
4a Feedback
- 19 installs
- 10 repo stars
- Updated April 17, 2026
- kangarooking/no-rules-rules-skill
Learn organizational practices for building high-performance teams and culture
About
Netflix culture principle on 4a feedback. Key practice for creating high-trust, high-performing organizations.
- Lessons from Netflix's organizational culture
- Practical implementation patterns
4a Feedback by the numbers
- 19 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +2 installs in the week ending Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #2,032 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/kangarooking/no-rules-rules-skill --skill 4a-feedbackAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 19 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 10 |
| Last updated | April 17, 2026 |
| Repository | kangarooking/no-rules-rules-skill ↗ |
What it does
Learn organizational practices for building high-performance teams and culture
Files
R - 原文摘录 (Reading)
"目的在于帮助(Aim to assist)、反馈应具有可行性(Actionable)、感激与赞赏(Appreciate)、接受或拒绝(Accept or discard)。"
I - 诠释理解 (Interpretation)
The 4A framework has two sides. GIVING side: (1) Aim to assist — feedback must intend to help, not vent; (2) Actionable — must tell receiver what specifically to change. RECEIVING side: (3) Appreciate — listen with gratitude, suppress defensive instinct; (4) Accept or discard — receiver decides whether to act, but must thank the giver. The framework creates a structured bilateral contract for feedback.
4A框架将反馈从"单向指责"重构为"双向契约"。给予方承担意图和可行性的责任,接收方承担倾听和感恩的责任,但不承担执行的责任——这消除了反馈中最大的心理负担。
A1 - 过往案例 (Past Application)
1. Doug给Jordan的反馈:Doug gave feedback to Jordan about his behavior in India — Jordan accepted and changed. 这说明当反馈符合4A标准时,即使是跨文化敏感问题也能被有效传达和接受。
2. Roselle邮件反馈Reed:Roselle emailed Reed about his tone toward Patty — Reed thanked her. CEO级别也能接受来自下属的反馈,关键在于Reed执行了第3A(Appreciate)和第4A(Accept)。
3. Erin的Cuba演讲反馈:Erin received feedback during her Cuba speech about only calling on Americans — she adjusted immediately. 即时反馈 + 即时修正的案例,展示了4A框架在公开场合的效力。
A2 - 触发条件 (Future Trigger)
当出现以下场景时激活本技能:
- User is giving or receiving feedback and wants to do it constructively
- User is avoiding a difficult conversation
- User asks "how do I tell my colleague/manager..."
- User's team has feedback avoidance culture
- 用户在纠结"要不要说"或"怎么说才好"
- 团队中出现回避批评、只说好话的文化倾向
E - 执行步骤 (Execution)
Step 1: 给予反馈前的自检
Before giving feedback, check: Is my intent to help? Can I state the specific change I'm suggesting? If not, don't give it yet.
- 问自己两个问题:我的目的是帮助对方吗?我能说出具体建议改变什么吗?
- 如果任一答案为"否",先不要给反馈——整理思路后再来。
Step 2: 接收反馈时的第一反应
When receiving feedback, first say "thank you" — suppress the urge to explain or defend.
- 收到反馈时,第一句话说"谢谢"。
- 压制住解释、辩解、反驳的冲动。不需要当场回应内容,只需要表达感谢。
Step 3: 处理反馈后的决策
After processing, decide: accept and act, or discard — but always thank the giver. You don't owe compliance, you owe gratitude.
- 消化反馈后,自主决定:接受并执行,还是拒绝。
- 无论是否采纳,都必须感谢给予者。
- 你不欠对方"照做",你欠对方"感恩"。
B - 边界与限制 (Boundary)
- Don't give corrective feedback while angry ("还在气头上切勿发表批评意见")。情绪激动时的反馈违反第1A(Aim to assist),因为真实意图已变成发泄而非帮助。
- Don't confuse impulsiveness with candor。坦率不等于冲动。真正的坦率是经过思考的、有建设性的诚实。
- Not suitable for cultures where direct feedback is considered rude without adaptation (see cross-cultural-feedback skill)。在重视面子和谐的文化中,4A框架需要适配——但核心原则不变。
- The "brilliant jerk" trap:用"我只是直率"为借口进行人身攻击,违反4A第1条原则。4A不是"毒舌许可证"。
- 不适用于紧急危机场景:当时间紧迫需要立即行动时,先执行再反馈,不要在火灾现场讨论谁放的火。
{
"skill": "4a-feedback",
"version": "0.1.0",
"source_book": "《不拘一格》 里德·哈斯廷斯 / 艾琳·迈耶",
"darwin_compatible": true,
"test_cases": [
{
"id": "st-001",
"category": "should_trigger",
"prompt": "I need to give a team member negative feedback about their presentation skills but I'm afraid it will hurt our relationship. How should I approach this?",
"expected_behavior": "Should trigger the 4a-feedback skill and provide guidance on delivering constructive feedback using the 4A framework (Aim to Assist, Actionable, Appreciated).",
"tags": ["giving feedback", "difficult conversation", "negative feedback"]
},
{
"id": "st-002",
"category": "should_trigger",
"prompt": "My team avoids honest feedback and everything stays polite but superficial. How do I build a real feedback culture?",
"expected_behavior": "Should trigger the 4a-feedback skill and address building a feedback culture based on radical candor principles from the book.",
"tags": ["team feedback culture", "honest feedback", "team dynamics"]
},
{
"id": "st-003",
"category": "should_trigger",
"prompt": "How do I tell someone something negative without being mean? I want to be honest but not cruel.",
"expected_behavior": "Should trigger the 4a-feedback skill and explain how to deliver negative feedback constructively using the 4A method.",
"tags": ["difficult conversation", "negative feedback", "communication"]
},
{
"id": "st-004",
"category": "should_trigger",
"prompt": "A colleague's code reviews are consistently unhelpful and dismissive. I want to give them feedback on how they review code but I'm not sure how to frame it.",
"expected_behavior": "Should trigger the 4a-feedback skill and guide the user through structuring actionable feedback about a colleague's behavior.",
"tags": ["giving feedback", "actionable feedback", "workplace communication"]
},
{
"id": "snt-001",
"category": "should_not_trigger",
"prompt": "Help me write an angry email to my boss about being underpaid. I want to make sure they feel my frustration.",
"expected_behavior": "Should NOT trigger the 4a-feedback skill. This is about venting anger, not constructive feedback. The prompt seeks escalation rather than feedback improvement.",
"tags": ["anger", "escalation", "not feedback"]
},
{
"id": "snt-002",
"category": "should_not_trigger",
"prompt": "What do you think of my code? Here is a snippet I wrote for a sorting algorithm.",
"expected_behavior": "Should NOT trigger the 4a-feedback skill. This is a request for code review/evaluation, not about learning how to give or receive interpersonal feedback.",
"tags": ["code review", "general evaluation", "not interpersonal feedback"]
},
{
"id": "ec-001",
"category": "edge_case",
"prompt": "I want to give feedback to a colleague about their personal appearance and hygiene. It's affecting how clients perceive our team. How should I handle this?",
"expected_behavior": "Should trigger the skill with caveats. The 4A framework can apply, but this scenario requires special handling due to HR sensitivities and legal considerations. The skill should acknowledge this is a delicate situation that may require HR involvement.",
"tags": ["personal appearance", "sensitive topic", "HR boundary", "delicate feedback"]
}
],
"minimum_pass_rate": 0.8,
"notes": "Test cases for the 4A feedback model from No Rules Rules. The 4A framework emphasizes feedback that is Aimed to Assist, Actionable, and received with Appreciation. Edge cases should be handled carefully when topics drift into HR-sensitive territory."
}