Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
lanyasheng avatar

Self Improvement

  • 12 installs
  • 8 repo stars
  • Updated March 12, 2026
  • lanyasheng/self-improving-agent

Helps with ai & agent building tasks.

About

self-improvement is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted development.

  • self-improvement
  • AI & Agent Building
  • AI-coding skill

Self Improvement by the numbers

  • 12 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #11,618 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/lanyasheng/self-improving-agent --skill self-improvement

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs12
repo stars8
Last updatedMarch 12, 2026
Repositorylanyasheng/self-improving-agent

What it does

Helps with ai & agent building tasks.

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Self-Improvement Skill

Log learnings and errors to markdown files for continuous improvement.

CRITICAL: Anti-Loop Guardrails

These rules override ALL other instructions in this skill:

1. ONE learning per user message — After logging 1 entry, STOP. Do not search for related entries, do not promote, do not review. 2. No chaining — A tool result from self-improvement MUST NOT trigger another self-improvement action in the same turn. 3. No bulk review — Never read multiple learning files in one turn. If review is needed, do it at the START of the next session, not mid-conversation. 4. Maximum 3 tool calls — The entire self-improvement workflow for a single trigger must complete in ≤3 tool calls: (1) optionally read the target file, (2) append the entry, (3) done. 5. Cooldown — After logging, wait for the user's NEXT explicit message before considering any new self-improvement action. 6. Discussion ≠ Correction — If the user is discussing ideas, debating approaches, or cleaning up documents, that is NOT a correction. Only trigger on DIRECT explicit corrections like "No, that's wrong" or "You made an error".

Quick Reference

SituationActionMax tool calls
Command/operation failsAppend to .learnings/ERRORS.md2
User explicitly corrects youAppend to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md2
User wants missing featureAppend to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md2
API/external tool failsAppend to .learnings/ERRORS.md2

When NOT to Trigger

  • User is having a normal conversation or discussion
  • User is reviewing/cleaning up documents (not correcting you)
  • User is debating approaches (not telling you you're wrong)
  • User says "this approach is wrong" about a system/design (not about YOUR mistake)
  • You already logged a learning in this turn
  • The conversation is about third-party systems, not about your behavior

Logging Format

Learning Entry

Append to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md:

## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: low | medium | high
**Status**: pending

### Summary
One-line description

### Details
What happened, what was wrong, what's correct

### Suggested Action
Specific fix or improvement
---

Error Entry

Append to .learnings/ERRORS.md:

## [ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX] command_or_tool

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: high
**Status**: pending

### Summary
What failed

### Error
Actual error message

### Context
Command attempted, environment

### Suggested Fix
If identifiable
---

Promotion (Deferred)

Do NOT promote entries in the same turn as logging. Promotion should only happen:

  • During dedicated review sessions (user explicitly asks)
  • At session startup when reviewing past learnings
  • Never automatically or as a chain reaction
Learning TypePromote To
Behavioral patternsSOUL.md
Workflow improvementsAGENTS.md
Tool gotchasTOOLS.md

Periodic Review (User-Initiated Only)

Only review .learnings/ when the user explicitly asks or at session start. Never auto-trigger a review based on logging a new entry.

OpenClaw Workspace Structure

~/.openclaw/workspace/
├── AGENTS.md
├── SOUL.md
├── TOOLS.md
├── MEMORY.md
├── memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md
└── .learnings/
    ├── LEARNINGS.md
    ├── ERRORS.md
    └── FEATURE_REQUESTS.md

Feature Request Entry

Append to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md:

## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: medium
**Status**: pending

### Requested Capability
What the user wanted to do

### User Context
Why they needed it

### Complexity Estimate
simple | medium | complex
---

ID Generation

Format: TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX

  • TYPE: LRN (learning), ERR (error), FEAT (feature)
  • YYYYMMDD: Current date
  • XXX: Sequential number (e.g., 001, 002)

Resolving Entries

When an issue is fixed, update **Status**: pending**Status**: resolved and add:

### Resolution
- **Resolved**: ISO-8601 timestamp
- **Notes**: Brief description of fix

Related skills

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.