Industry Standard Reviewer
- 180 installs
- 2 repo stars
- Updated January 25, 2026
- jorgealves/agent_skills
Run pre-merge reviews that benchmark diffs against common industry conventions for structure, safety, observability, and maintainability beyond linter output.
About
industry-standard-reviewer evaluates pull requests and patches against broadly accepted software engineering practices, spanning readability, testing discipline, error handling, and operational readiness. It helps teams enforce consistent quality bars during code review without relying solely on automated formatters or ad-hoc opinions.
- Checks naming, layering, and API contract hygiene
- Flags missing tests, logging, and error handling
- Compares patterns to widely adopted style guides
- Surfaces security and performance smell regressions
- Generates structured review comments for PRs
Industry Standard Reviewer by the numbers
- 180 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +8 installs in the week ending Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #354 of 1,352 Code Review & Quality skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/jorgealves/agent_skills --skill industry-standard-reviewerAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 180 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 2 |
| Last updated | January 25, 2026 |
| Repository | jorgealves/agent_skills ↗ |
What it does
Run pre-merge reviews that benchmark diffs against common industry conventions for structure, safety, observability, and maintainability beyond linter output.
Files
Industry Standard Reviewer
Purpose and Intent
The industry-standard-reviewer helps bridge the gap between "student code" and "professional code." It provides feedback that focuses on the soft and hard skills required to succeed in a professional engineering environment.
When to Use
- Final Project Reviews: Use this to give students a "real-world" experience of what a rigorous code review feels like.
- Career Preparation: Helps students learn the professional tone and common "clean code" critiques.
When NOT to Use
- Initial Learning: For absolute beginners, this level of critique might be overwhelming. Use the
pedagogical-code-graderfirst.
Security and Data-Handling Considerations
- Local processing of code snippets; ensures student privacy.
name: industry-standard-reviewer
version: 1.0.0
description: Simulates a Senior Engineer PR review to teach professional communication and industry naming standards. Use to prepare students for professional engineering environments and code review cultures.
inputs:
submission_diff:
type: string
required: true
persona_level:
type: string
enum: [supportive, strict, pragmatic]
default: pragmatic
outputs:
review_comments:
type: array
items:
type: object
capabilities:
- Tone and style analysis.
- Focus on Clean Code principles.
constraints:
- Simulated review; does not replace human mentor.
security:
- Diff data processed locally.
examples:
- input:
submission_diff: "var a = 1;"
output:
review_comments: [{comment: "Rename 'a' to something descriptive."}]Related skills
Improve Codebase ArchitectureSafely deepen clusters of shallow modules into cohesive, testable units while respecting their external dependencies.566k196k
Caveman ReviewGet ultra-compressed, one-line code review comments that cut noise while keeping every actionable fix.270k94.7kCodebase DesignShared vocabulary for designing deep modules: improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable.266k196kCavecrewDelegate coding tasks to specialized subagents that return compressed output, keeping the main context window usable for much longer sessions.220k94.7kCode ReviewReviews a branch or PR diff on two axes at once: conformance to coding standards plus a code-smell baseline, and whether it actually implements the original spec.201k196k
Requesting Code ReviewDispatch a consistent, high-signal code reviewer subagent that catches plan deviations and quality issues before merging or continuing development.183k264k