, without interpretation.
\subsection*{Third major finding}
Describe additional results as needed.
\section*{Discussion}
% Interpret results, compare to literature, acknowledge limitations
\subsection*{Main findings and interpretation}
Summarize your key findings and explain their significance. How do they advance our understanding?
\subsection*{Comparison to previous work}
Compare and contrast your results with existing literature\cite{example2023}.
\subsection*{Implications}
Discuss the broader implications of your work for the field and beyond.
\subsection*{Limitations and future directions}
Honestly acknowledge limitations and suggest future research directions.
\section*{Conclusions}
Provide a concise conclusion summarizing the main take-home messages of your work.
\section*{Methods}
% Detailed methods allowing reproducibility
% Can be placed after main text in Nature
\subsection*{Experimental design}
Describe overall experimental design, including controls.
\subsection*{Sample preparation}
Detail procedures for sample collection, preparation, and handling.
\subsection*{Data collection}
Describe instrumentation, measurement procedures, and data collection protocols.
\subsection*{Data analysis}
Explain analytical methods, statistical tests, and software used. State sample sizes, replication, and significance thresholds.
\subsection*{Ethical approval}
Include relevant ethical approval statements (human subjects, animal use, biosafety).
\section*{Data availability}
State where data supporting the findings can be accessed (repository, supplementary files, available on request).
\section*{Code availability}
If applicable, provide information on code availability (GitHub, Zenodo, etc.).
\section*{Acknowledgements}
Acknowledge funding sources, technical assistance, and other contributions. List grant numbers.
\section*{Author contributions}
Describe contributions of each author using CRediT taxonomy or similar (conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing, etc.).
\section*{Competing interests}
Declare any financial or non-financial competing interests. If none, state "The authors declare no competing interests."
% References
\bibliographystyle{naturemag} % Nature bibliography style
\bibliography{references} % Your .bib file
% Alternatively, manually format references:
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{example2023}
Smith, J. D., Jones, M. L. \& Williams, K. R. Groundbreaking discovery in the field. \textit{Nature} \textbf{600}, 123--130 (2023).
\bibitem{author2022}
Author, A. A. \& Coauthor, B. B. Another important paper. \textit{Nat. Methods} \textbf{19}, 456--
460 (2022).
% Add more references as needed
\end{thebibliography}
% Figure Legends (if not included with figures)
\section*{Figure Legends}
\textbf{Figure 1 | Figure title.} Comprehensive figure legend describing all panels, experimental conditions, sample sizes, and statistical analyses.
\textbf{Figure 2 | Second figure title.} Another detailed legend.
% Extended Data Figures (optional - supplementary figures)
\section*{Extended Data}
\textbf{Extended Data Figure 1 | Supplementary data title.} Description of supplementary figure supporting main findings.
\end{document}
% Notes for Authors:
% 1. Nature articles are typically ~3,000 words excluding Methods, References, Figure Legends
% 2. Use superscript numbered citations (1, 2, 3)
% 3. Figures should be high resolution (300+ dpi for photos, 1000 dpi for line art)
% 4. Submit figures as separate files (TIFF, EPS, or PDF)
% 5. Double-space the manuscript for review
% 6. Include line numbers using \linenumbers
% 7. Follow Nature's specific author guidelines for your target journal
% 8. Methods section can be quite detailed and placed after main text
% 9. Check word limits and specific requirements for your Nature family journal
% NeurIPS Conference Paper Template
% For submission to Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)
% Last updated: 2024
% Note: Use the official neurips_2024.sty file from the conference website
\documentclass{article}
% Required packages (neurips_2024.sty provides most formatting)
\usepackage{neurips_2024} % Official NeurIPS style file (download from conference site)
% Recommended packages
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{algorithm}
\usepackage{algorithmic}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{booktabs} % For better tables
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{microtype} % Improved typography
% Theorems, lemmas, etc.
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}
\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}
\newtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
% Title and Authors
\title{Your Paper Title: Concise and Descriptive \\ (Maximum Two Lines)}
% Authors - ANONYMIZED for initial submission
% For initial submission (double-blind review):
\author{
Anonymous Authors \\
Anonymous Institution(s) \\
}
% For camera-ready version (after acceptance):
% \author{
% First Author \\
% Department of Computer Science \\
% University Name \\
% City, State, Postal Code \\
% \texttt{first.author@university.edu} \\
% \And
% Second Author \\
% Company/Institution Name \\
% Address \\
% \texttt{second.author@company.com} \\
% \And
% Third Author \\
% Institution \\
% \texttt{third.author@institution.edu}
% }
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
Write a concise abstract (150-250 words) summarizing your contributions. The abstract should clearly state: (1) the problem you address, (2) your approach/method, (3) key results/findings, and (4) significance/implications. Make it accessible to a broad machine learning audience.
\end{abstract}
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:introduction}
Introduce the problem you're addressing and its significance in machine learning or AI. Motivate why this problem is important and challenging.
\subsection{Background and Motivation}
Provide necessary background for understanding your work. Explain the gap in current methods or knowledge.
\subsection{Contributions}
Clearly state your main contributions as a bulleted list:
\begin{itemize}
\item First contribution: e.g., "We propose a novel architecture for..."
\item Second contribution: e.g., "We provide theoretical analysis showing..."
\item Third contribution: e.g., "We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on..."
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Paper Organization}
Briefly describe the structure of the remainder of the paper.
\section{Related Work}
\label{sec:related}
Discuss relevant prior work and how your work differs. Organize by themes or approaches rather than chronologically. Be fair and accurate in describing others' work.
Cite key papers \cite{lecun2015deep, vaswani2017attention, devlin2019bert} and explain how your work builds upon or differs from them.
\section{Problem Formulation}
\label{sec:problem}
Formally define the problem you're solving. Include mathematical notation and definitions.
\subsection{Notation}
Define your notation clearly. For example:
\begin{itemize}
\item $\mathcal{X}$: input space
\item $\mathcal{Y}$: output space
\item $f: \mathcal{X} \rightarrow \mathcal{Y}$: function to learn
\item $\mathcal{D} = \{(x_i, y_i)\}_{i=1}^n$: training dataset
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Objective}
State your learning objective formally, e.g.:
\begin{equation}
\min_{\theta} \mathbb{E}_{(x,y) \sim \mathcal{D}} \left[ \mathcal{L}(f_\theta(x), y) \right]
\end{equation}
where $\mathcal{L}$ is the loss function and $\theta$ are model parameters.
\section{Method}
\label{sec:method}
Describe your proposed method in detail. This is the core technical contribution of your paper.
\subsection{Model Architecture}
Describe the architecture of your model with sufficient detail for reproduction. Include figures if helpful.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
% \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{architecture.pdf}
\caption{Model architecture diagram. Describe the key components and data flow. Use colorblind-safe colors.}
\label{fig:architecture}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Training Procedure}
Explain how you train the model, including:
\begin{algorithm}[t]
\caption{Training Algorithm}
\label{alg:training}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\STATE \textbf{Input:} Training data $\mathcal{D}$, learning rate $\alpha$
\STATE \textbf{Output:} Trained parameters $\theta$
\STATE Initialize $\theta$ randomly
\FOR{epoch $= 1$ to $T$}
\FOR{batch $(x, y)$ in $\mathcal{D}$}
\STATE Compute loss: $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(f_\theta(x), y)$
\STATE Update: $\theta \leftarrow \theta - \alpha \nabla_\theta \mathcal{L}$
\ENDFOR
\ENDFOR
\RETURN $\theta$
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\subsection{Key Components}
Describe key technical innovations or components in detail.
\section{Theoretical Analysis}
\label{sec:theory}
If applicable, provide theoretical analysis of your method.
\begin{theorem}
\label{thm:main}
State your main theoretical result here.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Provide proof or sketch of proof. Full proofs can go in the appendix.
\end{proof}
\section{Experiments}
\label{sec:experiments}
Describe your experimental setup and results.
\subsection{Experimental Setup}
\textbf{Datasets:} Describe datasets used (e.g., ImageNet, CIFAR-10, etc.).
\textbf{Baselines:} List baseline methods for comparison.
\textbf{Implementation Details:} Provide implementation details including hyperparameters, hardware, training time.
\textbf{Evaluation Metrics:} Define metrics used (accuracy, F1, AUC, etc.).
\subsection{Main Results}
Present your main experimental results.
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{Performance comparison on benchmark datasets. Bold indicates best performance. Results reported as mean ± std over 3 runs.}
\label{tab:main_results}
\begin{tabular}{lcccc}
\toprule
Method & Dataset 1 & Dataset 2 & Dataset 3 & Average \\
\midrule
Baseline 1 & 85.3 ± 0.5 & 72.1 ± 0.8 & 90.2 ± 0.3 & 82.5 \\
Baseline 2 & 87.2 ± 0.4 & 74.5 ± 0.6 & 91.1 ± 0.5 & 84.3 \\
\textbf{Our Method} & \textbf{91.7 ± 0.3} & \textbf{79.8 ± 0.5} & \textbf{94.3 ± 0.2} & \textbf{88.6} \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\subsection{Ablation Studies}
Conduct ablation studies to understand which components contribute to performance.
\subsection{Analysis}
Provide deeper analysis of results, failure cases, limitations, etc.
\section{Discussion}
\label{sec:discussion}
Discuss your findings, limitations, and broader implications.
\subsection{Limitations}
Honestly acknowledge limitations of your work.
\subsection{Broader Impacts}
Discuss potential positive and negative societal impacts (required by NeurIPS).
\section{Conclusion}
\label{sec:conclusion}
Summarize your main contributions and findings. Suggest future research directions.
% Acknowledgments (add after acceptance, not in submission version)
\section*{Acknowledgments}
Thank collaborators, funding sources (with grant numbers), and compute resources. Not included in double-blind submission.
% References
\bibliographystyle{plainnat} % or other NeurIPS-compatible style
\bibliography{references} % Your .bib file
% Appendix (optional, unlimited pages)
\appendix
\section{Additional Proofs}
\label{app:proofs}
Provide full proofs of theorems here.
\section{Additional Experimental Results}
\label{app:experiments}
Include additional experiments, more ablations, qualitative results, etc.
\section{Hyperparameters}
\label{app:hyperparameters}
List all hyperparameters used in experiments for reproducibility.
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{Hyperparameters used in all experiments}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
\toprule
Hyperparameter & Value \\
\midrule
Learning rate & 0.001 \\
Batch size & 64 \\
Optimizer & Adam \\
Weight decay & 0.0001 \\
Epochs & 100 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\section{Code and Data}
\label{app:code}
Provide links to code repository (anonymized for review, e.g., anonymous GitHub):
\begin{itemize}
\item Code: \url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/project-XXXX}
\item Data: Available upon request / at [repository]
\end{itemize}
\end{document}
% Notes for Authors:
% 1. Main paper: 8 pages maximum (excluding references and appendix)
% 2. References: unlimited pages
% 3. Appendix: unlimited pages (reviewed at discretion of reviewers)
% 4. Use double-blind anonymization for initial submission
% 5. Include broader impact statement
% 6. Code submission strongly encouraged (anonymous for review)
% 7. Use official neurips_2024.sty file (download from NeurIPS website)
% 8. Font: Times, 10pt (enforced by style file)
% 9. Figures should be colorblind-friendly
% 10. Ensure reproducibility: report seeds, hyperparameters, dataset splits
% PLOS ONE Article Template
% For submission to PLOS ONE and other PLOS journals
% Last updated: 2024
\documentclass[10pt,letterpaper]{article}
% Packages
\usepackage[top=0.85in,left=2.75in,footskip=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\usepackage{changepage}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{textcomp,marvosym}
\usepackage{cite}
\usepackage{nameref,hyperref}
\usepackage[right]{lineno}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[table]{xcolor}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{authblk}
% Line numbering
\linenumbers
% Set up authblk for PLOS format
\renewcommand\Authfont{\fontsize{12}{14}\selectfont}
\renewcommand\Affilfont{\fontsize{9}{11}\selectfont}
% Title
\title{Your Article Title Here: Concise and Descriptive}
% Authors and Affiliations
\author[1]{First Author}
\author[1,2]{Second Author}
\author[2,$\dagger$]{Third Author}
\affil[1]{Department of Biology, University Name, City, State, Country}
\affil[2]{Institute of Research, Institution Name, City, Country}
% Corresponding author
\affil[$\dagger$]{Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]}
\date{}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
% Abstract
\begin{abstract}
\noindent
Write a structured or unstructured abstract of 250-300 words. The abstract should be accessible to a broad readership and should clearly state: (1) background/rationale, (2) objectives, (3) methods, (4) principal findings with key data, and (5) conclusions and significance. Do not include citations in the abstract.
\end{abstract}
% Introduction
\section*{Introduction}
Provide background and context for your study. The introduction should:
\begin{itemize}
\item Present the rationale for your study
\item Clearly state what is currently known about the topic
\item Identify the knowledge gap your study addresses
\item State your research objectives or hypotheses
\item Explain the significance of the research
\end{itemize}
Review relevant literature \cite{smith2023,jones2022}, setting your work in context.
State your main research question or objective at the end of the introduction.
% Materials and Methods
\section*{Materials and Methods}
Provide sufficient detail to allow reproduction of your work.
\subsection*{Study Design}
Describe the overall study design (e.g., prospective cohort, randomized controlled trial, observational study, etc.).
\subsection*{Participants/Samples}
Describe your study population, sample collection, or experimental subjects:
\begin{itemize}
\item Sample size and how it was determined (power analysis)
\item Inclusion and exclusion criteria
\item Demographic information
\item For animal studies: species, strain, age, sex, housing conditions
\end{itemize}
\subsection*{Procedures}
Detail all experimental procedures, measurements, and interventions. Include:
\begin{itemize}
\item Equipment and reagents (with manufacturer, catalog numbers)
\item Protocols and procedures (step-by-step if novel)
\item Controls used
\item Blinding and randomization (if applicable)
\end{itemize}
\subsection*{Data Collection}
Describe how data were collected, including instruments, assays, and measurements.
\subsection*{Statistical Analysis}
Clearly describe statistical methods used:
\begin{itemize}
\item Software and version (e.g., R 4.3.0, Python 3.9 with scipy 1.9.0)
\item Statistical tests performed (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA, regression)
\item Significance level ($\alpha$, typically 0.05)
\item Corrections for multiple testing
\item Sample size justification
\end{itemize}
\subsection*{Ethical Approval}
Include relevant ethical approval statements:
\begin{itemize}
\item Human subjects: IRB approval, protocol number, consent procedures
\item Animal research: IACUC approval, protocol number, welfare considerations
\item Field studies: Permits and permissions
\end{itemize}
Example: "This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of University Name (Protocol \#12345). All participants provided written informed consent."
% Results
\section*{Results}
Present your findings in a logical sequence. Refer to figures and tables as you describe results. Do not interpret results in this section (save for Discussion).
\subsection*{First Major Finding}
Describe your first key result. Statistical results should include effect sizes and confidence intervals in addition to p-values.
As shown in Figure~\ref{fig:results1}, we observed a significant increase in [outcome variable] (mean $\pm$ SD: 45.2 $\pm$ 8.3 vs. 32.1 $\pm$ 6.9; t = 7.42, df = 48, p < 0.001).
\begin{figure}[!ht]
\centering
% \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{figure1.png}
\caption{{\bf Figure 1. Title of first figure.}
Detailed figure legend describing what is shown. Include: (A) Description of panel A. (B) Description of panel B. Sample sizes (n), error bars represent [SD, SEM, 95\% CI], and statistical significance indicated by asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Statistical test used should be stated.}
\label{fig:results1}
\end{figure}
\subsection*{Second Major Finding}
Describe your second key result, referencing Table~\ref{tab:results1}.
\begin{table}[!ht]
\centering
\caption{{\bf Table 1. Title of table.}}
\label{tab:results1}
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\hline
\textbf{Condition} & \textbf{Measurement 1} & \textbf{Measurement 2} & \textbf{p-value} \\
\hline
Control & 25.3 $\pm$ 3.1 & 48.2 $\pm$ 5.4 & -- \\
Treatment A & 32.7 $\pm$ 2.8 & 55.1 $\pm$ 4.9 & 0.003 \\
Treatment B & 41.2 $\pm$ 3.5 & 62.8 $\pm$ 6.2 & < 0.001 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\begin{flushleft}
Values shown as mean $\pm$ standard deviation (n = 20 per group). P-values from one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test comparing to control.
\end{flushleft}
\end{table}
\subsection*{Additional Results}
Present additional findings as needed.
% Discussion
\section*{Discussion}
Interpret your results and place them in the context of existing literature.
\subsection*{Principal Findings}
Summarize your main findings concisely.
\subsection*{Interpretation}
Interpret your findings and explain their significance. How do they advance understanding of the topic? Compare and contrast with previous studies \cite{brown2021,williams2020}.
\subsection*{Strengths and Limitations}
Discuss both strengths and limitations of your study honestly:
\textbf{Strengths:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Large sample size with adequate statistical power
\item Rigorous methodology with appropriate controls
\item Novel approach or finding
\end{itemize}
\textbf{Limitations:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Cross-sectional design limits causal inference
\item Generalizability may be limited to [specific population]
\item Potential confounding variables not measured
\end{itemize}
\subsection*{Implications}
Discuss the practical or theoretical implications of your findings.
\subsection*{Future Directions}
Suggest directions for future research.
% Conclusions
\section*{Conclusions}
Provide a concise conclusion summarizing the main findings and their significance. Avoid repeating the abstract.
% Acknowledgments
\section*{Acknowledgments}
Acknowledge individuals who contributed but do not meet authorship criteria, technical assistance, and writing assistance. Example: "We thank Dr. Jane Doe for technical assistance with microscopy and Dr. John Smith for helpful discussions."
% References
\section*{References}
% Using BibTeX
\bibliographystyle{plos2015}
\bibliography{references}
% Or manually formatted (Vancouver style, numbered):
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{smith2023}
Smith JD, Johnson ML, Williams KR. Title of article. Journal Abbrev. 2023;45(3):301-318. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.1234567.
\bibitem{jones2022}
Jones AB, Brown CD. Another article title. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(8):e0234567. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234567.
\bibitem{brown2021}
Brown EF, Davis GH, Wilson IJ, Taylor JK. Comprehensive study title. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1234. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-12345-6.
\bibitem{williams2020}
Williams LM, Anderson NO. Previous work on topic. Science. 2020;368(6489):456-460. doi:10.1126/science.abc1234.
\end{thebibliography}
% Supporting Information
\section*{Supporting Information}
List all supporting information files (captions provided separately during submission):
\paragraph{S1 Fig.}
\textbf{Title of supplementary figure 1.} Brief description.
\paragraph{S2 Fig.}
\textbf{Title of supplementary figure 2.} Brief description.
\paragraph{S1 Table.}
\textbf{Title of supplementary table 1.} Brief description.
\paragraph{S1 Dataset.}
\textbf{Raw data.} Complete dataset used in analysis (CSV format).
\paragraph{S1 File.}
\textbf{Supplementary methods.} Additional methodological details.
% Author Contributions (CRediT taxonomy recommended)
\section*{Author Contributions}
Use CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy):
\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Conceptualization:} FA, SA
\item \textbf{Data curation:} FA
\item \textbf{Formal analysis:} FA, SA
\item \textbf{Funding acquisition:} TA
\item \textbf{Investigation:} FA, SA
\item \textbf{Methodology:} FA, SA, TA
\item \textbf{Project administration:} TA
\item \textbf{Resources:} TA
\item \textbf{Software:} FA
\item \textbf{Supervision:} TA
\item \textbf{Validation:} FA, SA
\item \textbf{Visualization:} FA
\item \textbf{Writing – original draft:} FA
\item \textbf{Writing – review \& editing:} FA, SA, TA
\end{itemize}
(FA = First Author, SA = Second Author, TA = Third Author)
% Data Availability Statement (REQUIRED)
\section*{Data Availability}
Choose one of the following:
\textbf{Option 1 (Public repository):}
All data are available in the [repository name] repository at [URL/DOI].
\textbf{Option 2 (Supporting Information):}
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
\textbf{Option 3 (Available on request):}
Data cannot be shared publicly because of [reason]. Data are available from the [institution/contact] (contact via [email]) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
\textbf{Option 4 (Third-party):}
Data are available from [third party] (contact: [details]) for researchers who meet criteria for access.
% Funding Statement (REQUIRED)
\section*{Funding}
State all funding sources including grant numbers. If no funding, state "The authors received no specific funding for this work."
Example: "This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) [grant number 123456 to TA] and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [grant number R01-234567 to TA]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."
% Competing Interests (REQUIRED)
\section*{Competing Interests}
Declare any financial or non-financial competing interests. If none, state: "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist."
If competing interests exist, declare them explicitly: "Author TA is a consultant for Company X. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials."
\end{document}
% Notes for Authors:
% 1. PLOS ONE has no length limit - be concise but thorough
% 2. Use Vancouver style for citations [1], [2], [3]
% 3. Figures: TIFF or EPS format, 300-600 dpi
% 4. All data must be made available (data availability statement required)
% 5. Include line numbers for review
% 6. PLOS ONE focuses on scientific rigor, not novelty or impact
% 7. Reporting guidelines encouraged (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, etc.)
% 8. Ethical approval required for human/animal studies
% 9. All authors must agree to submission
% 10. Submit via PLOS online submission system
% Academic Research Poster Template using beamerposter
% For conference presentations
% Last updated: 2024
\documentclass[final]{beamer}
% Poster size and scale
% Common sizes: a0, a1, a2, a3, a4
% Custom size: size=custom,width=XX,height=YY
\usepackage[size=a0,scale=1.24,orientation=portrait]{beamerposter}
% Packages
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath,amsthm,amssymb,latexsym}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{booktabs,array}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{qrcode} % For QR codes
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{lipsum} % For placeholder text (remove in final version)
% Beamer theme
\usetheme{Berlin}
% Other themes: default, AnnArbor, Antibes, Bergen, Berkeley, Berlin, Boadilla, CambridgeUS, Copenhagen, Darmstadt, Dresden, Frankfurt, Goettingen, Hannover, Ilmenau, JuanLesPins, Luebeck, Madrid, Malmoe, Marburg, Montpellier, PaloAlto, Pittsburgh, Rochester, Singapore, Szeged, Warsaw
% Color theme
\usecolortheme{seahorse}
% Other color themes: default, albatross, beaver, beetle, crane, dolphin, dove, fly, lily, orchid, rose, seagull, seahorse, whale, wolverine
% Custom colors (Okabe-Ito colorblind-safe palette)
\definecolor{OIorange}{RGB}{230,159,0}
\definecolor{OIblue}{RGB}{86,180,233}
\definecolor{OIgreen}{RGB}{0,158,115}
\definecolor{OIyellow}{RGB}{240,228,66}
\definecolor{OIdarkblue}{RGB}{0,114,178}
\definecolor{OIvermillion}{RGB}{213,94,0}
\definecolor{OIpurple}{RGB}{204,121,167}
% Set custom colors
\setbeamercolor{block title}{fg=white,bg=OIdarkblue}
\setbeamercolor{block body}{fg=black,bg=white}
\setbeamercolor{block alerted title}{fg=white,bg=OIvermillion}
\setbeamercolor{block alerted body}{fg=black,bg=white}
% Fonts
\setbeamerfont{title}{size=\VERYHuge,series=\bfseries}
\setbeamerfont{author}{size=\Large}
\setbeamerfont{institute}{size=\large}
\setbeamerfont{block title}{size=\large,series=\bfseries}
\setbeamerfont{block body}{size=\normalsize}
% Remove navigation symbols
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
% Title, authors, and affiliations
\title{Your Research Title Here:\\A Concise and Descriptive Title}
\author{First Author\inst{1}, Second Author\inst{1,2}, Third Author\inst{2}}
\institute[shortinst]{
\inst{1} Department of Science, University Name, City, State, Country\\
\inst{2} Institute of Research, Institution Name, City, Country
}
% Footer
\setbeamertemplate{footline}{
\leavevmode%
\hbox{%
\begin{beamercolorbox}[wd=.33\paperwidth,ht=4ex,dp=2ex,left]{author in head/foot}%
\hspace{1em}\usebeamerfont{author in head/foot}Contact: [email protected]
\end{beamercolorbox}%
\begin{beamercolorbox}[wd=.34\paperwidth,ht=4ex,dp=2ex,center]{title in head/foot}%
\usebeamerfont{title in head/foot}Conference Name 2024
\end{beamercolorbox}%
\begin{beamercolorbox}[wd=.33\paperwidth,ht=4ex,dp=2ex,right]{date in head/foot}%
\usebeamerfont{date in head/foot}University Logo\hspace{1em}
\end{beamercolorbox}}%
\vskip0pt%
}
\begin{document}
\begin{frame}[t]
\begin{columns}[t]
% Left Column
\begin{column}{.48\textwidth}
% Introduction/Background
\begin{block}{Introduction}
\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Background:} Provide context for your research. What is the broader problem or area of study?
\item \textbf{Gap:} What is currently unknown or inadequately addressed?
\item \textbf{Objective:} Clearly state your research question or hypothesis
\item \textbf{Significance:} Why does this work matter?
\end{itemize}
\vspace{0.5cm}
\textbf{Hypothesis:} State your main hypothesis clearly in one sentence.
\end{block}
\vspace{1cm}
% Methods
\begin{block}{Methods}
\textbf{Study Design:} Brief description of overall approach.
\vspace{0.5cm}
\textbf{Participants/Samples:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Sample size: n = XX
\item Key characteristics
\item Inclusion/exclusion criteria
\end{itemize}
\vspace{0.5cm}
\textbf{Procedures:}
\begin{enumerate}
\item Data collection procedure
\item Experimental intervention or measurement
\item Analysis approach
\end{enumerate}
\vspace{0.5cm}
% Optional: Methods flowchart
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=1.5cm, auto,
box/.style={rectangle, draw, fill=OIblue!20, text width=8cm, text centered, minimum height=1cm}]
\node [box] (step1) {Step 1: Participant Recruitment};
\node [box, below of=step1] (step2) {Step 2: Baseline Assessment};
\node [box, below of=step2] (step3) {Step 3: Intervention};
\node [box, below of=step3] (step4) {Step 4: Follow-up Assessment};
\node [box, below of=step4] (step5) {Step 5: Data Analysis};
\draw [->] (step1) -- (step2);
\draw [->] (step2) -- (step3);
\draw [->] (step3) -- (step4);
\draw [->] (step4) -- (step5);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
\textbf{Statistical Analysis:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Statistical test used (e.g., t-test, ANOVA, regression)
\item Software: R 4.3.0, Python 3.9
\item Significance level: $\alpha = 0.05$
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\end{column}
% Right Column
\begin{column}{.48\textwidth}
% Results
\begin{block}{Results}
\textbf{Finding 1: Main Result}
\vspace{0.5cm}
% Figure 1
\begin{figure}
\centering
% \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{figure1.pdf}
\caption{Figure 1. Main result showing significant effect. Error bars represent standard deviation. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.}
\end{figure}
\vspace{0.5cm}
\textbf{Finding 2: Secondary Analysis}
\vspace{0.5cm}
% Table or second figure
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{Summary of key results}
\begin{tabular}{lcccc}
\toprule
\textbf{Condition} & \textbf{Mean} & \textbf{SD} & \textbf{n} & \textbf{p-value} \\
\midrule
Control & 25.3 & 3.1 & 30 & -- \\
Treatment A & 32.7 & 2.8 & 30 & 0.003 \\
Treatment B & 41.2 & 3.5 & 30 & < 0.001 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\vspace{0.5cm}
\textbf{Finding 3: Additional Observation}
Describe third key finding with reference to supporting data.
\end{block}
\vspace{1cm}
% Discussion/Conclusions
\begin{block}{Discussion \& Conclusions}
\textbf{Main Findings:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Summary of first key result
\item Summary of second key result
\item Summary of third key result
\end{itemize}
\vspace{0.5cm}
\textbf{Interpretation:}
\begin{itemize}
\item How do these findings advance understanding?
\item How do they compare to previous work?
\item What are the mechanisms or explanations?
\end{itemize}
\vspace{0.5cm}
\textbf{Limitations:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Acknowledge key limitations honestly
\item Discuss how they might affect interpretation
\end{itemize}
\vspace{0.5cm}
\textbf{Future Directions:}
\begin{itemize}
\item Next steps for research
\item Potential applications
\end{itemize}
\vspace{0.5cm}
\begin{alertblock}{Key Takeaway}
\textbf{One-sentence summary of most important finding or implication.}
\end{alertblock}
\end{block}
\vspace{1cm}
% References and QR Code
\begin{block}{References \& Contact}
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.65\textwidth}
\small
\textbf{Selected References:}
\begin{enumerate}
\item Smith et al. (2023). \textit{Journal Name}, 45:123-130.
\item Jones \& Brown (2022). \textit{Another Journal}, 12:456-467.
\item Williams et al. (2021). \textit{Third Journal}, 8:789-801.
\end{enumerate}
\vspace{0.3cm}
\textbf{Acknowledgments:} Funding from [Agency] Grant \#12345. Thanks to [collaborators].
\end{minipage}
\hfill
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.3\textwidth}
\begin{center}
\qrcode[height=3cm]{https://yourlab.university.edu/paper}\\
\small Scan for full paper\\and supplementary materials
\end{center}
\end{minipage}
\end{block}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}
\end{document}
% Notes for Poster Design:
% 1. Font sizes (for A0 poster):
% - Title: 80-100pt
% - Authors: 60pt
% - Section headers: 50-60pt
% - Body text: 32-36pt (set by beamerposter scale)
% - Captions: 28-32pt
%
% 2. Use colorblind-safe colors (Okabe-Ito palette provided)
%
% 3. Keep text minimal - use bullets, not paragraphs
%
% 4. Make figures large and clear
%
% 5. Use white space effectively - don't crowd
%
% 6. Test readability from 6 feet (2 meters) away
%
% 7. Include QR code linking to paper, lab website, or supplementary materials
%
% 8. Print at professional print shop (FedEx Office, university print center)
%
% 9. Common poster sizes:
% - A0: 841 × 1189 mm (33.1 × 46.8 in)
% - 36" × 48" (914 × 1219 mm)
% - Check conference requirements!
%
% 10. Compile with: pdflatex beamerposter_academic.tex
Conference Formatting Requirements
Comprehensive formatting requirements and submission guidelines for major academic conferences across disciplines.
Last Updated: 2024
---
Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence
NeurIPS (Neural Information Processing Systems)
Conference Type: Top-tier machine learning conference Frequency: Annual (December)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit:
- Main paper: 8 pages (excluding references)
- References: Unlimited
- Appendix/Supplementary: Unlimited (optional, reviewed at discretion)
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times or Times New Roman, 10pt for body text
- Line spacing: Single-spaced
- Margins: 1 inch (2.54 cm) all sides
- Column separation: 0.25 inch (0.635 cm)
- Paper size: US Letter (8.5 × 11 inches)
- Anonymization: Required for initial submission (double-blind review)
- Remove author names, affiliations
- Anonymize self-citations ("Author et al." → "Anonymous et al.")
- Remove acknowledgments revealing identity
- Citations: Numbered in square brackets [1], [2-4]
- References: Any consistent style (commonly uses numbered references)
- Figures:
- High resolution (300+ dpi)
- Colorblind-friendly palettes recommended
- Can span both columns if needed
- Tables: Clear, readable at publication size
- Equations: Numbered if referenced
- LaTeX Class:
neurips_2024.sty(updated annually) - Supplementary Materials:
- Code strongly encouraged (GitHub, anonymous repo for review)
- Additional experiments, proofs
- Not counted toward page limit
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/neurips_article.tex
Submission Notes:
- Use official style file (changes yearly)
- Paper ID on first page (auto-generated during submission)
- Include "broader impact" statement (varies by year)
- Reproducibility checklist required
Website: https://neurips.cc/
---
ICML (International Conference on Machine Learning)
Conference Type: Top-tier machine learning conference Frequency: Annual (July)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit:
- Main paper: 8 pages (excluding references and appendix)
- References: Unlimited
- Appendix: Unlimited (optional)
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times, 10pt
- Line spacing: Single-spaced
- Margins: 1 inch all sides
- Paper size: US Letter
- Anonymization: Required (double-blind)
- Citations: Numbered or author-year (consistent style)
- Figures: High resolution, colorblind-safe recommended
- LaTeX Class:
icml2024.sty(updated yearly) - Supplementary: Strongly encouraged (code, data, appendix)
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/icml_article.tex
Submission Notes:
- Must use official ICML style file
- Checklist for reproducibility
- Ethics statement if applicable
Website: https://icml.cc/
---
ICLR (International Conference on Learning Representations)
Conference Type: Top-tier deep learning conference Frequency: Annual (April/May)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit:
- Main paper: 8 pages (excluding references, appendix, ethics statement)
- References: Unlimited
- Appendix: Unlimited
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times, 10pt
- Anonymization: Required (double-blind)
- Citations: Numbered [1] or author-year
- LaTeX Class:
iclr2024_conference.sty - Supplementary: Code and data encouraged (anonymous GitHub)
- Open Review: Reviews and responses are public post-decision
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/iclr_article.tex
Unique Features:
- OpenReview platform (transparent review process)
- Author-reviewer discussion during review
- Camera-ready can exceed 8 pages
Website: https://iclr.cc/
---
CVPR (Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)
Conference Type: Top-tier computer vision conference Frequency: Annual (June)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit:
- Main paper: 8 pages (including figures and tables, excluding references)
- References: Unlimited (separate section)
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times Roman, 10pt
- Anonymization: Required (double-blind)
- Blur faces in images if needed
- Anonymize datasets if they reveal identity
- Paper size: US Letter
- Citations: Numbered [1]
- Figures: High resolution, can be color
- LaTeX Template: CVPR official template (changes yearly)
- Supplementary Material:
- Video demonstrations encouraged
- Additional results, code
- 100 MB limit for all supplementary files
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/cvpr_article.tex
Website: https://cvpr.thecvf.com/
---
AAAI (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence)
Conference Type: Major AI conference Frequency: Annual (February)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit:
- Technical papers: 7 pages (excluding references)
- References: Unlimited
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times Roman, 10pt
- Anonymization: Required (double-blind)
- Paper size: US Letter
- Citations: Various styles accepted (be consistent)
- LaTeX Template: AAAI official style
- Supplementary: Optional appendix
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/aaai_article.tex
Website: https://aaai.org/conference/aaai/
---
IJCAI (International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence)
Conference Type: Major AI conference Frequency: Annual
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit: 7 pages (excluding references)
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times, 10pt
- Anonymization: Required
- LaTeX Template: IJCAI official style
---
Computer Science
ACM CHI (Human-Computer Interaction)
Conference Type: Premier HCI conference Frequency: Annual (April/May)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit:
- Papers: 10 pages (excluding references)
- Late-Breaking Work: 4 pages
- Format: Single-column ACM format
- Font: Depends on ACM template
- Anonymization: Required for Papers track
- LaTeX Class:
acmartwith CHI proceedings format - Citations: ACM style (numbered or author-year)
- Figures: High quality, accessibility considered
- Accessibility: Alt text for figures encouraged
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/chi_article.tex
Website: https://chi.acm.org/
---
SIGKDD (Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining)
Conference Type: Top data mining conference Frequency: Annual (August)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit:
- Research Track: 9 pages (excluding references)
- Applied Data Science: 9 pages
- Format: Two-column
- LaTeX Class:
acmart(sigconf format) - Font: ACM template default
- Anonymization: Required (double-blind)
- Citations: ACM numbered style
- Supplementary: Code and data encouraged
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/kdd_article.tex
Website: https://kdd.org/
---
EMNLP (Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing)
Conference Type: Top NLP conference Frequency: Annual (November/December)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit:
- Long papers: 8 pages (+ unlimited references and appendix)
- Short papers: 4 pages (+ unlimited references)
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times New Roman, 11pt
- Anonymization: Required (double-blind)
- Do not include author names or affiliations
- Self-citations should be anonymized
- Paper size: US Letter or A4
- Citations: Named style similar to ACL
- LaTeX Template: ACL/EMNLP official style
- Supplementary: Appendix unlimited, code encouraged
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/emnlp_article.tex
Website: https://www.emnlp.org/
---
ACL (Association for Computational Linguistics)
Conference Type: Premier NLP conference Frequency: Annual (July)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit: 8 pages (long), 4 pages (short), excluding references
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times, 11pt
- Anonymization: Required
- LaTeX Template: ACL official style (acl.sty)
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/acl_article.tex
---
USENIX Security Symposium
Conference Type: Top security conference Frequency: Annual (August)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit:
- Papers: No strict limit (typically 15-20 pages including everything)
- Well-written, concise papers preferred
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times, 10pt
- Anonymization: Required (double-blind)
- LaTeX Template: USENIX official template
- Citations: Numbered
- Paper size: US Letter
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/usenix_article.tex
Website: https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity
---
SIGIR (Information Retrieval)
Conference Type: Top information retrieval conference Frequency: Annual (July)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit:
- Full papers: 10 pages (excluding references)
- Short papers: 4 pages (excluding references)
- Format: Single-column ACM format
- LaTeX Class:
acmart(sigconf) - Anonymization: Required
- Citations: ACM style
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/sigir_article.tex
---
Biology & Bioinformatics
ISMB (Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology)
Conference Type: Premier computational biology conference Frequency: Annual (July)
Formatting Requirements:
- Publication: Proceedings published in Bioinformatics journal
- Page Limit:
- Typically 7-8 pages including figures and references
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times, 10pt
- Citations: Numbered (Oxford style similar to Bioinformatics journal)
- LaTeX Template: Oxford Bioinformatics template
- Anonymization: Not required (single-blind)
- Figures: High resolution, color acceptable
- Supplementary: Encouraged for additional data/methods
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/ismb_article.tex
Website: https://www.iscb.org/ismb
---
RECOMB (Research in Computational Molecular Biology)
Conference Type: Top computational biology conference Frequency: Annual (April/May)
Formatting Requirements:
- Publication: Proceedings published as Springer LNCS (Lecture Notes in Computer Science)
- Page Limit:
- Extended abstracts: 12-15 pages (including references)
- Format: Single-column
- Font: Based on Springer LNCS template
- LaTeX Class:
llncs(Springer) - Citations: Numbered or author-year
- Anonymization: Required (double-blind)
- Supplementary: Appendix can be submitted
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/recomb_article.tex
Website: https://www.recomb.org/
---
PSB (Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing)
Conference Type: Biomedical informatics conference Frequency: Annual (January)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit: 12 pages including figures and references
- Format: Single-column
- Font: Times, 11pt
- Margins: 1 inch all sides
- Citations: Numbered
- Anonymization: Not required
- Figures: Embedded in text
- LaTeX Template: PSB official template
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/psb_article.tex
Website: https://psb.stanford.edu/
---
Engineering
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit: 8 pages (including figures and references)
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times, 10pt
- LaTeX Class: IEEEtran
- Citations: IEEE style [1]
- Anonymization: Required for initial submission
- Video: Optional video submissions encouraged
LaTeX Template: assets/journals/icra_article.tex
---
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
Formatting: Same as ICRA (IEEE robotics template)
---
International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit: 8 pages
- Format: Two-column
- LaTeX Class: IEEE template
- Citations: IEEE style
---
Design Automation Conference (DAC)
Formatting Requirements:
- Page Limit: 6 pages
- Format: Two-column
- Font: Times, 10pt
- LaTeX Class: ACM or IEEE template (check yearly guidelines)
---
Multidisciplinary
AAAS Annual Meeting
Conference Type: Broad scientific conference Formatting: Varies by symposium (typically extended abstracts)
---
Quick Reference Table
| Conference | Pages | Format | Blind | Citations | Template |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NeurIPS | 8 + refs | Two-col | Double | [1] | neurips_article.tex |
| ICML | 8 + refs | Two-col | Double | [1] | icml_article.tex |
| ICLR | 8 + refs | Two-col | Double | [1] | iclr_article.tex |
| CVPR | 8 + refs | Two-col | Double | [1] | cvpr_article.tex |
| AAAI | 7 + refs | Two-col | Double | Various | aaai_article.tex |
| CHI | 10 + refs | Single-col | Double | ACM | chi_article.tex |
| SIGKDD | 9 + refs | Two-col | Double | ACM [1] | kdd_article.tex |
| EMNLP | 8 + refs | Two-col | Double | Named | emnlp_article.tex |
| ISMB | 7-8 pages | Two-col | Single | [1] | ismb_article.tex |
| RECOMB | 12-15 pages | Single-col | Double | Springer | recomb_article.tex |
---
General Conference Submission Guidelines
Anonymization Best Practices (Double-Blind Review)
Remove:
- Author names, affiliations, emails from title page
- Acknowledgments section
- Funding information that reveals identity
- Any "our previous work" citations that make identity obvious
Anonymize:
- Self-citations: "Smith et al. [5]" → "Anonymous et al. [5]" or "Prior work [5]"
- Institution-specific details: "our university" → "a large research university"
- Dataset names if they reveal identity
Keep Anonymous:
- Code repositories (use anonymous GitHub for review)
- Supplementary materials
- Any URLs or links
Supplementary Materials
Common Inclusions:
- Source code (GitHub repository, zip file)
- Additional experimental results
- Proofs and derivations
- Extended related work
- Dataset descriptions
- Video demonstrations
- Interactive demos
Best Practices:
- Keep supplementary well-organized
- Reference supplementary clearly from main paper
- Ensure supplementary is anonymized for blind review
- Check file size limits (typically 50-100 MB)
Camera-Ready Preparation
After acceptance: 1. De-anonymize: Add author names, affiliations 2. Add acknowledgments: Funding, contributions 3. Copyright: Add conference copyright notice 4. Formatting: Follow camera-ready specific guidelines 5. Page limit: May allow 1-2 extra pages (check guidelines) 6. PDF/A compliance: Some conferences require PDF/A format
Accessibility Considerations
For All Conferences:
- Use colorblind-safe color palettes
- Ensure sufficient contrast
- Provide alt text for figures (where supported)
- Use clear, readable fonts
- Avoid solely color-based distinctions
---
Common Mistakes to Avoid
1. Wrong style file: Using outdated conference style file 2. Page limit violation: Figures/tables pushing over limit 3. Font size manipulation: Changing fonts to fit more content 4. Margin adjustments: Modifying margins to gain space 5. De-anonymization: Accidentally revealing identity in blind review 6. Missing references: Not citing relevant prior work 7. Low-quality figures: Pixelated or illegible figures 8. Inconsistent formatting: Different sections using different styles
---
Getting Official Templates
Where to Find Official Templates: 1. Conference website: "Call for Papers" or "Author Instructions" 2. GitHub: Many conferences host templates on GitHub 3. Overleaf: Many official templates available on Overleaf 4. CTAN: LaTeX class files often on CTAN repository
Template Naming:
- Conferences often update templates yearly
- Use the correct year's template (e.g.,
neurips_2024.sty) - Check for "camera-ready" vs. "submission" versions
---
Notes
1. Annual updates: Conference requirements change; always check current year's CFP 2. Deadline types:
- Abstract deadline (often 1 week before paper deadline)
- Paper deadline (firm, no extensions typically)
- Supplementary deadline (may be a few days after paper)
3. Timezone: Pay attention to deadline timezone (often AOE - Anywhere on Earth) 4. Rebuttal: Many conferences have author response/rebuttal periods 5. Dual submission: Check conference policy on concurrent submissions 6. Poster/Oral: Acceptance often comes with presentation format
Conference Tiers (Informal)
Machine Learning:
- Tier 1: NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR
- Tier 2: AAAI, IJCAI, UAI
Computer Vision:
- Tier 1: CVPR, ICCV, ECCV
Natural Language Processing:
- Tier 1: ACL, EMNLP, NAACL
Bioinformatics:
- Tier 1: RECOMB, ISMB
- Tier 2: PSB, WABI
(Tiers are informal and field-dependent; not official rankings)
Grant Proposal Requirements
Comprehensive requirements and formatting guidelines for major federal and private foundation grant programs.
Last Updated: 2024
---
NSF (National Science Foundation)
Overview
Agency: National Science Foundation Typical Award: $100K-$500K per year, 3-5 years Success Rate: 20-25% (varies by program) Review Criteria: Intellectual Merit + Broader Impacts (equally weighted)
---
NSF Standard Grant Proposal
Page Limits (NSF PAPPG - Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide):
| Component | Page Limit | Font | Spacing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project Summary | 1 page | Any readable, 10pt+ | Any |
| Project Description | 15 pages | Times Roman 11pt or similar | Single |
| References Cited | No limit | Times Roman 11pt | Single |
| Biographical Sketch | 3 pages per person | Times Roman 11pt | Single |
| Budget Justification | 3-5 pages | Any readable | Any |
| Current & Pending Support | No limit | Times Roman 11pt | Single |
| Facilities, Equipment | 2 pages | Any readable | Any |
| Data Management Plan | 2 pages | Any readable | Any |
Margins: 1 inch (2.54 cm) on all sides (strictly enforced)
---
NSF Project Summary (1 page)
Required Sections (clearly labeled):
1. Overview (1-2 paragraphs)
- Concise description of research activity
- Objectives and methods
2. Intellectual Merit (1 paragraph)
- How project advances knowledge
- Innovation and transformative potential
- Qualifications of research team
3. Broader Impacts (1 paragraph)
- Benefits to society
- Broadening participation
- Dissemination and outreach
Format: Can be full-page text or sectioned Audience: Non-specialists (broad scientific community)
Template: assets/grants/nsf_project_summary.tex
---
NSF Project Description (15 pages)
Typical Structure:
1. Introduction/Background (2-3 pages)
- Current state of knowledge
- Research gap
- Preliminary work/feasibility
- Team qualifications
2. Research Plan (8-10 pages)
- Objectives and hypotheses
- Methods and approach
- Timeline and milestones
- Expected outcomes
3. Broader Impacts (1-2 pages)
- Educational activities
- Broadening participation (underrepresented groups)
- Dissemination (publications, conferences, public outreach)
- Societal benefits
4. Results from Prior NSF Support (1 page, if applicable)
- Required if PI has had NSF support in past 5 years
- Intellectual merit and broader impacts of prior work
- Publications from prior NSF grants
Key Requirements:
- Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts integrated throughout
- Figures and tables allowed (count toward page limit)
- Citations to references (use References Cited section)
Template: assets/grants/nsf_proposal_template.tex
---
NSF Biographical Sketch (3 pages)
Required Sections: 1. Professional Preparation: Institutions, degrees, fields 2. Appointments: Current and previous positions 3. Products: Up to 5 most relevant, up to 5 other significant products
- Can include publications, datasets, software, patents
4. Synergistic Activities: Up to 5 examples of impact beyond research
Format:
- NSF template must be used (SciENcv or NSF-approved format)
- No longer uses "Publications" but "Products"
---
NSF Broader Impacts
NSF-Recognized Categories (demonstrate ≥1): 1. Advance discovery while promoting teaching/learning 2. Broaden participation of underrepresented groups 3. Disseminate broadly to enhance scientific/technological understanding 4. Benefits to society (economic, health, environment, national security) 5. Develop scientific workforce and infrastructure
Best Practices:
- Be specific with measurable outcomes
- Explain how activities will be assessed
- Integrate with research (don't treat as "add-on")
- Budget for broader impacts activities
Examples:
- K-12 outreach programs
- Curriculum development
- Training underrepresented students
- Public science communication
- Open-source software development
---
NSF Budget
Typical Categories:
- Senior Personnel: PI, co-PIs (% effort, salary)
- Other Personnel: Postdocs, graduate students, undergrads
- Fringe Benefits: Institutional rates
- Equipment: Items >$5,000
- Travel: Domestic and foreign
- Participant Support: Workshops, conferences (separate category)
- Other Direct Costs: Materials, publication, subawards
- Indirect Costs: Institutional F&A rate
Budget Justification: Explain need for each item
---
NSF Data Management Plan (2 pages)
Required Content:
- Types of data produced
- Standards for data format and metadata
- Policies for access and sharing
- Policies for re-use and redistribution
- Plans for archiving and preservation
Acceptable Approaches:
- Deposit in domain-specific repository
- Institutional repository
- Data available upon request (with restrictions justification)
---
NSF Review Process
Review Criteria (equally weighted):
1. Intellectual Merit:
- What is the potential to advance knowledge?
- How well-conceived and organized?
- Qualifications of PI and team?
- Availability of resources?
2. Broader Impacts:
- What are the potential benefits to society?
- How well-suited to achieve broader impacts?
Panel Review: Proposals reviewed by panel of experts Timeline: Typically 6 months from deadline to award decision
---
NSF LaTeX Templates
- Full Proposal:
assets/grants/nsf_proposal_template.tex - Project Summary:
assets/grants/nsf_project_summary.tex - Biographical Sketch: Use NSF SciENcv or template
Resources:
- NSF PAPPG: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg
- NSF Fastlane: https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/
---
NIH (National Institutes of Health)
Overview
Agency: National Institutes of Health Funding Mechanisms:
- R01: Research Project Grant (most common)
- R21: Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant
- K Awards: Career Development Awards
Success Rate: 10-20% (varies by institute and mechanism)
---
NIH R01 Research Grant
Page Limits (Research Strategy):
| Component | Page Limit | Font | Spacing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specific Aims | 1 page | Arial 11pt minimum | Any |
| Research Strategy | 12 pages | Arial 11pt minimum | 0.5 inch margins minimum |
| - Significance | Part of 12 | ||
| - Innovation | Part of 12 | ||
| - Approach | Part of 12 | ||
| Bibliography | No limit | Arial 11pt | |
| Biographical Sketch | 5 pages per person | Arial 11pt |
Margins: 0.5 inch minimum (all sides) Paper Size: Letter (8.5 × 11 inches)
---
NIH Specific Aims Page (1 page)
THE MOST CRITICAL COMPONENT
Structure (recommended):
1. Opening paragraph (2-3 sentences)
- Hook: Significance of problem
- Gap: What's not known
2. Long-term goal (1 sentence)
- Overarching research vision
3. Objective (1-2 sentences)
- What this proposal will accomplish
- Central hypothesis
4. Rationale (2-3 sentences)
- Why you expect success
- Preliminary data supporting hypothesis
5. Specific Aims (3 aims typical)
- Aim 1: [Title]. [1-2 sentence description. Working hypothesis. Expected outcome.]
- Aim 2: [Title]. [1-2 sentence description. Working hypothesis. Expected outcome.]
- Aim 3: [Title]. [1-2 sentence description. Working hypothesis. Expected outcome.]
6. Payoff paragraph (2-3 sentences)
- Impact and significance
- Innovation
- Future directions
Best Practices:
- Crystal clear, compelling narrative
- State hypothesis explicitly
- Explain expected outcomes
- Show innovation and impact
Template: assets/grants/nih_specific_aims.tex
---
NIH Research Strategy (12 pages)
Required Sections:
1. Significance (typically 2-3 pages)
- Importance: Critical barrier to progress
- Knowledge gap: What's not known
- Impact: How project advances field
- Rigor: Scientific premise/prior work
- References: Cite key literature
2. Innovation (typically 1-2 pages)
- Novelty: New concepts, approaches, methods
- Challenge paradigms: Shift thinking
- Refined/new methodologies: Technical innovation
- Novel applications: Existing tools in new ways
3. Approach (typically 7-9 pages)
For Each Aim:
- Rationale: Why this aim
- Experimental design: Detailed methods
- Expected outcomes: What results mean
- Potential problems & alternatives: Mitigation strategies
- Rigor and reproducibility: Controls, replication, statistics
- Timeline: When each aim completed
Additional Approach Content:
- Preliminary data (critical for R01)
- Power analyses for sample sizes
- Statistical analysis plans
- Rigor of prior research cited
---
NIH Biographical Sketch (5 pages)
Sections (NIH format): 1. Personal Statement (4 sentences explaining why you're suited) 2. Positions, Honors, and Scientific Appointments 3. Contributions to Science (Up to 5 contributions, up to 4 pubs each) 4. Research Support (current and completed grants, overlap checked)
Format: Must use NIH template (fillable PDF or format page)
---
NIH Review Criteria
Scored Criteria (1-9 scale, 1=best): 1. Significance: Importance, impact 2. Investigator(s): Qualifications, track record 3. Innovation: Novel concepts, methods 4. Approach: Feasibility, rigor, design 5. Environment: Institutional support, resources
Additional Considerations (not scored but noted):
- Vertebrate animals
- Biohazards
- Human subjects protections
- Inclusion of women, minorities, children
- Budget appropriateness
Overall Impact Score: 1-9 (synthesizes all criteria)
---
NIH R21 (Exploratory Grant)
Key Differences from R01:
- Research Strategy: 6 pages (vs. 12 for R01)
- Duration: 2 years maximum
- Budget: $275K total costs over 2 years
- Preliminary data: Not required (exploratory nature)
- Purpose: High-risk, high-reward projects; new directions
When to Choose R21 vs. R01:
- R21: Early-stage, limited preliminary data, high-risk
- R01: Established line of research, strong preliminary data
---
NIH K Awards (Career Development)
Mechanisms:
- K01: Mentored Research Scientist Development Award
- K08: Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award
- K23: Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award
- K99/R00: Pathway to Independence Award (postdoc to faculty)
Key Components:
- Career Development Plan: Training goals, timeline
- Research Plan: 6-12 pages (mechanism-dependent)
- Mentor(s): Letters of support, mentoring plan
- Institutional Commitment: Environment, resources
- Protected Time: 75% research effort typical
---
NIH Budget
Modular vs. Detailed:
- Modular: ≤$250K direct costs per year (25K increments)
- Detailed: >$250K direct costs per year
Modular Budget: Only need budget justification for personnel, consortium, equipment >$25K
Budget Period: Year-by-year (usually 5 years for R01)
---
NIH LaTeX Templates
- R01 Full Proposal:
assets/grants/nih_r01_template.tex - Specific Aims:
assets/grants/nih_specific_aims.tex - Biographical Sketch: Use NIH fillable PDF or format page
Resources:
- NIH Application Guide: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/how-to-apply-application-guide.html
- SF424 Forms: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/how-to-apply-application-guide/forms-e/general-forms-e.pdf
---
DOE (Department of Energy)
Overview
Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Offices:
- Office of Science: Basic research (BES, BER, ASCR, NP, HEP, FES)
- ARPA-E: High-risk, high-reward energy technologies
- EERE: Energy efficiency and renewable energy
Typical Award: $200K-$1M per year, 3 years Success Rate: 10-30% (varies by program)
---
DOE Office of Science Proposal
Page Limits (typical, varies by FOA):
| Component | Page Limit | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Project Narrative | 10-20 pages | Times 11pt, 1" margins |
| References | No limit | |
| Budget Justification | 3-5 pages | |
| Biographical Sketches | 2-3 pages each | |
| Current & Pending | No limit | |
| Facilities & Resources | No limit | |
| Data Management Plan | 2 pages |
---
DOE Project Narrative Structure
Typical Sections:
1. Background and Significance (2-3 pages)
- Energy relevance
- Current state of knowledge
- Research need
2. Preliminary Work (1-2 pages)
- Team's qualifications
- Relevant prior results
3. Research Plan (10-15 pages)
- Objectives: Clear goals
- Technical approach: Detailed methods
- Milestones and deliverables: Specific, measurable
- Timeline: Gantt chart common
- Team and management: Roles, collaboration
4. Broader Impacts (1-2 pages)
- Workforce development
- Technology transfer potential
- Publications and dissemination
---
DOE-Specific Requirements
Energy Relevance: Must clearly tie to DOE mission
- Basic science: Fundamental understanding for energy applications
- Applied: Energy efficiency, renewable energy, grid, storage
Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs): Often required to specify
- TRL 1-3: Basic research, proof of concept
- TRL 4-6: Component/subsystem validation
- TRL 7-9: System demonstration, deployment
National Laboratory Collaboration: Encouraged
- Include lab scientists as co-PIs or collaborators
- Letter of collaboration from lab
Cost Sharing: Sometimes required (check FOA)
- Can be in-kind (equipment, time)
- Must be documented
---
DOE Budget Considerations
Allowable Costs:
- Personnel (salaries, benefits)
- Equipment
- Travel (especially to DOE national labs)
- Materials and supplies
- Subcontracts
- Indirect costs (negotiated F&A rate)
Unallowable:
- Construction
- Entertainment
- Some indirect costs (depends on institution type)
---
DOE LaTeX Template
Template: assets/grants/doe_proposal_template.tex
Resources:
- DOE Office of Science Funding: https://science.osti.gov/grants
- EERE Funding: https://www.energy.gov/eere/funding/eere-funding-opportunities
---
DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency)
Overview
Agency: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DoD) Mission: High-risk, high-reward research for national security Typical Award: $500K-$5M per year, 2-4 years Success Rate: 5-15% (highly competitive)
---
DARPA BAA (Broad Agency Announcement) Response
Page Limits (typical, varies by BAA):
| Component | Page Limit | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Technical and Management Proposal | 20-25 pages | Times 12pt, 1" margins |
| Cost Proposal | Separate volume |
---
DARPA Technical Proposal Structure
Key Sections:
1. Executive Summary (1 page)
- Vision and impact
- Technical approach overview
- Team qualifications
2. Heilmeier Catechism (1-2 pages) DARPA requires answering these questions:
- What are you trying to do? Articulate objectives without jargon
- How is it done today? Limitations? Current practice and shortcomings
- What is new in your approach? Innovation
- Who cares? Impact if successful
- If successful, what difference will it make? Transformation
- What are the risks? Technical risks and mitigation
- How much will it cost? Budget overview
- How long will it take? Timeline
- What are the mid-term and final exams? Milestones for success
3. Technical Approach (10-15 pages)
- Detailed technical plan
- Task breakdown
- Risk mitigation
- Innovation justification
4. Management Plan (2-3 pages)
- Team organization
- Key personnel roles
- Collaboration approach
- Milestone schedule (Gantt chart)
5. Capabilities and Experience (2-3 pages)
- Team qualifications
- Relevant facilities and equipment
- Similar past programs
6. Transition Plan (1-2 pages)
- Path to DoD transition
- End users identified
- Technology transfer approach
---
DARPA-Specific Considerations
Engagement with Program Manager (PM):
- Strongly encouraged to contact PM before submission
- Discuss idea alignment with program goals
- PM can provide feedback on approach
Transformative Impact:
- Must demonstrate potential for "game-changing" impact
- Not incremental improvements
Technical Risk:
- High-risk approaches acceptable (even encouraged)
- Must show mitigation strategies
National Security Relevance:
- Clear connection to defense applications
- Dual-use (civilian + military) often valuable
Metrics for Success:
- Quantifiable milestones
- "Go/no-go" decision points
---
DARPA Budget
Full Cost Accounting: Detailed justification required
- Labor: Hourly rates, hours per task
- Materials: Itemized
- Equipment: Justification for purchases
- Travel: Specific trips with purpose
- Subcontracts: Detailed subcontract budgets
- Indirect Costs: Negotiated rates
Cost Realism: Budget must be realistic for proposed work
---
DARPA LaTeX Template
Template: assets/grants/darpa_baa_response.tex
Resources:
- DARPA Opportunities: https://www.darpa.mil/work-with-us/opportunities
- BAA Listings: SAM.gov (formerly FedBizOpps)
---
Private Foundations
Gates Foundation
Focus Areas: Global health, poverty alleviation, education Typical Award: Varies widely ($100K to $10M+)
Proposal Requirements:
- Letter of Inquiry (2-3 pages): Initial screening
- Full Proposal (if invited): 10-15 pages
- Theory of Change: How intervention leads to impact
- Monitoring & Evaluation: Metrics, data collection
Key Emphases:
- Scalability and sustainability
- Impact in low-resource settings
- Partnerships with local organizations
- Data-driven decision making
---
Wellcome Trust
Focus: Biomedical research, global health Geographic: UK and international Typical Award: £100K to £5M
Proposal Format (varies by scheme):
- Investigator Awards: Track record and research vision
- Project Grants: Specific research project
- Career Development: Early/mid-career researchers
Requirements:
- Research plan
- Track record
- Value for money justification
- Patient and public involvement
---
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)
Type: Investigator appointments (not grants) Award: ~$9M over 7 years (renewable) Focus: Biomedical research, early-career scientists
Selection:
- Nomination by institution
- Track record of innovation
- Research vision for next 5-7 years
- Scientific leadership potential
---
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI)
Focus: Science, education, justice & opportunity Award Types:
- Imaging: Advanced imaging technologies
- Neurodegeneration Challenge: AD, ALS, PD, FTD
- Single-Cell Biology: Tools and resources
Emphasis:
- Open science (data sharing, open-source)
- Collaboration across institutions
- Technology development
- Diversity and inclusion
---
Quick Reference Table
| Agency | Typical Award | Duration | Key Criteria | Template |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSF | $100K-500K/yr | 3-5 yrs | Intellectual Merit + Broader Impacts | nsf_proposal_template.tex |
| NIH R01 | $250K-500K/yr | 5 yrs | Significance, Innovation, Approach | nih_r01_template.tex |
| NIH R21 | $275K total | 2 yrs | Exploratory, high-risk | nih_r21_template.tex |
| DOE | $200K-1M/yr | 3 yrs | Energy relevance, TRLs | doe_proposal_template.tex |
| DARPA | $500K-5M/yr | 2-4 yrs | Transformative, Heilmeier | darpa_baa_response.tex |
---
General Best Practices
Writing Effective Proposals
1. Start early: 2-3 months minimum 2. Read the call carefully: Follow requirements exactly 3. Know your reviewers: Write for expert audience 4. Tell a story: Compelling narrative with clear logic 5. Be specific: Concrete objectives, methods, outcomes 6. Show feasibility: Preliminary data, expertise 7. Address weaknesses: Acknowledge and mitigate risks
Common Mistakes to Avoid
1. Vague objectives: "Understand X" → "Determine whether X causes Y" 2. Lack of innovation: Incremental vs. transformative 3. Poor broader impacts (NSF): Generic, unintegrated 4. Weak specific aims (NIH): Most critical page! 5. Missing preliminary data: Show feasibility 6. Unrealistic timeline: Be honest about what's achievable 7. Formatting violations: Auto-rejection possible 8. Typos and errors: Suggests lack of care
Timeline for Proposal Development
3 months before deadline:
- Identify opportunity
- Assemble team
- Outline aims/objectives
2 months before:
- Draft aims/objectives
- Preliminary budget
- Contact program officer (if allowed)
1 month before:
- Full first draft
- Internal review
- Revise based on feedback
2 weeks before:
- Final revisions
- Proofread carefully
- Assemble all documents
1 week before:
- Institutional review/approval
- Budget finalization
- Submission system upload
2 days before:
- Final check
- Submit (don't wait until deadline!)
---
Resources
Grant Writing Guides
- NSF PAPPG: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg
- NIH Application Guide: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/how-to-apply-application-guide.html
- GrantForward (database): https://www.grantforward.com/
- Pivot (database): https://pivot.proquest.com/
Institutional Resources
- Office of Sponsored Research (OSR)
- Grant writing workshops
- Internal mock reviews
- Budget/compliance offices
---
Summary
Key Takeaways:
1. Know the agency: Different missions, different emphases 2. Follow the rules: Page limits, fonts, margins strictly enforced 3. Tell a compelling story: Clear problem, innovative solution, feasible plan 4. Demonstrate impact: Intellectual merit (NSF/NIH) or mission relevance (DOE/DARPA) 5. Show feasibility: Preliminary data, team expertise, resources 6. Budget realistically: Justify all costs 7. Proofread carefully: Typos undermine credibility 8. Submit early: Technical glitches happen
Remember: Grant writing is a skill developed over time. Seek feedback, revise, and persist!
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Customize Template Script
Customize LaTeX templates with author information and project details.
Usage:
python customize_template.py --template nature_article.tex --output my_paper.tex
python customize_template.py --template nature_article.tex --title "My Research" --output my_paper.tex
python customize_template.py --interactive
"""
import argparse
import re
from pathlib import Path
def get_skill_path():
"""Get the path to the venue-templates skill directory."""
script_dir = Path(__file__).parent
skill_dir = script_dir.parent
return skill_dir
def find_template(template_name):
"""Find template file in assets directory."""
skill_path = get_skill_path()
assets_path = skill_path / "assets"
# Search in all subdirectories
for subdir in ["journals", "posters", "grants"]:
template_path = assets_path / subdir / template_name
if template_path.exists():
return template_path
return None
def customize_template(template_path, output_path, **kwargs):
"""Customize a template with provided information."""
# Read template
with open(template_path, 'r') as f:
content = f.read()
# Replace placeholders
replacements = {
'title': (
[r'Insert Your Title Here[^}]*', r'Your [^}]*Title[^}]*Here[^}]*'],
kwargs.get('title', '')
),
'authors': (
[r'First Author\\textsuperscript\{1\}, Second Author[^}]*',
r'First Author.*Second Author.*Third Author'],
kwargs.get('authors', '')
),
'affiliations': (
[r'Department Name, Institution Name, City, State[^\\]*',
r'Department of [^,]*, University Name[^\\]*'],
kwargs.get('affiliations', '')
),
'email': (
[r'first\.author@university\.edu',
r'\[email protected\]'],
kwargs.get('email', '')
)
}
# Apply replacements
modified = False
for key, (patterns, replacement) in replacements.items():
if replacement:
for pattern in patterns:
if re.search(pattern, content):
content = re.sub(pattern, replacement, content, count=1)
modified = True
print(f"✓ Replaced {key}")
# Write output
with open(output_path, 'w') as f:
f.write(content)
if modified:
print(f"\n✓ Customized template saved to: {output_path}")
else:
print(f"\n⚠️ Template copied to: {output_path}")
print(" No customizations applied (no matching placeholders found or no values provided)")
print(f"\nNext steps:")
print(f"1. Open {output_path} in your LaTeX editor")
print(f"2. Replace remaining placeholders")
print(f"3. Add your content")
print(f"4. Compile with pdflatex or your preferred LaTeX compiler")
def interactive_mode():
"""Run in interactive mode."""
print("\n=== Template Customization (Interactive Mode) ===\n")
# List available templates
skill_path = get_skill_path()
assets_path = skill_path / "assets"
print("Available templates:\n")
templates = []
for i, subdir in enumerate(["journals", "posters", "grants"], 1):
subdir_path = assets_path / subdir
if subdir_path.exists():
print(f"{subdir.upper()}:")
for j, template_file in enumerate(sorted(subdir_path.glob("*.tex")), 1):
templates.append(template_file)
print(f" {len(templates)}. {template_file.name}")
print()
# Select template
while True:
try:
choice = int(input(f"Select template (1-{len(templates)}): "))
if 1 <= choice <= len(templates):
template_path = templates[choice - 1]
break
else:
print(f"Please enter a number between 1 and {len(templates)}")
except ValueError:
print("Please enter a valid number")
print(f"\nSelected: {template_path.name}\n")
# Get customization info
title = input("Paper title (press Enter to skip): ").strip()
authors = input("Authors (e.g., 'John Doe, Jane Smith') (press Enter to skip): ").strip()
affiliations = input("Affiliations (press Enter to skip): ").strip()
email = input("Corresponding email (press Enter to skip): ").strip()
# Output file
default_output = f"my_{template_path.stem}.tex"
output = input(f"Output filename [{default_output}]: ").strip()
if not output:
output = default_output
output_path = Path(output)
# Customize
print()
customize_template(
template_path,
output_path,
title=title,
authors=authors,
affiliations=affiliations,
email=email
)
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
description="Customize LaTeX templates with author and project information",
formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter,
epilog="""
Examples:
%(prog)s --interactive
%(prog)s --template nature_article.tex --output my_paper.tex
%(prog)s --template neurips_article.tex --title "My ML Research" --output my_neurips.tex
"""
)
parser.add_argument('--template', type=str, help='Template filename')
parser.add_argument('--output', type=str, help='Output filename')
parser.add_argument('--title', type=str, help='Paper title')
parser.add_argument('--authors', type=str, help='Author names')
parser.add_argument('--affiliations', type=str, help='Institutions/affiliations')
parser.add_argument('--email', type=str, help='Corresponding author email')
parser.add_argument('--interactive', action='store_true', help='Run in interactive mode')
args = parser.parse_args()
# Interactive mode
if args.interactive:
interactive_mode()
return
# Command-line mode
if not args.template or not args.output:
print("Error: --template and --output are required (or use --interactive)")
parser.print_help()
return
# Find template
template_path = find_template(args.template)
if not template_path:
print(f"Error: Template '{args.template}' not found")
print("\nSearched in:")
skill_path = get_skill_path()
for subdir in ["journals", "posters", "grants"]:
print(f" - {skill_path}/assets/{subdir}/")
return
# Customize
output_path = Path(args.output)
customize_template(
template_path,
output_path,
title=args.title,
authors=args.authors,
affiliations=args.affiliations,
email=args.email
)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()