
Code Analysis
- 41 installs
- 466 repo stars
- Updated July 25, 2026
- managedcode/dotnet-skills
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
About
code-analysis is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted coding.
- code-analysis
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Code Analysis by the numbers
- 41 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +3 installs in the week ending Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #8,148 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 3, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill code-analysisAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 41 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 466 |
| Last updated | July 25, 2026 |
| Repository | managedcode/dotnet-skills ↗ |
What it does
Helps with ai & agent building tasks.
Files
.NET Code Analysis
Trigger On
- the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers
- CI should fail on analyzer warnings
- the team needs
AnalysisLevelorAnalysisModeguidance - the repo needs a gradual Roslyn warning promotion strategy
Do Not Use For
- third-party analyzer selection by itself
- formatting-only work
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md - project files or
Directory.Build.props - current analyzer severity policy
Hard Rules for AI Agents
Non-negotiable. Violating these undermines the user's explicit intent.
1. Never disable or remove TreatWarningsAsErrors or WarningsAsErrors if the project has set them. Do not comment them out, set to false, wrap in a condition, or add <TreatWarningsAsErrors>false</TreatWarningsAsErrors> to make the build pass. 2. Never add <NoWarn> or #pragma warning disable for warnings the user chose to treat as errors, unless the user explicitly approves the suppression. 3. Never silently downgrade severity in .editorconfig (e.g. error to warning or none) to make a build succeed. 4. If warnings-as-errors breaks the build — fix the code. If the fix is too large, ask the user whether to defer that warning ID. 5. If warning volume is too large to fix in one pass — report count and categories to the user and ask which to tackle first. Do not unilaterally disable the policy.
Workflow
flowchart TD
A[Start] --> B{New or legacy project?}
B -->|New| C[TreatWarningsAsErrors=true immediately]
B -->|Legacy| D[dotnet build, count warnings by ID]
D --> E{"< 30 warnings?"}
E -->|Yes| F[Fix all, then enable TreatWarningsAsErrors]
E -->|No| G[Report counts to user, ask which batch first]
G --> H[Add selected IDs to WarningsAsErrors]
H --> I[Fix that batch, verify build]
I --> J{More batches?}
J -->|Yes| G
J -->|No| F
C --> K[Set AnalysisLevel latest-recommended]
F --> K
K --> L[Promote security CA3xxx/CA5xxx to error in .editorconfig]
L --> M[Validate: build + CI green]1. Start with SDK analyzers before third-party packages. 2. Detect project maturity: new or existing/legacy. 3. Enable EnableNETAnalyzers, AnalysisLevel, AnalysisMode in Directory.Build.props. 4. Apply the right warning promotion strategy (see below). 5. Per-rule severity goes in repo-root .editorconfig. 6. dotnet build is the analyzer gate in CI.
Warning Promotion Strategy
New Projects
Set these in Directory.Build.props immediately:
TreatWarningsAsErrors= trueAnalysisLevel= latest-recommended- Security category = error in
.editorconfig
Fix all warnings before merging.
Legacy Projects — Gradual Promotion
Blanket TreatWarningsAsErrors on a legacy codebase produces hundreds/thousands of errors. An agent cannot fix them all at once — context floods, fix quality drops. Promote in batches.
Phase 1: Trivial Hygiene (start here)
Mechanical fixes, lowest effort:
- CS8019 — unnecessary using directive (remove it)
- CS0219 — variable assigned but never used (remove it)
- CS0168 — variable declared but never used (remove it)
- CS1591 — missing XML comment for public member (add comment or disable for internal code)
- CS0612 — obsolete member used, no message (replace with non-obsolete API)
- CS0618 — obsolete member used, with message (follow migration guidance)
Add to WarningsAsErrors: CS8019;CS0219;CS0168. Fix all, then Phase 2.
Phase 2: Code Quality (ask user which categories)
- CA2000 — dispose objects before losing scope (Reliability)
- CA1062 — validate public method arguments (Design)
- CA1822 — mark members as static (Performance)
- CA1860 — avoid Enumerable.Any() for length check (Performance)
- CA1861 — avoid constant arrays as arguments (Performance)
- CA2007 — consider calling ConfigureAwait (Reliability)
- CS8600–CS8610 — nullable reference type warnings (Nullability)
Ask: "Which categories next — Nullability, Performance, or Reliability?" Add selected IDs to WarningsAsErrors, fix, repeat.
Phase 3: Security (always promote early)
Set in .editorconfig regardless of project maturity:
[*.cs]
dotnet_analyzer_diagnostic.category-Security.severity = errorCovers CA3001 (SQL injection), CA3002 (XSS), CA3003 (path injection), CA3075 (insecure DTD), CA5350/CA5351 (weak crypto), CA5394 (insecure randomness).
Phase 4: Full Coverage
Once all batches pass, transition to:
<TreatWarningsAsErrors>true</TreatWarningsAsErrors>
<WarningsNotAsErrors>CA1707</WarningsNotAsErrors> <!-- explicit exceptions only -->Interaction Protocol (legacy codebases)
1. Run dotnet build, count warnings by ID. 2. Report summary: "Found 47 CS8019, 23 CA1822, 12 CA2000, 8 CS8600." 3. Ask which batch to tackle. Recommend starting with Phase 1. 4. Fix selected batch, verify build. 5. Add those IDs to WarningsAsErrors. 6. Report back, ask about next batch.
Never skip the ask step. The user decides the pace.
Bootstrap When Missing
1. Detect current state:
dotnet --inforg -n "EnableNETAnalyzers|AnalysisLevel|AnalysisMode|TreatWarningsAsErrors|WarningsAsErrors" -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT 2>&1— count warnings by ID
2. Classify: new (few/zero warnings) vs legacy (many warnings). 3. Enable EnableNETAnalyzers, AnalysisLevel, AnalysisMode in MSBuild config. 4. Apply promotion strategy matching project maturity. 5. Per-rule severity in repo-root .editorconfig. 6. Run dotnet build, return status: configured or status: improved. 7. If repo defers analyzer policy to another build layer, return status: not_applicable.
Deliver
- explicit, reviewable first-party analyzer policy
- build-time analyzer execution for CI
- warning promotion plan matching project maturity
Validate
- analyzer behavior driven by repo config, not IDE defaults
- CI reproduces same warnings/errors locally
- no
TreatWarningsAsErrors,WarningsAsErrors, or severity settings removed/weakened without user approval - promoted warnings produce build errors, not just IDE hints
Ralph Loop
1. Plan: analyze state, define target, constraints, risks, execution plan, validation steps. 2. Execute one step, produce concrete delta. 3. Review result, capture findings. 4. Apply fixes in small batches, rerun checks. 5. Update plan after each iteration. 6. Repeat until acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain. 7. Missing dependency: bootstrap or return status: not_applicable.
Required Result Format
status:complete|clean|improved|configured|not_applicable|blockedplan: concise plan and current stepactions_taken: concrete changesvalidation_skills: final skills run or skipped with reasonsverification: commands, checks, or review evidenceremaining: unresolved items ornone
Load References
- references/rules.md
- references/config.md
- references/code-analysis.md
Example Requests
- "Turn on built-in .NET analyzers."
- "Make analyzer warnings fail the build."
- "Set the right AnalysisLevel for this repo."
- "Start treating unused usings and unused variables as errors."
- "Help me gradually promote Roslyn warnings in my legacy project."
- "Which warnings should I promote to errors next?"
{
"version": "1.0.1",
"category": "Code Quality",
"packages": [
"Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers"
]
}
.NET SDK Code Analysis
Open/Free Status
- first-party .NET SDK analyzers
- free to use
- included with the modern .NET SDK
Install
For projects targeting .NET 5 or later, built-in analyzers are included with the SDK and code analysis is enabled by default.
For older or explicitly controlled projects, set analyzer properties in the project or Directory.Build.props:
<PropertyGroup>
<EnableNETAnalyzers>true</EnableNETAnalyzers>
<AnalysisLevel>latest-recommended</AnalysisLevel>
</PropertyGroup>Verify First
Before adding anything, check whether the repo already set analyzer policy:
rg -n "EnableNETAnalyzers|AnalysisLevel|AnalysisMode|TreatWarningsAsErrors" -g 'Directory.Build.*' -g '*.csproj' .Common Commands
dotnet build MySolution.sln
dotnet build MySolution.sln -warnaserrorCI Fit
- use
dotnet buildas the analyzer gate - keep
AnalysisLevelexplicit in MSBuild - keep rule severity in the repo-root
.editorconfig
When Not To Use
- when you only need a formatter
- when the repo specifically needs a framework or third-party analyzer set beyond the built-in SDK rules
Sources
MSBuild Properties and .editorconfig for Code Analysis
MSBuild Properties
Set in Directory.Build.props or project files.
EnableNETAnalyzers
<EnableNETAnalyzers>true</EnableNETAnalyzers>Default true in .NET 5+. Set explicitly to prevent accidental disabling.
AnalysisLevel
Values: 5.0–10.0 (specific SDK), latest, latest-recommended, latest-minimum, latest-all, preview.
Combined syntax includes mode: <AnalysisLevel>latest-recommended</AnalysisLevel> equals latest + Recommended mode.
AnalysisMode
Values: None (all off), Default, Minimum (critical only), Recommended (start here), All.
Category-Specific AnalysisMode
<AnalysisLevel>latest-recommended</AnalysisLevel>
<AnalysisModeSecurity>All</AnalysisModeSecurity>
<AnalysisModeReliability>All</AnalysisModeReliability>Categories: Design, Documentation, Globalization, Interoperability, Maintainability, Naming, Performance, Reliability, Security, Usage.
TreatWarningsAsErrors
<TreatWarningsAsErrors>true</TreatWarningsAsErrors>All warnings fail the build. Use for new projects or clean codebases. Agent rule: never disable to make a build pass.
WarningsAsErrors (selective — preferred for legacy)
<WarningsAsErrors>CS8019;CS0219;CS0168;CA2000;CA3001</WarningsAsErrors>Promote specific IDs to errors. Preferred for gradual adoption: add IDs as you fix each batch. Agent rule: never remove IDs from this list to make a build pass.
WarningsNotAsErrors
<TreatWarningsAsErrors>true</TreatWarningsAsErrors>
<WarningsNotAsErrors>CA1707</WarningsNotAsErrors>Explicit exceptions when using TreatWarningsAsErrors.
NoWarn
<NoWarn>$(NoWarn);CA1062</NoWarn>Disables warnings entirely. Use sparingly; prefer .editorconfig for visibility.
EnforceCodeStyleInBuild
<EnforceCodeStyleInBuild>true</EnforceCodeStyleInBuild>Enables IDE code style rules during build (off by default for performance).
.editorconfig
Place at repo root. Rules cascade to subdirectories.
Severity per rule
[*.cs]
dotnet_diagnostic.CA2000.severity = error
dotnet_diagnostic.CA1707.severity = noneSeverity per category (.NET 6+)
[*.cs]
dotnet_analyzer_diagnostic.category-Security.severity = error
dotnet_analyzer_diagnostic.category-Performance.severity = warningScope patterns
[**/Tests/**/*.cs]
dotnet_diagnostic.CA1707.severity = none
dotnet_diagnostic.CA1062.severity = none
[*.generated.cs]
generated_code = trueCode Style Settings
[*.cs]
csharp_style_namespace_declarations = file_scoped:suggestion
csharp_style_expression_bodied_methods = when_on_single_line:suggestion
csharp_style_expression_bodied_properties = true:suggestion
csharp_style_pattern_matching_over_as_with_null_check = true:warning
csharp_style_pattern_matching_over_is_with_cast_check = true:warning
csharp_style_prefer_null_check_over_type_check = true:suggestion
csharp_style_var_for_built_in_types = true:suggestion
csharp_style_var_when_type_is_apparent = true:suggestion
csharp_style_var_elsewhere = true:suggestionFormatting Settings
[*.cs]
indent_style = space
indent_size = 4
tab_width = 4
csharp_new_line_before_open_brace = all
csharp_new_line_before_else = true
csharp_new_line_before_catch = true
csharp_new_line_before_finally = trueRecommended Starting Configuration
Directory.Build.props
<Project>
<PropertyGroup>
<EnableNETAnalyzers>true</EnableNETAnalyzers>
<AnalysisLevel>latest-recommended</AnalysisLevel>
<EnforceCodeStyleInBuild>true</EnforceCodeStyleInBuild>
</PropertyGroup>
<PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)' == 'Release'">
<TreatWarningsAsErrors>true</TreatWarningsAsErrors>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>.editorconfig (root)
root = true
[*]
indent_style = space
indent_size = 4
end_of_line = lf
charset = utf-8
trim_trailing_whitespace = true
insert_final_newline = true
[*.cs]
dotnet_analyzer_diagnostic.category-Security.severity = error
dotnet_analyzer_diagnostic.category-Reliability.severity = warning
[**/Tests/**/*.cs]
dotnet_diagnostic.CA1707.severity = none
dotnet_diagnostic.CA1062.severity = noneVerification
dotnet build
dotnet build /p:ReportAnalyzer=trueReferences
SDK Analyzer Rule Categories
This reference covers the built-in .NET SDK analyzer rule categories, their prefixes, and practical guidance for each.
Rule Prefix Summary
| Prefix | Category | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| CA | Code Analysis | Design, reliability, security, performance, usage |
| IDE | IDE Analyzers | Code style, simplification, formatting |
| CS | C# Compiler Warnings | Language-level warnings promoted by analyzers |
CA Rules: Code Analysis
CA rules are the primary SDK analyzer rules. They cover correctness, performance, and security.
CA1xxx: Design Rules
- Ensure proper API design and naming.
- Examples: CA1000 (do not declare static members on generic types), CA1010 (collections should implement generic interface).
- High value for public APIs.
CA2xxx: Usage and Reliability
- Detect misuse of framework types and patterns.
- Examples: CA2000 (dispose objects before losing scope), CA2007 (consider calling ConfigureAwait).
- Enable these early; they catch real bugs.
CA3xxx: Security
- Identify security vulnerabilities.
- Examples: CA3001 (SQL injection), CA3075 (insecure DTD processing).
- Critical for any user-facing or network-connected code.
CA5xxx: Security (Extended)
- Extended security rules for cryptography, serialization, and input handling.
- Examples: CA5350 (do not use weak cryptographic algorithms), CA5394 (do not use insecure randomness).
- Enable for production systems handling sensitive data.
CA18xx, CA19xx: Performance
- Detect performance anti-patterns.
- Examples: CA1802 (use literals where appropriate), CA1860 (avoid Length/Count zero checks).
- High value for hot paths and resource-constrained environments.
IDE Rules: Code Style
IDE rules enforce consistency and simplify code.
IDE0001-IDE0099: Code Simplification
- Remove unnecessary code, simplify expressions.
- Examples: IDE0001 (simplify name), IDE0017 (use object initializers).
- Useful for codebase consistency.
IDE0100-IDE0199: Language Feature Preferences
- Prefer modern C# features.
- Examples: IDE0160 (file-scoped namespace preference), IDE0161 (convert to block-scoped namespace).
- Align with team style guide.
IDE0200-IDE0299: Expression Preferences
- Expression-bodied members, pattern matching, null checks.
- Examples: IDE0200 (unnecessary lambda expression), IDE0270 (use coalesce expression).
- Enforce via .editorconfig for consistency.
IDE1xxx: Formatting
- Whitespace, indentation, newlines.
- Examples: IDE1005 (delegate invocation should be conditional).
- Typically set to suggestion or silent; enforce in CI only when the team agrees.
Severity Levels
| Severity | Build Behavior | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| error | Fails build | Critical correctness or security |
| warning | Logged, may fail with TreatWarningsAsErrors | Important but deferrable |
| suggestion | IDE hint only | Style preferences |
| silent | Rule runs but no diagnostic | Rule disabled for output but still analyzed |
| none | Rule disabled | Not applicable to this codebase |
Suppression Strategies
Inline Suppression
#pragma warning disable CA2000
var resource = new Resource();
#pragma warning restore CA2000Use sparingly. Always include a justification comment.
GlobalSuppressions.cs
[assembly: SuppressMessage("Reliability", "CA2000:Dispose objects before losing scope",
Justification = "Ownership transferred to caller", Scope = "member",
Target = "~M:MyClass.CreateResource")]Prefer for project-wide suppression of known false positives.
.editorconfig
# Disable specific rule for all files
dotnet_diagnostic.CA1062.severity = none
# Disable for test files only
[**/Tests/**/*.cs]
dotnet_diagnostic.CA1707.severity = nonePrefer for category-level or scope-based configuration.
Rule Selection Guidance
1. Start with AnalysisMode = Recommended to get the common high-value rules. 2. Promote security rules (CA3xxx, CA5xxx) to error for production code. 3. Treat CA2xxx reliability rules as warnings initially; promote to error as the codebase matures. 4. Enforce IDE rules only when the team has agreed on style conventions. 5. Do not enable all rules at maximum severity immediately; ramp up over time.
Discovering Available Rules
# List all analyzer diagnostics from a build
dotnet build /p:ReportAnalyzer=true /v:d | grep "CA\|IDE"
# Get rule documentation
# https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/
# https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/