
Dify Docs Reader Test
- 3 installs
- 174 repo stars
- Updated August 4, 2026
- langgenius/dify-docs
Helps with testing & qa tasks.
About
dify-docs-reader-test is a Claude Code skill for testing & qa. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted development.
- dify-docs-reader-test
- Testing & QA
- AI-coding skill
Dify Docs Reader Test by the numbers
- 3 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- Ranked #1,648 of 2,153 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/langgenius/dify-docs --skill dify-docs-reader-testAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 3 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 174 |
| Last updated | August 4, 2026 |
| Repository | langgenius/dify-docs ↗ |
What it does
Helps with testing & qa tasks.
Files
Reader Experience Test
Purpose
Verify documentation from the reader's perspective. A clean-context agent reads the finished document as the target persona, with no access to source material, codebase, or prior conversation.
How to Invoke
Dispatch a subagent with exactly two inputs: 1. The document content (the page just written or updated) 2. The reader persona description (from the writing skill being used)
Do NOT provide: source material, codebase access, prior conversation, or any context the reader wouldn't have.
What the Test Agent Checks
- Can I accomplish the task described without prior knowledge?
- Are there steps that assume context not provided on this page?
- Are there terms used without explanation (and not in the glossary)?
- Is the information I need actually here, or do I have to guess?
- Do the code examples make sense on their own?
- After reading, do I know what to do next?
What the Test Agent Does NOT Do
- Style or formatting review (that is the writer's job)
- Fact-check against the codebase (that is the writer's job)
- Rewrite anything—only report what was confusing
Output Format
Structured feedback:
- Got stuck at: [section/step where understanding broke down]
- Didn't understand: [terms, concepts, or references that were unclear]
- Missing context: [assumptions the document makes that weren't established]
- Verdict: Clear / Minor gaps / Needs revision