
Career Document Architect
- 115 installs
- 138 repo stars
- Updated August 4, 2026
- lyndonkl/claude
career-document-architect is an agent skill that guides creation and review of academic career documents—including research statements, teaching statements, diversity statements, CVs, and NIH biosketches—for developers a
About
career-document-architect is an agent skill from lyndonkl/claude that structures academic job and promotion writing through a 7-step workflow: identify document type and audience, gather materials, develop a core narrative, draft with type-specific frameworks, add quantified evidence, align with institutional expectations, and polish against a JSON rubric (minimum average score ≥ 3.5). It covers research statements (typically 2–5 pages), teaching statements (1–2 pages), diversity statements (1–2 pages), academic CV sections, and NIH biosketches (5 pages maximum with up to 5 Contributions to Science). Frameworks emphasize vision plus track record, the “So What?” test, and showing versus telling with citations and mentorship counts. Related skills handle grants (`grant-proposal-assistant`) and letters (`academic-letter-architect`). Reach for it when drafting or revising faculty applications, promotion packages, fellowship statements, or biosketches—not for scientific manuscript peer review.
- 7-step workflow from audience analysis through rubric polish (≥ 3.5 average)
- Frameworks for research (2–5 pages), teaching (1–2 pages), diversity, CV, NIH biosketch (5 pages max)
- NIH biosketch supports up to 5 Contributions to Science sections with 4 publications each
- So What? test and showing-vs-telling tables for evidence-backed claims
- Institutional alignment and guardrails against fabrication or laundry-list CVs
Career Document Architect by the numbers
- 115 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +3 installs in the week ending Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #628 of 1,879 Documentation skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/lyndonkl/claude --skill career-document-architectAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 115 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 138 |
| Last updated | August 4, 2026 |
| Repository | lyndonkl/claude ↗ |
How do you write a faculty research statement?
Draft a 2–5 page research statement or 5-page NIH biosketch using career-document-architect frameworks, evidence tables, and rubric scoring.
Who is it for?
Researchers and engineer-scientists applying for faculty roles, fellowships, or promotion packages who need coherent research, teaching, and diversity statements with quantified evidence.
Skip if: Teams writing grant proposals, recommendation letters, or journal manuscripts—use grant-proposal-assistant, academic-letter-architect, or scientific-manuscript-review instead.
When should I use this skill?
User mentions research statement, teaching philosophy, diversity statement, academic CV, NIH biosketch, faculty application, or promotion package review.
What you get
Polished career document draft, narrative positioning commentary, and rubric-validated structure aligned to page limits.
- Polished career document draft
- Structure and positioning commentary
- Rubric-scored revision notes
By the numbers
- 7-step career document workflow checklist from type identification through polish
- NIH biosketch maximum length is 5 pages with up to 5 Contributions to Science sections
- Quality rubric minimum standard: average score ≥ 3.5
Files
Career Document Architect
Table of Contents
Related skills (use instead for):
- Grant proposals:
grant-proposal-assistant - Recommendation letters:
academic-letter-architect - Manuscript writing:
scientific-manuscript-review
Core Principles
1. Vision + Track Record: Show where you're going AND what you've accomplished
2. Coherent Narrative: All pieces should tell a unified story
3. Audience Awareness: Tailor depth and framing to readers
4. Evidence-Based Claims: Support assertions with specifics
5. Future-Oriented: Emphasize trajectory and potential
6. Authentic Voice: Represent yourself genuinely
Workflow
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Career Document Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Identify document type and audience
- [ ] Step 2: Gather raw materials (CV, accomplishments)
- [ ] Step 3: Develop core narrative thread
- [ ] Step 4: Draft document using appropriate framework
- [ ] Step 5: Add evidence and specifics
- [ ] Step 6: Align with institutional expectations
- [ ] Step 7: Polish and formatStep 1: Identify Type and Audience
Determine document type (research/teaching/diversity statement, CV, biosketch). Identify audience (search committee, review panel). Note any specific requirements (page limits, format specifications). See resources/methodology.md for audience considerations.
Step 2: Gather Raw Materials
Compile: Current CV, publications, grants, teaching evaluations, mentorship record, outreach activities, preliminary data, future plans. See resources/methodology.md for comprehensive list.
Step 3: Develop Core Narrative
Identify the through-line connecting your work. What question drives you? What impact do you seek? How does past work connect to future plans? See resources/methodology.md for narrative construction.
Step 4: Draft Using Framework
Select appropriate framework for document type. Follow structure that matches institutional norms. See Document Frameworks for each type.
Step 5: Add Evidence and Specifics
Replace generic claims with specific accomplishments. Quantify where possible (papers, citations, students mentored). Add concrete examples for abstract claims.
Step 6: Align with Institution
Research institution's priorities. Emphasize fit without fabricating. Address how you contribute to their mission. See resources/methodology.md for alignment strategies.
Step 7: Polish and Format
Check length constraints. Ensure consistent formatting. Proofread carefully. Validate using resources/evaluators/rubric_career_document.json. Minimum standard: Average score ≥ 3.5.
Document Frameworks
Research Statement
Purpose: Articulate research vision, demonstrate independence, show future potential
Length: Typically 2-5 pages (check requirements)
Structure:
OPENING (1 paragraph)
- Hook: Compelling statement of your research focus
- Big picture: Why this matters to the field/society
- Your role: How you contribute to addressing this
PAST RESEARCH (1-2 pages)
- Organize by themes, not chronology
- Highlight key contributions with impact
- Show how past work builds foundation for future
- Include quantifiable outcomes (papers, citations, methods)
CURRENT RESEARCH (0.5-1 page)
- Ongoing projects and preliminary results
- Bridge between past and future
- Show productivity and momentum
FUTURE DIRECTIONS (1-2 pages)
- 2-3 specific research directions
- For each: Why important? What's the approach? What's expected impact?
- Show independence and creativity
- Connect to fundable questions (NIH/NSF relevance)
CLOSING (1 paragraph)
- Synthesis: How pieces fit together
- Why this institution/department
- Broader impact statementTeaching Statement
Purpose: Articulate teaching philosophy and demonstrate effectiveness
Length: Typically 1-2 pages
Structure:
PHILOSOPHY (1-2 paragraphs)
- Core beliefs about teaching/learning
- What makes your approach distinctive
- Grounded in evidence or experience
EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS (1-2 paragraphs)
- Courses taught with enrollments
- Teaching evaluations (quote specific feedback)
- Student outcomes (publications, placements)
- Innovations introduced
METHODS AND APPROACHES (1-2 paragraphs)
- Specific techniques you use
- Active learning strategies
- Assessment approaches
- Technology integration
MENTORSHIP (1 paragraph)
- Undergraduate/graduate mentoring
- Student achievements
- Mentoring philosophy
FUTURE TEACHING (1 paragraph)
- Courses you could teach
- New courses you'd develop
- Curricular contributionsDiversity Statement
Purpose: Demonstrate commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion
Length: Typically 1-2 pages
Structure:
INTRODUCTION (1 paragraph)
- Your understanding of DEI in academia
- Why it matters to you
- Preview of your contributions
PAST ACTIONS (1-2 paragraphs)
- Specific activities promoting DEI
- Mentoring underrepresented students
- Curriculum development
- Outreach activities
- Quantify impact where possible
PERSONAL CONTEXT (optional, 1 paragraph)
- Your own background if relevant
- Experiences informing your commitment
- Only include if comfortable and genuine
FUTURE PLANS (1 paragraph)
- How you'll contribute at this institution
- Specific programs or initiatives
- Connection to institutional DEI priorities
CLOSING
- Synthesis of commitment
- Why this matters for your fieldCV Format (Academic)
Standard Sections:
CONTACT INFORMATION
EDUCATION
- Degrees in reverse chronological order
- Institution, degree, year, advisor (for PhD)
POSITIONS
- Academic appointments
- Industry positions (if relevant)
PUBLICATIONS
- Peer-reviewed (mark * for corresponding author)
- Preprints
- Reviews/Book chapters
GRANTS AND FUNDING
- Current and past funding
- Role (PI, Co-PI, etc.)
- Amount and duration
HONORS AND AWARDS
PRESENTATIONS
- Invited talks
- Conference presentations
TEACHING
- Courses taught
- Mentoring record
SERVICE
- Editorial boards
- Review panels
- Committee work
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPSNIH Biosketch
Length: 5 pages maximum
Sections:
A. PERSONAL STATEMENT (0.5 page)
- Why you're well-suited for this project
- Relevant experience and expertise
- Key accomplishments that qualify you
- Up to 4 publications supporting this statement
B. POSITIONS, SCIENTIFIC APPOINTMENTS, AND HONORS
C. CONTRIBUTIONS TO SCIENCE (up to 5 contributions, 0.5 page each)
- Contribution 1:
- Description of contribution (1 paragraph)
- Your specific role
- Impact on field
- Up to 4 publications supporting this contribution
- [Repeat for each contribution]
D. RESEARCH SUPPORT
- Current (with role, title, dates, description)
- Completed (last 3 years)Writing Strategies
The "So What?" Test
For every claim, ask "so what?" If you can't answer, the claim needs more:
| Claim | So What? | Improved |
|---|---|---|
| "I published 10 papers" | Impact? | "My 10 papers have been cited 500 times, including 3 that established new methods in the field" |
| "I'm passionate about teaching" | Evidence? | "My passion for teaching is reflected in consistent evaluation scores above 4.5/5 and 5 undergraduates who went to PhD programs" |
| "I'm committed to diversity" | What have you done? | "I co-founded a mentoring program that has supported 20 students from underrepresented groups" |
Showing vs. Telling
| Telling (Weak) | Showing (Strong) |
|---|---|
| "I am a productive researcher" | "I have published 15 peer-reviewed articles including 3 in high-impact journals" |
| "I am an effective teacher" | "Student evaluations average 4.7/5.0 with comments highlighting my use of active learning" |
| "I am committed to mentoring" | "I have mentored 8 undergraduates, 5 of whom are now in PhD programs" |
Future Vision Formula
For each future direction: 1. The Question: What will you investigate? 2. The Importance: Why does this matter? 3. The Approach: How will you do it? 4. The Expected Impact: What changes if successful?
Guardrails
Key requirements:
1. Truthful: Never fabricate or exaggerate 2. Evidence-based: Claims supported by specifics 3. Audience-appropriate: Match depth to readers 4. Forward-looking: Emphasize trajectory and vision 5. Coherent narrative: All pieces connect 6. Compliant: Follow format and length requirements
Common pitfalls:
- ❌ Laundry lists: Lists without narrative
- ❌ Vague claims: "I am passionate about..." without evidence
- ❌ Missing future: All past, no vision
- ❌ Generic fit: Same statement for every application
- ❌ Too long: Ignoring page limits
- ❌ Missing impact: What you did without why it matters
Quick Reference
Key resources:
- [resources/methodology.md](resources/methodology.md): Audience analysis, narrative development, institutional fit
- [resources/template.md](resources/template.md): Section templates, examples
- [resources/evaluators/rubric_career_document.json](resources/evaluators/rubric_career_document.json): Quality scoring
Typical lengths:
| Document | Typical Length |
|---|---|
| Research Statement | 2-5 pages |
| Teaching Statement | 1-2 pages |
| Diversity Statement | 1-2 pages |
| NIH Biosketch | 5 pages max |
Time estimates:
- Research statement (from scratch): 2-4 weeks
- Research statement (revision): 1-2 days
- Teaching statement: 1-2 days
- Diversity statement: 1-2 days
- CV update: 1-2 hours
- Biosketch: 2-4 hours
Inputs required:
- Current CV
- Job/fellowship description
- Institutional priorities (if known)
- Specific accomplishments to highlight
Outputs produced:
- Polished career document
- Commentary on structure and positioning
{
"name": "Career Document Architect Rubric",
"description": "Evaluation criteria for career document quality (statements, CV, biosketch)",
"criteria": [
{
"name": "Narrative Coherence",
"description": "Quality of through-line connecting all elements",
"weight": 1.2,
"scores": {
"1": "No coherent narrative; disjointed content",
"2": "Weak narrative; connections between sections unclear",
"3": "Adequate narrative but through-line could be stronger",
"4": "Good narrative; clear theme connecting past to future",
"5": "Excellent coherent narrative; compelling story arc throughout"
}
},
{
"name": "Evidence-Based Claims",
"description": "Quality of support for assertions about accomplishments",
"weight": 1.0,
"scores": {
"1": "Vague claims without evidence ('I am passionate about')",
"2": "Limited evidence; mostly generic descriptions",
"3": "Some evidence but not consistently quantified",
"4": "Good evidence with specific achievements and outcomes",
"5": "Excellent evidence; all claims supported with quantified specifics"
}
},
{
"name": "Vision and Future Orientation",
"description": "Quality of forward-looking content and research/career vision",
"weight": 1.2,
"scores": {
"1": "No future vision; only past accomplishments",
"2": "Vague future plans; lacks specificity",
"3": "Some future direction but not compelling",
"4": "Good vision with specific future plans",
"5": "Compelling vision; clear trajectory with fundable/achievable goals"
}
},
{
"name": "Audience and Fit",
"description": "Tailoring to audience and institutional context",
"weight": 1.0,
"scores": {
"1": "Generic document not tailored to opportunity",
"2": "Minimal customization; mostly boilerplate",
"3": "Some tailoring but fit could be stronger",
"4": "Good customization addressing institution/opportunity",
"5": "Excellent tailoring; content directly addresses audience priorities"
}
},
{
"name": "Structure and Format",
"description": "Adherence to expected structure and formatting",
"weight": 0.8,
"scores": {
"1": "Wrong format; missing required elements",
"2": "Significant structural issues; hard to navigate",
"3": "Adequate structure but not optimal",
"4": "Good structure following conventions",
"5": "Excellent structure; easy to scan, professional appearance"
}
},
{
"name": "Impact and Significance",
"description": "Quality of impact statements and significance framing",
"weight": 1.0,
"scores": {
"1": "No impact statements; just lists of activities",
"2": "Weak impact framing; significance unclear",
"3": "Some impact statements but inconsistent",
"4": "Good impact framing; clear significance for most items",
"5": "Excellent impact statements; clear 'so what' for all content"
}
}
],
"threshold": 3.5,
"passing_note": "Average score must be ≥ 3.5 for document to be considered complete. Scores below 3 in 'Narrative Coherence' or 'Vision' require revision."
}
Career Document Methodology
This resource supports the Career Document Architect skill with detailed methods.
---
Audience Analysis
Know Your Readers
Faculty Search Committees:
- Mix of specialists and non-specialists
- Looking for: Independence, vision, fit, potential
- Time-pressured: May skim initially
- Priorities: Can this person get tenure here?
Fellowship Review Panels:
- Often broader expertise range
- Looking for: Training plan, mentor quality, candidate promise
- Priorities: Is this a good investment?
Promotion Committees:
- Senior faculty across departments
- Looking for: Track record, impact, trajectory
- Priorities: Has this person met expectations?
Tailoring Content
| Audience | Depth | Jargon | Length | Emphasis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specialists | High | OK | Longer OK | Methods, technical contribution |
| Broad committee | Moderate | Define | Shorter | Impact, big picture |
| Non-academic | Low | Avoid | Short | Applications, outcomes |
---
Materials Checklist
Before Writing, Gather:
Research:
- [ ] Complete publication list with citations
- [ ] Grants (current and pending)
- [ ] Conference presentations
- [ ] Invited talks
- [ ] Collaborations
- [ ] Methods developed
- [ ] Data resources created
- [ ] Patents (if any)
Teaching:
- [ ] Courses taught with enrollments
- [ ] Teaching evaluations (numbers and quotes)
- [ ] Course materials developed
- [ ] Pedagogical innovations
- [ ] Student feedback highlights
Mentorship:
- [ ] Students mentored (undergrad, grad, postdoc)
- [ ] Their current positions
- [ ] Co-authored papers with mentees
- [ ] Thesis committees served on
Service:
- [ ] Review activities (journals, grants)
- [ ] Committee work
- [ ] Professional society roles
- [ ] Editorial positions
- [ ] Outreach activities
DEI:
- [ ] Mentoring of underrepresented students
- [ ] Outreach programs
- [ ] Curriculum development for inclusion
- [ ] Committee service on DEI
- [ ] Workshops or training attended
---
Narrative Development
Finding Your Through-Line
Your through-line is the unifying theme connecting all your work.
Questions to identify it: 1. What question keeps you up at night? 2. What would you work on even without funding? 3. What problem are you uniquely positioned to solve? 4. How do your different projects connect? 5. What impact do you ultimately seek?
Through-Line Formula
"I am working to [solve problem/answer question] by [approach], because [why it matters], which will [impact]."
Example: "I am working to understand how cells make fate decisions by developing new imaging technologies that capture cellular dynamics in real time, because understanding this process is key to regenerative medicine and cancer biology, which will enable new therapeutic strategies."
Testing Your Narrative
- Does every section connect to the through-line?
- Can you explain your work to a non-specialist using it?
- Does it distinguish you from others in your field?
- Does past work lead logically to future plans?
---
Institutional Fit
Research Before Writing
Find out:
- Department's strategic priorities
- Recent hires and their areas
- Gaps they might want to fill
- Core facilities and resources
- Potential collaborators
- Teaching needs and expectations
- DEI initiatives
Sources:
- Department website
- Recent job ad language
- Faculty profiles
- Recent news/announcements
- Talk with current faculty/students
Showing Fit (Without Fabricating)
Good fit statements:
- "My expertise in X would complement existing strengths in Y"
- "I look forward to collaborating with [specific faculty] on [specific topic]"
- "The [specific resource] at [institution] would enable my planned work on..."
- "I could contribute to teaching [courses that align with your skills]"
Avoid:
- ❌ Generic fit: "I would be a good fit because I like your department"
- ❌ Name-dropping without substance: Listing names without real connection
- ❌ Fabricating interest: Claiming interest in things you don't actually care about
Customization Strategy
What to customize:
- Opening/closing paragraphs mentioning institution
- Future plans that leverage their resources
- Teaching section matching their needs
- Collaborator mentions
What stays the same:
- Core narrative and through-line
- Past accomplishments
- Main future directions
- Fundamental teaching philosophy
---
Common Mistakes
Research Statement Mistakes
| Mistake | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| All past, no future | No vision | Add 40% future content |
| Technical laundry list | No narrative | Organize around themes |
| Too much jargon | Alienates committee | Define terms, write for broader audience |
| No independence shown | Concern about PI shadow | Emphasize YOUR contributions |
| Missing impact | Why should they care? | Add significance statements |
Teaching Statement Mistakes
| Mistake | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Generic philosophy | Not distinctive | Add specific methods and examples |
| No evidence | Just claims | Add evaluations, outcomes |
| Missing mentorship | Incomplete picture | Add student success stories |
| No future courses | Limited contribution | Propose courses you could teach |
Diversity Statement Mistakes
| Mistake | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Virtue signaling | No substance | Focus on actions and impact |
| Only future plans | What have you done? | Add past activities |
| Performative | Seems insincere | Be genuine about your commitment |
| Too personal | Oversharing | Keep focus on professional activities |
| Generic | Same as everyone | Add specific examples |
---
Revision Checklist
Before Submitting
Content:
- [ ] Through-line clear and consistent
- [ ] Claims supported with evidence
- [ ] Future vision compelling and feasible
- [ ] Institutional fit demonstrated
- [ ] Impact statements present
Structure:
- [ ] Logical organization
- [ ] Appropriate headings
- [ ] Transitions between sections
- [ ] Opening hooks attention
- [ ] Closing memorable
Format:
- [ ] Within page limit
- [ ] Consistent formatting
- [ ] Professional appearance
- [ ] Proofread for errors
- [ ] Name on every page
Career Document Templates
This resource provides templates for academic career documents.
---
Research Statement Template
Opening Paragraph
[HOOK: Compelling statement of your research focus]
[My field] is at an exciting juncture because [why this moment matters].
[BIG PICTURE: Why this matters]
Understanding [your focus area] is critical because [significance to field/society].
[YOUR CONTRIBUTION: Position yourself]
My research addresses this challenge by [your approach/contribution]. I have
[key accomplishment] and [another accomplishment], positioning me to [future impact].Past Research Section
## Research Accomplishments
### [Theme 1: Descriptive Title]
[Motivation for this research direction]
My work on [topic] has [key contribution]. Specifically, I [what you did], which
resulted in [outcome - publications, citations, methods adopted]. This work was
published in [journals] and has been cited [N] times / adopted by [N] labs.
[Your specific role if collaborative]
In this work, I independently developed [your contribution], while collaborating
with [collaborators] on [their contribution].
### [Theme 2: Descriptive Title]
[Continue same structure]
### [Theme 3: Descriptive Title]
[Continue same structure]Future Research Section
## Future Research Directions
My future research will build on these foundations to address [overarching goal].
I will pursue three interconnected directions:
### Direction 1: [Descriptive Title]
**The Question:** [What you will investigate]
**Why It Matters:** [Significance]
**The Approach:** I will [methods/approach]. This builds on my expertise in [past work]
and leverages [resources at institution if applicable].
**Expected Impact:** This work will [outcomes and significance].
**Funding Strategy:** This direction is well-suited for [NIH institute / NSF program /
foundation] funding.
### Direction 2: [Descriptive Title]
[Same structure]
### Direction 3: [Descriptive Title]
[Same structure]Closing Paragraph
## Vision and Fit
My research program combines [strengths] to address [big question]. At [Institution],
I would benefit from [specific resources/collaborators], and I would contribute to
the department's strengths in [area].
In summary, my work will [impact statement]. I am excited to build a research
program that [vision] while training the next generation of [scientists/scholars].---
Teaching Statement Template
## Teaching Philosophy
[CORE BELIEF]
I believe that effective teaching [your philosophy]. Students learn best when
[conditions you create].
[WHAT MAKES YOU DISTINCTIVE]
My approach emphasizes [specific methods], which I developed through [experience].
## Teaching Experience and Effectiveness
I have taught [courses] at [institutions], reaching [N] students. My teaching
evaluations consistently [performance metrics].
Selected student comments:
- "[Positive quote 1]"
- "[Positive quote 2]"
### Teaching Innovations
I have developed [innovations], including [specific examples]. These innovations
resulted in [outcomes - student performance, engagement].
## Mentorship
I have mentored [N] undergraduate and [N] graduate students. Notable outcomes include:
- [Student Name]: Now [current position]
- [Student Name]: Published [publications], now at [position]
## Future Teaching
At [Institution], I am prepared to teach:
- [Course 1]: [Brief description]
- [Course 2]: [Brief description]
I would also develop a new course on [topic], which would [contribution to curriculum].---
Diversity Statement Template
## Commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
[INTRODUCTION]
I am committed to building an inclusive academic environment where all students
can thrive. [Brief statement of why this matters to you]
## Past Actions and Impact
### Mentoring
I have mentored [N] students from underrepresented backgrounds, including
[specifics without identifying individuals]. These students have gone on to
[outcomes].
### Outreach
I have participated in [programs], reaching [N] students from [communities].
For example, I [specific activity] which resulted in [impact].
### Curriculum and Teaching
I have incorporated [inclusive practices] into my teaching, including [specific
examples]. Student feedback indicates [outcomes].
### Service
I have served on [committees or initiatives], contributing to [outcomes].
## Future Plans
At [Institution], I plan to:
- Continue mentoring students from diverse backgrounds, particularly in [area]
- Contribute to [specific institutional programs]
- Develop [new initiatives or approaches]
- [Other specific plans]
## Conclusion
Building an inclusive scientific community is not just the right thing to do—it
strengthens science by bringing diverse perspectives to bear on important problems.
I am committed to contributing to this goal throughout my career.---
NIH Biosketch Personal Statement Template
A. PERSONAL STATEMENT
I am uniquely qualified to lead [project] because of my [relevant expertise]. My
research has focused on [area], resulting in [key accomplishments].
[Paragraph on relevant technical expertise]
I have extensive experience in [methods/approaches] relevant to this project. My
work on [past project] demonstrated [relevant skills], as shown in [publications
below].
[Paragraph on relevant scientific contributions]
My contributions to the field of [area] include [discoveries/methods]. These
advances are directly relevant to [this project] because [connection].
[Paragraph on team/resources]
I have assembled [team/collaborators] and have access to [resources] necessary
for success. My [position/institution] provides [relevant support].
In summary, my expertise in [area], track record of [accomplishments], and
access to [resources] position me well to successfully complete this project.
Publications relevant to this statement:
1. [Citation 1]
2. [Citation 2]
3. [Citation 3]
4. [Citation 4]---
CV Section Headers (Academic)
CURRICULUM VITAE
[Your Name]
[Title]
[Department]
[Institution]
[Contact Information]
EDUCATION
ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS
HONORS AND AWARDS
RESEARCH FUNDING
Current Support
Completed Support
PUBLICATIONS
Peer-Reviewed Original Research (* denotes corresponding author)
Reviews and Book Chapters
Preprints
INVITED PRESENTATIONS
CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS
TEACHING
Courses Taught
Curriculum Development
Student Mentorship
Graduate Students
Undergraduate Students
Postdoctoral Fellows
SERVICE
Editorial Activities
Grant Review Service
Professional Society Service
Institutional Service
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPSRelated skills
How it compares
Use career-document-architect for faculty career narratives; switch to grant-proposal-assistant for funding proposals and academic-letter-architect for recommendation letters.
FAQ
Which documents does career-document-architect cover?
career-document-architect covers research statements, teaching statements, diversity statements, academic CVs, and NIH biosketches. It provides section templates, length guidance (e.g., biosketch 5 pages max), and a JSON rubric targeting average score ≥ 3.5.
How long should a research statement be?
career-document-architect typically targets research statements of 2–5 pages depending on institution requirements, with sections for past research, current work, and 2–3 future directions including fundable questions and expected impact.